Senior Software Engineer/Architect
for section headings. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose.
We need to preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. So we must keep the exact wording? Not necessarily exact but preserve info. We can rephrase slightly but must not lose detail. Probably safe to copy the sentences as given.
We need to remove boilerplate: EEO, accommodation, etc. Also remove duplicated lines, application instructions (like "Applications are accepted on a rolling basis.") That's not boilerplate but maybe considered application instruction? It says "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So "Applications are accepted on a rolling basis." is an application instruction, should be removed. Also "Learn more about our career opportunities at https://www.jhuapl.edu/careers." maybe considered navigation? Might be considered a link; but it's part of About Us. Might be okay to keep? It's not boilerplate but it's a link. The instruction says remove application instructions; that line is about applications, so remove. Also "All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to ..." is EEO boilerplate, remove. Also "APL is committed to providing reasonable accommodation..." remove. Also "The referenced pay range is based on JHU APL’s good faith belief..." maybe keep as part of Pay section? It's explanatory about pay range; we can keep as prose in Pay section.
We need to include Pay section with the pay range details and maybe the explanatory text. The Pay section heading
Pay
. Then we can have a containing the pay range description and the actual numbers.
We need Benefits section:
Benefits
. Then we can have a - list of benefits: robust education assistance program, unparalleled retirement contributions, healthy work/life balance, retirement plans, paid time off, medical, dental, vision, life insurance, short-term disability, long-term disability, flexible spending accounts, education assistance, training and development. Also maybe sign-on bonus, relocation benefits, locality allowance, discretionary payments for exceptional performance? Those are mentioned under compensation, not benefits exactly but could be considered benefits. However they are under compensation. Might be better to keep them under Pay? The instruction says Benefits section only if posting actually states them. The posting does state benefits: "Our employees enjoy generous benefits, including a robust education assistance program, unparalleled retirement contributions, and a healthy work/life balance." and later "APL provides eligible staff with a comprehensive benefits package including retirement plans, paid time off, medical, dental, vision, life insurance, short-term disability, long-term disability, flexible spending accounts, education assistance, and training and development." Also mentions "APL may offer bonuses or other forms of compensation per internal policy and/or contractual designation. Additional compensation may be provided in the form of a sign-on bonus, relocation benefits, locality allowance or discretionary payments for exceptional performance." That's compensation, not benefits. But we could include them under Benefits or Pay. Safer to include them under Benefits as they are benefits-like. However the instruction says "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting states benefits explicitly, so we can include Benefits section. We'll include the list of benefits as described.
We must not include placeholder text like "commensurate with experience". Not present.
Now we need to ensure we don't repeat the job title as a heading. Not needed.
Now produce HTML fragment.
Let's craft:
About the role
Are you passionate about building solutions for our greatest national security challenges? Are you searching for engaging work with an employer that prioritizes impact, innovation, and professional development? Do you value
for prose. We need to preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. So we must keep the exact wording? Not necessarily exact but preserve info. We can rephrase slightly but must not lose detail. Probably safe to copy the sentences as given. We need to remove boilerplate: EEO, accommodation, etc. Also remove duplicated lines, application instructions (like "Applications are accepted on a rolling basis.") That's not boilerplate but maybe considered application instruction? It says "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So "Applications are accepted on a rolling basis." is an application instruction, should be removed. Also "Learn more about our career opportunities at https://www.jhuapl.edu/careers." maybe considered navigation? Might be considered a link; but it's part of About Us. Might be okay to keep? It's not boilerplate but it's a link. The instruction says remove application instructions; that line is about applications, so remove. Also "All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to ..." is EEO boilerplate, remove. Also "APL is committed to providing reasonable accommodation..." remove. Also "The referenced pay range is based on JHU APL’s good faith belief..." maybe keep as part of Pay section? It's explanatory about pay range; we can keep as prose in Pay section. We need to include Pay section with the pay range details and maybe the explanatory text. The Pay section heading
Pay
. Then we can have acontaining the pay range description and the actual numbers. We need Benefits section:
Benefits
. Then we can have a- list of benefits: robust education assistance program, unparalleled retirement contributions, healthy work/life balance, retirement plans, paid time off, medical, dental, vision, life insurance, short-term disability, long-term disability, flexible spending accounts, education assistance, training and development. Also maybe sign-on bonus, relocation benefits, locality allowance, discretionary payments for exceptional performance? Those are mentioned under compensation, not benefits exactly but could be considered benefits. However they are under compensation. Might be better to keep them under Pay? The instruction says Benefits section only if posting actually states them. The posting does state benefits: "Our employees enjoy generous benefits, including a robust education assistance program, unparalleled retirement contributions, and a healthy work/life balance." and later "APL provides eligible staff with a comprehensive benefits package including retirement plans, paid time off, medical, dental, vision, life insurance, short-term disability, long-term disability, flexible spending accounts, education assistance, and training and development." Also mentions "APL may offer bonuses or other forms of compensation per internal policy and/or contractual designation. Additional compensation may be provided in the form of a sign-on bonus, relocation benefits, locality allowance or discretionary payments for exceptional performance." That's compensation, not benefits. But we could include them under Benefits or Pay. Safer to include them under Benefits as they are benefits-like. However the instruction says "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting states benefits explicitly, so we can include Benefits section. We'll include the list of benefits as described.
We must not include placeholder text like "commensurate with experience". Not present.
Now we need to ensure we don't repeat the job title as a heading. Not needed.
Now produce HTML fragment.
Let's craft:
About the role
Are you passionate about building solutions for our greatest national security challenges? Are you searching for engaging work with an employer that prioritizes impact, innovation, and professional development? Do you value