Mental Health Therapist - Telehealth (Unrestricted License LCSW-C, LCMFT, LCPC- Maryland)
Lyra Health · Maryland, United States · 1 mo ago
RemoteRemoteHealthcare$70k–$92k/yrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections using for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections where posting has real specific content. We must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate, EEO, legal, etc. Must preserve all substantive info.
We need to parse the posting.
First part: "About Lyra" description: that's company overview, not a section heading? Could be part of About the role? The instruction: use
for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections where posting has real specific content. We must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate, EEO, legal, etc. Must preserve all substantive info.
We need to parse the posting.
First part: "About Lyra" description: that's company overview, not a section heading? Could be part of About the role? The instruction: use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have "About the role" heading. The "About Lyra" could be considered part of About the role? Might be separate but not listed; we could include as a paragraph under About the role? The instruction says use those headings for sections; we can also have other headings? It says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but likely they expect only those. We'll include About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule only if content exists.
We need to extract content.
Let's read posting:
About Lyra Lyra Clinical Associates partners with Lyra Health... (company description). Then "About The Role" heading.
Then description of role: Lyra developed an innovative video therapy program called Lyra Care Therapy... Daily: As a Lyra Care Therapist... Regularly: Our therapists enjoy connecting... This role is a great fit if you're a licensed clinician... etc.
Then "Requirements" heading with bullet list.
Then after requirements there is a long EEO boilerplate etc. Then later: "As a full-time Licensed Mental Health Therapist, you will be employed by Lyra Clinical Associates. We manage the business operations so you can focus on providing high-quality mental health care. The anticipated annual base salary range for this full-time position is $70,000 - $92,000. The base range is determined by role and level, and placement within the range will depend on a number of job-related factors, including but not limited to your skills, qualifications, experience and location."
Then "Benefits" heading with bullet list.
Thus we have sections: About the role (maybe includes About Lyra?), Responsibilities (daily and regularly), Requirements, Qualifications? The posting doesn't have a separate Qualifications section; requirements include license, degree, experience etc. Could treat Requirements as qualifications. But we need to follow instruction: include sections only when posting has real specific content. We have content for About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Benefits, Pay. Possibly Skills? The posting mentions skills: excellent interpersonal skills, commitment to evidence-based treatments, etc. Could be under Skills. But we could also incorporate into Responsibilities or Requirements. Safer to include Skills section if there is explicit skill content. The posting includes: "This role is a great fit if you're a licensed clinician with excellent interpersonal skills, who wants continuous learning and development in their professional career, and thrives in a feedback rich environment." Also "Experience and commitment to providing evidence-based treatments (e.g., ACT, CBT, CPT, DBT) and clinical best practices (e.g., measurement based care, promoting skills practice)". That's more requirements. Could treat as Skills.
Schedule: posting mentions "Ability to work full-time, approximately 40 hours per week" and "Full-time resident of the United States". That's schedule info. So we can include Schedule section.
Qualifications: maybe we can treat Requirements as qualifications; but we already have Requirements. Could also have Qualifications separate if there is distinct content like degree, license. But the posting lumps them under Requirements. To avoid duplication, we could have Requirements and Qualifications both but risk duplication. Better to follow instruction: include sections only when posting has real specific content. Since the posting doesn't have a separate Qualifications heading, we could still create a Qualifications section with the content that qualifies (license, degree, experience). But that would duplicate Requirements. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we split, we still preserve all info, not lose. But we risk creating filler if we just repeat same content. Might be okay but better to keep as Requirements and maybe not include Qualifications if content overlaps heavily. However the instruction lists Qualifications as an example heading; we could include it if there is distinct content like degree, license. The posting includes license, degree, experience, etc. That could be considered qualifications. Meanwhile Requirements could be more about specific duties? Actually the bullet list under Requirements includes license, degree, experience, etc. So that's qualifications. So we could rename that section to Qualifications. But the instruction says use headings like Requirements, Qualifications etc. We could have both but content would be same; maybe we split: Requirements: experience managing risk, telehealth, computer literacy, caseload, full-time, US resident. Qualifications: license, degree, evidence-based treatment commitment. Let's see.
Let's extract bullet list under Requirements:
- Unrestricted LCSW, LMFT, LPC, PsyD, PhD, or equivalent license (i.e., able to work independently, without supervision from a licensed supervisor) without current, past, or pending disciplinary action
- Master’s degree from a clinical track (e.g., MSW, MFT, MC, MMHC)
- Experience and commitment to providing evidence-based treatments (e.g., ACT, CBT, CPT, DBT) and clinical best practices (e.g., measurement based care, promoting skills practice)
- Experience managing risk and responding to clinical crises, as needed
- Experience providing telehealth therapy services in a virtual environment (video and teletherapy) preferred but not required
- Computer and live video tools literacy (e.g., Zoom, Google Meets, DoxyMe, Skype, etc.)
- Experience maintaining a full clinical caseload of adult and/or adolescent clients/week (30 potential bookable calendar spots)
- Ability to work full-time, approximately 40 hours per week
- Full-time resident of the United States
We could split: Qualifications: license, degree, evidence-based treatments commitment. Requirements: experience managing risk, telehealth preferred, computer literacy, caseload, full-time, US resident. Skills: excellent interpersonal skills, continuous learning, feedback rich environment, maybe also computer literacy? But computer literacy is more requirement.
Responsibilities: daily and regularly tasks.
About the role: includes company description and role description.
Benefits: bullet list.
Pay: salary range.
Schedule: full-time approx 40 hours per week (already in requirements). Could still include schedule.
We must avoid filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present.
Now produce HTML.
Structure:
About the role
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but likely they expect only those. We'll include About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule only if content exists.
We need to extract content.
Let's read posting:
About Lyra Lyra Clinical Associates partners with Lyra Health... (company description). Then "About The Role" heading.
Then description of role: Lyra developed an innovative video therapy program called Lyra Care Therapy... Daily: As a Lyra Care Therapist... Regularly: Our therapists enjoy connecting... This role is a great fit if you're a licensed clinician... etc.
Then "Requirements" heading with bullet list.
Then after requirements there is a long EEO boilerplate etc. Then later: "As a full-time Licensed Mental Health Therapist, you will be employed by Lyra Clinical Associates. We manage the business operations so you can focus on providing high-quality mental health care. The anticipated annual base salary range for this full-time position is $70,000 - $92,000. The base range is determined by role and level, and placement within the range will depend on a number of job-related factors, including but not limited to your skills, qualifications, experience and location."
Then "Benefits" heading with bullet list.
Thus we have sections: About the role (maybe includes About Lyra?), Responsibilities (daily and regularly), Requirements, Qualifications? The posting doesn't have a separate Qualifications section; requirements include license, degree, experience etc. Could treat Requirements as qualifications. But we need to follow instruction: include sections only when posting has real specific content. We have content for About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Benefits, Pay. Possibly Skills? The posting mentions skills: excellent interpersonal skills, commitment to evidence-based treatments, etc. Could be under Skills. But we could also incorporate into Responsibilities or Requirements. Safer to include Skills section if there is explicit skill content. The posting includes: "This role is a great fit if you're a licensed clinician with excellent interpersonal skills, who wants continuous learning and development in their professional career, and thrives in a feedback rich environment." Also "Experience and commitment to providing evidence-based treatments (e.g., ACT, CBT, CPT, DBT) and clinical best practices (e.g., measurement based care, promoting skills practice)". That's more requirements. Could treat as Skills.
Schedule: posting mentions "Ability to work full-time, approximately 40 hours per week" and "Full-time resident of the United States". That's schedule info. So we can include Schedule section.
Qualifications: maybe we can treat Requirements as qualifications; but we already have Requirements. Could also have Qualifications separate if there is distinct content like degree, license. But the posting lumps them under Requirements. To avoid duplication, we could have Requirements and Qualifications both but risk duplication. Better to follow instruction: include sections only when posting has real specific content. Since the posting doesn't have a separate Qualifications heading, we could still create a Qualifications section with the content that qualifies (license, degree, experience). But that would duplicate Requirements. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we split, we still preserve all info, not lose. But we risk creating filler if we just repeat same content. Might be okay but better to keep as Requirements and maybe not include Qualifications if content overlaps heavily. However the instruction lists Qualifications as an example heading; we could include it if there is distinct content like degree, license. The posting includes license, degree, experience, etc. That could be considered qualifications. Meanwhile Requirements could be more about specific duties? Actually the bullet list under Requirements includes license, degree, experience, etc. So that's qualifications. So we could rename that section to Qualifications. But the instruction says use headings like Requirements, Qualifications etc. We could have both but content would be same; maybe we split: Requirements: experience managing risk, telehealth, computer literacy, caseload, full-time, US resident. Qualifications: license, degree, evidence-based treatment commitment. Let's see.
Let's extract bullet list under Requirements:
- Unrestricted LCSW, LMFT, LPC, PsyD, PhD, or equivalent license (i.e., able to work independently, without supervision from a licensed supervisor) without current, past, or pending disciplinary action
- Master’s degree from a clinical track (e.g., MSW, MFT, MC, MMHC)
- Experience and commitment to providing evidence-based treatments (e.g., ACT, CBT, CPT, DBT) and clinical best practices (e.g., measurement based care, promoting skills practice)
- Experience managing risk and responding to clinical crises, as needed
- Experience providing telehealth therapy services in a virtual environment (video and teletherapy) preferred but not required
- Computer and live video tools literacy (e.g., Zoom, Google Meets, DoxyMe, Skype, etc.)
- Experience maintaining a full clinical caseload of adult and/or adolescent clients/week (30 potential bookable calendar spots)
- Ability to work full-time, approximately 40 hours per week
- Full-time resident of the United States
We could split: Qualifications: license, degree, evidence-based treatments commitment. Requirements: experience managing risk, telehealth preferred, computer literacy, caseload, full-time, US resident. Skills: excellent interpersonal skills, continuous learning, feedback rich environment, maybe also computer literacy? But computer literacy is more requirement.
Responsibilities: daily and regularly tasks.
About the role: includes company description and role description.
Benefits: bullet list.
Pay: salary range.
Schedule: full-time approx 40 hours per week (already in requirements). Could still include schedule.
We must avoid filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present.
Now produce HTML.
Structure:
About the role
... (company overview + role description)
Responsibilities
- Provide short-term, evidence-based treatment via live video, maintaining a caseload of diverse and varied clinical needs.
- Assign digital lessons, videos, and assessments to clients to enhance learnings and monitor outcomes between sessions.
- Attend one-on-one and peer group clinical consultation meetings.
- Conduct peer-based quality assurance reviews.
- Attend robust training to enhance clinical skills.
- Have access to expert consultation and support for complex clients.
About the role
Lyra Clinical Associates partners with Lyra Health, a leading provider of evidence-based mental health care, serving more than 20 million people globally in partnership with employers and more than 100 million through health plan and partner relationships. The company has delivered more than 15 million sessions of mental health care, published more than 35 peer-reviewed studies, and delivered unmatched outcomes in terms of access, clinical effectiveness, and cost efficiency. Lyra members have access to care in one day, and nine out of ten improve with the support of providers like you. Lyra