Senior Clinical Informatics Specialist - Hybrid
for section headings, - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose.
We need to decide what to list as lists.
For Responsibilities: we have sentences: "serves as an expert clinical informatics resource and leader in promoting the integration and optimization of information technology to improve clinical outcomes and practice. The Sr. CIS leads clinical-focused informatics initiatives, serving as a trusted advisor to leaders and clinical stakeholders across the care continuum." Could be two bullet points? Could be prose. The instruction: Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. If we treat responsibilities as a list, we can make bullet points. But we need to preserve all substantive information; we can either keep as prose (
) or list. The rule says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't forbid using
for prose duties. But to be safe, we can put responsibilities as
(since not explicitly a list). However, we could also make a list if we split into bullet points. The instruction: "Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". If we don't have a list, we can use
. So we can keep responsibilities as
.
For Required Qualifications: we have bullet-like items: Bachelor's Degree in a clinical discipline, IT/Informatics, Business, Education, Management, or related field OR equivalent combination of education and experience 5 years in a position that has the same or similar primary duties working with a clinical information system within a healthcare setting. That's not a list per se but could be two items. We could make a list:
- Bachelor's Degree in a clinical discipline, Information Technology/Informatics, Business, Education, Management, or related field OR an equivalent combination of education and experience
- 5 years in a position that has the same or similar primary duties working with a clinical information system within a healthcare setting.
But the original text had missing space; we should correct? We must preserve ALL substantive information; we should not invent or summarize away detail. Correcting a typo might be considered altering? The original: "experience5 years". It's likely a typo but we should preserve exactly? The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." Changing "experience5 years" to "experience 5 years" is adding a space, which is minor but could be considered altering. Safer to keep as is? But it's hard to read. However, we could keep the exact string: "experience5 years". That is substantive information (the missing space is part of the text). I'd keep it exactly as given: "experience5 years". Similarly, "Preferred Qualifications Master's Degree in Education, Information Technology, Business Administration, or a clinical discipline such as Nursing, or healthcare field.Informatics certifications or credentialing (may be equivalent for up to 2 years of experience for this position at the hiring manger’s discretion) upon hire." There's missing space before "Informatics". We'll keep as is.
Thus for Required Qualifications we could make a containing the sentences. Or we could make a list but we need to preserve exact wording. If we split into list items, we might need to add punctuation. Safer to use
for prose.
Similarly for Preferred Qualifications.
Benefits: we have a paragraph describing benefits. Could be list but we can keep as
.
Pay: we have Pay Range: $50.32 - $79.45 plus note. Could be
.
Schedule: we have Job Schedule: Full time, Job Shift: Day, Workplace Type: Hybrid. Could be
.
We need to decide which sections to include: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Skills omitted.
Now we need to ensure we don't include duplicated lines. There's duplicated mention of benefits earlier and later; we should combine but not duplicate. We'll produce a single Benefits section with the combined info.
We must not include headings like "About The Team" etc.
We must not include "Reqsition ID" etc.
We must not include "Applicants in the Unincorporated County of Los Angeles:" (that's legal/EEO? It's about fair chance; could be considered EEO/legal boilerplate. Probably remove.
We must not include "Providence is proud to be an Equal Opportunity Employer..." etc. Remove.
We must not include "About Providence" maybe it's okay but not a standard heading; we could incorporate into About the role? But we already have About the role. The "About
for prose. We need to decide what to list as lists. For Responsibilities: we have sentences: "serves as an expert clinical informatics resource and leader in promoting the integration and optimization of information technology to improve clinical outcomes and practice. The Sr. CIS leads clinical-focused informatics initiatives, serving as a trusted advisor to leaders and clinical stakeholders across the care continuum." Could be two bullet points? Could be prose. The instruction: Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. If we treat responsibilities as a list, we can make bullet points. But we need to preserve all substantive information; we can either keep as prose (
) or list. The rule says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't forbid using
for prose duties. But to be safe, we can put responsibilities as
(since not explicitly a list). However, we could also make a list if we split into bullet points. The instruction: "Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". If we don't have a list, we can use
. So we can keep responsibilities as
. For Required Qualifications: we have bullet-like items: Bachelor's Degree in a clinical discipline, IT/Informatics, Business, Education, Management, or related field OR equivalent combination of education and experience 5 years in a position that has the same or similar primary duties working with a clinical information system within a healthcare setting. That's not a list per se but could be two items. We could make a list:
- Bachelor's Degree in a clinical discipline, Information Technology/Informatics, Business, Education, Management, or related field OR an equivalent combination of education and experience
- 5 years in a position that has the same or similar primary duties working with a clinical information system within a healthcare setting. But the original text had missing space; we should correct? We must preserve ALL substantive information; we should not invent or summarize away detail. Correcting a typo might be considered altering? The original: "experience5 years". It's likely a typo but we should preserve exactly? The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." Changing "experience5 years" to "experience 5 years" is adding a space, which is minor but could be considered altering. Safer to keep as is? But it's hard to read. However, we could keep the exact string: "experience5 years". That is substantive information (the missing space is part of the text). I'd keep it exactly as given: "experience5 years". Similarly, "Preferred Qualifications Master's Degree in Education, Information Technology, Business Administration, or a clinical discipline such as Nursing, or healthcare field.Informatics certifications or credentialing (may be equivalent for up to 2 years of experience for this position at the hiring manger’s discretion) upon hire." There's missing space before "Informatics". We'll keep as is. Thus for Required Qualifications we could make a
containing the sentences. Or we could make a list but we need to preserve exact wording. If we split into list items, we might need to add punctuation. Safer to use
for prose. Similarly for Preferred Qualifications. Benefits: we have a paragraph describing benefits. Could be list but we can keep as
. Pay: we have Pay Range: $50.32 - $79.45 plus note. Could be
. Schedule: we have Job Schedule: Full time, Job Shift: Day, Workplace Type: Hybrid. Could be
. We need to decide which sections to include: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Skills omitted. Now we need to ensure we don't include duplicated lines. There's duplicated mention of benefits earlier and later; we should combine but not duplicate. We'll produce a single Benefits section with the combined info. We must not include headings like "About The Team" etc. We must not include "Reqsition ID" etc. We must not include "Applicants in the Unincorporated County of Los Angeles:" (that's legal/EEO? It's about fair chance; could be considered EEO/legal boilerplate. Probably remove. We must not include "Providence is proud to be an Equal Opportunity Employer..." etc. Remove. We must not include "About Providence" maybe it's okay but not a standard heading; we could incorporate into About the role? But we already have About the role. The "About
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". If we don't have a list, we can use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't forbid using