Joint Campaign & Logistics Planner
D&G Solutions · Belleville, IL · 3 wk ago
On-siteManagementFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate.
We need to parse the posting.
Key parts:
- Intro: "Joint Campaign and Logistics Planner On Site | Scott AFB, Illinois | Secret Clearance Required (TS/SCI Eligible) If you want to shape how global bulk fuel logistics supports operational war plans and contribute directly to Combatant Command readiness, we would love to talk." That's intro prose.
- "Why This Role Exists" then paragraph about work impact, D&G seeking a Joint Campaign & Logistics Planner to support USTRANSCOM... This is about the role. Could be "About the role" section.
- "What You Will Do" list of duties. That's Responsibilities.
- "Required" then bullet list of qualifications: Bachelor's degree..., Minimum of 5 years..., Planning Acumen..., Strategic Policy Alignment..., System Expertise... That's Requirements/Qualifications.
- "Preferred" then bullet list: Advanced Military Planning Graduate..., Energy / Joint Logistics Experience..., Exercise & Wargaming... That's Preferred qualifications (could be Skills or Qualifications). We'll treat as "Preferred Qualifications" maybe under Requirements or separate Skills. But we have headings: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to decide.
We have "Clearance and Eligibility" bullet: Active DoD Secret clearance required with eligibility for TS/SCI. This is a requirement.
- "Location On site at Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. Travel -Approximately 15% CONUS and OCONUS." That's Schedule? Actually location and travel. Could be under "Schedule" maybe not. There's no explicit schedule like shift. Travel percentage could be under "Schedule" or maybe we omit if not specific. The instruction: include Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections only if posting actually states them. It does state travel approx 15% CONUS and OCONUS. That's schedule-related (travel). Could be under Schedule.
- "Who We Are" description of company. That's not required but could be omitted as boilerplate? It's about company, not job. Might be considered boilerplate but it's substantive about employer. The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "Who We Are" is not exactly those, but could be considered company overview. Might keep as "About the company"? Not a listed heading. We have headings limited to About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we should not add extra headings. So we can incorporate company info into About the role maybe? But About the role already used for role description. Could add a short paragraph about company under About the role? Might be okay.
- "What We Offer" bullet list: Competitive salary | Comprehensive benefits | 401(k) | Bonus and profit sharing | Flexible hours | Education reimbursement | Generous paid time off. That's Benefits (and maybe Pay). It mentions Competitive salary (pay) and benefits. We need to decide: we have separate Pay and Benefits headings. The posting mentions both salary and benefits. We could create a Benefits section with the list, and maybe Pay section if we have salary detail. It only says "Competitive salary" no specifics. According to instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). "Competitive salary" is vague but not exactly placeholder like "not specified". It's still vague but maybe acceptable? The instruction says avoid filler/placeholder text like "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD". "Competitive salary" is somewhat vague but not exactly those. Might be okay to include Pay section with that line. However they said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Could combine Pay and Benefits into one Benefits section? But we have headings for Pay and Benefits separate. Might be better to have Benefits section that includes both salary and benefits. But we have a Pay heading; if we don't have specific pay, maybe omit Pay section. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state "Competitive salary" which is a statement about pay, albeit vague. So we could include Pay section with that line. However it's not a specific number; but it's still stating pay exists. I'd lean to include Pay section with that line.
- Benefits: list includes Comprehensive benefits, 401(k), Bonus and profit sharing, Flexible hours, Education reimbursement, Generous paid time off. That's substantive.
- Schedule: we have travel approx 15% CONUS and OCONUS. That's schedule-related. Could include Schedule section with that line.
Now we need to output HTML fragment with
for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate.
We need to parse the posting.
Key parts:
- Intro: "Joint Campaign and Logistics Planner On Site | Scott AFB, Illinois | Secret Clearance Required (TS/SCI Eligible) If you want to shape how global bulk fuel logistics supports operational war plans and contribute directly to Combatant Command readiness, we would love to talk." That's intro prose.
- "Why This Role Exists" then paragraph about work impact, D&G seeking a Joint Campaign & Logistics Planner to support USTRANSCOM... This is about the role. Could be "About the role" section.
- "What You Will Do" list of duties. That's Responsibilities.
- "Required" then bullet list of qualifications: Bachelor's degree..., Minimum of 5 years..., Planning Acumen..., Strategic Policy Alignment..., System Expertise... That's Requirements/Qualifications.
- "Preferred" then bullet list: Advanced Military Planning Graduate..., Energy / Joint Logistics Experience..., Exercise & Wargaming... That's Preferred qualifications (could be Skills or Qualifications). We'll treat as "Preferred Qualifications" maybe under Requirements or separate Skills. But we have headings: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to decide.
We have "Clearance and Eligibility" bullet: Active DoD Secret clearance required with eligibility for TS/SCI. This is a requirement.
- "Location On site at Scott Air Force Base, Illinois. Travel -Approximately 15% CONUS and OCONUS." That's Schedule? Actually location and travel. Could be under "Schedule" maybe not. There's no explicit schedule like shift. Travel percentage could be under "Schedule" or maybe we omit if not specific. The instruction: include Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections only if posting actually states them. It does state travel approx 15% CONUS and OCONUS. That's schedule-related (travel). Could be under Schedule.
- "Who We Are" description of company. That's not required but could be omitted as boilerplate? It's about company, not job. Might be considered boilerplate but it's substantive about employer. The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "Who We Are" is not exactly those, but could be considered company overview. Might keep as "About the company"? Not a listed heading. We have headings limited to About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we should not add extra headings. So we can incorporate company info into About the role maybe? But About the role already used for role description. Could add a short paragraph about company under About the role? Might be okay.
- "What We Offer" bullet list: Competitive salary | Comprehensive benefits | 401(k) | Bonus and profit sharing | Flexible hours | Education reimbursement | Generous paid time off. That's Benefits (and maybe Pay). It mentions Competitive salary (pay) and benefits. We need to decide: we have separate Pay and Benefits headings. The posting mentions both salary and benefits. We could create a Benefits section with the list, and maybe Pay section if we have salary detail. It only says "Competitive salary" no specifics. According to instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). "Competitive salary" is vague but not exactly placeholder like "not specified". It's still vague but maybe acceptable? The instruction says avoid filler/placeholder text like "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD". "Competitive salary" is somewhat vague but not exactly those. Might be okay to include Pay section with that line. However they said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Could combine Pay and Benefits into one Benefits section? But we have headings for Pay and Benefits separate. Might be better to have Benefits section that includes both salary and benefits. But we have a Pay heading; if we don't have specific pay, maybe omit Pay section. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state "Competitive salary" which is a statement about pay, albeit vague. So we could include Pay section with that line. However it's not a specific number; but it's still stating pay exists. I'd lean to include Pay section with that line.
- Benefits: list includes Comprehensive benefits, 401(k), Bonus and profit sharing, Flexible hours, Education reimbursement, Generous paid time off. That's substantive.
- Schedule: we have travel approx 15% CONUS and OCONUS. That's schedule-related. Could include Schedule section with that line.
Now we need to output HTML fragment with headings and - for lists,
for prose.
We must not include markdown fences.
We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail.
We need to remove duplicated lines.
Let's extract content.
Intro: "Joint Campaign and Logistics Planner On Site | Scott AFB, Illinois | Secret Clearance Required (TS/SCI Eligible) If you want to shape how global bulk fuel logistics supports operational war plans and contribute directly to Combatant Command readiness, we would love to talk."
We can treat that as a
intro.
Then "Why This Role Exists" paragraph: "The work we do has real impact, and the people behind it matter just as much. D&G is seeking a Joint Campaign & Logistics Planner to support the United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) in executing its responsibility as the Department's Single Manager for Global Bulk Fuel Management and Delivery (GBFMD). This position serves as a senior planning authority responsible for translating Department-level guidance, including the National Defense Strategy (NDS), Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), and Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP) into operational-level bulk fuel posture, distribution concepts, and campaign objectives. The planner leads the operational integration of bulk fuel feasibility assessments into Combatant Command (CCMD) Campaign Plans (CCPs), Operation Plans (OPLANs), and Concept Plans (CONPLANs), identifying strategic risks and developing mitigation strategies for contested logistics environments."
We can put that under About the role (
About the role
) as prose.
Then "What You Will Do" list: each sentence starts with a verb. We'll make - each.
List items:
- Lead operational-level planning and cross-functional campaign synchronization for Global Bulk Fuel Management and Delivery across USTRANSCOM, its Service Components, Geographic Combatant Commands (GCCs), the Joint Staff, and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA Energy).
- Represent USTRANSCOM as an authoritative planning expert in Combatant Command Joint Operational Planning Teams (OPTs), embedding bulk fuel posture and logistics distribution into deliberate, crisis action, and contingency plans.
- Translate guidance from the Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP), and Global Campaign Plans (GCP) into actionable logistics concepts of support, with an emphasis on Annex D (Logistics) and bulk fuel integration.
- Lead and support Bulk Fuel Feasibility Assessments (BFFAs) and Planning Assistance Teams (PATs) to identify distribution bottlenecks, storage shortfalls, and contested-environment vulnerabilities across integrated problem sets.
- Integrate fuel logistics into the Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) enterprise; assess plan viability by evaluating force movement velocity against theater fuel storage and distribution throughput capacity.
- Coordinate with theater Petroleum Integration Cells (PICs) and Joint Petroleum Officers to align the Petroleum War Reserve Requirement (PWRR) with real-world distribution capabilities.
- Formulate strategic recommendations, executive-level decision briefs, and posture adjustments for the Commander, USTRANSCOM, CCMD leadership, and the Joint Staff.
That's Responsibilities (
Responsibilities
).
Now Required qualifications: we have bullet list after "Required What We Are Looking For". Actually the heading "Required" then paragraph: "Bachelor’s degree in strategic studies, National Security Policy, Military Operational Art and Science, Operations Research, International Relations, or related discipline (or equivalent military staff college completion). Minimum of 5 years of operational and campaign planning experience at a Combatant Command (CCMD), Joint Staff, Service Component Headquarters, or Sub-Unified Command level. Planning Acumen: Demonstrated mastery of the Joint Planning Process (JPP) per Joint Publication 5-0 (Joint Planning) and Joint Publication 4-0 (Joint Logistics), with direct experience developing campaign design, Annex D (Logistics), and contingency plans. Strategic Policy Alignment: Working knowledge of Department-level planning directives, including the National Defense Strategy (NDS), Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP), and the Global Deployment and Distribution Enterprise. System Expertise: Operational proficiency with the Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) enterprise and Joint Planning and Execution Services (JPES) at the plan-feasibility and campaign-assessment level (beyond tactical TPFDD data entry)."
We can treat each as separate - or combine into prose? Since it's a list of requirements, better as
- . However some items have colons and sub-details. We'll keep each bullet as a
- containing the full sentence.
Thus:
- Bachelor’s degree in strategic studies, National Security Policy, Military Operational Art and Science, Operations Research, International Relations, or related discipline (or equivalent military staff college completion).
- Minimum of 5 years of operational and campaign planning experience at a Combatant Command (CCMD), Joint Staff, Service Component Headquarters, or Sub-Unified Command level.
- Planning Acumen: Demonstrated mastery of the Joint Planning Process (JPP) per Joint Publication 5-0 (Joint Planning) and Joint Publication 4-0 (Joint Logistics), with direct experience developing campaign design, Annex D (Logistics), and contingency plans.
- Strategic Policy Alignment: Working knowledge of Department-level planning directives, including the National Defense Strategy (NDS), Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP), and the Global Deployment and Distribution Enterprise.
- System Expertise: Operational proficiency with the Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) enterprise and Joint Planning and Execution Services (JPES) at the plan-feasibility and campaign-assessment level (beyond tactical TPFDD data entry).
Also Clearance and Eligibility: "Active DoD Secret clearance required with eligibility for TS/SCI. This role is restricted to U.S. person(s) (U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and other protected individuals under 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3))."
We could add as another
- under Requirements.
Now Preferred qualifications: list after "Preferred". Items:
- Advanced Military Planning Graduate: Graduate of an Advanced Studies Group: US Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS / FA59) US Air Force School of Advanced Air and Space Studies (SAASS / 16G) Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS) US Marine Corps School of Advanced Warfighting (SAW / 0505) US Navy Maritime Advanced Warfighting School (MAWS / 1805) Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS / JPME Phase II)
- Energy / Joint Logistics Experience: Prior experience in bulk fuel logistics, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA Energy) synchronization, Petroleum Integration Cells (PIC), or Petroleum War Reserve Requirement (PWRR) calculations.
- Exercise & Wargaming: Proven background designing and participating in CCMD/Joint Staff tier-one wargames, tabletop exercises (TT
- for lists,
for prose. We must not include markdown fences. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. We need to remove duplicated lines. Let's extract content. Intro: "Joint Campaign and Logistics Planner On Site | Scott AFB, Illinois | Secret Clearance Required (TS/SCI Eligible) If you want to shape how global bulk fuel logistics supports operational war plans and contribute directly to Combatant Command readiness, we would love to talk." We can treat that as a
intro. Then "Why This Role Exists" paragraph: "The work we do has real impact, and the people behind it matter just as much. D&G is seeking a Joint Campaign & Logistics Planner to support the United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) in executing its responsibility as the Department's Single Manager for Global Bulk Fuel Management and Delivery (GBFMD). This position serves as a senior planning authority responsible for translating Department-level guidance, including the National Defense Strategy (NDS), Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), and Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP) into operational-level bulk fuel posture, distribution concepts, and campaign objectives. The planner leads the operational integration of bulk fuel feasibility assessments into Combatant Command (CCMD) Campaign Plans (CCPs), Operation Plans (OPLANs), and Concept Plans (CONPLANs), identifying strategic risks and developing mitigation strategies for contested logistics environments." We can put that under About the role (
About the role
) as prose. Then "What You Will Do" list: each sentence starts with a verb. We'll make- each.
List items:
- Lead operational-level planning and cross-functional campaign synchronization for Global Bulk Fuel Management and Delivery across USTRANSCOM, its Service Components, Geographic Combatant Commands (GCCs), the Joint Staff, and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA Energy).
- Represent USTRANSCOM as an authoritative planning expert in Combatant Command Joint Operational Planning Teams (OPTs), embedding bulk fuel posture and logistics distribution into deliberate, crisis action, and contingency plans.
- Translate guidance from the Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP), and Global Campaign Plans (GCP) into actionable logistics concepts of support, with an emphasis on Annex D (Logistics) and bulk fuel integration.
- Lead and support Bulk Fuel Feasibility Assessments (BFFAs) and Planning Assistance Teams (PATs) to identify distribution bottlenecks, storage shortfalls, and contested-environment vulnerabilities across integrated problem sets.
- Integrate fuel logistics into the Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) enterprise; assess plan viability by evaluating force movement velocity against theater fuel storage and distribution throughput capacity.
- Coordinate with theater Petroleum Integration Cells (PICs) and Joint Petroleum Officers to align the Petroleum War Reserve Requirement (PWRR) with real-world distribution capabilities.
- Formulate strategic recommendations, executive-level decision briefs, and posture adjustments for the Commander, USTRANSCOM, CCMD leadership, and the Joint Staff.
That's Responsibilities (
Responsibilities
). Now Required qualifications: we have bullet list after "Required What We Are Looking For". Actually the heading "Required" then paragraph: "Bachelor’s degree in strategic studies, National Security Policy, Military Operational Art and Science, Operations Research, International Relations, or related discipline (or equivalent military staff college completion). Minimum of 5 years of operational and campaign planning experience at a Combatant Command (CCMD), Joint Staff, Service Component Headquarters, or Sub-Unified Command level. Planning Acumen: Demonstrated mastery of the Joint Planning Process (JPP) per Joint Publication 5-0 (Joint Planning) and Joint Publication 4-0 (Joint Logistics), with direct experience developing campaign design, Annex D (Logistics), and contingency plans. Strategic Policy Alignment: Working knowledge of Department-level planning directives, including the National Defense Strategy (NDS), Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP), and the Global Deployment and Distribution Enterprise. System Expertise: Operational proficiency with the Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) enterprise and Joint Planning and Execution Services (JPES) at the plan-feasibility and campaign-assessment level (beyond tactical TPFDD data entry)." We can treat each as separate - or combine into prose? Since it's a list of requirements, better as
- . However some items have colons and sub-details. We'll keep each bullet as a
- containing the full sentence. Thus: - Bachelor’s degree in strategic studies, National Security Policy, Military Operational Art and Science, Operations Research, International Relations, or related discipline (or equivalent military staff college completion). - Minimum of 5 years of operational and campaign planning experience at a Combatant Command (CCMD), Joint Staff, Service Component Headquarters, or Sub-Unified Command level. - Planning Acumen: Demonstrated mastery of the Joint Planning Process (JPP) per Joint Publication 5-0 (Joint Planning) and Joint Publication 4-0 (Joint Logistics), with direct experience developing campaign design, Annex D (Logistics), and contingency plans. - Strategic Policy Alignment: Working knowledge of Department-level planning directives, including the National Defense Strategy (NDS), Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP), and the Global Deployment and Distribution Enterprise. - System Expertise: Operational proficiency with the Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) enterprise and Joint Planning and Execution Services (JPES) at the plan-feasibility and campaign-assessment level (beyond tactical TPFDD data entry). Also Clearance and Eligibility: "Active DoD Secret clearance required with eligibility for TS/SCI. This role is restricted to U.S. person(s) (U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and other protected individuals under 8 U.S.C. 1324b(a)(3))." We could add as another
- under Requirements. Now Preferred qualifications: list after "Preferred". Items: - Advanced Military Planning Graduate: Graduate of an Advanced Studies Group: US Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS / FA59) US Air Force School of Advanced Air and Space Studies (SAASS / 16G) Joint Advanced Warfighting School (JAWS) US Marine Corps School of Advanced Warfighting (SAW / 0505) US Navy Maritime Advanced Warfighting School (MAWS / 1805) Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS / JPME Phase II) - Energy / Joint Logistics Experience: Prior experience in bulk fuel logistics, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA Energy) synchronization, Petroleum Integration Cells (PIC), or Petroleum War Reserve Requirement (PWRR) calculations. - Exercise & Wargaming: Proven background designing and participating in CCMD/Joint Staff tier-one wargames, tabletop exercises (TT
- each.
List items:
- Lead operational-level planning and cross-functional campaign synchronization for Global Bulk Fuel Management and Delivery across USTRANSCOM, its Service Components, Geographic Combatant Commands (GCCs), the Joint Staff, and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA Energy).
- Represent USTRANSCOM as an authoritative planning expert in Combatant Command Joint Operational Planning Teams (OPTs), embedding bulk fuel posture and logistics distribution into deliberate, crisis action, and contingency plans.
- Translate guidance from the Contingency Planning Guidance (CPG), Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP), and Global Campaign Plans (GCP) into actionable logistics concepts of support, with an emphasis on Annex D (Logistics) and bulk fuel integration.
- Lead and support Bulk Fuel Feasibility Assessments (BFFAs) and Planning Assistance Teams (PATs) to identify distribution bottlenecks, storage shortfalls, and contested-environment vulnerabilities across integrated problem sets.
- Integrate fuel logistics into the Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) enterprise; assess plan viability by evaluating force movement velocity against theater fuel storage and distribution throughput capacity.
- Coordinate with theater Petroleum Integration Cells (PICs) and Joint Petroleum Officers to align the Petroleum War Reserve Requirement (PWRR) with real-world distribution capabilities.
- Formulate strategic recommendations, executive-level decision briefs, and posture adjustments for the Commander, USTRANSCOM, CCMD leadership, and the Joint Staff.
That's Responsibilities (