Senior Internal Auditor
for each section that has real content. Use - for lists. Use
for prose. Do not repeat job title. No Job ID. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Please Note" about work authorization? That's maybe legal but not EEO? It's about work authorization; might be considered legal boilerplate. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. The "Please Note Applicants must be legally authorized to work in the United States. At this time, we are not able to sponsor or assume sponsorship of employment visas." That's legal/immigration notice; likely considered legal boilerplate, should be removed. Also "If you have a disability..." is EEO accommodation notice; remove. Also "Benefits And Compensation" section: we have benefits description; we should include Benefits section if there is real content. The posting says: "In addition to base salary, this position is eligible for an annual bonus based on company and individual performance as well as a generous benefits package." Then later under "Benefits And Compensation": "We offer a competitive compensation package, performance-based incentives, and a comprehensive benefits program—including health, dental, vision, 401(k) with company match, paid time off, and professional development opportunities." That's substantive. So we should include Benefits section with list.
Pay: The posting includes pay ranges for Chicago and NYC. So we should include Pay section with those ranges. It says "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only and will be commensurate with candidate experience. Pay ranges for candidates in other locations may differ based on the cost of labor in that location." Then lists Chicago Pay Range: $111,384- $132,498 New York City Pay Range: $121,482- $144,636. That's specific, so include Pay section.
Schedule: The posting says "This is a 100% in-office position. Candidates must be able to work on-site at a designated company office during standard business hours." That's schedule info (in-office, standard business hours). So we can include Schedule section.
We need to avoid filler like "commensurate with experience" etc. But we can include the pay ranges; we should not include the phrase "commensurate with candidate experience" as it's filler? The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). So we should not include that phrase. We can just list the ranges.
We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep the responsibilities, qualifications, etc.
We need to structure: sections maybe About the role? The posting has a Summary paragraph after "Summary". That could be considered About the role. Use
About the role
with paragraph.
Then Responsibilities: we have Essential Responsibilities with bullet points (though not formatted as bullet list but sentences). We need to convert to - . The responsibilities are many sentences; we can split each sentence into list items. Must preserve all detail; we can keep each sentence as a list item.
Similarly for Internal Audit responsibilities etc. Actually the responsibilities are grouped under headings: Essential Responsibilities (with subpoints), Internal Audit, Analytics, Leadership, and Improvement. We could combine all responsibilities into one list under Responsibilities section, or we could keep sub-sections? The instruction: use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should have a Responsibilities section containing all duties. We'll combine.
Then Qualifications / Experience: we have Required and Preferred. Could combine into Requirements section (or Qualifications). The instruction lists Requirements as possible heading. We'll use Requirements
for required qualifications, and maybe Preferred Qualifications
? But only allowed headings list includes Qualifications, Skills, etc. We could put Required under Requirements and Preferred under Qualifications? But we need to preserve all info. Perhaps we can have Requirements (required) and then a separate section Preferred Qualifications (still a heading). The instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use those for section headings. It says "Use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests we can use those headings; we could also use others but better to stick to those. We have both required and preferred; we could put required under Requirements and preferred under Qualifications. Or we could combine into Requirements with subheadings? But we cannot use etc? Not prohibited but we should follow instruction. Probably safest: Use Requirements
for required qualifications, and Preferred Qualifications
for preferred (still a heading). The instruction didn't list Preferred Qualifications but it's okay as a heading? It says "e.g." not exhaustive. So we can.
Then Skills: maybe we can extract skills from qualifications (proficiency in Microsoft Office, etc.) but we already have them in qualifications. Could create Skills section for technical skills: proficiency in Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, process documentation or flowcharting tools, data analytics tools (Power BI, Alteryx, SQL, ACL, IDEA, etc.). But we already have them in qualifications; we might duplicate. Better to keep qualifications as is and not create separate Skills unless needed. The instruction: prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we can keep Requirements (including required and preferred) and maybe not separate Skills.
We also need Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We must not include boilerplate like "Core Values". That's not requested; we should remove.
Also remove "At Clearbrook our Core Values..." etc.
Also remove "Please Note" about work authorization and disability accommodation.
Also remove "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only and will be commensurate with candidate experience. Pay ranges for candidates in other locations may differ based on the cost of labor in that location." That's filler? It's somewhat explanatory but not specific; we could keep it as part of Pay section? It mentions that ranges are for those geographic areas only; that's substantive? It clarifies that the ranges apply to those locations. Might be considered substantive. However the instruction says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). The phrase "commensurate with candidate experience" is filler; we should avoid that. The sentence also includes "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only". That's not filler; it's specific. We could keep that sentence but remove the "commensurate with candidate experience" part. However we need to preserve all substantive information; we can rephrase to keep the substantive part: "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only. Pay ranges for candidates in other locations may differ based on the cost of labor in that location." That's still somewhat generic but maybe okay. However the instruction says avoid filler like "commensurate with experience". So we can drop that phrase.
Thus Pay section: we can have a paragraph: "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only. Pay ranges for candidates in other locations may differ based on the cost of labor in that location." Then a list: Chicago Pay Range: $111,384- $132,498; New York City Pay Range: $121,482- $144,636.
We could also just list the ranges without the explanatory sentence; but we need to preserve all substantive info; the sentence about geographic areas is substantive. We'll include.
Schedule: "This is a 100% in-office position. Candidates must be able to work on-site at a designated company office during standard business hours." We'll put as paragraph.
Benefits: "We offer a competitive compensation package, performance-based incentives, and a comprehensive benefits program—including health, dental, vision, 401(k) with company match, paid time off, and professional development opportunities." Also earlier: "In addition to base salary, this position is eligible for an annual bonus based on company and individual performance as well as a generous benefits package." We'll combine.
Now Responsibilities: need to extract each duty.
Let's list responsibilities from the text:
Essential Responsibilities (bullet-like sentences):
- Support enterprise and Internal Audit risk assessments, the risk-based audit plan, and annual SOX scoping.
- Monitor emerging risks and regulatory, accounting, and industry developments affecting controls and audit coverage.
- Document key processes, risks, and controls through narratives, flowcharts, and risk and control matrices.
- Conduct walkthroughs and test key business and IT controls in accordance with established standards.
- Evaluate automated controls, interfaces, system-generated reports, and key dependencies, coordinating with IT Audit as needed.
- Evaluate deficiencies, develop practical remediation plans, and monitor closure and validation.
- Assess risks and controls related to transformations, implementations, redesigns, automation, acquisitions, and integrations.
- Support compliance with SOX, the Model Audit Rule, and other ICFR requirements.
- Coordinate external auditor planning, testing, information requests, reliance, and remediation.
- Support executive reporting and provide guidance to process, technology, and control owners.
Internal Audit:
- Execute and coordinate financial, operational, compliance, and integrated audits.
- Assess risks, define objectives and scope, and develop risk-based audit programs.
- Conduct planning, fieldwork, analytics, control testing, and other audit procedures.
- Prepare clear, well-supported workpapers that meet professional and reliance standards.
- Identify control issues and improvement opportunities, and develop concise, actionable observations.
- Communicate engagement status, significant issues, conclusions, and report content.
- Apply professional judgment and skepticism, and escalate significant issues appropriately.
- Assess whether management action plans are timely, adequate, and sustainable.
Analytics, Leadership, and Improvement:
- Use analytics and visualization to strengthen risk assessments, expand testing, and generate insights.
- Develop repeatable analytics, dashboards, and monitoring routines to improve efficiency and identify risks promptly.
- Lead assigned workstreams, coordinate stakeholders, and guide or review junior and co-sourced resources.
- Build constructive relationships while maintaining independence, objectivity, and professional skepticism.
- Support quality assurance and improve audit and SOX methodologies, tools, efficiency, and knowledge sharing.
- Perform other duties as assigned.
We'll turn each into
- .
Now Qualifications/Experience Required:
List:
- Bachelor’s degree from an accredited institution in accounting, finance, business administration, economics, information systems, data science, or a related field.
- At least five years of relevant experience in public accounting, internal audit, SOX/ICFR compliance, or a combination of these disciplines.
- Demonstrated SOX/ICFR experience, including scoping, walkthroughs, control design assessment, operating effectiveness testing, deficiency evaluation, and remediation monitoring.
- Working knowledge of applicable Internal Audit professional standards, the COSO Internal Control—Integrated Framework, enterprise risk management concepts, and risk assessment practices.
- Understanding of ICFR, control deficiency evaluation, management assessment requirements, and external auditor reliance considerations.
- Ability to lead audit workstreams, coordinate cross-functional stakeholders, apply professional skepticism, constructively challenge management, and influence practical improvements.
- Strong analytical, problem-solving, project management, organizational, and time management skills, with the ability to balance multiple priorities and meet deadlines.
- Excellent written and verbal communication skills, with the
for prose. Do not repeat job title. No Job ID. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "Please Note" about work authorization? That's maybe legal but not EEO? It's about work authorization; might be considered legal boilerplate. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. The "Please Note Applicants must be legally authorized to work in the United States. At this time, we are not able to sponsor or assume sponsorship of employment visas." That's legal/immigration notice; likely considered legal boilerplate, should be removed. Also "If you have a disability..." is EEO accommodation notice; remove. Also "Benefits And Compensation" section: we have benefits description; we should include Benefits section if there is real content. The posting says: "In addition to base salary, this position is eligible for an annual bonus based on company and individual performance as well as a generous benefits package." Then later under "Benefits And Compensation": "We offer a competitive compensation package, performance-based incentives, and a comprehensive benefits program—including health, dental, vision, 401(k) with company match, paid time off, and professional development opportunities." That's substantive. So we should include Benefits section with list. Pay: The posting includes pay ranges for Chicago and NYC. So we should include Pay section with those ranges. It says "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only and will be commensurate with candidate experience. Pay ranges for candidates in other locations may differ based on the cost of labor in that location." Then lists Chicago Pay Range: $111,384- $132,498 New York City Pay Range: $121,482- $144,636. That's specific, so include Pay section. Schedule: The posting says "This is a 100% in-office position. Candidates must be able to work on-site at a designated company office during standard business hours." That's schedule info (in-office, standard business hours). So we can include Schedule section. We need to avoid filler like "commensurate with experience" etc. But we can include the pay ranges; we should not include the phrase "commensurate with candidate experience" as it's filler? The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). So we should not include that phrase. We can just list the ranges. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep the responsibilities, qualifications, etc. We need to structure: sections maybe About the role? The posting has a Summary paragraph after "Summary". That could be considered About the role. Use
About the role
with paragraph. Then Responsibilities: we have Essential Responsibilities with bullet points (though not formatted as bullet list but sentences). We need to convert to- . The responsibilities are many sentences; we can split each sentence into list items. Must preserve all detail; we can keep each sentence as a list item.
Similarly for Internal Audit responsibilities etc. Actually the responsibilities are grouped under headings: Essential Responsibilities (with subpoints), Internal Audit, Analytics, Leadership, and Improvement. We could combine all responsibilities into one list under Responsibilities section, or we could keep sub-sections? The instruction: use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should have a Responsibilities section containing all duties. We'll combine. Then Qualifications / Experience: we have Required and Preferred. Could combine into Requirements section (or Qualifications). The instruction lists Requirements as possible heading. We'll use
Requirements
for required qualifications, and maybePreferred Qualifications
? But only allowed headings list includes Qualifications, Skills, etc. We could put Required under Requirements and Preferred under Qualifications? But we need to preserve all info. Perhaps we can have Requirements (required) and then a separate section Preferred Qualifications (still a heading). The instruction says usefor section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use those for section headings. It says "Use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests we can use those headings; we could also use others but better to stick to those. We have both required and preferred; we could put required under Requirements and preferred under Qualifications. Or we could combine into Requirements with subheadings? But we cannot use
etc? Not prohibited but we should follow instruction. Probably safest: Use
Requirements
for required qualifications, andPreferred Qualifications
for preferred (still a heading). The instruction didn't list Preferred Qualifications but it's okay as a heading? It says "e.g." not exhaustive. So we can. Then Skills: maybe we can extract skills from qualifications (proficiency in Microsoft Office, etc.) but we already have them in qualifications. Could create Skills section for technical skills: proficiency in Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, process documentation or flowcharting tools, data analytics tools (Power BI, Alteryx, SQL, ACL, IDEA, etc.). But we already have them in qualifications; we might duplicate. Better to keep qualifications as is and not create separate Skills unless needed. The instruction: prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we can keep Requirements (including required and preferred) and maybe not separate Skills. We also need Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must not include boilerplate like "Core Values". That's not requested; we should remove. Also remove "At Clearbrook our Core Values..." etc. Also remove "Please Note" about work authorization and disability accommodation. Also remove "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only and will be commensurate with candidate experience. Pay ranges for candidates in other locations may differ based on the cost of labor in that location." That's filler? It's somewhat explanatory but not specific; we could keep it as part of Pay section? It mentions that ranges are for those geographic areas only; that's substantive? It clarifies that the ranges apply to those locations. Might be considered substantive. However the instruction says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). The phrase "commensurate with candidate experience" is filler; we should avoid that. The sentence also includes "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only". That's not filler; it's specific. We could keep that sentence but remove the "commensurate with candidate experience" part. However we need to preserve all substantive information; we can rephrase to keep the substantive part: "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only. Pay ranges for candidates in other locations may differ based on the cost of labor in that location." That's still somewhat generic but maybe okay. However the instruction says avoid filler like "commensurate with experience". So we can drop that phrase. Thus Pay section: we can have a paragraph: "The base salary range provided below is for hires in those geographic areas only. Pay ranges for candidates in other locations may differ based on the cost of labor in that location." Then a list: Chicago Pay Range: $111,384- $132,498; New York City Pay Range: $121,482- $144,636. We could also just list the ranges without the explanatory sentence; but we need to preserve all substantive info; the sentence about geographic areas is substantive. We'll include. Schedule: "This is a 100% in-office position. Candidates must be able to work on-site at a designated company office during standard business hours." We'll put as paragraph. Benefits: "We offer a competitive compensation package, performance-based incentives, and a comprehensive benefits program—including health, dental, vision, 401(k) with company match, paid time off, and professional development opportunities." Also earlier: "In addition to base salary, this position is eligible for an annual bonus based on company and individual performance as well as a generous benefits package." We'll combine. Now Responsibilities: need to extract each duty. Let's list responsibilities from the text: Essential Responsibilities (bullet-like sentences): - Support enterprise and Internal Audit risk assessments, the risk-based audit plan, and annual SOX scoping. - Monitor emerging risks and regulatory, accounting, and industry developments affecting controls and audit coverage. - Document key processes, risks, and controls through narratives, flowcharts, and risk and control matrices. - Conduct walkthroughs and test key business and IT controls in accordance with established standards. - Evaluate automated controls, interfaces, system-generated reports, and key dependencies, coordinating with IT Audit as needed. - Evaluate deficiencies, develop practical remediation plans, and monitor closure and validation. - Assess risks and controls related to transformations, implementations, redesigns, automation, acquisitions, and integrations. - Support compliance with SOX, the Model Audit Rule, and other ICFR requirements. - Coordinate external auditor planning, testing, information requests, reliance, and remediation. - Support executive reporting and provide guidance to process, technology, and control owners. Internal Audit: - Execute and coordinate financial, operational, compliance, and integrated audits. - Assess risks, define objectives and scope, and develop risk-based audit programs. - Conduct planning, fieldwork, analytics, control testing, and other audit procedures. - Prepare clear, well-supported workpapers that meet professional and reliance standards. - Identify control issues and improvement opportunities, and develop concise, actionable observations. - Communicate engagement status, significant issues, conclusions, and report content. - Apply professional judgment and skepticism, and escalate significant issues appropriately. - Assess whether management action plans are timely, adequate, and sustainable. Analytics, Leadership, and Improvement: - Use analytics and visualization to strengthen risk assessments, expand testing, and generate insights. - Develop repeatable analytics, dashboards, and monitoring routines to improve efficiency and identify risks promptly. - Lead assigned workstreams, coordinate stakeholders, and guide or review junior and co-sourced resources. - Build constructive relationships while maintaining independence, objectivity, and professional skepticism. - Support quality assurance and improve audit and SOX methodologies, tools, efficiency, and knowledge sharing. - Perform other duties as assigned. We'll turn each into - . Now Qualifications/Experience Required: List: - Bachelor’s degree from an accredited institution in accounting, finance, business administration, economics, information systems, data science, or a related field. - At least five years of relevant experience in public accounting, internal audit, SOX/ICFR compliance, or a combination of these disciplines. - Demonstrated SOX/ICFR experience, including scoping, walkthroughs, control design assessment, operating effectiveness testing, deficiency evaluation, and remediation monitoring. - Working knowledge of applicable Internal Audit professional standards, the COSO Internal Control—Integrated Framework, enterprise risk management concepts, and risk assessment practices. - Understanding of ICFR, control deficiency evaluation, management assessment requirements, and external auditor reliance considerations. - Ability to lead audit workstreams, coordinate cross-functional stakeholders, apply professional skepticism, constructively challenge management, and influence practical improvements. - Strong analytical, problem-solving, project management, organizational, and time management skills, with the ability to balance multiple priorities and meet deadlines. - Excellent written and verbal communication skills, with the