Senior Customer Engineer - LATAM
for each heading. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. We have content for About the role (the paragraph after "About The Role"). Responsibilities list (bullet points). Requirements: we have "We're Looking For Someone Who Has ..." includes many bullet-like items. We need to parse them into list items. Also Skills maybe separate? The posting includes "Fluency in business and conversational Spanish and English." etc. Could treat as Requirements. Could also have Skills section for technical skills like SQL, dbt, Python, etc. But we can combine into Requirements. The instruction: use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). We need to decide which sections to include based on content.
We have About the role content. Responsibilities content. Requirements/Qualifications content: the "We're Looking For Someone Who Has ..." list. Benefits content: "Benefits And Perks" list. Pay: not specified (no salary). So we should NOT include Pay section because no specific content. Schedule: not specified. So omit Pay and Schedule.
We also have "About Mixpanel" and "About The Customer Engineering Team" but those are likely boilerplate? The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The "About Mixpanel" and "About The Customer Engineering Team" might be considered company overview, not required. But they might be considered part of the posting; but the instruction says to preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. However earlier they said: "Use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So they expect only those headings. The "About Mixpanel" and "About The Customer Engineering Team" are not among those headings, so we should not output them as headings. Could we embed that content under a generic
without heading? The instruction: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it." It doesn't forbid other paragraphs without heading. However they said "Use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests we should only use those headings for sections. But we could still have
paragraphs without heading for other content like company overview. However they also said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Might be okay to include a brief intro paragraph before sections. But the instruction: "Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences." So we can output something like:
About Mixpanel ...
About The Customer Engineering Team ...
About the role
...
Responsibilities
- ...
Requirements
- ...
Benefits
- ...
About the role
...
Responsibilities
- ...
Requirements
- ...
Benefits
- ...
before the sections. That would preserve them. The instruction didn't forbid extra paragraphs. It only said use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It didn't say we cannot have other headings or paragraphs. It said "Use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That implies if we have a section heading, we should use . It doesn't forbid other content. So we can include a brief intro
. It doesn't forbid other content. So we can include a brief intro
with those paragraphs. But we need to avoid duplication: The About Mixpanel and About The Customer Engineering Team are not duplicated elsewhere. We'll include them. Now we need to strip boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. At the end there is EEO statement etc. We must remove that. Also the "Why choose Mixpanel?" paragraph and culture values etc. That might be considered boilerplate? It's not exactly legal but could be considered company marketing. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The "Why choose Mixpanel?" and culture values might be considered substantive? However they are not under the prescribed headings. Could we include them as a
before sections? That would preserve them. But the instruction also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Including many paragraphs may be thin. However they are substantive. But maybe they consider them as boilerplate? Not sure. The EEO statement is definitely boilerplate to remove. The "Why choose Mixpanel?" and culture values might be considered marketing fluff but still part of posting. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. It does not explicitly say to remove marketing fluff. So we should keep them. Thus we will include after the initial company overview paragraphs maybe a paragraph about "Why choose Mixpanel?" and culture values. But we need to avoid duplication: The "About Mixpanel" already mentions 29,000 customers etc. The "Why choose Mixpanel?" repeats some of that. Might be duplication. The instruction says remove duplicated lines. So we should avoid duplicating same info. The "Why choose Mixpanel?" includes: "We’re a leader in analytics with over 29,000 customers and $277M invested from prominent investors: like Andreessen-Horowitz, Sequoia, YC, and, most recently, Bain Capital. Mixpanel’s pioneering event-based data analytics platform