Senior Licensed Professional Mental Health Counselor
for section headings, - for lists,
for prose.
We need to preserve all substantive information. Must not invent or summarize away detail. Must keep details like "up to $200 -000" (note there is a space? The text says "$200 -000". Probably a typo but we must preserve as is. We'll keep exactly "$200 -000". Also eligibility period "one to five years". Also mention "Former EDRP participants ineligible to apply". Also mention contact email.
We need to include all details from duties, qualifications, etc.
We must decide how to split content into sections.
Potential sections:
- About the role: summary paragraph about EDRP eligibility and maybe brief role description.
- Responsibilities: list of duties (the bullet points under Duties). Could be a
.
- Requirements: basic requirements (citizenship, English proficiency, education, licensure). Could be a .
- Qualifications: maybe include grade determinations and KSAs? Or we could combine Requirements and Qualifications? But we need to follow instruction: use headings only when posting has real specific content. We can have both Requirements and Qualifications if they have distinct content.
Qualifications could include: Senior LPMHC GS-12 requirements: experience, five years post-licensed experience, ability to provide clinical supervision, etc. Also the KSAs list.
Skills: maybe the KSAs list could go under Skills. But KSAs are knowledge, skills, abilities. Could be under Skills.
But we need to avoid duplication. Let's think: The posting has "Qualifications" heading in original (Basic Requirements, Education, Licensure, Grade Determinations, Demonstrated Knowledge - Skills and Abilities). So we could map:
- Requirements: Basic Requirements (citizenship, English proficiency, Education, Licensure). That seems like basic qualifications.
- Qualifications: Grade Determinations (experience, senior LPMHC GS-12) and Demonstrated Knowledge - Skills and Abilities (the KSAs). That seems appropriate.
- Skills: maybe not needed if we put KSAs under Qualifications. But we could still have Skills section for the KSAs if we want. However instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine KSAs into Qualifications and not have separate Skills.
Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Schedule.
Check if we have content for Benefits: EDRP details. Yes.
Schedule: Work schedule and telework info.
Now we need to ensure we don't miss any substantive info: The note about Readjustment Counselors multi-disciplinary, each discipline announced separately. That's substantive; where to place? Could be under About the role or Requirements? It's a note about the position classification. Could be under About the role as additional context.
Also Functional Statement #: 82263A - maybe minor metadata; we could fold into a short p or drop. The instruction: do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short or drop it. So we can include Functional Statement in a short p maybe under About the role or at end.
Relocation/Recruitment Incentives: Authorized EDRP Authorized: Former EDRP participants ineligible to apply for incentive. Contact email. Learn more. That's part of Benefits? Could be under Benefits as well.
Permanent Change of Station (PCS):
for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information. Must not invent or summarize away detail. Must keep details like "up to $200 -000" (note there is a space? The text says "$200 -000". Probably a typo but we must preserve as is. We'll keep exactly "$200 -000". Also eligibility period "one to five years". Also mention "Former EDRP participants ineligible to apply". Also mention contact email. We need to include all details from duties, qualifications, etc. We must decide how to split content into sections. Potential sections: - About the role: summary paragraph about EDRP eligibility and maybe brief role description. - Responsibilities: list of duties (the bullet points under Duties). Could be a
- .
- Requirements: basic requirements (citizenship, English proficiency, education, licensure). Could be a
- .
- Qualifications: maybe include grade determinations and KSAs? Or we could combine Requirements and Qualifications? But we need to follow instruction: use headings only when posting has real specific content. We can have both Requirements and Qualifications if they have distinct content.
Qualifications could include: Senior LPMHC GS-12 requirements: experience, five years post-licensed experience, ability to provide clinical supervision, etc. Also the KSAs list.
Skills: maybe the KSAs list could go under Skills. But KSAs are knowledge, skills, abilities. Could be under Skills.
But we need to avoid duplication. Let's think: The posting has "Qualifications" heading in original (Basic Requirements, Education, Licensure, Grade Determinations, Demonstrated Knowledge - Skills and Abilities). So we could map:
- Requirements: Basic Requirements (citizenship, English proficiency, Education, Licensure). That seems like basic qualifications.
- Qualifications: Grade Determinations (experience, senior LPMHC GS-12) and Demonstrated Knowledge - Skills and Abilities (the KSAs). That seems appropriate.
- Skills: maybe not needed if we put KSAs under Qualifications. But we could still have Skills section for the KSAs if we want. However instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine KSAs into Qualifications and not have separate Skills.
Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Schedule.
Check if we have content for Benefits: EDRP details. Yes.
Schedule: Work schedule and telework info.
Now we need to ensure we don't miss any substantive info: The note about Readjustment Counselors multi-disciplinary, each discipline announced separately. That's substantive; where to place? Could be under About the role or Requirements? It's a note about the position classification. Could be under About the role as additional context.
Also Functional Statement #: 82263A - maybe minor metadata; we could fold into a short p or drop. The instruction: do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. So we can include Functional Statement in a short p maybe under About the role or at end. Relocation/Recruitment Incentives: Authorized EDRP Authorized: Former EDRP participants ineligible to apply for incentive. Contact email. Learn more. That's part of Benefits? Could be under Benefits as well. Permanent Change of Station (PCS):