Jobs · Consulting · California

Performance Management Consultant

California Department of Human Resources (CalHR) · Greater Sacramento · 1 mo ago
HybridConsultingFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections when posting has real specific content. We need to extract substantive info: The job description includes: - About This Role: description about Performance Management Consultant, solving complex employee performance challenges, advise leaders, navigate sensitive personnel matters, develop fair recommendations, strengthen accountability, high-performing workforce. - Working Conditions: telework eligibility, in-person at least 4 days per week, additional in-office days may be required. - Minimum Requirements: refer to Class Specification, ANALYST III. - Position Details: Job Code, Position #, Working Title, Classification, Salary range $6,623.00 - $8,290.00, # of Positions: 1, Work Location: Sacramento County, Telework: Hybrid, Job Type: 9 Month Limited Term - Full Time. - Department Information: description of CalHR. - Benefits: mention CalHR employees excluded from bargaining, eligible to receive enhanced benefits: CoBen benefit allowance, employer paid life insurance, additional vacation/annual leave, not subject to State Disability Insurance payroll withholding. Also mention benefits website. - Pay: salary range given. - Schedule: 9 Month Limited Term - Full Time, maybe mention anticipated interview dates? Not schedule. Also mention working conditions: in-person at least 4 days per week. - Responsibilities: maybe from About This Role and Duty Statement? Not detailed duties listed. Could infer responsibilities: advise leaders, navigate sensitive personnel matters, develop fair recommendations, strengthen accountability, help build high-performing workforce. Could list as bullet list. - Requirements: Minimum Requirements (refer to Class Specification) and maybe Desirable Qualifications list. - Qualifications: maybe same as Requirements? Could combine. - Skills: from Desirable Qualifications: knowledge of HR laws, ability to research, communication skills, manage multiple assignments, judgment, collaboration, etc. We need to avoid boilerplate: remove navigation, EEO, etc. Also remove application instructions, etc. Keep substantive. We must not repeat job title as heading. The page already shows it, so we don't add heading for job title. We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings; fold minor metadata into short

or drop it. So we can include position details in a paragraph. We must not create sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences. Let's structure:

About the Role

... prose ...

Responsibilities

  • ...
  • ...

Working Conditions

... maybe combine with Schedule? But we have separate Schedule section if content. Could include telework and in-person requirement.

Minimum Requirements

... reference to Class Specification ANALYST III.

Desirable Qualifications

    ...

Skills

Maybe we can combine desirable qualifications as skills; but we need Skills section only if posting has real specific content. The desirable qualifications list includes skills; we could put them under Skills. But we already have Desirable Qualifications; maybe we treat that as Qualifications. The instruction: use headings for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we need to map content to these headings. Thus: - About the role: prose. - Responsibilities: bullet list of duties. - Requirements: Minimum Requirements (maybe also include eligibility?). - Qualifications: Desirable Qualifications? Or maybe combine Requirements and Qualifications? But we need both headings if content. - Skills: maybe from Desirable Qualifications that are skill-based. - Benefits: bullet list. - Pay: salary range. - Schedule: job type (9 Month Limited Term - Full Time) and maybe anticipated interview dates? Not schedule. Could include work schedule: in-person at least 4 days per week, telework hybrid. We need to avoid duplication. Let's extract specifics: About the Role paragraph: "Are you a skilled HR professional who thrives on solving complex employee performance challenges? CalHR’s Human Resources Office is seeking a collaborative and solutions-oriented Performance Management Consultant to advise leaders, navigate sensitive personnel matters, and develop fair, practical, and well-supported recommendations. If you are ready to strengthen accountability and help build a high-performing public-sector workforce, we encourage you to apply." We can put that as prose. Responsibilities: maybe derived from that: advise leaders, navigate sensitive personnel matters, develop fair practical well-supported recommendations, strengthen accountability, help build high-performing public-sector workforce. Could also include: provide guidance on performance management, progressive discipline, etc. But we should not invent. Use only what is stated. The posting also mentions "You will find additional information about the job in the Duty Statement." Not specific. So we stick to those. Requirements: Minimum Requirements: "You will find the Minimum Requirements in the Class Specification. ANALYST III". Also maybe mention "New to State candidates will be hired into the minimum salary of the classification or minimum of alternate range when applicable." That's about pay, not requirement. We could also include eligibility: "Who May Apply" but that's application instructions; we should drop application instructions per rule. So we ignore. Qualifications: Desirable Qualifications list: many bullet points. We'll put those under Qualifications. Skills: maybe we could extract skill-based items from Desirable Qualifications: Knowledge of and experience applying HR laws..., Demonstrated ability to independently research..., Ability to gain confidence..., Strong written and verbal communication skills..., Ability to manage multiple complex assignments..., Sound judgment, discretion, emotional intelligence..., Ability to collaborate across organizational boundaries..., Experience identifying operational risks... These are skills/qualities. Could put under Skills. But we might duplicate. Perhaps better: Qualifications = Desirable Qualifications (list). Skills = maybe a subset? But we need to avoid filler. Could combine Qualifications and Skills into one section? But instruction says use headings for those sections if content exists. We could have both, but ensure not repetitive. Let's decide: - Qualifications: list of Desirable Qualifications (the bullet points). - Skills: maybe we can list specific skill items: Knowledge of HR laws, ability to research and analyze, communication skills, manage multiple assignments, judgment/discretion/emotional intelligence, collaboration, experience identifying operational risks. That's still similar. Maybe we treat Qualifications as the list of Desirable Qualifications, and Skills as a short list of core competencies: Knowledge of HR laws and regulations, Strong written and verbal communication, Ability to manage multiple complex assignments, Sound judgment and discretion, Ability to collaborate across organizational boundaries. That's still derived. But to avoid duplication, maybe we just have Qualifications and omit Skills. However instruction says we can include Skills if posting has real specific content. It does have skill-related content. So we can include. We need to ensure we don't invent. We'll pull exact phrases from Desirable Qualifications. Desirable Qualifications bullets: - Knowledge of and experience applying human resources laws, rules, regulations, collective bargaining provisions, policies, and practices related to performance management and progressive discipline. - Demonstrated ability to independently research and analyze complex issues, distinguish facts from assumptions, evaluate alternatives and risk, and prepare well-supported recommendations. - Ability to gain the confidence of supervisors, managers, executives, and professional partners while providing objective and sometimes difficult advice. - Strong written and verbal communication skills, including experience preparing sensitive personnel documents, analytical summaries, procedures, guidance, and training materials. - Ability to manage multiple complex assignments, establish priorities, meet time-sensitive deadlines, and maintain accurate case documentation with limited oversight. - Sound judgment, discretion, emotional intelligence, and the ability to maintain confidentiality and remain impartial in sensitive or contentious matters. - Ability to collaborate across organizational boundaries, facilitate productive discussions, and build effective relationships with internal and external stakeholders. - Experience identifying operational risks and leading or supporting process improvements, compliance activities, audits, or organizational change. We can use these as Qualifications. For Skills, we could distill: Knowledge of HR laws, Strong written and verbal communication, Ability to manage multiple assignments, Sound judgment/discretion/emotional intelligence, Ability to collaborate, Experience identifying operational risks. But that's still from the list; might be considered redundant but okay. Alternatively, we could treat Qualifications as the list, and Skills as a shorter list of skill verbs: Research and analysis, Communication, Prioritization, Judgment, Collaboration, Risk identification. That's still derived. Given the instruction to avoid filler, maybe better to have only Qualifications and not Skills. But we need to follow instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could combine Qualifications and Skills into one section called Qualifications (or Skills). But we need to use headings exactly as listed if we include them. Could we omit Skills heading entirely? Yes, we only include sections when posting has real specific content. If we think Skills content is covered under Qualifications, we can omit Skills heading. That seems acceptable. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay, Schedule, Working Conditions? Actually Working Conditions could be part of Schedule or separate. The instruction includes Schedule heading; we can put schedule info there. Working Conditions could be under Schedule or maybe we create a separate section? Not in list. So we incorporate working conditions into Schedule or maybe into Responsibilities? Better to put under Schedule: mention hybrid telework, in-person at least 4 days per week. Pay: salary range. Benefits: bullet list. Now let's craft HTML. We need to wrap each section:

Heading

then content. For lists:
  • ...
For prose:

...

We must not include markdown fences. Let's write. About the role:

Are you a skilled HR professional who thrives on solving complex employee performance challenges? CalHR’s Human Resources Office is seeking a collaborative and solutions-oriented Performance Management Consultant to advise leaders, navigate sensitive personnel matters, and develop fair, practical, and well-supported recommendations. If you are ready to strengthen accountability and help build a high-performing public-sector workforce, we encourage you to apply.

Responsibilities: bullet list: - Advise leaders on employee performance matters. - Navigate sensitive personnel issues. - Develop fair, practical, and well-supported recommendations. - Strengthen accountability. - Help build a high-performing public-sector workforce. We need to ensure these are directly from posting. The posting says: "advise leaders, navigate sensitive personnel matters, and develop fair, practical, and well-supported recommendations." Also "strengthen accountability and help build a high-performing public-sector workforce." So we can list those. Requirements: Minimum Requirements: "You will find the Minimum Requirements in the Class Specification. ANALYST III." Also maybe mention "New to State candidates will be hired into the minimum salary of the classification or minimum of alternate range when applicable." That's about pay, not requirement. We'll keep just the class spec. Thus:

Minimum requirements are defined in the Class Specification for the ANALYST III classification.

Qualifications: list the Desirable Qualifications bullets. Benefits: list: CoBen benefit allowance, employer paid life insurance, additional vacation/annual leave, not subject to State Disability Insurance payroll withholding. Also mention access to competitive, quality and affordable benefits via benefits website. Could include that. Pay: salary range: $6,623.00 - $8,290.00 per month? Actually it's monthly? We'll just state. Schedule: Job Type: 9 Month Limited Term - Full Time. Also mention telework hybrid, in-person at least 4 days per week. We could also mention anticipated interview dates? Not schedule. Let's craft. Now ensure we don't include boilerplate like "Please note, CalHR is not an E-Verified employer." That's not boilerplate? It's maybe minor metadata but could

Similar jobs

Performance Consultant

RELXMiamisburg, OH· 6 days ago
Human Resources$79k–$131k/yrapply on relx.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com

Performance Consultant

LexisNexisMiamisburg, OH· 6 days ago
Human Resources$79k–$131k/yrapply on relx.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com

Performance Consultant

EpiqTampa, FL· 1 wk ago
RemoteHuman Resourcesapply on epiqsystems.wd503.myworkdayjobs.com

Performance Consultant

Riverbed TechnologyFlorida, United States· 3 mo ago
RemoteCustomer Serviceapply on careers-riverbed.icims.com