Quality Lead I - 2nd & 3rd Shift
for section headings (e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)
2. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose
3. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)
4. Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it
5. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail
6. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions
7. Include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD")
8. Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them
9. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones
10. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences
Let me analyze the job posting content:
- "What We Offer" section: lists benefits (health/dental/vision insurance, flex spending accounts, short & long-term disability, paid holidays and vacation, bonuses opportunities). This is a Benefits section.
- "Job Summary": prose description of the role. This could be "About the role" or similar.
- "Hours Of Operation": schedule information (Monday through Friday + Overtime/Weekends, 2nd Shift: 2:00PM to 10:00PM, 3rd Shift: 10:00PM to 6:00AM). This is a Schedule section.
- "Job Duties": list of duties. This is Responsibilities.
- "Required Competencies & Knowledge": includes "Knowledge of:", "Skill In", "Ability To", "Proficiency in:". This could be split into Requirements/Qualifications/Skills.
- "Work Environment": prose about working relations. Could be part of About the role or separate.
- "Physical Requirements": list of physical requirements. This could be part of Requirements or a separate section.
- "Minimum Qualifications": list of qualifications. This is Qualifications.
- "Sponsorship for work authorization is not available..." and "Maker's Pride is an Equal Opportunity Employer." - these are boilerplate/legal, should be removed.
I need to map these to appropriate headings. The allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
I'll create sections:
1. About the role (Job Summary + Work Environment maybe)
2. Responsibilities (Job Duties)
3. Requirements (Required Competencies & Knowledge - Knowledge of, Skill In, Ability To, Proficiency in)
4. Qualifications (Minimum Qualifications)
5. Benefits (What We Offer)
6. Schedule (Hours Of Operation)
Physical Requirements could be part of Requirements or Qualifications. Since it's a list of physical requirements, I'll include it under Requirements or maybe a separate "Physical Requirements" but the allowed headings don't include that. The rules say use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So I should stick to those. Physical Requirements could be under Requirements.
Also, "Required Competencies & Knowledge" includes Knowledge, Skill, Ability, Proficiency. That's essentially requirements/skills. I'll put under Requirements.
Now, I need to ensure I don't create sections with filler. All sections have real content.
Let me structure:
About the role
Job Summary text...
Work Environment text...
Responsibilities
- ... each duty ...
Requirements
Required Competencies & Knowledge
- Knowledge of: GFSI and FSMA requirements, Environmental Monitoring Programs, QA Technician role and responsibilities, Customer specs and expectations
- Skill In: ...
- Ability To: ...
- Proficiency in: MS Office Suite and SAP
- Physical Requirements: ...
But the "Skill In" and "Ability To" are lists. I'll break them into separate list items or sub-lists. Since we can only use - for lists, I can make a list with sub-lists? The rule says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't forbid nested lists. But to keep simple, I'll make each bullet a category with its items as comma-separated or separate sub-bullets. However, the instruction says "use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". It doesn't specify nested lists. I think it's okay to have nested lists. But to be safe, I'll flatten: each bullet is a requirement statement.
Better: For Requirements, I'll create a list where each item is a requirement. For example:
- Knowledge of GFSI and FSMA requirements, Environmental Monitoring Programs, QA Technician role and responsibilities, Customer specs and expectations
- Exhibited experience with necessary SAP transactions
- Excellent oral and written communication skills
- Strong self-confidence
- Excellent problem-solving skills and ability to work with autonomy
- Accurate, detail-oriented, and able to maintain utmost confidentiality
- Ability to communicate in English to give and acknowledge instructions/problems
- Physical and mental ability to work in excess of 40 hours per week
- Ability to add, subtract, multiply, and divide in various units of measure
- Ability to define problems, collect data, establish facts, and draw valid conclusions
- Ability to write routine reports and correspondence
- Ability to interpret a variety of instructions furnished in written, oral, diagram, and/or schedule form
- Ability to work well with others in stressful situations and meet deadlines
- Ability to handle multiple priorities and tasks
- Excellent keyboarding, record keeping, and follow-up skills
- Proficiency in MS Office Suite and SAP
- Physical requirements: reaching with hands/arms throughout the day, ability to use hands and fingers, ability to see, hear, and talk, ability to work in light to moderate noise levels, may be required to walk up to 400 yards to work and break areas, may climb steps to and from work and break areas, may have to work in hot or cold conditions depending on type of production operation
But that's a long list. However, the posting groups them. I'll keep the grouping but as separate list items with sub-lists? The rule doesn't forbid nested lists. I'll use nested lists for clarity.
Similarly for Qualifications: Minimum Qualifications list.
Benefits: list of benefits.
Schedule: list of shift times.
Now, I need to remove boilerplate: "Sponsorship for work authorization is not available for this position. It is the candidate’s responsibility to ensure they are legally authorized to work in the location to which they apply. Maker's Pride is an Equal Opportunity Employer." That's EEO/legal boilerplate, remove.
Also, "Job Duties Duties may include, but are not limited to the following:" - I'll include the duties as list items.
Now, write HTML.
I'll start with About the role:
About the role
The Quality Lead is responsible for serving as a point of contact for QA Technicians on the shift when other supervision is not available, manage assigned FSQA programs, serve as backup for document specialist reviewer tasks, maintain data entry into associated computer systems as necessary, and work with the QA team and other department personnel to meet requirements, assignments, trials, and responsibilities.
Maintain harmonious working relations with employees from all departments. Maintain harmonious working relations with management from all levels. Communicate effectively with all employees and management.
Then Responsibilities:
Responsibilities
- Monitor and assist QA Technicians performing in-process QA checks
- Participate in the Internal Audit program
- Perform GMP Audits
- Oversee Incident Report generation and communication
- Lead and assist in managing RCA-CAPAs
- Participate in Mock Traces / Recalls as necessary
- Perform and/or oversee the PEM and Non-PEM swabbing programs
- Assist in consumer/customer complaint investigations
- Serve as main QA contact for trials or new product qualification activities as assigned
- Track and order lab supplies
- Monitor rework processes when conducted for compliance to standards
- File paperwork related to the GFSI system
- Maintain hold inventory records
- Participate in sensory and other product reviews as required
- Provide necessary data for KPIs
- Perform QA Technician duties when required as back up
- Follow Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) at all times
- Comply with all safety, health and environmental regulations as prescribed by law
- Comply with all Company rules, regulations and policies
- May be required to work weekends from time to time
- Perform other duties as assigned by QA leadership
Requirements:
Requirements
- Knowledge of GFSI and FSMA requirements, Environmental Monitoring Programs, QA Technician role and responsibilities, Customer specs and expectations
- Exhibited experience with necessary SAP transactions
- Excellent oral and written communication skills
- Strong self-confidence
- Excellent problem-solving skills and the ability to work with autonomy
- Accurate, detail-oriented, and able to maintain the utmost confidentiality
- Ability to communicate in English to give and acknowledge instructions/problems
- Physical and mental ability to work in excess of 40 hours per week
- Ability to add, subtract, multiply, and divide in various units of measure, using whole numbers, common fractions, and decimals
- Ability to define problems, collect data, establish facts, and draw valid conclusions
- Ability to write routine reports and correspondence
- Ability to interpret a variety of instructions furnished in written, oral, diagram, and/or schedule form
- Ability to work well with others in stressful situations and meet deadlines as necessary
- Ability to handle multiple priorities and tasks
- Excellent keyboarding, record keeping, and follow-up skills
- Proficiency in MS Office Suite and SAP
- Physical requirements: reaching with hands/arms throughout the day; ability to use hands and fingers; ability to see, hear, and talk; ability to work in light to moderate noise levels; may be required to walk up to 400 yards to work and break areas; may climb steps to and from work and break areas; may have to work in hot or cold conditions depending on type of production operation
Qualifications:
Qualifications
- High school diploma or GED equivalent (QAD approval otherwise)
- Associates Degree in science field preferred, but not required
for prose 3. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) 4. Do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it 5. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail 6. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions 7. Include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") 8. Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them 9. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones 10. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences Let me analyze the job posting content: - "What We Offer" section: lists benefits (health/dental/vision insurance, flex spending accounts, short & long-term disability, paid holidays and vacation, bonuses opportunities). This is a Benefits section. - "Job Summary": prose description of the role. This could be "About the role" or similar. - "Hours Of Operation": schedule information (Monday through Friday + Overtime/Weekends, 2nd Shift: 2:00PM to 10:00PM, 3rd Shift: 10:00PM to 6:00AM). This is a Schedule section. - "Job Duties": list of duties. This is Responsibilities. - "Required Competencies & Knowledge": includes "Knowledge of:", "Skill In", "Ability To", "Proficiency in:". This could be split into Requirements/Qualifications/Skills. - "Work Environment": prose about working relations. Could be part of About the role or separate. - "Physical Requirements": list of physical requirements. This could be part of Requirements or a separate section. - "Minimum Qualifications": list of qualifications. This is Qualifications. - "Sponsorship for work authorization is not available..." and "Maker's Pride is an Equal Opportunity Employer." - these are boilerplate/legal, should be removed. I need to map these to appropriate headings. The allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. I'll create sections: 1. About the role (Job Summary + Work Environment maybe) 2. Responsibilities (Job Duties) 3. Requirements (Required Competencies & Knowledge - Knowledge of, Skill In, Ability To, Proficiency in) 4. Qualifications (Minimum Qualifications) 5. Benefits (What We Offer) 6. Schedule (Hours Of Operation) Physical Requirements could be part of Requirements or Qualifications. Since it's a list of physical requirements, I'll include it under Requirements or maybe a separate "Physical Requirements" but the allowed headings don't include that. The rules say use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So I should stick to those. Physical Requirements could be under Requirements.
Also, "Required Competencies & Knowledge" includes Knowledge, Skill, Ability, Proficiency. That's essentially requirements/skills. I'll put under Requirements.
Now, I need to ensure I don't create sections with filler. All sections have real content.
Let me structure:
About the role
Job Summary text...
Work Environment text...
Responsibilities
- ... each duty ...
Requirements
Required Competencies & Knowledge
- Knowledge of: GFSI and FSMA requirements, Environmental Monitoring Programs, QA Technician role and responsibilities, Customer specs and expectations
- Skill In: ...
- Ability To: ...
- Proficiency in: MS Office Suite and SAP
- Physical Requirements: ...
- for lists, I can make a list with sub-lists? The rule says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't forbid nested lists. But to keep simple, I'll make each bullet a category with its items as comma-separated or separate sub-bullets. However, the instruction says "use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". It doesn't specify nested lists. I think it's okay to have nested lists. But to be safe, I'll flatten: each bullet is a requirement statement.
Better: For Requirements, I'll create a list where each item is a requirement. For example:
- Knowledge of GFSI and FSMA requirements, Environmental Monitoring Programs, QA Technician role and responsibilities, Customer specs and expectations
- Exhibited experience with necessary SAP transactions
- Excellent oral and written communication skills
- Strong self-confidence
- Excellent problem-solving skills and ability to work with autonomy
- Accurate, detail-oriented, and able to maintain utmost confidentiality
- Ability to communicate in English to give and acknowledge instructions/problems
- Physical and mental ability to work in excess of 40 hours per week
- Ability to add, subtract, multiply, and divide in various units of measure
- Ability to define problems, collect data, establish facts, and draw valid conclusions
- Ability to write routine reports and correspondence
- Ability to interpret a variety of instructions furnished in written, oral, diagram, and/or schedule form
- Ability to work well with others in stressful situations and meet deadlines
- Ability to handle multiple priorities and tasks
- Excellent keyboarding, record keeping, and follow-up skills
- Proficiency in MS Office Suite and SAP
- Physical requirements: reaching with hands/arms throughout the day, ability to use hands and fingers, ability to see, hear, and talk, ability to work in light to moderate noise levels, may be required to walk up to 400 yards to work and break areas, may climb steps to and from work and break areas, may have to work in hot or cold conditions depending on type of production operation
About the role
The Quality Lead is responsible for serving as a point of contact for QA Technicians on the shift when other supervision is not available, manage assigned FSQA programs, serve as backup for document specialist reviewer tasks, maintain data entry into associated computer systems as necessary, and work with the QA team and other department personnel to meet requirements, assignments, trials, and responsibilities.
Maintain harmonious working relations with employees from all departments. Maintain harmonious working relations with management from all levels. Communicate effectively with all employees and management.
Then Responsibilities:Responsibilities
- Monitor and assist QA Technicians performing in-process QA checks
- Participate in the Internal Audit program
- Perform GMP Audits
- Oversee Incident Report generation and communication
- Lead and assist in managing RCA-CAPAs
- Participate in Mock Traces / Recalls as necessary
- Perform and/or oversee the PEM and Non-PEM swabbing programs
- Assist in consumer/customer complaint investigations
- Serve as main QA contact for trials or new product qualification activities as assigned
- Track and order lab supplies
- Monitor rework processes when conducted for compliance to standards
- File paperwork related to the GFSI system
- Maintain hold inventory records
- Participate in sensory and other product reviews as required
- Provide necessary data for KPIs
- Perform QA Technician duties when required as back up
- Follow Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) at all times
- Comply with all safety, health and environmental regulations as prescribed by law
- Comply with all Company rules, regulations and policies
- May be required to work weekends from time to time
- Perform other duties as assigned by QA leadership
Requirements
- Knowledge of GFSI and FSMA requirements, Environmental Monitoring Programs, QA Technician role and responsibilities, Customer specs and expectations
- Exhibited experience with necessary SAP transactions
- Excellent oral and written communication skills
- Strong self-confidence
- Excellent problem-solving skills and the ability to work with autonomy
- Accurate, detail-oriented, and able to maintain the utmost confidentiality
- Ability to communicate in English to give and acknowledge instructions/problems
- Physical and mental ability to work in excess of 40 hours per week
- Ability to add, subtract, multiply, and divide in various units of measure, using whole numbers, common fractions, and decimals
- Ability to define problems, collect data, establish facts, and draw valid conclusions
- Ability to write routine reports and correspondence
- Ability to interpret a variety of instructions furnished in written, oral, diagram, and/or schedule form
- Ability to work well with others in stressful situations and meet deadlines as necessary
- Ability to handle multiple priorities and tasks
- Excellent keyboarding, record keeping, and follow-up skills
- Proficiency in MS Office Suite and SAP
- Physical requirements: reaching with hands/arms throughout the day; ability to use hands and fingers; ability to see, hear, and talk; ability to work in light to moderate noise levels; may be required to walk up to 400 yards to work and break areas; may climb steps to and from work and break areas; may have to work in hot or cold conditions depending on type of production operation
Qualifications
- High school diploma or GED equivalent (QAD approval otherwise)
- Associates Degree in science field preferred, but not required
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". It doesn't specify nested lists. I think it's okay to have nested lists. But to be safe, I'll flatten: each bullet is a requirement statement.
Better: For Requirements, I'll create a list where each item is a requirement. For example:
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't forbid nested lists. But to keep simple, I'll make each bullet a category with its items as comma-separated or separate sub-bullets. However, the instruction says "use