Senior/Staff Engineer, Control Systems

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? The posting includes "Position Overview". Could map to "About the role". Also "Responsibilities And Essential Duties". "Knowledge And Skills". "Education And Experience". "DIRECT REPORTS" maybe not needed. "FREEDOM TO ACT" maybe not a section. "WORK CONDITIONS" maybe not needed unless we treat as part of responsibilities? The instruction: include a section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it. We have content for Position Overview, Responsibilities, Knowledge And Skills, Education And Experience. Also maybe "Benefits", "Pay", "Schedule" not present, so omit. Also "Qualifications" maybe covered by Education And Experience. We'll produce sections: About the role (Position Overview), Responsibilities, Knowledge and Skills, Education and Experience. Use

for each heading. Use

• for lists. Use

  for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate like EEO, etc. Also remove duplicated lines. Also remove application instructions (none). Also remove cookie/navigation/legal etc. We need to extract content. Let's parse the job description. First paragraph: "Job Description At Cheniere, we provide the world with safe, reliable energy. But more than that, we provide opportunities for our talented employees to impact their communities every day. Our diversity is key to our continued success and forges a path where our culture supports greater equity and inclusion for our employees, customers and beyond." This is generic company description; could be considered "About the role"? Might be considered boilerplate but it's about company. Might be considered part of Position Overview? The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. This is not exactly those, but it's generic company description. Might be considered part of "About the role". However we need to preserve ALL substantive information. This is substantive about company values. Could keep as part of About the role. Then "Position Overview The Senior/Staff Engineer, Control Systems reports to the Engineering Superintendent, Control Systems and is the technical expert for all matters related to the instrumentation and control technology as well as accountable for troubleshooting, supporting, maintaining, and improving these systems including all associated documentations. The Senior/Staff Engineer, Control Systems provides Operations department with expertise, participates in development of capital projects, conducts data analytics and testing as required to solve problems, optimize plant performance, supports safety and environmental audits / compliance, and understands business objectives so that the facility operates safely in support of business needs. This is a non-DOT position." We'll put that under About the role. Then "Responsibilities And Essential Duties" followed by a long list of duties each starting with a verb. We'll convert each bullet to

• . Need to preserve all duties. Let's extract them: - Serve as the Controls Systems administrator. - Monitors the health of aging control system software and hardware and schedules replacement and upgrades as needed. - Provide Controls Systems support to Maintenance and Operations groups to keep systems operational. - Custodian of the DCS alarm management program to prevent nuisance alarms and unmanageable alarm influx resulting from process upsets. - Identify applicable critical alarms that require specific Operator action and implement ‘Operator Guide Messages’ to communicate required Operator action. - Assume the role as the Operator Training Simulator administrator (OTS). - Develop and maintain the OTS for use in training and as an engineering tool. - Use sound engineering practices, plant standards, and specifications to ensure that documentation for the Controls Systems are maintained properly. - Custodian of the control system alarm setpoint list, narratives, cause and effects, logic diagrams, and instrument index. - Thoroughly understand the technical Management of Change (MOC) process and utilize it in support of capital projects and routine facility changes. - Participate in Pre-Startup Safety Reviews (PSSR). - Develop or modify Complex control schemes and logic for capital and optimization projects based on Process Engineer’s objectives for implementation. - Actively participate in regulatory agency audits as required. - Develop control system design basis, preliminary estimates, and schedules to support capital and facility upgrade/optimization projects. - Assess and lead the implementations of advanced process strategies for the control system. - Closely work with the Engineering Superintendent, CSE, to define problems, establish work scopes, prepare task budgets and schedules, plan work, provide technical direction, and report the work status to management. - Reinforce safety and environmental awareness through frequent job observations and by interfacing with plant personnel. - Work with Engineering and Construction department to provide support and assure O & M interests are represented on major projects. - Participates in Controls Systems factory acceptance tests (FATs) and site acceptance tests (SATs). - Interact with and support Commercial Operations, Regulatory Affairs, and other departments as required. - Coach, mentor and develop less experience staff within the control systems engineering group. - Actively participate in Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) and Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP) as well and Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) - Lead incident investigation to analyze equipment and system failures and suggest feasible solutions and corrective actions. - Actively monitor control systems performance and act to improve the performance of the systems as well as rectifying any known failures. - The duties and responsibilities described are not a comprehensive list and additional tasks may be assigned to the employee from time to time; or the scope of the job may change as necessitated by business demands. We'll include all. Next "Knowledge And Skills" section: It has Knowledge and Skills subparts. Knowledge: list bullet points? It's a paragraph with sentences separated by periods. We'll convert each distinct knowledge item to
• . Let's extract: - Strong fundamental knowledge of field instrumentation, control system architecture and design and its application in automated industrial facilities. - Preferred In-depth knowledge of the Yokogawa Distributed Control System (DCS), Yokogawa Safety Instrumented System (SIS), and Allen Bradley Programmable Logic Control Systems (PLC) in an operating facility. - Familiar with the hazards of hydrocarbon processes, cryogenic services and the methods used to keep process facilities safe. - Knowledge of LNG Liquefaction technology and processes. - In-depth knowledge of applicable codes, standards, and regulations and their implementation in LNG operating facilities. - Competent in the configuration, testing and troubleshooting of process automation applications, software, cyber security, and their communication interfaces. Skills: list: - Strong teamwork, leadership and administrative abilities are required. - An acute sensitivity to safety issues in a hazardous environment. - Exceptional written, verbal, and interpersonal communication skills. - Ability to communicate effectively at all levels of an organization and with individuals and groups from different disciplines, industries, and governmental agencies. - Able to work with a culturally diverse group of technical individuals whose skills cover the range required to engineer, operate, and maintain the LNG terminal and Liquefaction production facilities. - Possess the personality and ability to relate to and to establish a mutually respectful relationship with 1) management, 2) peers and 3) the various facility level workers (Plant Manager, plant supervision and plant workers) whom are all responsible for ensuring good operations. - Organized, planning skills, able to manage multiple activities and programs in timely fashion and with a high degree of accuracy, able to meet work deadlines. - Exceptional problem solving and analytical skills. - Accomplished public speaker, able to create and deliver industry-specific presentations. - Computer savvy including Microsoft Office Suite including Word, Excel, Access, Project, and PowerPoint. - Must maintain a Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) card in good standing status. Note: The TWIC appears also later in WORK CONDITIONS; but we keep it here. Next "Education And Experience" section: Education, Training and Certifications: Bachelor’s degree in Engineering. A Professional Engineer’s (PE) License is a plus. Experience Senior Engineer, Control Systems: Minimum five (5+) years hands-on experience as a Process Controls and DCS/SIS Engineer. Yokogawa Centum VP and Prosafe systems experience a plus. Staff Engineer, Control Systems: Minimum of t en (10+) years’ experience as a Control and DCS Engineer. Minimum five (5) years of Recent LNG experience is preferred. Petrochemical, NGL, cryogenic natural gas processing, or other hydrocarbon processing experience is a plus. We need to fix typo "t en" -> "ten". We'll preserve as is? Probably we should correct obvious typo? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The typo is likely a mistake but it's part of the posting. Should we keep exactly? It says "Minimum of t en (10+) years’ experience". That seems like a formatting error. I'd keep as is? Might be considered a mistake but we should not "invent" correction. However we could keep as "Minimum of ten (10+) years’ experience" by fixing the space? The original text: "Minimum of t en (10+) years’ experience". There's a space missing between t and en. I'd preserve the exact text? The instruction says do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Changing "t en" to "ten" is inventing? It's correcting a typo, which could be considered inventing. Safer to keep as is: "Minimum of t en (10+) years’ experience". But that looks weird. However we could keep as "Minimum of ten (10+) years’ experience" assuming it's a typo but we are not adding info, just correcting obvious typo. The instruction ambiguous. I'd keep as is to avoid inventing. Also "DIRECT REPORTS No Direct Reports" - we could omit because it's not a section with substantive content? It's just a line. Could be omitted as not needed. "FREEDOM TO ACT Ability to multi-task and function in a highly dynamic atmosphere; must exercise discretion independently." Could be part of Knowledge And Skills? But we already have skills. Could add as a skill bullet. However it's under its own heading. The instruction: include a section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it. This is a specific content. Could create a section "Freedom to Act"? Not among allowed headings list: they listed allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. They didn't list Freedom to Act. So we should not create a section with that heading. Instead we could fold that content into Skills or Knowledge And Skills. Since Skills heading is allowed, we can add that bullet under Skills. Similarly "WORK CONDITIONS" includes many details; not among allowed headings. Could fold into Responsibilities? Or maybe we could create a section "Working Conditions"? Not allowed. So we should incorporate into Responsibilities or maybe as a separate paragraph under Responsibilities? The instruction: Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So only those headings allowed. So we must not create other headings. So we need to embed WORK CONDITIONS content somewhere else, perhaps as part of Responsibilities (as duties) or as a paragraph under Responsibilities? But it's not a duty; it's work conditions. Could be placed under Responsibilities as a bullet? Might be okay. However the instruction says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". It doesn't forbid adding content under allowed headings that wasn't originally under that heading. So we can add work conditions as bullet under Responsibilities or maybe under Skills? Probably under Responsibilities as it's about job context. Similarly "Ada Job Requirements Reasonable accommodations will be made..." That's about accommodations; could be folded into Responsibilities or maybe under Knowledge And Skills? Could be under Responsibilities as a note. Also "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ..." boilerplate to remove. "About Us" section: company description; could be folded into About