Jobs · Montana

Radiology Technologist Outpatient AMI (FT- 1.0 FTE, Day Shift)

Bozeman Health · Bozeman, MT · 1 mo ago
Full-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes description of role, essential functions, knowledge/skills/abilities, schedule requirements, physical requirements, exposures, etc. No explicit pay or benefits mentioned. So we should not include Pay or Benefits sections. We need sections: About the role (maybe summary), Responsibilities (essential job functions), Requirements/Qualifications (minimum qualifications), Knowledge, Skills And Abilities (skills), Schedule Requirements (schedule), Physical Requirements (maybe could be part of Responsibilities? but it's specific content; we could include as a separate section like Physical Requirements, but heading list didn't include Physical Requirements; only allowed headings are those listed. We must use only those headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we need to map content to these headings. We can combine physical requirements into Responsibilities or maybe Skills? Probably Responsibilities includes duties; physical requirements could be part of Responsibilities? But better to put under Responsibilities as a bullet list? However the instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It says "e.g." meaning those are examples, not exclusive? It says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Likely they expect only those headings. So we should create sections with those headings only if content exists. We have content for About the role (first paragraph). Responsibilities (essential job functions). Requirements (minimum qualifications). Qualifications maybe same as Requirements? Could split but we have both. Could put Requirements for minimum qualifications and Qualifications for ARRT etc? Actually Minimum Qualifications includes: Graduate of CAHEA accredited Radiology program or equivalent, ARRT, Current AHA BLS certification, willingness to learn, general knowledge of MRI safety. That's qualifications. Could treat as Requirements. Qualifications maybe could be same; but we can include both if we have distinct content. We have also Knowledge, Skills And Abilities section. So we can have Skills heading. Schedule Requirements -> Schedule heading. We have no Pay or Benefits, so omit those. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Must not include boilerplate like EEO etc. Already removed. We need to use
  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

    for prose. Thus we need to convert paragraphs into

    and lists into

    • . Let's extract content. About the role: first sentence(s) before "Required Minimum Qualifications": "The Acute Care Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Trainee provides health care services by assisting in diagnosis or treatment. Will learn to perform MRI procedures, producing images for the interpretation by or at the request of a licensed practitioner. Learning the operation of a magnetic resonance scanner to obtain images used in the diagnosis and treatment of patient pathologies. With the added knowledge of imaging techniques and cross-sectional anatomy to create high quality images for interpretation by radiologists and other medical professionals. Modifies technical settings and adjusts scanning parameters to enhance images and minimize unnecessary exposure. Performs routine inspections and maintenance on scanner and archives imaging data." That's a bunch of sentences; we can put as

      . Responsibilities: Essential Job Functions list: includes many bullet-like sentences. We'll make a

        with each duty as
      • . List them: - Will learn to perform MRI exams and procedures for NICU, CCU, ED and other hospital departments as requested by medical staff. - Performs ancillary duties as required to maintain proper distribution, billing, and archival of exams and procedures. - Completes documentation, in designated area, of all information required for proper interpretation, reporting, archiving, and retrieval of exams. - Retrieves and files exam jackets, written orders, and related health information to ensure the timely performance and reporting of MRI exams and procedures. - Participates in the implementation, monitoring, and improvement of hospital quality indicators as described in the strategic plan. - Trainee required to sign work commitment prior to MRI opportunity and will become ARRT Certified upon completion. - Trainee is required to have bimonthly performance eval to ensure progression of MRI skills. - Other related duties and responsibilities as assigned. Also earlier duties: "Performs routine inspections and maintenance on scanner and archives imaging data." Already in About the role maybe but could also be responsibility. We'll keep in About. Requirements: Minimum Qualifications list: - Graduate of Committee of Allied Health Education and Accreditation (CAHEA) accredited Radiology program or equivalent - American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) - Current American Heart Association (AHA) Basic Life Support (BLS) certification. - Demonstrates willingness to learn and grow in order to perform emergency/trauma MRI procedures that may require anesthesia and other MRI exams for all populations including Neonates, Pediatrics, and adults - Shows a general knowledge of MRI and the safety practices that are involved with imaging patients. We'll put as
          . Qualifications: maybe we could treat as same as Requirements; but we could also include ARRT etc again? Might be redundant. Since we already have Requirements, we could skip Qualifications heading to avoid duplication. But instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we can combine Requirements and Qualifications into one section maybe called Requirements (or Qualifications). But we need to decide which heading to use. Since we have both headings available, we could use Requirements for minimum qualifications and Qualifications for ARRT etc? But they overlap. Better to use Requirements for the list and maybe Qualifications for something else like "Demonstrates willingness to learn..." but that's also in list. I'd rather use Requirements for the list and omit Qualifications heading to avoid thin section. However we must include a section only when posting has real specific content for it. If we omit Qualifications, that's fine. Skills: Knowledge, Skills And Abilities list: - Demonstrate sound judgment, patience, and maintain a professional demeanor at all times - Exercise tact, discretion, sensitivity, and maintains confidentiality - Perform essential job functions successfully in a fast-paced environment - Learn current and new computer applications and office equipment utilized at Bozeman Health - Strong interpersonal, verbal, and written communication skills - Analyze, organize, and prioritize work while meeting multiple deadlines - Demonstrate the Bozeman Health SPIRIT values of: Service, People, Integrity, Respect, Improvement, and Teamwork. We'll put as
            . Schedule: Schedule Requirements paragraph: "This role requires regular and sustained attendance.The position may necessitate working beyond a standard 40-hour workweek, including weekends and after-hours shifts.On-call work may be required to respond promptly to organizational, patient, or employee needs." We'll put as

            . We should not include Physical Requirements or Exposures sections because not in allowed headings. Could we incorporate them into Responsibilities? Might be okay to add as bullet under Responsibilities? But they are not duties but physical requirements. However we could still include them as part of Responsibilities? Might be stretching. Better to omit them? But instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we omit physical requirements, we lose substantive info. So we need to include them somewhere. Since we cannot create a heading not in list, we could embed them under Responsibilities as a sub-list? But Responsibilities heading is for duties; physical requirements are not duties but could be considered part of job responsibilities? Might be acceptable. However the instruction says "Use

            for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." suggests these are examples, not exclusive. But to be safe, we could add a section for Physical Requirements using

            even if not listed? The instruction says use those for section headings (e.g. ...). It might be okay to use other headings but they gave examples. Safer to stick to given headings. But then we lose physical requirements. However we could incorporate physical requirements into Responsibilities as a bullet list under a subheading? Not allowed to add extra headings. Could we add a

            under Responsibilities that includes physical requirements? That would preserve info but mix categories. Might be acceptable. Similarly exposures could be added under Responsibilities or maybe under Skills? Not ideal. Given the instruction to preserve ALL substantive information, I think we should include Physical Requirements and Exposures as part of Responsibilities (maybe as a separate

              under Responsibilities). But we need to decide. Let's read the instruction again: "Use

              for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use
              • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

                for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

                or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Thus they explicitly say never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. They didn't say we cannot create other sections. They gave examples of headings. So we could create Physical Requirements and Exposures sections if we want, as they are substantive. However they said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could combine them into Responsibilities to keep few sections. I'll choose to embed Physical Requirements and Exposures under Responsibilities as additional bullet lists maybe with a note? But that would mix duty lists with physical requirement lists. Could we add a

                under Responsibilities that includes a sentence about physical requirements and exposures? That would lose detail. Better to create separate sections for Physical Requirements and Exposures using

                even if not in examples, as they are substantive. The instruction didn't forbid other headings; it just gave examples. So I'll add sections: Physical Requirements and Exposures. But we must ensure we don't create Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless stated. We have Schedule, so we include Schedule. Thus final sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Skills, Schedule, Physical Requirements, Exposures. We'll omit Qualifications. Now craft HTML. We'll start with

                About the role

                ...

                Then

                Responsibilities

                • ...
                • ...
                Then

                Requirements

                  ...
                Then

                Skills

                  ...
                Then

                Schedule

                ...

                Then

                Physical Requirements

                  ...
                Then

                Exposures

                  ...
                Make sure to preserve all details exactly. Let's extract each bullet. About the role sentences: "The Acute Care Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologist Trainee provides health care services by assisting in diagnosis or treatment. Will learn to perform MRI procedures, producing images for the interpretation by or at the request of a licensed practitioner. Learning the operation of a magnetic resonance scanner to obtain images used in the diagnosis and treatment of patient pathologies. With the added knowledge of imaging techniques and cross-sectional anatomy to create high quality

Similar jobs