Lead Design Engineer
- .
Requirements: educational + experience.
Educational Requirements: "Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Applied Science, or equivalent required. Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering preferred."
Experience Requirements: "Six years of experience in a design engineering role is required."
Combine into Requirements section as prose or list? Could be
- ... ...
- All FN America employees are expected to demonstrate the behaviors of accountability, collaboration, communication, customer focus, and innovation.
- Ability to author thorough written and verbal status and technical reports.
- Ability to utilize and follow FNA and industry engineering standards and procedures.
- Technical knowledge of all typical firearm processing technologies and expertise in at least one knowledge area, including machining processes, plastic injection molding, metal injection molding, investment casting, surface treating, and spring manufacturing.
- Understanding of proper design components and subassemblies that result in the successful development and validation of major new products.
- Ability to use required tools on difficult tasks and/or group of tasks or equivalent.
- Knowledge of GD&T per ASME Y14.5 1994 and 1982.
- Lab equipment and measurement tools; development and execution of test procedures.
- 3D CAD software (PTC Creo preferred).
- Project Management Principles (work-based schedule development and execution).
- Design Analysis and Simulation Software (experience with CETOL, Ansys, Adams, and STAR-CCM+ preferred).
- Microsoft
with both sentences. Qualifications: skills and competencies. Extract: "All FN America employees are expected to demonstrate the behaviors of accountability, collaboration, communication, customer focus, and innovation. Additional requirements of this position include: Ability to author thorough written and verbal status and technical reports. Ability to utilize and follow FNA and industry engineering standards and procedures. Technical knowledge of all typical firearm processing technologies and expertise in at least one knowledge area, including machining processes, plastic injection molding, metal injection molding, investment casting, surface treating, and spring manufacturing. Understanding of proper design components and subassemblies that result in the successful development and validation of major new products. Ability to use required tools on difficult tasks and/or group of tasks or equivalent." We could break into
- items.
Skills: tools knowledge etc.
Extract: "Tools Knowledge of GD&T per ASME Y14.5 1994 and 1982. Lab Equipment and Measurement Tools Development and Execution of Test Procedures 3D CAD software (PTC Creo preferred) Project Management Principles (work-based schedule development and execution) Design Analysis and Simulation Software (experience with CETOL, Ansys, Adams, and STAR-CCM+ preferred) Microsoft Office Training Training on department specific Gateway (SharePoint based), PDS (PTC Windchill based), project management software will be required."
Also maybe "Certifications/Licenses None." That's not a skill; we could include under Skills? But it's basically none. Since it's "None", we should not create a section for it if it's just "None". The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. "None" is similar to placeholder? It's a statement that there are none. Might be considered filler? Probably better to omit Certifications/Licenses section entirely because it's not substantive (just says none). So we skip.
Working Conditions: "Typical office environment with some travel between buildings and to other locations required. May be exposed to loud noises, toxic chemicals, and dangerous machinery when on the plant floor. All FN America employees have a responsibility to participate in the development of a safe and healthy workplace and to comply with instructions given for their own safety and health and that of others."
This is substantive. Should we include a section? The allowed headings do not include Working Conditions. We could maybe put under About the role or Responsibilities? But it's not exactly those. The instruction says use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings? It says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Likely they expect only those headings. So we need to map Working Conditions into one of those. Perhaps it fits under Responsibilities? Not really. Could be under About the role? Maybe we can include a brief sentence about working conditions in About the role? But that would be mixing. However we must preserve all substantive information; we cannot drop it. We could add a
after the About the role section without a heading? The instruction says use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't say we cannot have other headings, but suggests to use those for sections. Safer to include Working Conditions as a paragraph under About the role? Might be okay.
Alternatively we could create a section "Working Conditions" using even though not in list; but instruction says use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). The "e.g." implies examples, not exclusive list. So we could add other headings if needed. But they said "use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests those are the expected headings; but not strictly prohibited others. However to be safe, we could incorporate Working Conditions into Responsibilities or About the role as a paragraph.
I'll add a paragraph after Responsibilities maybe as part of Responsibilities? Actually working conditions is not a duty. Could add a separate section "Working Conditions" with . I think it's acceptable as it's substantive and not covered elsewhere. The instruction didn't forbid other headings; just gave examples. I'll include Working Conditions.
Now we need to output only HTML fragment.
Structure:
About the role
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). The "e.g." implies examples, not exclusive list. So we could add other headings if needed. But they said "use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests those are the expected headings; but not strictly prohibited others. However to be safe, we could incorporate Working Conditions into Responsibilities or About the role as a paragraph.
I'll add a paragraph after Responsibilities maybe as part of Responsibilities? Actually working conditions is not a duty. Could add a separate section "Working Conditions" with . I think it's acceptable as it's substantive and not covered elsewhere. The instruction didn't forbid other headings; just gave examples. I'll include Working Conditions.
Now we need to output only HTML fragment.
Structure:
About the role
. I think it's acceptable as it's substantive and not covered elsewhere. The instruction didn't forbid other headings; just gave examples. I'll include Working Conditions.
Now we need to output only HTML fragment.
Structure:
About the role
... company description ...
... position summary ...
Responsibilities
Requirements
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Applied Science, or equivalent required. Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering preferred.
Six years of experience in a design engineering role is required.