Scientific Writer

POSITION SUMMARY This is a junior-level position designed for a recent PhD scientist looking to transition from the bench into a dedicated scientific writing career. In this role, you will work closely with our R&D team to transform biological data & results into high-quality regulatory documents, congress abstracts, scientific presentations & peer-reviewed manuscripts. ESSENTIAL DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES Author, edit, and format scientific documents for submission to regulatory authorities, conferences and peer-reviewed scientific journals. Review raw experimental data, statistical outputs and figures provided by internal scientists and external collaborators to build cohesive, rigorous scientific narratives. Draft, edit, and coordinate the submission of scientific abstracts, poster presentations, and slide decks for major international scientific conferences. Partner with investigators, bench scientists, biostatisticians, and external academic collaborators to gather content and manage the internal review process. Maintain an up-to-date understanding of the competitive therapeutic landscape by conducting targeted literature reviews to contextualize our internal R&D findings. Accountable for managing publication timelines from initial draft outline through journal peer review, revisions, and final publication. EDUCATION & EXPERIENCE Ph.D. Biology, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Immunology, or a closely related life sciences discipline. This position does not require prior industry experience. CORE KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS Proven track record of academic publication during PhD is required. Technical ability to easily interpret complex data: RNAseq, flow cytometry, qPCR, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles, and in vivo efficacy models. Proficiency with reference management software (e.g., EndNote, Zotero), data graphing tools (e.g., GraphPad Prism), and standard Microsoft Office tools. Exceptional written English communication, strong attention to detail regarding data accuracy, and the ability to accept constructive feedback during peer review.