Senior Manger, Environmental Health & Safety (EHS)

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About Us? The instruction says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences. We need to parse the job posting. Content: - About Us: description of BW Packaging, Barry-Wehmiller, etc. This is substantive. Should we put under "About the role"? The instruction says headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. But we can also use other headings? It says "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It gives examples but not exclusive. Likely we should use those headings where appropriate. The "About Us" could be considered "About the role"? Actually "About the role" is typical for role summary. The posting includes "Position Summary" after Job Description. So we can have "About the role" containing the Position Summary and maybe the About Us? The About Us is company description, not role. But we could still include it under "About the role" or maybe we can create a separate section like "About the company". However instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine About Us and Position Summary into "About the role". But we need to preserve all substantive info. We can include About Us as a paragraph under About the role heading. Then we have Job Description: Position Summary (the paragraph after "Job Description:"). Then Key Responsibilities (list). Then sections: Strategic Leadership, Regulatory Compliance & Risk Management, Safety Program Management, Environmental Program Management, Workers Compensation Management (US), Training & Culture Building, Performance Management & Reporting, Leadership. These are subheadings within responsibilities. We could flatten them into a single Responsibilities section with subheadings? The instruction says use

  for section headings. Could we use

  for each of those subheadings? That would be many sections but they are substantive. However they said prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. But these are not thin; each has content. Could we combine them under a single Responsibilities heading and use

  • for each bullet? The responsibilities are currently in paragraphs with bold headings. We could convert each bold heading into a

    ? But only

    allowed for section headings. Could we treat each as a

    ? That would be many sections but maybe acceptable. However they said prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. But these are not thin; each has multiple sentences. Could be okay. Alternatively, we could have a single Responsibilities section with

    Responsibilities and then inside use

    for subheadings? But they only said use

    for section headings, not forbidding other headings. Safer to stick to

    for main sections and use

    or

    • for content. We could embed subheadings as inside

      . That might be acceptable. Similarly Qualifications & Experience: we can have a Qualifications section. Physical Demands (Essential Functions) maybe could be part of Qualifications or Requirements? Could be a Requirements section. Pay: there is pay range: "The approximate pay range for this position is $130K - $150K base salary + competitive incentive structure which may vary based on performance." So we should include a Pay section. Schedule: not mentioned. Benefits: not explicitly mentioned besides "competitive incentive structure". Could be considered benefits but not explicit. Probably not include Benefits section unless explicit. Thus sections: About the role (including About Us and Position Summary), Responsibilities (including all the key responsibilities sub-sections), Qualifications (including Qualifications & Experience and Physical Demands), Pay. We need to ensure we preserve all substantive info. Let's extract. About Us paragraph: "BW Packaging is driving performance at the intersection of people, technology, and customer care. As part of the privately held Barry-Wehmiller family, we unite a global team of packaging experts with a clear purpose: People Who Care, Building Solutions that Perform. We take on our customers’ toughest challenges as our own — delivering both innovative and enduring solutions that set the standard for value and performance. Our strength comes from our people and the power of our brands — trusted names in packaging that are known worldwide for engineering excellence, application expertise, and lifetime commitment to customer success. Truly Human Leadership guides our belief that exceptional business results and profound respect for people together provide the foundation of enduring success. We are committed to forging lasting partnerships with our customers, earning their trust through integrity, expertise, and execution. With our full range of packaging solutions and long term partnership and service, we help customers achieve operational excellence today while building the future of packaging together. Barry-Wehmiller is a diversified global supplier of engineering consulting and manufacturing technology for the packaging, corrugating, sheeting and paper-converting industries. By blending people-centric leadership with disciplined operational strategies and purpose-driven growth, Barry-Wehmiller has become a $3 billion organization with nearly 12,000 team members united by a common belief: to use the power of business to build a better world." Position Summary: "The Senior Leader, Environmental Health & Safety (EHS), leads the development and execution of BW Packaging’s EHS strategy across multiple manufacturing sites. This role develops, refines, and manages a unified EHS program that ensures regulatory compliance, reduces risk, promotes consistent safety practices, and strengthens a culture of care. The Senior Leader partners with Operations, Field Service, and the People team to embed safety into daily work, drive continuous improvement, and maintain consistent standards and processes. This role also leads the U.S. Workers’ Compensation strategy and execution, including effective case management, cost control, and alignment with safety practices." Now Responsibilities: we have several sub-sections. We need to capture each bullet as list items? The text is paragraphs with headings. We could convert each heading into a

      inside the Responsibilities section, but we only allowed

      for section headings. However we could still use

      for each responsibility heading and treat them as sections. That would be many sections but each is substantive. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." These are not thin; each has multiple sentences. Could be okay. But we also have to avoid creating sections with filler text. None of these are filler. Thus we could have:

      Strategic Leadership

      Develop, implement, execute and continuously improve the EHS strategy aligned with business goals and culture expectations. Establish and standardize EHS governance models, policies, procedures, and best practices across all sites and ensure consistent application. Advise executive leadership on EHS risks, trends, and regulatory impacts.

      Similarly for each. But we also need a top-level Responsibilities heading? Could just have these as separate sections under a generic Responsibilities heading? The instruction says use

      for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It suggests those are typical headings. But we could also have other headings; they didn't forbid. However to be safe, we could have a top-level

      Responsibilities

      and then inside use
      • for each duty. But the duties are not simple bullet points; they have headings and paragraphs. Could we embed headings inside
      • ? Possibly. Better: Use

        Responsibilities

        then
        • for each major duty area, and inside each
        • we can have

          (though not allowed) or . But we can just put the heading as bold text inside

          . That preserves info. Let's decide: We'll create sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Pay. Inside Responsibilities, we will have a

          with each responsibility area as
          • . Inside each
          • , we can have a heading and then the paragraph text. Similarly Qualifications: we have Qualifications & Experience and Physical Demands. We'll put them as
            • maybe. Pay: just a

              . Now ensure we don't include boilerplate: Remove EEO, equal-opportunity, scam-warning, etc. At the end there is: "At Barry-Wehmiller we recognize that people come with a wealth of experience and talent beyond just the technical requirements of a job. If your experience is close to what you see listed here, please still consider applying. We know that our differences often can bring about innovation, excellence and meaningful work—therefore, people from all backgrounds are encouraged to apply to our positions. Please let us know if you require reasonable accommodations during the interview process. Barry-Wehmiller is an equal opportunity employer. M/F/D/V This organization uses E-Verify. Applicants may be subject to pre-employment screening which may include drug screening, reference checks, employment verifications, background screening and/or skills assessments. Company: BW Packaging" We need to remove EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. The lines about equal opportunity employer, M/F/D/V, E-Verify, pre-employment screening are boilerplate. Also "Please let us know if you require reasonable accommodations during the interview process." That's maybe not boilerplate but could be considered application instruction? It's about accommodations; could be considered part of application instructions. The instruction says remove application instructions. So we should remove that line as well. Also "If your experience is close to what you see listed here, please still consider applying." That's application instruction. Remove. Also "We know that our differences often can bring about innovation, excellence and meaningful work—therefore, people from all backgrounds are encouraged to apply to our positions." That's also encouragement to apply; remove. Thus we keep only substantive content: About Us, Position Summary, Responsibilities, Qualifications & Experience, Physical Demands, Pay range. Also "Company: BW Packaging" is minor metadata; we can fold into a short

              or drop. Probably drop. Now craft HTML. We'll start with

              About the role

              then

              containing About Us + Position Summary? Might be long but okay. Better: separate About Us and Position Summary as paragraphs under same heading. Thus:

              About the role

              BW Packaging is driving performance at the intersection of people, technology, and customer care. As part of the privately held Barry-Wehmiller family, we unite a global team of packaging experts with a clear purpose: People Who Care, Building Solutions that Perform. We take on our customers’ toughest challenges as our own — delivering both innovative and enduring solutions that set the standard for value and performance. Our strength comes from our people and the power of our brands — trusted names in packaging that are known worldwide for engineering excellence, application expertise, and lifetime commitment to customer success. Truly Human Leadership guides our belief that exceptional business results and profound respect for people together provide