Senior Manager, Public Relations

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? The posting includes a paragraph about Epiq values etc. That's like "About the role" or maybe "Job Summary". We'll follow instructions: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading. Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences. We need to decide which sections to include based on content. Content includes: - Intro paragraph: "At Epiq, your work contributes to complex, global legal outcomes..." That's about the role/company. Could be "About the role" or maybe "Job Summary". We'll use "About the role". - Job Summary: "The Senior Manager, Public Relations develops and executes public relations programs..." That's also part of job description. Could be under "Job Summary" but we only have headings list: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We can map: "Job Summary" could be part of About the role. Or we could have separate "Job Summary" but not in list; but instructions say use those headings as examples, not exclusive? It says "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we can use those headings; we can also use other headings? Probably better to stick to those. So we can have About the role (includes intro and job summary). Responsibilities: list of essential job responsibilities. Requirements: maybe Education and Experience? Qualifications: maybe Preferred Qualifications? Skills: list of skills. Benefits: there is a line "Click Here To Learn About Epiq's Benefits." but no detail; we should not create Benefits section unless posting actually states them. It only says click here to learn about benefits, no specifics. So we should NOT include Benefits section. Pay: there is compensation range $140,000 to $150,000 USD annually and may be eligible for an annual bonus. That's specific, so we should include Pay section. Schedule: not mentioned; do not include. We also have "Physical Requirements" etc. That could be part of Requirements or Qualifications? It's a requirement but not education/experience. Could be under Requirements. We'll include it. We must remove boilerplate: EEO, equal opportunity, legal, etc. Also remove "Click Here To Learn About Epiq's Benefits." (since it's a link, but no detail). Also remove "In compliance with federal law..." etc. Also remove "Your specific salary will be determined based on several factors:" maybe part of Pay? It's detail about pay determination; we can keep as prose under Pay. Also remove "Further details about the package will be provided during the initial screening call..." maybe part of Pay? It's about benefits/package; but we have no benefits detail; we could keep as part of Pay? It's about package details; but it's vague. Might be considered boilerplate? It's not EEO; it's about package details. Could keep as prose under Pay. Also remove "Epiq Leadership Compass ..." sections (those are internal leadership competencies). Those are not part of job posting? They appear after the job description; they are likely boilerplate about company values. Should we remove? The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The leadership compass seems like internal competency model; not exactly boilerplate but could be considered extra. It's not about the job. Likely we should remove it as it's not substantive to the role. Also remove the final EEO paragraph. Thus we keep: - About the role: intro paragraph + Job Summary. - Responsibilities: list of essential job responsibilities (bullet points). - Requirements: Education, Experience, Physical Requirements maybe. - Qualifications: Preferred Qualifications? Could also include Certifications? The posting has "Preferred Qualifications: Experience in the legal industry..." and "Certifications: Strategic Communication Management Professional certification preferred." Could be under Qualifications. - Skills: list of skills (Brand management, Communications strategy, etc.) - Pay: compensation range and bonus eligibility, plus details about salary determination. We must not repeat job title as heading. We must not include Job ID etc. We must preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. We need to format lists with

  • . For prose, use

    . We need to ensure we don't create sections with filler text. Let's extract content precisely. Intro paragraph: "At Epiq, your work contributes to complex, global legal outcomes. You’ll join a values‑driven community where integrity guides decisions, relentless service sets the bar, and we thrive on big challenges together. We invest in your growth with enterprise‑wide learning and mobility. We celebrate who you are, and we respect life beyond work with flexibility that’s recognized externally. Enabled by modern platforms and AI, you’ll do the most meaningful work of your career and see your impact at scale." Job Summary: "The Senior Manager, Public Relations develops and executes public relations programs that increase Epiq visibility, strengthen market reputation, and reinforce the company position in legal services, legal technology, eDiscovery, cybersecurity, and AI. This role works with executive leadership, subject matter experts, marketing, product, and business leaders to advance earned media, thought leadership, and industry influence programs across key markets." We can combine these into About the role section. Responsibilities list (Essential Job Responsibilities): - Develop and execute public relations and thought leadership programs that increase the visibility and credibility of Epiq executives and subject matter experts - Identify opportunities to share Epiq perspective across legal services, eDiscovery, cybersecurity, legal operations, AI, data privacy, and digital transformation - Partner with business leaders and subject matter experts to develop clear insights, points of view, and market commentary that add value to industry conversations - Secure speaking opportunities, media interviews, podcast appearances, contributed articles, webinars, and other visibility opportunities for Epiq leaders and specialists - Develop bylined articles, opinion pieces, keynote messaging, panel talking points, blog content, and executive communications materials - Maintain an annual thought leadership calendar aligned to strategic business priorities, industry trends, and key market events - Monitor industry developments, competitor activity, emerging trends, and market opportunities relevant to Epiq and its clients - Advise stakeholders on issues management and reputational considerations - Support communications for acquisitions, strategic partnerships, leadership announcements, major client successes, research initiatives, and corporate milestones - Strengthen the company position across legal services, technology, and business transformation We need to keep each as

  • . Requirements: Education: Bachelor’s degree in communications, marketing, public relations, journalism, or related field. Experience: Eight or more years of experience in public relations, corporate communications, media relations, or thought leadership programs. Physical Requirements: Ability to work in an office environment and perform tasks that may require sitting, standing, and using office equipment. We could also include "Must be authorized to work in the United States for any employer." That's a requirement but it's legal; maybe we keep? It's not EEO; it's a work authorization requirement. Could be under Requirements. However it's near the compensation section. Might be considered boilerplate? It's a legal requirement for employment in US; but it's substantive. The instruction says remove legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. Work authorization is not EEO; it's a legal requirement for employment. Might be okay to keep. But it's also repeated later: "Must be authorized to work in the United States for any employer." and earlier "In compliance with federal law, all persons hired will be required to verify identity and eligibility to work in the United States and to complete the required employment eligibility verification form upon hire." That's more legal boilerplate. We could keep the short statement as part of Requirements. But to be safe, maybe we include it under Requirements as a short note. Qualifications & Requirements section also includes "Preferred Qualifications:" and "Certifications:" which we can put under Qualifications. Preferred Qualifications: - Experience in the legal industry, legal technology, legal services, eDiscovery, cybersecurity, compliance, risk, information governance, or adjacent professional services sectors. - Familiarity with legal, business, technology, and trade publications is preferred. Certifications: - Strategic Communication Management Professional certification preferred. We could combine under Qualifications. Skills list: many items: Brand management Communications strategy Content development Content strategy Detail-oriented work Digital marketing High accuracy Internal communications Marketing communications Marketing communications planning Media relations People management Press releases Reputation management Social media marketing Thought leadership development Executive communications Stakeholder management We need to output as
    • . Pay section: "The Compensation range for this role is $140,000 to $150,000 USD annually and may be eligible for an annual bonus. In compliance with federal law, all persons hired will be required to verify identity and eligibility to work in the United States and to complete the required employment eligibility verification form upon hire. Must be authorized to work in the United States for any employer. Your specific salary will be determined based on several factors: Location-based market rate for the roleYour abilities in relation to the job specificationPerformance during screening and interviewPay parity with the wider team in the considered location Further details about the package will be provided during the initial screening call with the Talent Acquisition Team." We need to preserve all substantive information. However we need to remove duplicated lines and boilerplate. The "In compliance with federal law..." is legal boilerplate; maybe we should remove as per instruction to remove legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. That line is legal compliance. So we should remove it. Also "Must be authorized to work in the United States for any employer." is also a legal requirement; but maybe we keep as it's substantive? It's also a requirement. However it's also legal. The instruction says remove legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is legal but not EEO; it's about work authorization. Might be considered boilerplate but it's a genuine requirement. I'd keep it as a short note under Requirements or Pay? Probably under Requirements as it's a requirement for employment. But we already have Physical Requirements; we could add a separate bullet for work authorization. But the instruction says remove legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. The phrase "In compliance with federal law, all persons hired will be required to verify identity and eligibility to work in the United States and to complete the required employment eligibility verification form upon hire." is definitely legal boilerplate. Remove that. The phrase "Must be authorized to work in the United States for any employer." is also a legal requirement but less boilerplate; still it's a statement about work eligibility. Might be considered boilerplate but it's a concrete requirement. I'd keep it as a short note under Requirements. Also "Your specific salary will be determined based on several factors: Location-based market rate for the roleYour abilities in relation to the job specificationPerformance during screening and interviewPay parity with