Global Health Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR) Senior Manager

We need to output HTML fragment with headings

for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We need to parse the job description. Content: - Intro about Amgen mission etc. That's "About the role" maybe? Actually "About the role" could be the introductory paragraph describing the role and company. We'll include that as About the role. - Responsibilities: "What you will do" bullet list: Generating global-impact payer-relevant evidence, patient reported outcomes (PRO), clinical outcomes assessment strategy (COA) and evidence synthesis; Ensuring delivery of global materials to support HTA submissions including the Global Value Dossier (GVD) and economic models; Translating strategic objectives into concrete delivery via HEOR project plan; Maintaining strong working relationships with top-10 countries, including the United States; Ensuring compliance with HTA dossier governance; Engaging with vendors and external experts to validate HEOR strategy and technical approach; This role is global, with tactical execution. As a Senior HEOR Manager, you will need to engage with internal customers to align and support the comprehensive HEOR plan, including the ASL, top-10 countries and cross-functional teams: Evidence Generation Team (EGT), Global Medical Affairs Team (GMAT), Center for Observational Research, Real-world Evidence sub-Team (RWEsT), Global Biostatistical Sciences, US Payer Marketing, Medical Value & Access. We can list each as

. - Requirements: The "What we expect of you Basic Qualifications" includes multiple options: Doctorate degree and 2 years ... etc. That's qualifications. Could be under Requirements or Qualifications. The instruction says we have sections: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to decide where to put each piece. Basic qualifications: education + years experience. That's qualifications. Preferred qualifications: list of items: Degree educated in relevant field; Health economics training; Experience in writing research protocols and publications; Experience in developing payer-relevant evidence, including real-world evidence; Experience in designing PRO/COA strategy; Experience in evidence synthesis (systematic literature reviews, indirect treatment comparisons and meta-analyses); Strategic and technical understanding of HTA requirements; Experience in developing GVDs and AMCP dossiers; Experience in developing economic models and predictive analytics; Experience in influencing Access strategy with a HEOR lens; Experience in the United States market. These could be under Skills or Qualifications. Since they are "Preferred Qualifications", we could put them under Qualifications as well, maybe separate bullet list. Skills: maybe we could extract skills from preferred qualifications? But we can also have a Skills section summarizing abilities like HEOR strategy, HTA, economic modeling, PRO/COA, evidence synthesis, etc. However we must not invent content; we can list the preferred qualifications as skills. But we already have Qualifications section; we could put basic qualifications under Requirements and preferred under Qualifications? The instruction says we have both Requirements and Qualifications sections; we can decide. Better: Requirements = basic qualifications (must have). Qualifications = preferred qualifications (nice to have). Skills could be derived from responsibilities? But we might not need a Skills section if we don't have explicit skill list separate. However we have "Skills" as a possible heading; we could include if there is explicit skill list. The posting does not have a separate "Skills" heading; but we could treat the preferred qualifications as skills. But then we would duplicate. Perhaps we put preferred qualifications under Skills, and basic qualifications under Requirements. And Qualifications section maybe omitted if no distinct content. But we need to follow instruction: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it. So we can include Requirements (basic qualifications), Skills (preferred qualifications), and maybe Qualifications omitted. But we also have Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Benefits: The posting mentions "In Addition To The Base Salary, Amgen Offers a Total Rewards Plan, Based On Eligibility, Comprising Of Health And Welfare Plans For Staff And Eligible Dependents, Financial Plans With Opportunities To Save Towards Retirement Or Other Goals, Work/life Balance, And Career Development Opportunities That May Include A comprehensive employee benefits package, including a Retirement and Savings Plan with generous company contributions, group medical, dental and vision coverage, life and disability insurance, and flexible spending accounts A discretionary annual bonus program, or for field sales representatives, a sales-based incentive plan Stock-based long-term incentives Award-winning time-off plans Flexible work models where possible." That's benefits content. So we can include Benefits section with bullet list. Pay: The posting includes "The expected annual salary range for this role in the U.S. (excluding Puerto Rico) is posted. Actual salary will vary based on several factors including but not limited to, relevant skills, experience, and qualifications." Then later "Salary Range 160,290.45USD -216,863.55 USD". So we have pay info. So include Pay section with that range. Schedule: Not mentioned. No schedule info. So omit Schedule. About the role: The introductory paragraphs about Amgen mission and role description before "What you will do". That's about the role. We'll put that as prose in

. Now we need to output HTML fragment only, no /. Use

for each section heading. Use

• for lists. Use

  for prose. We must not repeat job title as heading. Not include Job ID etc. Remove boilerplate like EEO, accommodation, etc. Also remove "Originally posted on Himalayas", "Apply now and make a lasting impact with the Amgen team. careers.amgen.com", "In any materials you submit, you may redact..." etc. Also remove "Application deadline", "Sponsorship", etc. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to keep the mission description, responsibilities, basic qualifications, preferred qualifications, benefits, pay. Let's extract substantive content precisely. About the role: The paragraph(s) before "What you will do". Let's copy: "Career Category Research Job Description Join Amgen s Mission of Serving Patients At Amgen , if you feel like youre part of something bigger, its because you are. Our shared missionto serve patients living with serious illnessesdrives all that we do. Since 1980, weve helped pioneer the world of biotech in our fight against the worlds toughest diseases. With our focus on four therapeutic areas Oncology, Inflammation, General Medicine, and Rare Disease we reach millions of patients each year. Amgen is advancing a broad and deep pipeline of medicines to treat cancer, heart disease, inflammatory conditions, rare diseases, and obesity and obesity-related conditions. As a member of the Amgen team, youll help make a lasting impact on the lives of patients as we research, manufacture, and deliver innovative medicines to help people live longer, fuller happier lives. Our award-winning culture is collaborative, innovative, and science based. If you have a passion for challenges and the opportunities that lay within them, youll thrive as part of the Amgen team. Join us and transform the lives of patients while transforming your career." We need to clean up spacing: there are missing spaces after commas etc. But we should preserve the text as is? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. We should keep the content but we can fix obvious typographical errors? Probably we should keep as given but maybe we can add spaces for readability. However altering text could be considered inventing? It's just formatting. Safer to keep exactly as given but we can adjust minor spacing? The original text has weird concatenations: "Amgen s Mission", "Amgen , if you feel like youre part", "Our shared missionto serve", etc. We could keep it as is; it's still substantive. We'll output as is. But we might want to fix readability without changing meaning. The instruction says do not invent or summarize away detail; fixing spacing is not inventing new info, just formatting. I think it's okay to add spaces where missing. However to be safe, we could keep exactly as given but it's ugly. I'd rather add spaces for readability; it's not adding new info. I'll add spaces where needed. Let's rewrite About the role paragraph with proper spacing: "Join Amgen's Mission of Serving Patients. At Amgen, if you feel like you're part of something bigger, it's because you are. Our shared mission to serve patients living with serious illnesses drives all that we do. Since 1980, we've helped pioneer the world of biotech in our fight against the world's toughest diseases. With our focus on four therapeutic areas—Oncology, Inflammation, General Medicine, and Rare Disease—we reach millions of patients each year. Amgen is advancing a broad and deep pipeline of medicines to treat cancer, heart disease, inflammatory conditions, rare diseases, and obesity and obesity-related conditions. As a member of the Amgen team, you'll help make a lasting impact on the lives of patients as we research, manufacture, and deliver innovative medicines to help people live longer, fuller, happier lives. Our award-winning culture is collaborative, innovative, and science-based. If you have a passion for challenges and the opportunities that lie within them, you'll thrive as part of the Amgen team. Join us and transform the lives of patients while transforming your career." That seems fine. Now Responsibilities: We'll list bullet points. List items: - Generating global-impact payer-relevant evidence, patient reported outcomes (PRO), clinical outcomes assessment strategy (COA) and evidence synthesis - Ensuring delivery of global materials to support Health Technology Assessment (HTA) submissions including the Global Value Dossier (GVD) and economic models - Translating strategic objectives into concrete delivery via HEOR project plan - Maintaining strong working relationships with top-10 countries, including the United States - Ensuring compliance with HTA dossier governance - Engaging with vendors and external experts to validate HEOR strategy and technical approach - Engaging with internal customers to align and support the comprehensive HEOR plan, including the ASL, top-10 countries and cross-functional teams: Evidence Generation Team (EGT), Global Medical Affairs Team (GMAT), Center for Observational Research, Real-world Evidence sub-Team (RWEsT), Global Biostatistical Sciences, US Payer Marketing, Medical Value & Access We could combine the last two sentences about internal customers. The posting says: "This role is global, with tactical execution. As a Senior HEOR Manager, you will need to engage with internal customers to align and support the comprehensive HEOR plan, including the ASL, top-10 countries and cross-functional teams: Evidence Generation Team (EGT), Global Medical Affairs Team (GMAT), Center for Observational Research, Real-world Evidence sub-Team (RWEsT), Global Biostatistical Sciences, US Payer Marketing, Medical Value & Access." We'll make that a bullet. Now Requirements (basic qualifications): list of options: - Doctorate degree and 2 years of health economics & outcomes research experience - Master's degree and 4 years of health economics & outcomes research experience - Bachelor's degree and 6 years of health economics & outcomes research experience - Associates degree and 10 years of health economics & outcomes research experience - High school diploma / GED and 12 years of health economics & outcomes research experience We'll output as

  • . Now Skills (preferred qualifications): list: - Degree educated in relevant field - Health economics training (on the job or academic) - Experience in writing research protocols and publications - Experience in developing payer-relevant evidence, including real-world evidence - Experience in designing PRO/COA strategy - Experience in evidence synthesis (systematic literature reviews, indirect treatment comparisons and meta-analyses) - Strategic and technical understanding of HTA requirements - Experience in developing GVDs and AMCP dossiers - Experience in developing economic models and predictive analytics - Experience in influencing Access strategy with a HEOR lens - Experience in the United States market We'll output as bullet list. Now Benefits: we need to extract the