Jobs · Business Development · Wisconsin

Physician - MD/DO - Family Medicine - Baraboo, Wisconsin $360K 1st year potential

SSM Health · Baraboo, WI · 1 wk ago
On-siteBusiness DevelopmentPart-time
The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. Let me analyze the content and apply the rules. Rules: - Use

for section headings (About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule) - Use
  • for lists of duties/requirements/benefits - Use

    for prose - Do NOT repeat job title as heading - Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings - Preserve ALL substantive information - Remove boilerplate (cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions) - Include section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it - Never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") - Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them - Prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones - Output ONLY HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences Now, let's parse the job posting: Title: Family Medicine Physician | Baraboo, WI | SSM Health Dean Medical Group (but we don't repeat title as heading) Content sections: 1. Intro paragraph: "Outpatient primary care, flexible scheduling, minimal call, and strong system support just 40 miles north of Madison." and "SSM Health Dean Medical Group is seeking a Family Medicine Physician to join an established, growing practice in Baraboo, Wisconsin a community known for strong schools, outdoor recreation, and an exceptional quality of life." 2. "Why Physicians Choose This Opportunity:" with bullet points: - 100% outpatient Family Medicine with full-time and part-time scheduling options - Minimal call with a large call group and strong clinical support - Established patient demand, EPIC EMR, and integrated specialty referral network - Autonomy to build your practice with the resources of a leading health system - large call group with minimal call which is phone call only; 1 in 12 call group 3. "Compensation & Benefits:" with bullet points: - Competitive two-year guaranteed salary with generous sign-on bonus - Comprehensive physician benefits, retirement support, and relocation assistance - CME allowance, paid CME time, and professional liability coverage 4. "Why SSM Health?" paragraph: "Join a mission-driven, physician-led organization with strong leadership support, collaborative culture, and the resources of an integrated health system." 5. "Build a rewarding Family Medicine practice with SSM Health Dean Medical Group in Baraboo." (maybe part of Why SSM Health) 6. "About SSM Health:" paragraph describing organization. 7. "Community Description:" paragraph about Baraboo. 8. EEO statement (boilerplate, remove) 9. Application instruction (visit joinssmhealth.com) - remove. Now, I need to decide on sections. The rules say use

    for section headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. But we should only include sections when there is real content. The posting has: - Overview/About the role (intro) - Why Physicians Choose This Opportunity (could be Responsibilities or Qualifications? Actually it's more like "Why choose this opportunity" - maybe "About the Role" or "Opportunity Highlights") - Compensation & Benefits (Benefits and Pay) - Why SSM Health? (About the organization) - Community Description (Location/Community) We need to map to allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. But the rules say "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It says "e.g." meaning those are examples, but we should use those headings when appropriate. However, we should not create a heading if there's no real content. Also we should not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless posting states them. The posting does state Compensation & Benefits, so we can have Benefits and maybe Pay. But the compensation details are in the same section. Could combine into "Compensation & Benefits" but the allowed headings are Benefits, Pay. Could do two sections: Pay and Benefits. But the posting lists them together. Might be better to have a "Compensation & Benefits" heading? The rules say use those example headings, but not strictly limited? It says "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". That suggests we should use those specific headings. However, we can also use other headings? The instruction: "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests those are the typical ones. I think we should use the most appropriate from that list. Let's map: - "About the role" for the introductory paragraph. - "Responsibilities" maybe not explicitly listed; the "Why Physicians Choose This Opportunity" includes practice details (outpatient, call, scheduling). Could be "Responsibilities" or "Qualifications"? Actually it's more about the role's features. Could be "About the Role" or "Opportunity Highlights". But the example headings include "About the role". I'll use "About the Role" for the intro and the why choose section? Might combine. Better to structure: - About the Role (intro paragraph) - Opportunity Highlights (the bullet points under Why Physicians Choose This Opportunity) - but not in example headings. Could use "Responsibilities" but those aren't responsibilities. Could use "Qualifications"? Not really. Could use "Skills"? No. Might create a custom heading? The rules say "use

    for section headings (e.g. ...)". It doesn't say we cannot use other headings. But to be safe, I'll use the example headings where they fit. For the bullet points, they describe the role's features, maybe "Responsibilities" is not right. Could be "Qualifications" but not. Perhaps "About the Role" can include both intro and highlights. But the highlights are a list. Could put them under "About the Role" as a list. - Compensation & Benefits: we have Benefits and Pay. The posting mentions "Competitive two-year guaranteed salary with generous sign-on bonus" (Pay), "Comprehensive physician benefits, retirement support, and relocation assistance" (Benefits), "CME allowance, paid CME time, and professional liability coverage" (Benefits). So we can have two sections: Pay and Benefits. But the posting groups them. Could have a "Compensation & Benefits" heading? Not in example. But the rule says "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting states them, so we can create Pay and Benefits sections. However, the posting doesn't separate them; it's a combined list. I'll create a "Compensation & Benefits" heading? But the example headings are Pay and Benefits. I think it's okay to have a "Compensation & Benefits" heading as it's a common section. But the instruction says "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It might be expecting those exact headings. However, the user said "e.g." meaning for example. I'll use the exact headings from the example when appropriate. For compensation, I'll use "Pay" and "Benefits" as separate sections, but the content is mixed. I'll split the bullet points accordingly. - Why SSM Health? Could be "About the Organization" but not in example. Could be "Qualifications"? No. Might skip heading and just include as paragraph under "About the Role"? But it's a distinct section. The rules say include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it. The posting has "Why SSM Health?" and "About SSM Health:" and "Community Description:". These are substantive. I could create headings like "About the Organization" and "Community". But not in example. However, the example list is not exhaustive. I think it's okay to use descriptive headings. The instruction: "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". It doesn't say "only these". So I can use other headings. But to be consistent, maybe use "About the Organization" and "Community". However, the user might expect the example headings. I'll use "About the Organization" for Why SSM Health and About SSM Health, and "Community" for Community Description. But the rules also say: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe combine Why SSM Health and About SSM Health into one section "About SSM Health". And Community Description as separate. Let's decide on sections: 1. About the Role (intro paragraph + why choose bullet points) 2. Pay (salary, sign-on bonus) 3. Benefits (benefits, retirement, relocation, CME, liability) 4. About SSM Health (why SSM Health, about SSM Health) 5. Community (community description) But the "Why Physicians Choose This Opportunity" includes scheduling options (full-time/part-time) which could be Schedule. The posting mentions "full-time and part-time scheduling options" and "minimal call". Could create a "Schedule" section. The rules say never create Schedule unless posting actually states them. It does state scheduling options and call. So we could have a Schedule section. But the example headings include Schedule. I'll create a Schedule section for the scheduling and call details. Let's parse the bullet points: - 100% outpatient Family Medicine with full-time and part-time scheduling options -> Schedule - Minimal call with a large call group and strong clinical support -> Schedule/Call - Established patient demand, EPIC EMR, and integrated specialty referral network -> About the Role (practice environment) - Autonomy to build your practice with the resources of a leading health system -> About the Role - large call group with minimal call which is phone call only; 1 in 12 call group -> Schedule/Call So we can have: - About the Role: intro paragraph + practice environment bullets (established patient demand, EPIC EMR, integrated specialty referral network, autonomy) - Schedule: scheduling options, call details - Pay: salary, sign-on bonus - Benefits: benefits, retirement, relocation, CME, liability - About SSM Health: why SSM Health, about SSM Health - Community: community description That seems good. Now, we must remove EEO statement and application instructions. Now, write HTML fragment with

    and
    • and

      . Let's craft. First, About the Role:

      About the Role

      SSM Health Dean Medical Group is seeking a Family Medicine Physician to join an established, growing practice in Baraboo, Wisconsin—a community known for strong schools, outdoor recreation, and an exceptional quality of life. The position offers outpatient primary care with flexible scheduling and strong system support just 40 miles north of Madison.

      • Established patient demand, EPIC EMR, and integrated specialty referral network
      • Autonomy to build your practice with the resources of a leading health system
      Schedule:

      Schedule

      • 100% outpatient Family Medicine with full-time and part-time scheduling options
      • Minimal call with a large call group and strong clinical support

Similar jobs