Network Model Engineer 2

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate like EEO, legal, etc. Must preserve all substantive info. We need to parse the posting. Content: - Intro paragraph about ERCOT environment, mission, inclusive etc. That's about the role? Could be "About the role" or maybe "About ERCOT". The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we need to map content. We have: - Description of role: As a Power Systems Modeling Engineer, you will develop transmission system models used in both real-time operations and in transmission planning... etc. That's responsibilities. - Additional Job Duties: Network Model Development (list), Modeling Application Support (list), Other Responsibilities (list). Those are responsibilities. - Education: Bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering or related field, or combination. - Required Skills: Has experience with developing and maintaining software at least one of the following programming languages or equivalent: C#, Java, Python - Preferred Skills: Has experience with at least one of the following power system simulators or equivalent: PowerWorld, PSS/E, ASPEN - One-liner: Experience with SQL, Experience with software tools like Git/BitBucket and Jira, Strong communication skills, Able and comfortable with working independently, managing projects, and stakeholder groups - Required Experience Level: Level 2, Level 3, Sr level descriptions. - Work Location: Hybrid, on-site in Taylor, TX at least 2-3 days per week, etc. That's schedule info. - Salary: Expected Salary Range $87,000 - $120,000. - Benefits: Not explicitly mentioned. There's no benefits section. So we should not create Benefits unless posting actually states them. It doesn't. So omit Benefits. - Pay: we have salary range, so include Pay section. - Schedule: we have work location/hybrid schedule details, so include Schedule section. - Qualifications: Could combine Education and Experience? Usually Qualifications includes education and experience. We'll have a Qualifications section containing education and experience requirements. - Requirements: Could be required skills? Might be separate. But we have Required Skills, Preferred Skills, One-liner (which seems like additional skills). Could combine into Skills section. But we have separate headings: Skills, Requirements, Qualifications. We need to decide mapping. We must not create empty sections. Use only when posting has real specific content. We have content for: - About the role: maybe the introductory paragraph about ERCOT environment and mission. That's substantive. - Responsibilities: the detailed duties. - Qualifications: education and experience levels. - Skills: required skills, preferred skills, one-liner items. - Pay: salary range. - Schedule: work location/hybrid. We should not include Benefits (none). Also not include Requirements if we already covered in Qualifications/Skills. But we could put Requirements as required skills (maybe separate). However we have Required Skills and Preferred Skills; we could put those under Skills. The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we need to decide what goes where. We could treat: - About the role: introductory paragraph. - Responsibilities: all duties. - Requirements: required experience levels (maybe also required education? but that's qualification). Could put experience levels under Requirements. - Qualifications: education (Bachelor's degree) and maybe also required skills? But we already have Skills heading. Better: Qualifications: education and experience levels (since they are qualifications). Skills: required skills, preferred skills, one-liner items. Requirements: maybe we could put nothing? But we need to include a section only when posting has real specific content. If we don't have distinct content for Requirements, we should omit it. However we have experience level details; those could be considered qualifications. So we can put them under Qualifications. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Skills, Pay, Schedule. Check if any content for Benefits: none, omit. Now we need to format. Use

for section headings. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

  for prose. We must preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. We need to include all details from the posting, but we can format as lists. Let's extract details. About the role: The introductory paragraph(s) before "As a Power Systems Modeling Engineer". Let's capture: "At ERCOT, our diverse and dynamic work environment provides a platform on which employees can work together to build the future of the Texas power grid and wholesale market utilizing the latest technologies and resources. We encourage you to join our talented, dedicated workforce to develop world-class solutions for today and tomorrow’s energy challenges while learning new skills and growing your career. ERCOT is committed to fostering inclusion at all levels of our company. It is the cornerstone of our corporate values of accountability, leadership, innovation, trust, and expertise. We know that individuals with a wide variety of talents, ideas, and experiences propel the innovation that drives our success. An inclusive and diverse workforce strengthens us and allows for a collaborative environment to solve the challenges that face our industry today and in the future." That's about the role/company. We'll put that in a

  . Responsibilities: All duties after "As a Power Systems Modeling Engineer, you will develop transmission system models used in both real-time operations and in transmission planning." Then list. We need to capture all duties: - Develop transmission system models used in both real-time operations and in transmission planning. These models support the delivery of power to everyone in the ERCOT grid and the planning of billions of dollars of transmission system projects. - Joining a team that performs industry leading power systems modeling and model management. - In power systems modeling you will develop real-time operational models in conjunction with ERCOT transmission service providers. - You will also help improve system modeling processes and develop software tools to manage and validate model data. - Good communication skills will be needed as this role will involve working with numerous internal and external stakeholders to build transmission system models. Additional Job Duties: Network Model Development: - Develops operations models from the Network Model Management System (NMMS) - Works with the Network Data Support Working Group (NDSWG) members on operational model data exchange and transmission network model maintenance in NMMS. - Reviews generator and transmission equipment data submitted by resource entities and works with resource entities to correct invalid model data. Modeling Application Support: - Manages transmission system model software infrastructure and develops tools to assist in managing transmission models which includes database infrastructure, model data exchange interfaces, and data export formats - Develops and maintains modeling software tools in Java, C# .NET, Python to validate transmission network and generator data submissions using electrical engineering principles by doing data comparison and validity checks, and to automate and perform system modeling - Develops rules to validate data submissions in operations and planning models using SQL - Manages projects to upgrade the NMMS applications to implement desired new functionality, reviews system patches, and help administer servers Other Responsibilities: - Provides training and mentoring of members of the Engineering Development Program (EDP) - Works closely with ERCOT Network Model Maintenance, Network Model Coordination, Resource Integration, System Operations, System Planning, Forward Markets, Client Services, and Grid Applications Development - Reviews, drafts, and presents changes to the Protocols, Guides, procedures, training material for EDP and for Market Participants (MPs), and other supporting ERCOT documents related to system modeling - Reviews changes to NERC standards to assess if changes to modeling methodologies are needed We need to preserve all that. We can structure as

  • for each bullet. For sub-bullets maybe nested lists? The instruction says use
    • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't forbid nested lists. We can do nested
      inside
      • for subcategories. Qualifications: Education and experience levels. Education: Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering or related field, or a combination of education and experience that provides the applicant with knowledge equivalent to a major in such fields. Experience levels: Level 2: Requires minimum 1 years job related work experience in excess of degree requirements. Level 3: Requires minimum 3 years job related work experience in excess of degree requirements. Sr level: Requires minimum 5 years job related work experience in excess of degree requirements. We could present as list. Skills: Required Skills, Preferred Skills, One-liner items. Required Skills: Has experience with developing and maintaining software at least one of the following programming languages or equivalent: C#, Java, Python Preferred Skills: Has experience with at least one of the following power system simulators or equivalent: PowerWorld, PSS/E, ASPEN One-liner: Experience with SQL, Experience with software tools like Git/BitBucket and Jira, Strong communication skills, Able and comfortable with working independently, managing projects, and stakeholder groups We could combine into a single list of skills, but we need to preserve detail. Could separate into subheadings? But we only have

        for section headings, not subheadings. We could still use

        to label within Skills section. But better to use

        • and include the details in the li text. We could do:
          • Required Skills: Experience with developing and maintaining software in at least one of: C#, Java, Python
          • Preferred Skills: Experience with at least one of: PowerWorld, PSS/E, ASPEN
          • Experience with SQL
          • Experience with software tools like Git/BitBucket and Jira
          • Strong communication skills
          • Able and comfortable with working independently, managing projects, and stakeholder groups
          That preserves all. Pay: Expected Salary Range $87,000 - $120,000. Schedule: Work location hybrid details. We need to include all details: "WORK LOCATION: This position is Hybrid. Employees will be required to be on-site in Taylor, TX at least 2-3 days per week, or more, as needed based on the business needs as determined by management. Employees are required on-site during tight grid conditions or emergency grid operations. On-site schedules are flexible or may be rotated based on business needs as determined by the Manager. Remote work is required to be performed from your Texas residence. Employees may opt to work on-site more than required or 100% of the time." We'll put that in a

          or maybe list? It's prose. Now we must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. The posting includes a lot of legal text at the end: "The foregoing description reflects the minimum qualifications..." etc. Also EEO statement. We must remove those. We must also remove lines like "This job description is not intended to create a contract of employment..." etc. Also the EEO statement at the end. Also the "Salary and level will be based on overall experience as determined by ERCOT." That's somewhat relevant to Pay? It mentions salary and level based on experience. We already have salary range. That line could be considered part of Pay? It's not a specific number but says salary and level based on experience. Could include as part of Pay section? Might be considered substantive. The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep that line if it's substantive. It says: "Salary and level will be based on overall experience as determined by ERCOT." That's additional info about salary determination. We can include in Pay section. Also "The foregoing description reflects the minimum qualifications and the essential functions of the position that must be performed proficiently with or without reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities. It is not an