Research Associate II / Senior Research Associate (1-year contract)
for each. Use - for lists. Use
for prose. Remove boilerplate: mission, value, diversity maybe considered "About the role"? Actually mission is about company, not role. Could be "About the role" includes description of what you will contribute. The posting includes "What You Will Contribute To Altos" which is role description. So we can put that under About the role.
Responsibilities: there is a "Key Responsibilities:" with sub-bullets. We'll list them.
Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: The posting has "Who You Are" with bullet-like sentences. Could split into Requirements (education, experience) and Qualifications/Skills (proficiency, etc). But we need to avoid thin sections. Perhaps combine into one "Requirements" covering education, experience, skills. Or separate if content sufficient.
Pay: The posting includes hourly pay rate: "The hourly pay rate for Redwood City, CA Research Associate II: $46/hr - $60/hr Senior Research Associate: $52/hr - $67/hr Exact compensation may vary based on skills, experience, and location." So we have Pay info. Include Pay section.
Schedule: Not mentioned explicitly. No schedule info. So omit Schedule.
Benefits: Not mentioned. Omit.
We need to preserve all substantive info, not invent. Remove boilerplate like mission, value, diversity? The mission statement maybe not needed for role but could be considered "About the role"? The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." We could include About the role (mission description maybe not needed). But we have "What You Will Contribute To Altos" which is role description. Also we have "Our Mission..." etc. That's company info, not role. Should we include? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep mission, value, diversity etc somewhere. But we must not create sections with filler. Could put them under About the role as prose? However About the role heading expects role specifics. Could we create a section "About Altos" but not in allowed headings list? The allowed headings are listed: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must use those headings only. So we need to fit company mission etc into one of those sections, likely About the role (since it's about the role and company). That seems acceptable.
Thus About the role will include mission, value, diversity, and what you will contribute.
Responsibilities: list from Key Responsibilities.
Requirements: include education, experience, etc from Who You Are.
Qualifications/Skills: maybe we can split but risk thin. Could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section? But we need to follow allowed headings; we could have both Requirements and Qualifications if each has substantive content. Let's see: Who You Are includes bullet-like sentences: Bachelor’s or Master’s degree... At least 2 years... Demonstrated proficiency... Strong attention to detail... Highly organized... Comfortable working weekends... Effective communicator... Deeply committed... That's a mix of requirements and skills. Could split: Requirements: education, experience. Qualifications/Skills: proficiency, attention to detail, organization, communication, commitment. That seems substantive enough.
Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Pay.
We must not include Benefits or Schedule.
Now format: Use
for each heading. Then content: For About the role, we can have
paragraphs. For Responsibilities, we need
- . For Requirements, maybe
- . For Qualifications,
- . For Skills,
- . For Pay,
.
We need to preserve all substantive info: include details like dosing routes, blood collection, necropsy, etc. Also include note about UK applicant privacy notice? That's boilerplate legal; we should remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. The privacy notice and EEO statements are legal boilerplate; remove them. Also remove scam warning note. Also remove "For UK applicants..." etc. Also remove "Equal Opportunity Employment" etc. Also remove "Note: Altos Labs will not ask you to download a messaging app..." etc. Also remove "Our Mission..."? That's not boilerplate; it's mission statement, keep.
Also remove "Our Value..." etc keep.
Also remove "Diversity at Altos" maybe keep as part of About the role.
Now craft content.
About the role paragraph: combine mission, value, diversity, and what you will contribute.
Let's write:
Our mission is to restore cell health and resilience through cell rejuvenation to reverse disease, injury, and the disabilities that can occur throughout life. For more information, see our website at altoslabs.com. Our Single Altos Value: Everyone Owns Achieving Our Inspiring Mission. Altos Labs has been named one of the Top 3 Biotech Companies and ranked for the second year on the Forbes 2026 Best Startups in America list. At Altos, exceptional scientists and industry leaders from around the world work together to advance a shared mission. Our intentional focus is on Belonging, so that all employees know that they are valued for their unique perspectives. We are all accountable for sustaining a diverse and inclusive environment.
What You Will Contribute To Altos: An exciting opportunity is available for a Senior Research Associate (Contractor) to join the In Vivo Translational Sciences (IVTS) team within 3DS (Drug Discovery and Development Sciences) at Altos Labs. The Senior Research Associate will provide hands‑on in vivo support across multiple programs, executing rodent studies from study initiation through completion. Responsibilities include dosing, in‑life procedures, blood collection, necropsy, tissue collection and processing, and accurate study documentation to generate high‑quality data for project teams. You will work closely with in vivo scientists, operational leads, and vivarium staff to plan and execute studies according to established protocols, timelines, and applicable IACUC and animal welfare standards. This role requires a broad and demonstrated in vivo skill set, including proficiency in multiple dosing routes, blood collection techniques, tissue harvest, necropsy, and accurate and timely record keeping. The ideal candidate is a highly collaborative, detail‑oriented, and adaptable team member who can work effectively across multiple programs and priorities while maintaining a high standard of animal welfare, technical execution, and data quality.
That seems good.
Now Responsibilities: list from Key Responsibilities. We'll extract each bullet.
Key Responsibilities: In Vivo Study Execution (with subpoints). Study Planning, Logistics, and Documentation. Animal Welfare, Compliance, and Best Practices. Cross‑Functional Collaboration.
We'll create - for each main bullet, maybe include subpoints as separate
- or nested? Simpler: each main bullet as
- with its content.
Let's list:
- Execute hands‑on in vivo studies in rodents (primarily mice; rats as needed) under the guidance of the Operational Lead and in accordance with approved protocols and timelines. Perform dosing via multiple routes, including PO, IP, IV, and SC; experience with oropharyngeal and intratracheal administration preferred, with stereotactic/ICV surgery experience a plus. Perform in‑life blood collection, including submental/submandibular and tail vein bleeds, as well as terminal cardiac blood collection. Perform necropsy and transcardiac whole‑body perfusion, including tissue harvest, dissection, and tissue weighing. Experience with CSF collection is a plus. Perform basic sample processing, including snap‑freezing, fixation, labeling, and sample transfer. Monitor body weight, clinical observations, animal health, welfare, and special diets, with appropriate documentation and escalation of concerns. Troubleshoot routine technical and operational challenges and communicate with scientists and operational leads to identify and implement appropriate corrective actions.
- Partner with in vivo operational leads and scientists to plan and schedule study activities, including dosing, sample collection timepoints, and necropsies across multiple programs. Communicate effectively across teams to coordinate study activities, priorities, timelines, and sample needs. Accurately document all procedures, observations, and data in study sheets and electronic records, ensuring data integrity and traceability. Assist with organization and maintenance of in vivo workspaces, ensuring adequate supplies, reagents, and equipment readiness.
- Ensure strict adherence to animal welfare standards, institutional protocols, and regulatory requirements (e.g., IACUC guidelines), consistently following approved procedures and SOPs. Participate in ongoing training and contribute to a culture of safety, ethical conduct, and continuous improvement in in vivo practices. Proactively assess animal health and escalate concerns to protect welfare and study integrity.
- Serve as a technical trainer for in vivo procedures and cross‑training staff to expand technical coverage across programs. Work closely with scientists, research associates, and vivarium personnel across programs to coordinate in vivo activities and meet experimental timelines. Communicate clearly and proactively regarding study progress, deviations, and issues that may impact animal welfare or data quality. Serve as a reliable and flexible team member, providing weekend and time‑sensitive study coverage as needed.
Now Requirements: education and experience.
From Who You Are:
- Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in a life science discipline (e.g., Biology, Pharmacology, Veterinary Science, Animal Science, or related field).
- At least 2 years of hands‑on in vivo research experience in an industry or comparable research setting; experience supporting multiple programs or therapeutic areas is a plus.
We'll put as
- .
Qualifications: maybe include demonstrated proficiency, attention to detail, organization, etc.
But we already have some in Responsibilities. However Qualifications section can contain:
- Demonstrated proficiency in standard rodent dosing techniques (PO, IP, IV, SC); advanced skills in oropharyngeal and/or intratracheal dosing strongly preferred or a plus.
- Strong attention to detail and data integrity, with a proven ability to follow complex protocols and SOPs accurately and consistently.
- Highly organized and capable of managing multiple concurrent study tasks, prioritizing effectively in a time‑sensitive, study‑driven environment.
- Comfortable working independently on weekends and with minimal on‑site supervision, with flexibility to adjust hours based on study demands.
- Effective communicator and team‑oriented collaborator, able to work constructively with scientists, RAs, and vivarium personnel.
- Deeply committed to high standards of animal care, ethical research conduct, and a culture of safety and compliance.
That seems good.
Skills: maybe we could separate technical skills vs soft skills, but we already have many. Could we make Skills section for technical skills: proficiency in dosing routes, blood collection, necropsy, tissue processing, sample handling, etc. But we already covered many in Responsibilities. To avoid thin sections, maybe we combine Qualifications and Skills into one? But we need to follow allowed headings; we could have Qualifications and Skills both if they have substantive content. Let's see if we can split: Qualifications: education, experience, proficiency, attention to detail, organization, weekend work, communication, commitment. Skills: technical skills like dosing routes, blood collection, necropsy, tissue harvest, sample processing, CSF collection, etc. However many of those are in Responsibilities. Might be okay to have Skills section focusing on technical abilities: proficiency in multiple dosing routes (PO, IP, IV, SC), oropharyngeal/intratracheal dosing, stereotactic/ICV surgery, blood collection techniques (submental/submandibular, tail vein, cardiac), necropsy and perfusion, tissue harvest/dissection/weighing, CSF collection, sample processing (snap‑freezing, fixation, labeling, transfer), record keeping, troubleshooting, etc.
But we risk duplication. However instruction: preserve
for prose. Remove boilerplate: mission, value, diversity maybe considered "About the role"? Actually mission is about company, not role. Could be "About the role" includes description of what you will contribute. The posting includes "What You Will Contribute To Altos" which is role description. So we can put that under About the role. Responsibilities: there is a "Key Responsibilities:" with sub-bullets. We'll list them. Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: The posting has "Who You Are" with bullet-like sentences. Could split into Requirements (education, experience) and Qualifications/Skills (proficiency, etc). But we need to avoid thin sections. Perhaps combine into one "Requirements" covering education, experience, skills. Or separate if content sufficient. Pay: The posting includes hourly pay rate: "The hourly pay rate for Redwood City, CA Research Associate II: $46/hr - $60/hr Senior Research Associate: $52/hr - $67/hr Exact compensation may vary based on skills, experience, and location." So we have Pay info. Include Pay section. Schedule: Not mentioned explicitly. No schedule info. So omit Schedule. Benefits: Not mentioned. Omit. We need to preserve all substantive info, not invent. Remove boilerplate like mission, value, diversity? The mission statement maybe not needed for role but could be considered "About the role"? The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." We could include About the role (mission description maybe not needed). But we have "What You Will Contribute To Altos" which is role description. Also we have "Our Mission..." etc. That's company info, not role. Should we include? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep mission, value, diversity etc somewhere. But we must not create sections with filler. Could put them under About the role as prose? However About the role heading expects role specifics. Could we create a section "About Altos" but not in allowed headings list? The allowed headings are listed: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must use those headings only. So we need to fit company mission etc into one of those sections, likely About the role (since it's about the role and company). That seems acceptable. Thus About the role will include mission, value, diversity, and what you will contribute. Responsibilities: list from Key Responsibilities. Requirements: include education, experience, etc from Who You Are. Qualifications/Skills: maybe we can split but risk thin. Could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section? But we need to follow allowed headings; we could have both Requirements and Qualifications if each has substantive content. Let's see: Who You Are includes bullet-like sentences: Bachelor’s or Master’s degree... At least 2 years... Demonstrated proficiency... Strong attention to detail... Highly organized... Comfortable working weekends... Effective communicator... Deeply committed... That's a mix of requirements and skills. Could split: Requirements: education, experience. Qualifications/Skills: proficiency, attention to detail, organization, communication, commitment. That seems substantive enough. Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Pay. We must not include Benefits or Schedule. Now format: Use
for each heading. Then content: For About the role, we can have
paragraphs. For Responsibilities, we need
- . For Requirements, maybe
- . For Qualifications,
- . For Skills,
- . For Pay,
. We need to preserve all substantive info: include details like dosing routes, blood collection, necropsy, etc. Also include note about UK applicant privacy notice? That's boilerplate legal; we should remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. The privacy notice and EEO statements are legal boilerplate; remove them. Also remove scam warning note. Also remove "For UK applicants..." etc. Also remove "Equal Opportunity Employment" etc. Also remove "Note: Altos Labs will not ask you to download a messaging app..." etc. Also remove "Our Mission..."? That's not boilerplate; it's mission statement, keep. Also remove "Our Value..." etc keep. Also remove "Diversity at Altos" maybe keep as part of About the role. Now craft content. About the role paragraph: combine mission, value, diversity, and what you will contribute. Let's write:
Our mission is to restore cell health and resilience through cell rejuvenation to reverse disease, injury, and the disabilities that can occur throughout life. For more information, see our website at altoslabs.com. Our Single Altos Value: Everyone Owns Achieving Our Inspiring Mission. Altos Labs has been named one of the Top 3 Biotech Companies and ranked for the second year on the Forbes 2026 Best Startups in America list. At Altos, exceptional scientists and industry leaders from around the world work together to advance a shared mission. Our intentional focus is on Belonging, so that all employees know that they are valued for their unique perspectives. We are all accountable for sustaining a diverse and inclusive environment.
What You Will Contribute To Altos: An exciting opportunity is available for a Senior Research Associate (Contractor) to join the In Vivo Translational Sciences (IVTS) team within 3DS (Drug Discovery and Development Sciences) at Altos Labs. The Senior Research Associate will provide hands‑on in vivo support across multiple programs, executing rodent studies from study initiation through completion. Responsibilities include dosing, in‑life procedures, blood collection, necropsy, tissue collection and processing, and accurate study documentation to generate high‑quality data for project teams. You will work closely with in vivo scientists, operational leads, and vivarium staff to plan and execute studies according to established protocols, timelines, and applicable IACUC and animal welfare standards. This role requires a broad and demonstrated in vivo skill set, including proficiency in multiple dosing routes, blood collection techniques, tissue harvest, necropsy, and accurate and timely record keeping. The ideal candidate is a highly collaborative, detail‑oriented, and adaptable team member who can work effectively across multiple programs and priorities while maintaining a high standard of animal welfare, technical execution, and data quality.
That seems good. Now Responsibilities: list from Key Responsibilities. We'll extract each bullet. Key Responsibilities: In Vivo Study Execution (with subpoints). Study Planning, Logistics, and Documentation. Animal Welfare, Compliance, and Best Practices. Cross‑Functional Collaboration. We'll create- for each main bullet, maybe include subpoints as separate
- or nested? Simpler: each main bullet as
- with its content.
Let's list:
- Execute hands‑on in vivo studies in rodents (primarily mice; rats as needed) under the guidance of the Operational Lead and in accordance with approved protocols and timelines. Perform dosing via multiple routes, including PO, IP, IV, and SC; experience with oropharyngeal and intratracheal administration preferred, with stereotactic/ICV surgery experience a plus. Perform in‑life blood collection, including submental/submandibular and tail vein bleeds, as well as terminal cardiac blood collection. Perform necropsy and transcardiac whole‑body perfusion, including tissue harvest, dissection, and tissue weighing. Experience with CSF collection is a plus. Perform basic sample processing, including snap‑freezing, fixation, labeling, and sample transfer. Monitor body weight, clinical observations, animal health, welfare, and special diets, with appropriate documentation and escalation of concerns. Troubleshoot routine technical and operational challenges and communicate with scientists and operational leads to identify and implement appropriate corrective actions.
- Partner with in vivo operational leads and scientists to plan and schedule study activities, including dosing, sample collection timepoints, and necropsies across multiple programs. Communicate effectively across teams to coordinate study activities, priorities, timelines, and sample needs. Accurately document all procedures, observations, and data in study sheets and electronic records, ensuring data integrity and traceability. Assist with organization and maintenance of in vivo workspaces, ensuring adequate supplies, reagents, and equipment readiness.
- Ensure strict adherence to animal welfare standards, institutional protocols, and regulatory requirements (e.g., IACUC guidelines), consistently following approved procedures and SOPs. Participate in ongoing training and contribute to a culture of safety, ethical conduct, and continuous improvement in in vivo practices. Proactively assess animal health and escalate concerns to protect welfare and study integrity.
- Serve as a technical trainer for in vivo procedures and cross‑training staff to expand technical coverage across programs. Work closely with scientists, research associates, and vivarium personnel across programs to coordinate in vivo activities and meet experimental timelines. Communicate clearly and proactively regarding study progress, deviations, and issues that may impact animal welfare or data quality. Serve as a reliable and flexible team member, providing weekend and time‑sensitive study coverage as needed.
Now Requirements: education and experience.
From Who You Are:
- Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in a life science discipline (e.g., Biology, Pharmacology, Veterinary Science, Animal Science, or related field).
- At least 2 years of hands‑on in vivo research experience in an industry or comparable research setting; experience supporting multiple programs or therapeutic areas is a plus.
We'll put as
- . Qualifications: maybe include demonstrated proficiency, attention to detail, organization, etc. But we already have some in Responsibilities. However Qualifications section can contain: - Demonstrated proficiency in standard rodent dosing techniques (PO, IP, IV, SC); advanced skills in oropharyngeal and/or intratracheal dosing strongly preferred or a plus. - Strong attention to detail and data integrity, with a proven ability to follow complex protocols and SOPs accurately and consistently. - Highly organized and capable of managing multiple concurrent study tasks, prioritizing effectively in a time‑sensitive, study‑driven environment. - Comfortable working independently on weekends and with minimal on‑site supervision, with flexibility to adjust hours based on study demands. - Effective communicator and team‑oriented collaborator, able to work constructively with scientists, RAs, and vivarium personnel. - Deeply committed to high standards of animal care, ethical research conduct, and a culture of safety and compliance. That seems good. Skills: maybe we could separate technical skills vs soft skills, but we already have many. Could we make Skills section for technical skills: proficiency in dosing routes, blood collection, necropsy, tissue processing, sample handling, etc. But we already covered many in Responsibilities. To avoid thin sections, maybe we combine Qualifications and Skills into one? But we need to follow allowed headings; we could have Qualifications and Skills both if they have substantive content. Let's see if we can split: Qualifications: education, experience, proficiency, attention to detail, organization, weekend work, communication, commitment. Skills: technical skills like dosing routes, blood collection, necropsy, tissue harvest, sample processing, CSF collection, etc. However many of those are in Responsibilities. Might be okay to have Skills section focusing on technical abilities: proficiency in multiple dosing routes (PO, IP, IV, SC), oropharyngeal/intratracheal dosing, stereotactic/ICV surgery, blood collection techniques (submental/submandibular, tail vein, cardiac), necropsy and perfusion, tissue harvest/dissection/weighing, CSF collection, sample processing (snap‑freezing, fixation, labeling, transfer), record keeping, troubleshooting, etc. But we risk duplication. However instruction: preserve
- . For Pay,
- . For Skills,
- . For Qualifications,