Jobs · Engineering · Texas

Mechanical/Fluids Engineer (any level)

Blue Origin · Van Horn, TX · 1 mo ago
On-siteEngineeringFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements (or Qualifications), Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. The posting includes: About the role (vision, mission, New Shepard program). Responsibilities (list). Minimum Qualifications (list). Preferred Qualifications (list). Benefits (list). No explicit Pay or Schedule. There's mention of relocation, up to 25% travel, interviews include technical assessment. That could be part of "About the role" or maybe "Requirements"? Travel is not pay/schedule. No explicit pay or schedule, so we should not create those sections. We need headings:

for each section. Use
  • for lists. Use

    for prose. We must preserve all substantive info, not invent. Remove boilerplate: Application Close Date, EEO, etc. Also remove duplicated lines. Also remove "Special Mentions" maybe incorporate into About the role? It says: Special Mentions Relocation available Up to 25% travel required between facilities and for field operations from the Kent, Washington location Interviews will include a technical assessment. That's substantive; we can include in About the role or maybe a separate section like "Additional Details". But we only have allowed headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We could put travel/relocation under About the role or maybe under Requirements? Probably About the role includes mission etc. We'll add a paragraph about relocation/travel/technical assessment. We need to not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID. We need to include Minimum Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications. Could combine into Requirements and Qualifications sections. The instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have both Requirements and Qualifications sections. Requirements could be Minimum Qualifications. Qualifications could be Preferred Qualifications. Or we could treat Requirements as both min and pref? Better to follow typical: Requirements = Minimum Qualifications, Qualifications = Preferred Qualifications. Skills: maybe we can extract skills from responsibilities? But we have no explicit skills section; we could omit Skills if no specific content. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could omit Skills if not explicitly present. However we have skills like "Ability to create and interpret engineering drawings and P&IDs", "Excellent written and verbal communication skills". Those could be under Skills. But they are also in Minimum Qualifications. Might be okay to put them under Requirements. Since we have both Requirements and Qualifications, we can put the minimum qualifications under Requirements, and preferred under Qualifications. Skills section maybe not needed. Benefits: we have benefits list. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits. Now we need to extract content. About the role: includes vision statement, New Shepard program description, role description summary, special mentions (relocation, travel, technical assessment). Also maybe "This role is part of the New Shepard program." etc. We'll combine into a few paragraphs. Responsibilities: list from "Responsibilities Include But Are Not Limited To" bullet points. Requirements: Minimum Qualifications list. Qualifications: Preferred Qualifications list. Benefits: Benefits list. We must preserve all substantive info; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep each bullet point exactly as given (or close). We must not omit any. Let's extract. About the role prose: - "At Blue Origin, we envision millions of people living and working in space for the benefit of Earth. We’re working to develop reusable, safe, and low-cost space vehicles and systems within a culture of safety, collaboration, and inclusion. Join our team of problem solvers as we add new chapters to the history of spaceflight! This role is part of the New Shepard program. New Shepard is a reusable suborbital rocket system designed to take astronauts and research payloads past the Kármán line – the internationally recognized boundary of space. Through operational reusability, New Shepard supports our mission of lowering the cost of access to space." - Job Description Summary: "Applies standard engineering techniques to design, install, modify, analyze, repair and test tools, engines, machines, and other mechanically functioning equipment. Development, release, and support of engineering artifacts across the development cycle to support hardware fabrication, assembly, verification, test and operations. Implements operating procedures, resolves system malfunctions, and provide technical information. Researches and analyzes customer design proposals, specifications, manuals, and other data to evaluate the feasibility, cost, and maintenance requirements of designs or applications. Specifies system components or directs modification of products to ensure conformance with engineering design and performance specifications. Investigates equipment failures and difficulties to diagnose faulty operation, and to make recommendations to maintenance crew. As part of a dynamic and dedicated team of Mechanical and Fluid Engineers, you will play a crucial role in developing systems to test rocket engines, components, and integrated space flight vehicles. As a Ground System Fluid/Mechanical Engineer II, you will contribute to all aspects of test stand design across the full system lifecycle — designing fluid and structural systems for test facilities, supporting supplier coordination, and helping bring new test systems from concept through commissioning. You will grow your technical expertise while delivering meaningful work on world-class test infrastructure under the guidance of senior engineers. Passion for our mission and vision is required!" - Special Mentions: "Relocation available Up to 25% travel required between facilities and for field operations from the Kent, Washington location Interviews will include a technical assessment" We can combine into a paragraph or two. Now Responsibilities list: - Support design and development of fluid and mechanical systems for ground test facilities across the system lifecycle, from System Requirement Review (SRR) through Pre-Activation Review (PAR) - Develop and release engineering deliverables including P&IDs, models, drawings, eBOMs, and engineering analyses under the guidance of senior engineers - Apply fluid mechanics, structural analysis, and system integration fundamentals to the design of high-pressure gas, cryogenic, and propellant fluid systems — including process architecture, layout, and component selection - Design and develop mechanical test fixtures and structural supports - Support hazard assessments including Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) and Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOPs) - Participate in design reviews (IDR, FDR) and build reviews; support PAR readiness activities including system walkdowns - Coordinate with suppliers on technical requirements under supervision; support tracking of cost and schedule inputs - Support proof testing, passivation, and cleaning of fluid system components to required IEST cleanliness standards - Apply industry standards including ASME B31.3 and ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) to design work - Provide on-site support during fabrication, installation, and start-up of new facilities or upgrades - Identify and communicate technical, cost, and schedule risks to the team or project lead - Maintain configuration management of engineering deliverables in Windchill Now Minimum Qualifications list: - Bachelor's degree in Mechanical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, or related field - 3+ years of experience in fluid systems, mechanical systems, or test operations - Foundational knowledge of fluid mechanics, structural analysis, and system integration - Demonstrated knowledge of fluid system components including valves, regulators, and pumps for cryogenic, propellant, and high-pressure gas applications - Practical knowledge of standard installation and fabrication methods for piping systems, connections, fasteners, and welding - Working knowledge of industry standards including ASME B31.3 and ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) - Ability to create and interpret engineering drawings and P&IDs - Excellent written and verbal communication skills Now Preferred Qualifications list: - Advanced engineering degree - Experience with PTC Creo/ProEngineer, ProPiping, or AutoCAD Plant/P&ID - Experience with PLM configuration management tools such as Windchill - Familiarity with pipe stress analysis tools such as Bentley AutoPipe, CAESAR II, or equivalent - Familiarity with fluid system simulation tools such as AFT Arrow/Fathom or equivalent - Experience with static or non-linear FEA analysis (e.g., ANSYS) - Knowledge of aerospace fluid system cleanliness standards (IEST-STD-CC1246) - Familiarity with propellant handling or propulsion system design and testing - Exposure to Process Hazard Analysis (HAZOP, FMEA) or similar safety assessment methodologies - Experience operating or commissioning test facilities Now Benefits list: - Medical, dental, vision, basic and supplemental life insurance, paid parental leave, short and long-term disability, 401(k) with a company match of up to 5%, and an Education Support Program. - Stock Options for all regular employees (working at least 20 hours/week) - Paid Time Off: Up to four (4) weeks per year based on weekly scheduled hours, and up to 14 company-paid holidays. - Dependent on role type and job level, employees may be eligible for benefits and bonuses based on the company's intent to reward individual contributions and enable them to share in the company's results, or other factors at the company's sole discretion. Bonus amounts and eligibility are not guaranteed and subject to change and cancellation. Please check with your recruiter for more details. We should keep that as is. Now we need to output HTML fragment only, no markdown fences. We'll structure:

    About the role

    ... paragraphs ...

    Responsibilities

    • ...
    • ...

    Requirements

      ...

    Qualifications

      ...

    Benefits

      ...
    We need to ensure we don't include empty sections. Now we need to ensure we preserve all substantive info. Let's craft the About the role paragraphs. Paragraph 1: Vision and mission description. Paragraph 2: Job Description Summary (maybe multiple sentences). Could be one paragraph. Paragraph 3: Special mentions (relocation, travel, technical assessment). Could be one paragraph. We'll combine. Now check for any duplicated lines: The posting had "Applications will be accepted on an ongoing basis until the requisition is closed." That's boilerplate; we remove. Also "This position is not for immediate vacancy but is intended to fill anticipated future openings. Applicants who best meet the job requirements will be contacted and considered when a position becomes available." That's also boilerplate? It's substantive about future openings; maybe we should keep? It's about the role being for future openings. It's substantive info. Should we keep? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The statement about future openings is not boilerplate; it's about the role. So we should keep it. Where to place? Could be in About the role or maybe a separate note. We'll add a paragraph after the special mentions. Also "Culture Statement Don’t meet all desired requirements? ..." That's boilerplate? It's encouraging applicants; maybe considered boilerplate? It's generic EEO-like encouragement. Might be considered boilerplate; but it's not EEO legal. It's a culture statement encouraging to apply even if not meeting all qualifications. Could be considered substantive? It's more of a generic encouragement. The instruction says remove EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is similar to encouragement; maybe treat as boilerplate and remove. Safer to remove. Also "Export Control Regulations Applicants for employment at Blue Origin must be a U.S. citizen or national, U.S. permanent resident (i.e. current Green Card holder), or lawfully admitted into the U.S. as a refugee or granted asylum." That's legal requirement; likely boilerplate to remove. Background Check Required... also boilerplate. Thus we keep only the substantive parts: vision, role description, responsibilities, qualifications, benefits, plus future openings note

Similar jobs

Mechanical Engineer

EPINew Freedom, PA· 2 wk ago
Engineeringapply on promachbuilt.wd108.myworkdayjobs.com

Mechanical Engineer

OutpostLos Angeles, CA· 3 mo ago
Engineering$125k–$160k/yrapply on job-boards.greenhouse.io

Mechanical Engineer

ZOLL Cardiac Management SolutionsPittsburgh, PA· 3 mo ago
Engineering$70k–$85k/yrapply on zoll.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com