Jobs · Management

Renewable Energy Mid-Senior Level Project Development Attorney

Clean Energy Counsel, LLP · United States · 1 mo ago
RemoteRemoteManagement$235k/yrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, etc. Also remove duplicated lines, application instructions. Keep all substantive info. We need to parse the posting. Content: - Intro: Clean Energy Counsel ... seeks to hire a highly qualified mid-level project development associate with law firm experience and excellent academic credentials... fully remote. - Experience and Qualifications: bullet list (though not bullet but sentences). Contains: Ideally 6-8 years’ experience at a law firm, ideally in a practice serving clients in the renewable energy and related industries. Experience negotiating a variety of traditional renewable energy contracts (EPCs, O&Ms, PPAs, etc.). Strong deal management, organization, drafting, communication, negotiation and analytical skills. Team-focused outlook with a focus on mentoring junior attorneys. Proficiency in legal research and drafting. Ability to work independently and with a team. Ability to work and collaborate effectively in a remote work environment. Excellent written and verbal communication skills and organizational and planning skills with the capacity to simultaneously handle a variety of complex matters under strict deadlines and pressure. Admission to and in good standing with the Bar of the applicant’s state of residence. Dedication to the firm’s mission. - Duties and Responsibilities: Support the team with project development in the renewable energy field. Collaborate with clients, CEC colleagues, and other professionals on project development matters. Adhere to Firm policies, practices, and priorities. Perform other duties as requested by Firm management. - Benefits: list: 1,200 annual billable hour requirement, with hourly bonus for exceeding such requirement. Base salary of $235,000 + . The base salary for this position will be determined during the interview process and will vary based on multiple factors, including but not limited to prior experience, relevant expertise, current business needs, and market factors. Annual merit bonuses. Fully remote work environment. 401(k), including firm profit-sharing matching. Dental/Health/Vision/Rx insurance. Paid time off and paid holidays. - Who We Are: description about firm, mission, etc. This could be "About the role" or "About the firm". The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we need to map content. We have sections: About the role (maybe intro), Responsibilities (duties), Requirements/Qualifications (experience and qualifications), Skills (maybe combine), Benefits, Pay (salary info), Schedule (maybe billable hour requirement? Not exactly schedule). The posting mentions "1,200 annual billable hour requirement" which is about workload, not schedule. Could be considered Schedule? But schedule usually refers to work hours, remote, etc. We have "Fully remote work environment." That could be Schedule? Actually schedule is about work hours, maybe not present. The instruction: only include section if posting has real specific content. So we need to decide. We have content for: - About the role: intro paragraph describing firm and role. - Responsibilities: duties list. - Requirements: experience and qualifications (maybe combine with Qualifications). Could have separate Requirements and Qualifications but we can combine into one section if content overlaps. But we need to follow instruction: use headings for those categories if we have content. We could have both Requirements and Qualifications sections if we can split content meaningfully. However the posting lumps experience and qualifications together. Could treat as Qualifications. Requirements maybe not separate. Safer to have one section: Qualifications (or Requirements). The instruction says use headings like Requirements, Qualifications. We can choose Qualifications. - Skills: we have many skills listed (deal management, organization, drafting, communication, negotiation, analytical, team-focused, mentoring, legal research, ability to work independently/team, remote collaboration, written/verbal communication, organizational/planning, capacity to handle complex matters under deadlines). Could be a Skills section. - Benefits: list. - Pay: base salary info, bonus, merit bonuses. - Schedule: maybe not present; we have billable hour requirement and remote work. Could treat billable hour requirement as Schedule? But schedule usually about hours per week, flexible, etc. Not explicit. Safer to omit Schedule if no clear schedule info. - Also we have "Fully remote work environment." Could be under Benefits or Schedule. Already have Benefits includes fully remote work environment. So we can keep that there. Thus sections: About the role (h3), Responsibilities (h3), Qualifications (h3), Skills (h3), Benefits (h3), Pay (h3). Possibly also "About the firm" but we can incorporate into About the role. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID. We must preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must not include boilerplate like EEO, diversity statement, etc. Remove those lines. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences. Let's extract substantive content precisely. Intro paragraph: "Clean Energy Counsel, a mission-driven law firm dedicated to accelerating the world’s transition away from fossil fuels, seeks to hire a highly qualified mid-level project development associate with law firm experience and excellent academic credentials to join our firm. We are looking for an attorney who has expertise in both drafting and negotiating an array of renewable energy contracts such as EPCs, O&Ms, PPAs, etc. This position is fully remote – as a distributed law firm, we offer the opportunity to work remotely from wherever you are licensed to practice law." That's the intro. Now Responsibilities (Duties and Responsibilities): "Support the team with project development in the renewable energy field. Collaborate with clients, CEC colleagues, and other professionals on project development matters. Adhere to Firm policies, practices, and priorities. Perform other duties as requested by Firm management." Now Qualifications (Experience and Qualifications): "Ideally 6-8 years’ experience at a law firm, ideally in a practice serving clients in the renewable energy and related industries. Experience negotiating a variety of traditional renewable energy contracts (EPCs, O&Ms, PPAs, etc.). Strong deal management, organization, drafting, communication, negotiation and analytical skills. Team-focused outlook with a focus on mentoring junior attorneys. Proficiency in legal research and drafting. Ability to work independently and with a team. Ability to work and collaborate effectively in a remote work environment. Excellent written and verbal communication skills and organizational and planning skills with the capacity to simultaneously handle a variety of complex matters under strict deadlines and pressure. Admission to and in good standing with the Bar of the applicant’s state of residence. Dedication to the firm’s mission." Now Skills: Could extract from qualifications but we might duplicate. Better to separate: Skills could be the list of skills: deal management, organization, drafting, communication, negotiation, analytical, team-focused, mentoring junior attorneys, legal research, drafting, ability to work independently/team, remote collaboration, written/verbal communication, organizational/planning, capacity to handle complex matters under deadlines. However many overlap with qualifications. To avoid duplication, we could keep Qualifications as experience + qualifications, and Skills as a subset? But instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; we must not omit any detail. If we put skills in Qualifications, we still preserve. Having both sections may duplicate content. Duplication is allowed? It says remove duplicated lines. So we should avoid duplicating same sentences. So we need to split content without duplication. We can categorize: Experience (years, industry) as Qualifications. Skills as the abilities list. Let's try to split: Experience/Qualifications: - Ideally 6-8 years’ experience at a law firm, ideally in a practice serving clients in the renewable energy and related industries. - Experience negotiating a variety of traditional renewable energy contracts (EPCs, O&Ms, PPAs, etc.). - Admission to and in good standing with the Bar of the applicant’s state of residence. - Dedication to the firm’s mission. Skills: - Strong deal management, organization, drafting, communication, negotiation and analytical skills. - Team-focused outlook with a focus on mentoring junior attorneys. - Proficiency in legal research and drafting. - Ability to work independently and with a team. - Ability to work and collaborate effectively in a remote work environment. - Excellent written and verbal communication skills and organizational and planning skills with the capacity to simultaneously handle a variety of complex matters under strict deadlines and pressure. That seems reasonable and non-duplicative. Now Benefits: List: - 1,200 annual billable hour requirement, with hourly bonus for exceeding such requirement - Base salary of $235,000 + . The base salary for this position will be determined during the interview process and will vary based on multiple factors, including but not limited to prior experience, relevant expertise, current business needs, and market factors. - Annual merit bonuses - Fully remote work environment. - 401(k), including firm profit-sharing matching - Dental/Health/Vision/Rx insurance - Paid time off and paid holidays But note base salary line includes "$235,000 +" and then says base salary will be determined during interview and will vary. That's a bit contradictory. We need to preserve all substantive information; we should keep both statements as they appear. However we might separate Pay section for salary details, and Benefits for other benefits. The instruction says include Pay section only if posting actually states them. It does state base salary and bonus. So we can have Pay section with base salary info and bonus, merit bonuses. Benefits section with other benefits: billable hour requirement? Actually billable hour requirement is more like expectation, could be under Pay or Schedule. But we can keep it under Benefits as it's a benefit/requirement. However the instruction says Benefits section only if posting actually states them. It does state benefits list. So we can include Benefits. We need to avoid duplication: base salary appears in both Benefits and Pay if we put there. Let's decide: Put base salary, hourly bonus for exceeding billable hour requirement, annual merit bonuses in Pay section. Put other benefits: fully remote work environment, 401(k) with profit-sharing, dental/health/vision/Rx insurance, paid time off and paid holidays in Benefits section. The billable hour requirement is more of an expectation; but it's mentioned under Benefits in original. We could keep it under Pay as it's about billable hours and bonus. Or we could keep it under Benefits as it's a requirement. To avoid duplication, we can put billable hour requirement in Pay (since it's about billable hours and bonus). Let's read original: "Benefits 1,200 annual billable hour requirement, with hourly bonus for exceeding such requirementBase salary of $235,000 + . The base salary for this position will be determined during the interview process and will vary based on multiple factors, including but not limited to prior experience, relevant expertise, current business needs, and market factors.Annual merit bonusesFully remote work environment.401(k), including firm profit-sharing matchingDental/Health/Vision/Rx insurancePaid time off and paid holidays" Thus the benefits list includes billable hour requirement, base salary, annual merit bonuses, fully remote, 401k, insurance, PTO. So we could keep all under Benefits. But we also need Pay section if we want to separate salary. However the instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe we just have Benefits section covering all those items, and not create a separate Pay section unless needed. But we have also Pay info like base salary etc. It's already in Benefits. So we could omit Pay section. However the instruction says include Pay section only if posting actually states them. It does state them, but we could still include them under Benefits. The instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we can combine Pay into Benefits to reduce sections. But we need to follow heading list: they gave examples but not mandatory to use all. So we can choose to have Benefits only. But we also have Schedule:

Similar jobs