HR Data Analyst

We need to output HTML fragment with headings

for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We need to parse the job description. First, remove boilerplate: "FirstEnergy at a Glance", "About The Opportunity", etc. We need to preserve substantive info. Let's extract sections: - About the role: maybe from "About The Opportunity" and "Summary". The description includes: "This is an open position with FirstEnergy Service Co., a subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp. [SC00 Summary The Human Resources Reporting & Analytics department is striving to be the catalyst for data-driven excellence in people management. We aspire to transform the way our organization harnesses and leverages HR data to empower informed decisions and optimize our workforce's potential. Our commitment is to provide actionable insights, foster a culture of inclusivity, and enable strategic HR practices that drive sustainable growth and innovation. We envision a future where decisions, policies and actions are empowered by the intelligence we derive from our data and contribute to our company’s success. Reporting Specialists respond to dynamic and often urgent data requests from stakeholders across HR and business units. They ensure timely, accurate, and insightful reporting while maintaining data integrity and compliance. This role requires agility, technical proficiency, and strong communication skills." Thus we can create an "About the role" section with that prose. - Responsibilities: list bullet points under "Responsibilities Include". Items: Report Development (with sub-bullets), Stakeholder Collaboration, Data Integrity & Compliance, Documentation & Process Improvement, Tool Proficiency & Learning. We need to flatten into

• items. Should we keep sub-bullets? Probably each bullet as a list item; we can combine subpoints into one li with semicolons or separate lines. We'll preserve content. - Requirements: maybe "Qualifications At The Analyst Level III Include" and "Qualifications At The Analyst Level IV Include". Also "Benefits, Compensation & Workforce Diversity" is separate but includes benefits info. Also "Safety" etc. But we need sections: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide what goes where. The posting includes qualifications for Analyst Level III and IV. That's qualifications. Also maybe "Requirements" could be the same as qualifications? But we need separate sections if content exists. We have "Qualifications At The Analyst Level III Include" and "Qualifications At The Analyst Level IV Include". That's qualifications. We also have "Benefits, Compensation & Workforce Diversity" which describes benefits: competitive pay plus incentive compensation, company-sponsored pension plan, 401(k) with matching, medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, life insurance, skills development training with tuition reimbursement. Also mention website for more info. Also workforce diversity statement. We have no explicit Pay or Schedule specifics. The benefits section mentions competitive pay but no specific numbers. According to rule: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. Benefits section is present (they describe benefits). So we can include Benefits section. Pay: they mention "competitive pay plus incentive compensation" but that's vague; still it's stating pay conceptually. However rule says: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The phrase "competitive pay plus incentive compensation" is somewhat vague but still states pay exists. Might be acceptable to include Pay section with that sentence. However they also have a Benefits section that already includes pay mention. Could combine pay into Benefits. But they ask to prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe we omit Pay section and keep Benefits only, as pay info is included there. Similarly Schedule: no info, so omit. Skills: maybe we can extract from qualifications: "Intermediate proficiency in SQL, Excel, and basic reporting tools (e.g., Oracle HCM OTBI, BI Publisher). Able to gather requirements from stakeholders and translate them into technical specifications. Designs and develops reports and dashboards with moderate complexity; performs basic testing and validation. Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with HR and business teams. Maintains documentation of report development processes and ensures data integrity." For Analyst Level IV: "Proficient in SQL, HCM tools, and data visualization platforms (e.g., Power BI, Oracle, Tableau, Workday). Independently develops and delivers ad-hoc and recurring reports tailored to stakeholder needs. Performs advanced data extraction, cleaning, and validation across multiple systems. Leads efforts in process improvement, identifying patterns for automation and streamlining. Provides technical support and training to HR staff; ensures compliance with data privacy regulations." We could create a Skills section summarizing these. However we already have Qualifications sections that include skills. Might be redundant. The instruction: Use headings for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to include a section only when posting has real specific content for it. We have content for About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications (Analyst III and IV), Benefits. We also have content for Skills (maybe we can extract). But Qualifications already covers skills; maybe we can treat Qualifications as the section for qualifications/requirements. The posting also has "Requirements" maybe not explicitly labeled but we could treat the qualifications as requirements. However we have both Qualifications and Requirements headings possible. To avoid thin sections, we could combine Requirements and Qualifications into one Qualifications section. But the instruction says we can use Requirements heading if there is content. The posting does not have a separate "Requirements" heading; but we could infer that the qualifications are requirements. However we should not invent headings if not clearly present? The instruction: "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It suggests we can use those headings if appropriate. It doesn't forbid using a heading even if not explicitly in posting, as long as we have real specific content for it. So we can create a Requirements section with the qualification details (maybe split into Analyst III and IV). But we also have Qualifications heading; we could have both but that would be duplicate content. Better to pick one: Qualifications seems more fitting as they have "Qualifications At The Analyst Level III Include" and "Qualifications At The Analyst Level IV Include". So we will use Qualifications section. Skills: we could extract specific skills like SQL, Excel, Power BI, etc. But that's already in Qualifications. To avoid thin sections, we may omit Skills. Benefits: we have content. Pay: we have mention of competitive pay but it's inside Benefits; we could still create Pay section with that sentence, but it's thin. Better to omit Pay. Schedule: no content, omit. Thus final sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits. We need to ensure we preserve all substantive information. Let's extract each. About the role: combine the paragraphs from "About The Opportunity" and "Summary". We'll produce a

  with that content. Responsibilities: list items: - Report Development: Respond to one-time and urgent data requests from HR, Finance, and leadership teams. Extract, clean, and analyze data from various systems (e.g., Oracle HCM, Power BI, Excel). Deliver clear, accurate, and timely reports tailored to stakeholder needs. Develop Dashboards and scheduled reports for leaders across HR and Business Units. - Stakeholder Collaboration: Work closely with requestors to clarify reporting needs and define success criteria. Translate business questions into technical reporting requirements. - Data Integrity & Compliance: Ensure all reports meet data privacy, security, and compliance standards. Validate data sources and perform quality assurance checks before delivery. - Documentation & Process Improvement: Document ad-hoc request outcomes and identify patterns for potential automation. Recommend improvements to streamline, automate, or build dashboards for recurring ad-hoc reporting processes. - Tool Proficiency & Learning: Stay current with reporting tools and data platforms used across the organization. Continuously improve technical skills and contribute to knowledge sharing within the team. We need to keep the content exactly; we can keep as one

  per main heading, with internal sentences. Qualifications: we have two levels. We'll combine into a

  with items for each level maybe. Qualifications At The Analyst Level III Include: Bachelor’s degree in HR, Data Science, or related discipline with 4 years of related experience in reporting or data analysis. In Lieu of a degree, 6 years of related experience is required. Related experience includes working knowledge of: Intermediate proficiency in SQL, Excel, and basic reporting tools (e.g., Oracle HCM OTBI, BI Publisher). Able to gather requirements from stakeholders and translate them into technical specifications. Designs and develops reports and dashboards with moderate complexity; performs basic testing and validation. Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with HR and business teams. Maintains documentation of report development processes and ensures data integrity. Qualifications At The Analyst Level IV Include: Bachelor’s degree with 7 of related experience in HR reporting or analytics. In lieu of a degree, 9 years of related experience required. Related experience includes in-depth knowledge of: Proficient in SQL, HCM tools, and data visualization platforms (e.g., Power BI, Oracle, Tableau, Workday). Independently develops and delivers ad-hoc and recurring reports tailored to stakeholder needs. Performs advanced data extraction, cleaning, and validation across multiple systems. Leads efforts in process improvement, identifying patterns for automation and streamlining. Provides technical support and training to HR staff; ensures compliance with data privacy regulations. Note there is a typo: "Bachelor’s degree with 7 of related experience" likely missing "years". We'll keep as is. We'll output as
  • for each level, preserving the text. Benefits: from "Benefits, Compensation & Workforce Diversity". We'll extract: competitive pay plus incentive compensation, a company-sponsored pension plan, 401(k) savings plan with matching employer contribution, a choice of medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, and life insurance programs, as well as skills development training with tuition reimbursement. Also mention website for more info. Also workforce diversity statement: "FirstEnergy proudly supports workforce diversity. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, religion, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, status as a protected veteran, or status as a qualified individual with a disability. No recruiters or agencies without a previously signed contract. Unable to sponsor or transfer H-1B visas at this time." Also safety section but that's not benefits; we could omit safety as not requested. However safety is substantive but not under any of our headings; we could maybe include under About the role? But it's separate. The instruction: remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. The safety section is not boilerplate; it's substantive. But we don't have a heading for Safety. Could we add a Safety section? Not in the list of allowed headings? The list includes examples but not exhaustive; we could add other headings if needed. However they said "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The e.g. suggests those are examples, not exclusive. But to be safe, we could include Safety as a section if we have content. However they want few substantive sections over many thin ones. Safety is a decent paragraph. Could we incorporate safety into About the role? Might be okay but it's distinct. However the instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Adding Safety would increase sections. Maybe we can omit safety as it's not directly asked for headings; but we must preserve ALL substantive information. If we omit safety, we lose substantive info. So we need to include it somewhere. Could we add a Safety