Health Physicist / Radiation Safety Expert

We need to output only HTML fragment, with headings

for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info. Remove boilerplate: navigation, EEO, legal, etc. Also remove duplicated lines, application instructions. Must not include sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Pay: posting says Salary: $75 - $100 per hour. So we can have Pay section with that. Benefits: they list "Competitive Hourly Compensation: Up to $100/hr as an independent contractor, paid hourly Keep Your Current Role: Structured as supplemental work, not a career move. No requirement to leave your position 100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones Direct Impact on Frontier AI Safety: ...". Those are benefits. So we can have Benefits section summarizing those bullet points. Schedule: they mention "100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones". That could be Schedule. But we already used flexible hours in Benefits. Could separate: Benefits: Competitive hourly compensation, keep current role, direct impact, etc. Schedule: 100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones. Pay: $75 - $100 per hour. We need sections: About the role (bit about us). Responsibilities (Key Responsibilities and Duties). Requirements (maybe Qualifications Needed). Skills (maybe some of qualifications). But we must not create thin sections. Better to combine: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications (including education, experience, skills), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Avoid duplication. Let's extract substantive content: About the role: "We are partnered with a fast growing AI data services company that builds the training and evaluation data behind many of the world's leading AI labs and foundation model developers. Their work sits where technical expertise meets model safety, bringing in specialists from chemistry, biology, radiation science, nuclear engineering and emergency response to evaluate how AI systems handle high consequence subject matter. The experts on these projects shape how frontier models reason about hazard, risk and public safety, and that reach extends well beyond any single laboratory or response program. They operate remotely across time zones and build their review teams around people who are already practicing in their field. We are helping them identify CBRN specialists for this engagement." Responsibilities: list bullet points under "Key Responsibilities and Duties". We'll convert each sentence into

. Qualifications: list bullet points under "Qualifications Needed". We'll convert each line into

. Skills: maybe we can extract from qualifications: "Professional English proficiency at C1 minimum, sufficient to follow written guidelines and produce detailed written feedback", "Familiarity with safety frameworks, emergency response concepts, biosafety levels, hazardous material communication, radiation protection principles, decontamination concepts, incident reporting and public health guidance preferred", "Prior experience with AI safety, data annotation, technical QA, policy review, risk assessment, red team review, scientific review or rubric based evaluation strongly preferred", "Reliable and self directed, able to deliver consistent quality in an hourly remote contractor workflow", "Must be a citizen of the United States, United Kingdom, Australia or New Zealand". Could be part of Qualifications but we can separate Skills. Benefits: list bullet points from "Why join us?" section: Competitive Hourly Compensation: Up to $100/hr as an independent contractor, paid hourly; Keep Your Current Role: Structured as supplemental work, not a career move. No requirement to leave your position; 100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones; Direct Impact on Frontier AI Safety: Your judgment shapes how leading models handle chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear subject matter; Work Inside Your Expertise: Technical review and reference writing in the domain you already practice in, not general purpose data work; Credential Respected, Not Retrained: Built for practicing specialists, with project rubrics rather than a long ramp; Growing Engagement: An expanding program with continued need across all four CBRN domains. Pay: Salary: $75 - $100 per hour. Schedule: maybe we already covered flexible hours in Benefits; but we could still have Schedule: 100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones. However that duplicates Benefits. To avoid duplication, maybe we put flexible hours under Benefits and not Schedule. But we need to include Schedule only if posting has real specific content for it. It does: "100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones". That's schedule info. Could still be in Benefits but we can also put in Schedule. The instruction: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe combine flexible hours into Benefits and not create Schedule section. But we need to include Pay section because we have pay info. Benefits we have many items. So we can have About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay. That's five sections. No Skills separate. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID etc. We must output only HTML fragment, no /. Use

for each section heading. Use

• for lists. Use

  for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep all details from About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Benefits, Pay. Ensure we don't lose any detail. Let's extract About the role paragraph exactly as given (maybe minor tweaks for readability but keep meaning). We'll put in

  . Responsibilities: list each duty: - Review AI generated responses covering chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, hazardous material, emergency preparedness and public safety topics for technical accuracy, safety framing and guideline alignment - Flag outputs that provide dangerous procedural detail, acquisition guidance, weaponization support, evasion tactics, unsafe laboratory guidance, harmful exposure advice or other misuse enabling content - Create gold standard reference content that answers benign CBRN questions responsibly without introducing operationally dangerous instruction - Evaluate and rank model outputs on safe handling, correct risk framing, appropriate refusals, helpful redirection, scientific accuracy and clarity - Detect hallucinated claims, incorrect hazard classifications, misleading risk statements, overconfident conclusions, poor escalation guidance and unsafe recommendations - Apply project rubrics consistently and provide clear written feedback explaining why content is safe, unsafe, incomplete or technically incorrect - Ensure CBRN content uses precise terminology and communicates risk without exaggeration or minimization - Escalate ambiguous, high risk or potentially harmful content for additional review per project guidelines Qualifications Needed: list each bullet: - Bachelor's degree or higher in Chemistry, Biology, Microbiology, Public Health, Toxicology, Nuclear Engineering, Radiation Science, Emergency Management, Environmental Health and Safety, Biosecurity, Security Studies or a related field, or equivalent professional experience - Minimum 3 years of professional experience in CBRN safety, emergency preparedness, hazardous materials, biosafety, radiation safety, public health, environmental health and safety, defense or security analysis, or technical review - Experience or strong background in chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear hazard categories, including high level risk assessment, exposure pathways, protective concepts, emergency communication and public safety principles - Strong background in identifying unsafe instructions, operationally enabling detail, inappropriate specificity, misleading hazard claims, inaccurate emergency advice and unsupported technical conclusions - Proven ability to evaluate technical content for accuracy, completeness and policy alignment, and to explain that judgment in precise written English - Professional English proficiency at C1 minimum, sufficient to follow written guidelines and produce detailed written feedback - Familiarity with safety frameworks, emergency response concepts, biosafety levels, hazardous material communication, radiation protection principles, decontamination concepts, incident reporting and public health guidance preferred - Prior experience with AI safety, data annotation, technical QA, policy review, risk assessment, red team review, scientific review or rubric based evaluation strongly preferred - Reliable and self directed, able to deliver consistent quality in an hourly remote contractor workflow - Must be a citizen of the United States, United Kingdom, Australia or New Zealand Benefits (Why join us?): - Competitive Hourly Compensation: Up to $100/hr as an independent contractor, paid hourly - Keep Your Current Role: Structured as supplemental work, not a career move. No requirement to leave your position - 100% Remote, Flexible Hours: Set your own schedule and volume across time zones - Direct Impact on Frontier AI Safety: Your judgment shapes how leading models handle chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear subject matter - Work Inside Your Expertise: Technical review and reference writing in the domain you already practice in, not general purpose data work - Credential Respected, Not Retrained: Built for practicing specialists, with project rubrics rather than a long ramp - Growing Engagement: An expanding program with continued need across all four CBRN domains Pay: Salary: $75 - $100 per hour. We should not include duplicated lines like "Want to learn more about this role and Jobot Consulting? Click our Jobot Consulting logo and follow our LinkedIn page!" etc. Also remove EEO boilerplate etc. Now produce HTML:

  About the role

  We are partnered with a fast growing AI data services company that builds the training and evaluation data behind many of the world's leading AI labs and foundation model developers. Their work sits where technical expertise meets model safety, bringing in specialists from chemistry, biology, radiation science, nuclear engineering and emergency response to evaluate how AI systems handle high consequence subject matter. The experts on these projects shape how frontier models reason about hazard, risk and public safety, and that reach extends well beyond any single laboratory or response program. They operate remotely across time zones and build their review teams around people who are already practicing in their field. We are helping them identify CBRN specialists for this engagement.

  Responsibilities

  • Review AI generated responses covering chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, hazardous material, emergency preparedness and public safety topics for technical accuracy, safety framing and guideline alignment
  • Flag outputs that provide dangerous procedural detail, acquisition guidance, weaponization support, evasion tactics, unsafe laboratory guidance, harmful exposure advice or other misuse enabling content
  • Create gold standard reference content that answers benign CBRN questions responsibly without introducing operationally dangerous instruction
  • Evaluate and rank model outputs on safe handling, correct risk framing, appropriate refusals, helpful redirection, scientific accuracy and clarity
  • Detect hallucinated claims, incorrect hazard classifications, misleading risk statements, overconfident conclusions, poor escalation guidance and unsafe recommendations
  • Apply project rubrics consistently and provide clear written feedback explaining why content is safe, unsafe, incomplete or technically incorrect
  • Ensure CBRN content uses precise terminology and communicates risk without exaggeration or minimization
  • Escalate ambiguous, high risk or potentially harmful content for additional review per project guidelines

  Qualifications

  • Bachelor's degree or higher in Chemistry, Biology, Microbiology, Public Health, Toxicology, Nuclear Engineering, Radiation Science, Emergency Management, Environmental Health and Safety, Biosecurity, Security Studies or a related field, or equivalent professional experience
  • Minimum 3 years of professional experience in CBRN safety, emergency preparedness, hazardous materials, biosafety, radiation safety, public health, environmental health and safety, defense or security analysis, or technical review
  • Experience or strong background in chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear hazard categories, including high level risk assessment, exposure pathways, protective concepts, emergency communication and public safety principles
  • Strong background in identifying unsafe instructions, operationally enabling detail, inappropriate specificity, misleading hazard claims, inaccurate emergency advice and unsupported technical conclusions
  • Proven ability to evaluate technical content for accuracy