Senior Ecological Risk Assessor
for section headings: e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to map content accordingly.
We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove "About WSP" maybe? It's not required heading but we can include as "About the role"? Actually "About WSP" is company description; could be considered "About the role"? But we have specific headings list: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We should only include sections that have real specific content.
We have content: "Your Impact" (responsibilities/duties). "Who You Are" includes required qualifications and preferred qualifications. Also "WSP Benefits". "Compensation" includes salary ranges. Also maybe "About WSP" could be considered "About the role"? But it's about company, not role. Could be omitted? The instruction: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it. So we can include sections: Responsibilities (Your Impact), Requirements (Required Qualifications), Qualifications (Preferred Qualifications?), Benefits, Pay. Possibly also Skills? Not explicitly listed but could be derived from qualifications. But better to stick to given headings.
We need to use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use
for prose.
We must preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from those sections.
Let's extract:
Your Impact:
- Direct and supervise technical assignments and manages entire projects or specific elements of projects;
- Perform as lead ecological risk assessor authoring proposals and projects;
- Extensive client and regulator interaction, particularly with scoping of ecological risk assessments and application of the risk assessment results and conclusions in site decision-making;
- Provide technical review for projects to comply with environmental regulations, company standards, contract requirements, and related specifications;
- Occasionally travel for projects, conferences, business development, or training.
Who You Are:
Required Qualifications:
- B.S. in Toxicology, Biology, or equivalent.
- 10+ years of relevant experience in conducting, authoring, directing, and performing technical review of multi-media ecological risk assessments with increasing levels of project complexity and responsibility
- Extensive hands-on knowledge of ecological risk assessment principles, procedures, and guidance particularly USEPA CERCLA
- Demonstrated successful interactions across a range of private sector and governmental clients
- Performance and technical review of multi-media screening level and baseline ecological risk assessments for common and emerging contaminants
- Completion of projects through feasibility studies and Records of Decision (including identifying risk-based remedial goals)
- Extensive experience in scoping, managing, and conducting ecological risk assessment components for each of the stages of the CERCLA process including: Development of work plans and QAPPs (including evaluating sampling strategies and appropriateness of data for risk assessment)
- Experience with risk communication with clients and stakeholders, and at conferences and professional organizations including presenting complex technical information in a concise and accurate manner
Preferred Qualifications:
- M.S. in Toxicology, Biology, or equivalent.
- Experience with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
WSP Benefits:
- coverage related to medical, dental, vision, disability, and life;
- retirement savings;
- paid sick leave;
- paid vacation (or other personal time);
- paid parental leave;
- paid time off for purposes of bereavement, voting, and/or attendance at naturalization proceedings.
Compensation:
- Expected Salary (all locations): $103,000 - $166,900
- Explanation about range etc. We need to preserve all substantive information, but we should not include boilerplate like "WSP USA is providing the compensation range that the company in good faith believes it might pay and offer for this position, based on the successful applicant’s education, experience, knowledge, skills, abilities in addition to internal equity and specific geographic location. WSP USA reserves the right to ultimately pay more or less than the posted range and offer additional benefits and other compensation, depending on circumstances not related to an applicant’s sex or other status protected by local, state, and/or federal law." That's quite verbose but it's substantive? It's basically legal disclaimer. Might be considered boilerplate? The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is a legal disclaimer about compensation. Might be considered legal boilerplate. However it's part of the compensation description. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. But also remove legal boilerplate. This is a legal disclaimer about compensation; could be considered legal boilerplate. I'd lean to remove that paragraph as it's generic legal language. Keep the salary ranges and maybe the note about Colorado only.
We have also Expected Salary (Colorado only): $103,000 - $156,600 with similar disclaimer. We'll keep the ranges and maybe a brief note that these are expected salary ranges; but we can drop the disclaimer.
Thus Pay section: include two paragraphs: one for all locations, one for Colorado only.
Now we need to decide headings: Use
for each section.
Potential sections:
- Responsibilities (Your Impact)
- Requirements (Required Qualifications)
- Qualifications (Preferred Qualifications) maybe combine? Could have Requirements and Qualifications separate. We'll put Required under Requirements, Preferred under Qualifications.
- Benefits
- Pay
We should not include Schedule as not present.
Now format:
Responsibilities
- ...
...
Requirements
- ...
...
Qualifications
- ...
...
Benefits
- ...
...
Pay
Expected Salary (all locations): $103,000 - $166,900
Expected Salary (Colorado only): $103,000 - $156,600
We need to preserve all substantive information from each bullet. Let's list them precisely.
Responsibilities bullets:
- Direct and supervise technical assignments and manages entire projects or specific elements of projects;
- Perform as lead ecological risk assessor authoring proposals and projects;
- Extensive client and regulator interaction, particularly with scoping of ecological risk assessments and application of the risk assessment results and conclusions in site decision-making;
- Provide technical review for projects to comply with environmental regulations, company standards, contract requirements, and related specifications;
- Occasionally travel for projects, conferences, business development, or training.
Note some have trailing semicolons; we can keep as is.
Requirements bullets (Required Qualifications):
- B.S. in Toxicology, Biology, or equivalent.
- 10+ years of relevant experience in conducting, authoring, directing, and performing technical review of multi-media ecological risk assessments with increasing levels of project complexity and responsibility
- Extensive hands-on knowledge of ecological risk assessment principles, procedures, and guidance particularly USEPA CERCLA
- Demonstrated successful interactions across a range of private sector and governmental clients
- Performance and technical review of multi-media screening level and baseline ecological risk assessments for common and emerging contaminants
- Completion of projects through feasibility studies and Records of Decision (including identifying risk-based remedial goals)
- Extensive experience in scoping, managing, and conducting ecological risk assessment components for each of the stages of the CERCLA process including: Development of work plans and QAPPs (including evaluating sampling strategies and appropriateness of data for risk assessment)
- Experience with risk communication with clients and stakeholders, and at conferences and professional organizations including presenting complex technical information in a concise and accurate manner
Preferred Qualifications bullets:
- M.S. in Toxicology, Biology, or equivalent.
- Experience with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Benefits bullets:
- coverage related to medical, dental, vision, disability, and life;
- retirement savings;
- paid sick leave;
- paid vacation (or other personal time);
- paid parental leave;
- paid time off for purposes of bereavement, voting, and/or attendance at naturalization proceedings.
Now ensure we didn't miss any other substantive content like location options: "any of our WSP offices, which may include Atlanta, GA; Kansas City, MO; Gainesville, FL; Valhalla, NY; Morristown, NJ; Buffalo, NY or Boston MA." That's location info. Could be part of About the role? Not in headings list. Could be included in Responsibilities? Not exactly. Could be included in a short paragraph under Responsibilities? The instruction: include a section ONLY when posting has real specific content for it. We have location info; we could put it under Responsibilities as a brief note? But better to maybe include under "About the role"? Not in headings list. However we could treat location as part of Responsibilities? Not ideal. Perhaps we can add a short paragraph under Responsibilities about location flexibility. But the instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we could add an "About the role" section that includes location and maybe brief description. The posting includes "Job Description This Opportunity WSP is currently initiating a search for a Senior Ecological Risk Assessor with the potential to work out of any of our WSP offices, which may include Atlanta, GA; Kansas City, MO; Gainesville, FL; Valhalla, NY; Morristown, NJ; Buffalo, NY or Boston MA. Be involved in projects with our Federal Programs Team and be a part of a growing organization that meets our clients’ objectives and solves their challenges." That's about the role. So we should include an About the role section.
Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay.
We must not repeat job title as heading. So About the role is fine.
Now About the role content: include the location list and mention involvement with Federal Programs Team, growing organization, etc. Also mention collaborating with team to support growing risk assessment and toxicology practice in project planning and execution as well as public outreach and stakeholder communication. Risk assessments will be prepared to meet requirements of USEPA and many States’ environmental regulatory programs. The position will involve coordination and implementation of project work associated with multimedia (air, water, and soil) risk assessments and environmental regulatory compliance in the industrial/commercial and government sectors as well as project management.
We need to preserve all substantive information from that paragraph.
Let's extract:
- WSP is currently initiating a search for a Senior Ecological Risk Assessor with the potential to work out of any of our WSP offices, which may include Atlanta, GA; Kansas City, MO; Gainesville, FL; Valhalla, NY; Morristown, NJ; Buffalo, NY or Boston MA.
- Be involved in projects with our Federal Programs Team and be a part of a growing organization that meets our clients’ objectives and solves their challenges.
- The successful candidate will collaborate with our current team of risk assessment team members to support our growing risk assessment and toxicology practice in project planning and execution as well as public outreach and stakeholder communication.
- Risk assessments will be prepared to meet the requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and many States’ environmental regulatory programs.
- The position will involve coordination and implementation of project work associated with multimedia (air, water, and soil) risk assessments and environmental regulatory compliance in the industrial/commercial and government sectors as well as project management.
We can turn these into
prose or
list?
for prose. We must preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from those sections. Let's extract: Your Impact: - Direct and supervise technical assignments and manages entire projects or specific elements of projects; - Perform as lead ecological risk assessor authoring proposals and projects; - Extensive client and regulator interaction, particularly with scoping of ecological risk assessments and application of the risk assessment results and conclusions in site decision-making; - Provide technical review for projects to comply with environmental regulations, company standards, contract requirements, and related specifications; - Occasionally travel for projects, conferences, business development, or training. Who You Are: Required Qualifications: - B.S. in Toxicology, Biology, or equivalent. - 10+ years of relevant experience in conducting, authoring, directing, and performing technical review of multi-media ecological risk assessments with increasing levels of project complexity and responsibility - Extensive hands-on knowledge of ecological risk assessment principles, procedures, and guidance particularly USEPA CERCLA - Demonstrated successful interactions across a range of private sector and governmental clients - Performance and technical review of multi-media screening level and baseline ecological risk assessments for common and emerging contaminants - Completion of projects through feasibility studies and Records of Decision (including identifying risk-based remedial goals) - Extensive experience in scoping, managing, and conducting ecological risk assessment components for each of the stages of the CERCLA process including: Development of work plans and QAPPs (including evaluating sampling strategies and appropriateness of data for risk assessment) - Experience with risk communication with clients and stakeholders, and at conferences and professional organizations including presenting complex technical information in a concise and accurate manner Preferred Qualifications: - M.S. in Toxicology, Biology, or equivalent. - Experience with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. WSP Benefits: - coverage related to medical, dental, vision, disability, and life; - retirement savings; - paid sick leave; - paid vacation (or other personal time); - paid parental leave; - paid time off for purposes of bereavement, voting, and/or attendance at naturalization proceedings. Compensation: - Expected Salary (all locations): $103,000 - $166,900 - Explanation about range etc. We need to preserve all substantive information, but we should not include boilerplate like "WSP USA is providing the compensation range that the company in good faith believes it might pay and offer for this position, based on the successful applicant’s education, experience, knowledge, skills, abilities in addition to internal equity and specific geographic location. WSP USA reserves the right to ultimately pay more or less than the posted range and offer additional benefits and other compensation, depending on circumstances not related to an applicant’s sex or other status protected by local, state, and/or federal law." That's quite verbose but it's substantive? It's basically legal disclaimer. Might be considered boilerplate? The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is a legal disclaimer about compensation. Might be considered legal boilerplate. However it's part of the compensation description. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. But also remove legal boilerplate. This is a legal disclaimer about compensation; could be considered legal boilerplate. I'd lean to remove that paragraph as it's generic legal language. Keep the salary ranges and maybe the note about Colorado only. We have also Expected Salary (Colorado only): $103,000 - $156,600 with similar disclaimer. We'll keep the ranges and maybe a brief note that these are expected salary ranges; but we can drop the disclaimer. Thus Pay section: include two paragraphs: one for all locations, one for Colorado only. Now we need to decide headings: Use
for each section.
Potential sections:
- Responsibilities (Your Impact)
- Requirements (Required Qualifications)
- Qualifications (Preferred Qualifications) maybe combine? Could have Requirements and Qualifications separate. We'll put Required under Requirements, Preferred under Qualifications.
- Benefits
- Pay
We should not include Schedule as not present.
Now format:
Responsibilities
- ...
...
Requirements
- ...
...
Qualifications
- ...
...
Benefits
- ...
...
Pay
Expected Salary (all locations): $103,000 - $166,900
Expected Salary (Colorado only): $103,000 - $156,600
We need to preserve all substantive information from each bullet. Let's list them precisely. Responsibilities bullets: - Direct and supervise technical assignments and manages entire projects or specific elements of projects; - Perform as lead ecological risk assessor authoring proposals and projects; - Extensive client and regulator interaction, particularly with scoping of ecological risk assessments and application of the risk assessment results and conclusions in site decision-making; - Provide technical review for projects to comply with environmental regulations, company standards, contract requirements, and related specifications; - Occasionally travel for projects, conferences, business development, or training. Note some have trailing semicolons; we can keep as is. Requirements bullets (Required Qualifications): - B.S. in Toxicology, Biology, or equivalent. - 10+ years of relevant experience in conducting, authoring, directing, and performing technical review of multi-media ecological risk assessments with increasing levels of project complexity and responsibility - Extensive hands-on knowledge of ecological risk assessment principles, procedures, and guidance particularly USEPA CERCLA - Demonstrated successful interactions across a range of private sector and governmental clients - Performance and technical review of multi-media screening level and baseline ecological risk assessments for common and emerging contaminants - Completion of projects through feasibility studies and Records of Decision (including identifying risk-based remedial goals) - Extensive experience in scoping, managing, and conducting ecological risk assessment components for each of the stages of the CERCLA process including: Development of work plans and QAPPs (including evaluating sampling strategies and appropriateness of data for risk assessment) - Experience with risk communication with clients and stakeholders, and at conferences and professional organizations including presenting complex technical information in a concise and accurate manner Preferred Qualifications bullets: - M.S. in Toxicology, Biology, or equivalent. - Experience with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Benefits bullets: - coverage related to medical, dental, vision, disability, and life; - retirement savings; - paid sick leave; - paid vacation (or other personal time); - paid parental leave; - paid time off for purposes of bereavement, voting, and/or attendance at naturalization proceedings. Now ensure we didn't miss any other substantive content like location options: "any of our WSP offices, which may include Atlanta, GA; Kansas City, MO; Gainesville, FL; Valhalla, NY; Morristown, NJ; Buffalo, NY or Boston MA." That's location info. Could be part of About the role? Not in headings list. Could be included in Responsibilities? Not exactly. Could be included in a short paragraph under Responsibilities? The instruction: include a section ONLY when posting has real specific content for it. We have location info; we could put it under Responsibilities as a brief note? But better to maybe include under "About the role"? Not in headings list. However we could treat location as part of Responsibilities? Not ideal. Perhaps we can add a short paragraph under Responsibilities about location flexibility. But the instruction says usefor section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we could add an "About the role" section that includes location and maybe brief description. The posting includes "Job Description This Opportunity WSP is currently initiating a search for a Senior Ecological Risk Assessor with the potential to work out of any of our WSP offices, which may include Atlanta, GA; Kansas City, MO; Gainesville, FL; Valhalla, NY; Morristown, NJ; Buffalo, NY or Boston MA. Be involved in projects with our Federal Programs Team and be a part of a growing organization that meets our clients’ objectives and solves their challenges." That's about the role. So we should include an About the role section. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay. We must not repeat job title as heading. So About the role is fine. Now About the role content: include the location list and mention involvement with Federal Programs Team, growing organization, etc. Also mention collaborating with team to support growing risk assessment and toxicology practice in project planning and execution as well as public outreach and stakeholder communication. Risk assessments will be prepared to meet requirements of USEPA and many States’ environmental regulatory programs. The position will involve coordination and implementation of project work associated with multimedia (air, water, and soil) risk assessments and environmental regulatory compliance in the industrial/commercial and government sectors as well as project management. We need to preserve all substantive information from that paragraph. Let's extract: - WSP is currently initiating a search for a Senior Ecological Risk Assessor with the potential to work out of any of our WSP offices, which may include Atlanta, GA; Kansas City, MO; Gainesville, FL; Valhalla, NY; Morristown, NJ; Buffalo, NY or Boston MA. - Be involved in projects with our Federal Programs Team and be a part of a growing organization that meets our clients’ objectives and solves their challenges. - The successful candidate will collaborate with our current team of risk assessment team members to support our growing risk assessment and toxicology practice in project planning and execution as well as public outreach and stakeholder communication. - Risk assessments will be prepared to meet the requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and many States’ environmental regulatory programs. - The position will involve coordination and implementation of project work associated with multimedia (air, water, and soil) risk assessments and environmental regulatory compliance in the industrial/commercial and government sectors as well as project management. We can turn these into
prose or
- list?