Oliver Wyman- Temporary Consultant / Specialist
for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content.
We need to parse the job posting text.
Let's read:
"Gathers key data inputs and executes complete, accurate, traceable and sanity-checked quantitative and qualitative analyses. Analyzes and researches within work streams, under the guidance of a manager. Creates clear slides and speak up appropriately with clients and internally on topics related to their work Structures their own work and output; moving the project and the client relationship forward."
That's responsibilities/duties.
Then "About Oliver Wyman ..." description of company.
Then "The applicable hourly rate for this role is $225 per hour. The base pay offered will be determined on factors such as experience, skills, training, location, certifications, and education, and any applicable minimum wage requirements. Decisions will be determined on a case-by-case basis. In addition to the base salary, this position may be eligible for performance-based incentives. We are excited to offer a competitive total rewards package which includes health and welfare benefits, tuition assistance, 401K savings and other retirement programs as well as employee assistance programs."
Then "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capital, people and investments, and management consulting, advising clients in 130 countries. With annual revenue of over $27 billion and more than 95,000 colleagues, Marsh helps build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective. For more information, visit oliverwyman.com, or follow us on LinkedIn and X. Marsh is committed to embracing a diverse, inclusive and flexible work environment. We aim to attract and retain the best people and embrace diversity of age background, disability, ethnic origin, family duties, gender orientation or expression, marital status, nationality, parental status, personal or social status, political affiliation, race, religion and beliefs, sex/gender, sexual orientation or expression, skin color, veteran status (including protected veterans), or any other characteristic protected by applicable law. If you have a need that requires accommodation, please let us know by contacting reasonableaccommodations@marsh.com. Marsh is committed to hybrid work, which includes the flexibility of working remotely and the collaboration, connections and professional development benefits of working together in the office. All Marsh colleagues are expected to be in their local office or working onsite with clients at least three days per week. Office-based teams will identify at least one “anchor day” per week on which their full team will be together in person."
Then "R_335277" (Job ID) - we drop.
We need to remove boilerplate: EEO, legal, etc. The text includes EEO statements and accommodation contact etc. Those should be removed.
We need to keep substantive info: responsibilities, company description, pay, benefits, schedule/hybrid work expectations.
We need to decide sections.
We have responsibilities: bullet list of duties.
We have About the role? Actually the first paragraph is responsibilities. There's no explicit "About the role" heading but we can create a section "About the role" maybe summarizing? But rule: include a section ONLY when posting has real, specific content for it. The posting does not have a separate "About the role" paragraph; the first paragraph is responsibilities. Could we treat that as "Responsibilities"? Yes.
We have "About Oliver Wyman" which is company overview; could be "About the company" but not in allowed headings. Allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we can put company description maybe under "About the role"? Not exactly. Could we omit? The rule says we should not repeat job title as heading, but we can include other headings only if content exists. There's no explicit "About the role" content besides responsibilities. However we could treat the first paragraph as responsibilities and maybe also include a brief "About the role" summarizing? But that would be invented content. Better to not include "About the role" if no explicit content. But we need to include responsibilities.
We have pay info: hourly rate $225 per hour, base pay determined case-by-case, performance-based incentives. That's specific enough for Pay section.
We have benefits: health and welfare benefits, tuition assistance, 401K savings and other retirement programs, employee assistance programs. That's Benefits.
We have schedule/hybrid work: expectation to be in local office or onsite with clients at least three days per week, anchor day per week. That's Schedule.
We might also have Requirements/Qualifications/Skills: not explicitly listed. The posting does not list specific requirements like degree, years experience. So we should not create those sections.
Thus output sections: Responsibilities, Pay, Benefits, Schedule.
We need to use for each heading. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use
for prose.
Responsibilities: we have multiple sentences; could be list items. Let's break into bullet points:
- Gathers key data inputs and executes complete, accurate, traceable and sanity-checked quantitative and qualitative analyses.
- Analyzes and researches within work streams, under the guidance of a manager.
- Creates clear slides and speaks up appropriately with clients and internally on topics related to their work.
- Structures their own work and output; moving the project and the client relationship forward.
Note: original text had "speak up" but we can correct grammar? Should we preserve exact wording? It says "Creates clear slides and speak up appropriately". Might be a typo. We should preserve as is? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Changing grammar could be considered altering. Safer to keep original wording exactly: "Creates clear slides and speak up appropriately with clients and internally on topics related to their work". We'll keep that.
Pay: we have sentences. Could be prose
. Might also list bullet points but not required. We'll use
.
Benefits: list items.
Schedule: prose.
We need to omit boilerplate: EEO statements, accommodation contact, Marsh description beyond hybrid work? The Marsh description includes revenue, colleagues etc. That's company info but not in allowed headings; we could maybe include under "About the role"? Not appropriate. The rule says we should not create sections unless posting has real specific content for it. The Marsh description is not about role, responsibilities, pay, benefits, schedule. It's company overview. Since we don't have a heading for company overview, we might drop it. However is that considered substantive information? It's about the company, not the role. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." But we also have constraint to only use allowed headings. If we drop company overview, we are losing substantive info. However maybe we can include it under "About the role" as a description of the firm? The heading "About the role" could be interpreted as description of the role and the firm? Usually "About the role" is about the position, not company. But we could treat it as "About Oliver Wyman" but not allowed heading. The instructions say: use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It gives examples but not exhaustive? It says "use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests those are the allowed headings. So we should only use those headings. If we have content that doesn't fit, we might need to incorporate into existing sections or drop if not relevant. The company overview may be considered not essential to the job posting? But it's substantive. However maybe we can incorporate into "About the role" as a brief description of the firm as part of role context. The rule: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So if we put "About the role" heading, we need to have real specific content for it. We could put the Oliver Wyman description as content under About the role. That is specific content about the firm, which is relevant to the role. It's not filler. So we can do that.
Thus sections: About the role (Oliver Wyman description), Responsibilities, Pay, Benefits, Schedule.
We must ensure we don't repeat job title as heading (we aren't). No Job ID.
Now we need to remove boilerplate: EEO statements, accommodation contact, Marsh diversity statement, etc. Also remove lines like "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh McLennan [NYSE: MMC]." and later "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), ..." duplicates. We need to keep the substantive info about Oliver Wyman being a global leader etc. But we need to avoid duplication. Let's extract the unique substantive content about Oliver Wyman:
First paragraph: "Oliver Wyman is a global leader in management consulting. With offices in more than 70 cities across 30 countries, Oliver Wyman combines deep industry knowledge with specialized expertise in strategy, operations, risk management, and organization transformation. The firm has more than 6,000 professionals around the world who work with clients to optimize their business, improve their operations and risk profile, and accelerate their organizational performance to seize the most attractive opportunities. Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh McLennan [NYSE: MMC]. For more information, visit www.oliverwyman.com. Follow Oliver Wyman on Twitter @OliverWyman."
Second Oliver Wyman paragraph later: "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capital, people and investments, and management consulting, advising clients in 130 countries. With annual revenue of over $27 billion and more than 95,000 colleagues, Marsh helps build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective. For more information, visit oliverwyman.com, or follow us on LinkedIn and X."
These are somewhat overlapping but provide different details: first focuses on Oliver Wyman specifics; second focuses on Marsh parent. Both are substantive. We should keep both but avoid duplication of sentences like "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh". Slightly different: first says Marsh McLennan [NYSE: MMC]; second says Marsh (NYSE: MRSH). Both are true but maybe we keep both as they give different info. However they are somewhat redundant. The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep both statements, even if they overlap. We can keep both paragraphs.
But we also need to remove EEO boilerplate etc. The Marsh diversity statement and accommodation contact etc should be removed.
Also remove lines about hybrid work? That's schedule info, we keep.
Now we need to format.
Let's craft HTML:
About the role
Oliver Wyman is a global leader in management consulting. With offices in more than 70 cities across 30 countries, Oliver Wyman combines deep industry knowledge with specialized expertise in strategy, operations, risk management, and organization transformation. The firm has more than 6,000 professionals around the world who work with clients to optimize their business, improve their operations and risk profile, and accelerate their organizational performance to seize the most attractive opportunities. Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh McLennan [NYSE: MMC]. For more information, visit www.oliverwyman.com. Follow Oliver Wyman on Twitter @OliverWyman.
Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capital, people and investments, and management consulting, advising clients in 130 countries. With annual revenue of over $27 billion and more than 95,000 colleagues, Marsh helps
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use
for prose. Responsibilities: we have multiple sentences; could be list items. Let's break into bullet points: - Gathers key data inputs and executes complete, accurate, traceable and sanity-checked quantitative and qualitative analyses. - Analyzes and researches within work streams, under the guidance of a manager. - Creates clear slides and speaks up appropriately with clients and internally on topics related to their work. - Structures their own work and output; moving the project and the client relationship forward. Note: original text had "speak up" but we can correct grammar? Should we preserve exact wording? It says "Creates clear slides and speak up appropriately". Might be a typo. We should preserve as is? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Changing grammar could be considered altering. Safer to keep original wording exactly: "Creates clear slides and speak up appropriately with clients and internally on topics related to their work". We'll keep that. Pay: we have sentences. Could be prose
. Might also list bullet points but not required. We'll use
. Benefits: list items. Schedule: prose. We need to omit boilerplate: EEO statements, accommodation contact, Marsh description beyond hybrid work? The Marsh description includes revenue, colleagues etc. That's company info but not in allowed headings; we could maybe include under "About the role"? Not appropriate. The rule says we should not create sections unless posting has real specific content for it. The Marsh description is not about role, responsibilities, pay, benefits, schedule. It's company overview. Since we don't have a heading for company overview, we might drop it. However is that considered substantive information? It's about the company, not the role. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." But we also have constraint to only use allowed headings. If we drop company overview, we are losing substantive info. However maybe we can include it under "About the role" as a description of the firm? The heading "About the role" could be interpreted as description of the role and the firm? Usually "About the role" is about the position, not company. But we could treat it as "About Oliver Wyman" but not allowed heading. The instructions say: use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It gives examples but not exhaustive? It says "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests those are the allowed headings. So we should only use those headings. If we have content that doesn't fit, we might need to incorporate into existing sections or drop if not relevant. The company overview may be considered not essential to the job posting? But it's substantive. However maybe we can incorporate into "About the role" as a brief description of the firm as part of role context. The rule: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So if we put "About the role" heading, we need to have real specific content for it. We could put the Oliver Wyman description as content under About the role. That is specific content about the firm, which is relevant to the role. It's not filler. So we can do that. Thus sections: About the role (Oliver Wyman description), Responsibilities, Pay, Benefits, Schedule. We must ensure we don't repeat job title as heading (we aren't). No Job ID. Now we need to remove boilerplate: EEO statements, accommodation contact, Marsh diversity statement, etc. Also remove lines like "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh McLennan [NYSE: MMC]." and later "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), ..." duplicates. We need to keep the substantive info about Oliver Wyman being a global leader etc. But we need to avoid duplication. Let's extract the unique substantive content about Oliver Wyman: First paragraph: "Oliver Wyman is a global leader in management consulting. With offices in more than 70 cities across 30 countries, Oliver Wyman combines deep industry knowledge with specialized expertise in strategy, operations, risk management, and organization transformation. The firm has more than 6,000 professionals around the world who work with clients to optimize their business, improve their operations and risk profile, and accelerate their organizational performance to seize the most attractive opportunities. Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh McLennan [NYSE: MMC]. For more information, visit www.oliverwyman.com. Follow Oliver Wyman on Twitter @OliverWyman." Second Oliver Wyman paragraph later: "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capital, people and investments, and management consulting, advising clients in 130 countries. With annual revenue of over $27 billion and more than 95,000 colleagues, Marsh helps build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective. For more information, visit oliverwyman.com, or follow us on LinkedIn and X." These are somewhat overlapping but provide different details: first focuses on Oliver Wyman specifics; second focuses on Marsh parent. Both are substantive. We should keep both but avoid duplication of sentences like "Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh". Slightly different: first says Marsh McLennan [NYSE: MMC]; second says Marsh (NYSE: MRSH). Both are true but maybe we keep both as they give different info. However they are somewhat redundant. The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep both statements, even if they overlap. We can keep both paragraphs. But we also need to remove EEO boilerplate etc. The Marsh diversity statement and accommodation contact etc should be removed. Also remove lines about hybrid work? That's schedule info, we keep. Now we need to format. Let's craft HTML:
About the role
Oliver Wyman is a global leader in management consulting. With offices in more than 70 cities across 30 countries, Oliver Wyman combines deep industry knowledge with specialized expertise in strategy, operations, risk management, and organization transformation. The firm has more than 6,000 professionals around the world who work with clients to optimize their business, improve their operations and risk profile, and accelerate their organizational performance to seize the most attractive opportunities. Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh McLennan [NYSE: MMC]. For more information, visit www.oliverwyman.com. Follow Oliver Wyman on Twitter @OliverWyman.
Oliver Wyman is a business of Marsh (NYSE: MRSH), a global leader in risk, reinsurance and capital, people and investments, and management consulting, advising clients in 130 countries. With annual revenue of over $27 billion and more than 95,000 colleagues, Marsh helps