Licensed NDT II

We need to output only HTML fragment, with headings

for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title. Remove boilerplate like EEO etc. Also remove navigation, cookie, legal, duplicated lines, application instructions. We need to parse the job description and extract relevant content. Let's identify sections: - About the role: The initial paragraph: "Build an Aviation Career You’re Proud Of ..." maybe qualifies as about the role. Also later "What To Expect In This Role" could be responsibilities. - Responsibilities: The bullet list under "What To Expect In This Role" includes: Perform the specific non-destructive test process (FPI, ET, MT, UT). Inspect all types of aircraft parts... Inspect and interpret the test results. Document the completion and test results... Maintains personal qualifications... Supervise trainees... Moves between production assignments... Ensures the functional and acceptable status of the NDT equipment... - Requirements: Basic Qualifications: Certified as level II or III according to ASNT or NAS 410 as a level II in FPI, MT, UT, ET. Must be able to provide evidence from previous employment... High School Diploma or GED equivalent. Must be authorized to work in the U.S. without sponsorship. Must have previous experience as an aircraft structural/sheet metal mechanic or airframe mechanic. - Qualifications: Preferred Qualifications: ASNT NDT Certification, or equivalent certifiable NAS 410 training. Experience working in Aviation and/or in an MRO environment. Experience working on Dassault Falcon Jet, Bombardier, Gulfstream, and Hawkers. Experience with detailed mapping. Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) license. - Skills: Could be extracted from responsibilities: Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection, Magnetic Particle Testing, Ultrasonic Testing, Eddy Current Testing, ability to interpret results, documentation, supervising trainees, moving between assignments, maintaining equipment. But maybe we can put skills as a separate section if we have content. However the instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could combine Skills into Requirements or Qualifications. But we have separate headings allowed. We need to decide if we have enough content for Skills. The posting mentions specific NDT methods; that could be considered skills. We could create a Skills section listing those. - Benefits: The posting lists: Sign-on and Relocation Bonuses Available, Comprehensive Healthcare Insurance, 401(k) with a 5% company match, immediately vested, Paid Time Off starting from day one, Quarterly Bonus opportunities, Health & Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts, Short & Long-Term Disability Insurance, Life and AD&D Insurance, Career development and cross-training opportunities with corporate partners such as Flight Safety and CAE. - Pay: Salary: 34.01 – 51.02. Also mentions performance-based cash and equity incentives. Actual pay determined based on skills, experience, internal equity. So we have pay info. - Schedule: Not mentioned. No schedule info. So we should not include Schedule section. - About Us / About The Team: Could be considered "About the role"? But we already have About the role maybe covering introductory paragraphs. However the "About Us" and "About The Team" are company description; could be considered "About the role"? The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can include About the role as a section that includes the introductory narrative about the role and maybe company overview? But we should not include boilerplate like EEO etc. The "About Us" and "About The Team" contain some EEO statement at the end (Inclusivity Is Our Standard). That's boilerplate EEO; we should remove that. Also the earlier part about StandardAero history is okay to keep as part of About the role? Might be considered company overview, not strictly role. But we can include it under About the role as it's relevant to the role context. However we need to avoid duplication and boilerplate. The EEO statement at the end: "Inclusivity Is Our Standard It is StandardAero’s policy to provide equal employment opportunities..." That's boilerplate; remove. Also there is a line "#BIZAV" maybe a tag; remove. Also there is "About The Team Inclusivity Is Our Standard" - we should remove the EEO part but maybe keep the first sentence about inclusivity? Actually it's still EEO boilerplate. Safer to remove entire "About The Team" section. Thus we will have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay. Now we need to format each with

heading and then content: either

for prose or

• for lists. We must preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep the exact details. Let's extract content precisely. About the role: The initial paragraphs: "Build an Aviation Career You’re Proud Of Build your career with integrity by working at a company that doesn’t just treat you like a number. You’ll get the tools to do things right in a clean and safe work environment and the trust to fix any issue that comes your way. Our on-the-job training and team of experts mean you’ll be set up for success. Take charge of our day-to-day operations, so we remain the trusted source for aviation repair and maintenance. Work with your team to implement the right processes and practices across our organization to help ensure flight and product efficiency and quality. As a Level II NDT Technician, you will utilize your expertise in Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection, Magnetic Particle Testing, Ultrasonic Testing, and Eddy Current Testing to ensure the airworthiness and safety of aircraft and engine parts. You will perform detailed inspections during maintenance, repair, and modifications to verify compliance with FAA regulations and technical manuals." We could keep that as prose in a

  . Also maybe include the "What To Expect In This Role" heading? But that is more responsibilities. We'll treat that as Responsibilities. Thus About the role paragraph as above. Responsibilities: The bullet list under "What To Expect In This Role". Let's list each: - Perform the specific non-destructive test process (FPI, ET, MT, UT). - Inspect all types of aircraft parts (including engines, structures, landing gear, accessories, etc.) before, during, and after maintenance. - Inspect and interpret the test results. - Document the completion and test results of non-destructive test process. - Maintains personal qualifications as stated in the appropriate company process. - Supervise trainees in the on-the-job trainer non-destructive test training requirements. - Moves between production assignments that utilize multiple NDT skills. - Ensures the functional and acceptable status of the non-destructive test equipment in accordance with the appropriate company process. We need to preserve the exact wording. Some have capitalization variations; we can keep as is. We'll put each as

• . Requirements (Basic Qualifications): - Certified as a level II or III according to the requirements of ASNT or NAS 410 as a level II in Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection (FPI), Magnetic Particle Test (MT), Ultrasonic Testing (UT), and Eddy Current Testing (ET). - Must be able to and willing to provide evidence from previous employment that meets the requirements of NAS 410 of accepting the certification in the method. - High School Diploma or GED equivalent. - Must be authorized to work in the U.S. without sponsorship. - Must have previous experience as an aircraft structural/sheet metal mechanic or airframe mechanic. We need to keep exact phrasing. The second bullet: "Must be able to and willing to provide evidence from previous employment that meets the requirements of NAS 410 of accepting the certification in the method." That's a bit awkward but we keep. Qualifications (Preferred Qualifications): - ASNT NDT Certification, or equivalent certifiable NAS 410 training. - Experience working in Aviation and/ in an MRO environment. (Note there is a slash: "Aviation and/ in an MRO environment." Probably a typo; we keep as is.) - Experience working on Dassault Falcon Jet, Bombardier, Gulfstream, and Hawkers. - Experience with detailed mapping. - Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) license. Skills: We could list the NDT methods and related abilities. But we must not invent. We can extract from responsibilities and qualifications: Fluorescent Penetrant Inspection, Magnetic Particle Testing, Ultrasonic Testing, Eddy Current Testing, ability to inspect and interpret test results, document results, maintain personal qualifications, supervise trainees, move between production assignments, ensure functional status of NDT equipment. However some of these are more responsibilities than skills. But we can still list them as skills if we want a Skills section. However the instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. If we create Skills, we might have many sections; maybe better to omit Skills and incorporate those details into Responsibilities or Qualifications. Since we already have Responsibilities covering duties, we could omit Skills. The instruction says we can include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it. It does not require us to include all possible headings. So we can skip Skills if we deem it not needed. However the posting does mention specific NDT expertise; that could be considered skills. But we already have them in Responsibilities. To keep sections few, we can omit Skills. Thus sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay. Now Benefits: list each benefit as
• . - Sign-on and Relocation Bonuses Available - Comprehensive Healthcare Insurance - 401(k) with a 5% company match, immediately vested - Paid Time Off starting from day one - Quarterly Bonus opportunities - Health & Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts - Short & Long-Term Disability Insurance - Life and AD&D Insurance - Career development and cross-training opportunities with corporate partners such as Flight Safety and CAE Pay: Salary range and performance-based cash and equity incentives. We need to preserve exact wording: "Salary: 34.01 – 51.02 The compensation package for this position also includes a performance-based cash and equity incentives. Actual pay will be determined based on the selected candidate's skills, experience, and internal equity considerations." We can put that in a

  . Now ensure we don't include any boilerplate like EEO, navigation, cookie, legal, duplicated lines, application instructions. We removed About The Team and the EEO statement. Also removed "#BIZAV". Also removed any lines like "About Us Raising the Standard of Excellence since 1911..." Wait we kept some of that? Actually we didn't include About Us in About the role; we only used the initial paragraphs. The About Us paragraph is separate: "Raising the Standard of Excellence since 1911 With over a century of proven excellence, StandardAero has become an industry leader in MRO services and customized solutions in the aerospace field. Our shared values and learning-based culture inspire our team to exceed their potential and power our customers’ missions worldwide. With on-the-job training, advancement opportunities, and excellent benefits, StandardAero invites you to experience a fulfilling and meaningful career with us." That is substantive company overview; could be considered part of About the role? The instruction: About the role section could include company description? It's ambiguous. But we have already an About the role section with the initial paragraphs. We could add the About Us content to that section as well, making it more substantive. However we must avoid duplication; the About Us content is not duplicated elsewhere. It's okay to include it in About the role. Thus About the role will contain two paragraphs: first the initial motivational paragraph, second the company overview. We'll keep them as separate

  elements or combine into one? Better to keep as separate

  for readability. Now check for any other boilerplate: The line "