Senior Director, Health Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR)
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones.
We need to decide which sections to include based on content.
We have:
- Who We Are (company description)
- About Commercial (description of commercial team)
- Summary (role summary)
- Description (detailed responsibilities)
- Education & Experience (qualifications)
- Possibly "Ireland Safety Responsibility" (some EHS note) - but that seems like boilerplate? It's specific to Ireland safety responsibility; maybe we keep as a section? It's not typical heading like About the role etc. But we can treat as a separate section maybe "Safety Responsibility". However guidelines: Use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. But they say "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests we can use those headings if appropriate, but we can also use other headings? The examples are just examples; we likely should map content to those standard headings where possible. For "Who We Are" maybe not needed; could be part of About the role? But they said do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it). The "Who We Are" is company overview; could be placed under a heading like "About the company" but not in list. However they said prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could combine Who We Are and About Commercial into an "About the company" section. But they didn't list that as example; but we can still use for any heading; they just gave examples. Likely acceptable to use headings like "About BioMarin", "About Commercial", "Summary", "Responsibilities", "Qualifications". However they said use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should stick to those headings if possible. Let's map:
- About the role: could include Summary and maybe Who We Are? Actually About the role is about the role itself, not company. So we could put Summary under About the role.
- Responsibilities: from Description bullet points.
- Requirements / Qualifications: from Education & Experience.
- Skills: maybe not explicitly listed; we could omit if not present.
- Benefits, Pay, Schedule: not present, so omit.
Thus we will have sections: About the role (Summary), Responsibilities (Description), Qualifications (Education & Experience). Possibly also "About the company" but not required; we could incorporate Who We Are and About Commercial into About the role? But that would be mixing company info with role summary; maybe better to have a separate section like "About BioMarin". However guidelines say prefer few substantive sections; adding another section may be okay if substantive. But they didn't forbid other headings; they just gave examples. I'd include a section "About BioMarin" for Who We Are and About Commercial combined.
But we must not include filler. All content is substantive.
We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences.
We'll produce:
About BioMarin
... combined Who We Are and About Commercial ...
About the role
... Summary ...
Responsibilities
- ... each responsibility from Description ...
Qualifications
- ... each bullet from Education & Experience ...
We need to preserve all substantive information; not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to copy the text exactly as given, but we can format into paragraphs and list items. Must not omit any detail.
Let's extract the relevant sections.
Who We Are:
"BioMarin is a leading rare disease biotechnology company focused on genetically defined conditions. Guided by our purpose to develop medicines that make a profound impact on people’s lives, our global teams have delivered a portfolio of therapies since our founding in 1997. Our revolutionary treatments for conditions like achondroplasia (the most common form of dwarfism), PKU (phenylketonuria), CLN2, a form of Batten disease, and a number of forms of MPS (mucopolysaccharidosis) offer new possibilities for patients and families who previously had few, if any, available options. More recently, with the close of the Amicus acquisition, our portfolio has expanded to include therapies for Fabry disease and Pompe disease, expanding our ability to reach more people living with rare genetic conditions. Our success comes from our unwavering commitment to excellence, our deep understanding of patient needs, our scientific expertise, and our world-class manufacturing capabilities. At the heart of BioMarin is a dedicated team of the brightest minds in the industry working together to deliver innovative therapies to patients and families around the world."
About Commercial:
"Be part of the worldwide infrastructure that gets our drugs to underserved patients around the world. Our global sales force solidifies BioMarin’s commercial presence in the United States and Europe and is rapidly growing in other regions, such as South America, EuMEA, and Asia-Pacific."
We can combine these two paragraphs into one or two
s. Probably two
under same heading.
Summary:
"The Health Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR) Senior Director leads asset-specific payer evidence strategies, including patient-relevant outcomes strategy, to generate differentiated evidence, strengthen the payer value proposition, and optimize access for BioMarin assets across all therapeutic areas of interest. s. The role is responsible for shaping patient-relevant outcomes requirements within the clinical programs, ensuring alignment with Regulatory, HTA and access needs. In partnership with internal cross-functional and external stakeholders, the Senior Director leads the design and execution of patient-relevant outcomes research initiatives. The Sr. Director cultivates strong partnerships with cross-functional partners across Value & Access, Commercial, Medical Affairs, Clinical Development, Regulatory Affairs and Patient Advocacy, while engaging with external stakeholders including HTA agencies, payers and patient organizations. This role requires deep expertise in patient-relevant outcomes research and a strong understanding of market access, value and HTA frameworks. The position reports to the ED, Head of the Global HEOR team, which sits within the Pricing Access Value & Evidence (PAVE) organization and has a direct report."
Note there is a stray "s." after "interest." Probably a typo; we keep as is.
Description (Responsibilities) list:
We need to extract each bullet point (sentences starting with verbs). The description is a paragraph with many sentences; we need to turn each duty into a
- . The instruction: Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we should split the description into separate items. Let's parse:
"Lead the development, execution and communication of payer evidence strategies aligned with brand and Value & Access priorities for early-stage pipeline assets"
"Collaborate closely with Value & Access, Commercial, Medical Affairs, Clinical Development & Regulatory Affairs & Patient Advocacy organizations"
"Drive organizational understanding of payer and HTA requirements related to patient-relevant outcomes and health utility measurement"
"Drive the strategic assessment for patient-relevant outcomes requirements for HTA and access to support differentiation and value demonstration"
"Ensure payer evidence requirements are incorporated into clinical development plans to enable optimal patient access"
"Lead the development of cross-functionally aligned, asset-specific patient-relevant outcomes strategies informed by disease conceptual models"
"Lead patient-relevant endpoint planning and provide oversight of implementation within clinical trials"
"Lead early Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) strategy development, including assessment of access implications and trade-offs across markets"
"Assess payer evidence gaps and inform future integrated evidence planning for early-stage pipeline assets"
"Manage and partner with external partners in the execution of asset-level patient-relevant outcomes strategies, including PRO development and validation, health state valuation studies (time trade-off or standard gamble), and patient preference research, as appropriate"
"Lead scientific interactions with HTA agencies, particularly scientific advice (e.g., EU HTA JSC, NICE, CADTH), including preparation of briefing materials and evidence packages related to PRO endpoints, MCIDs, etc"
"Support scientific interactions with regulatory agencies and patient advocacy organizations"
"In partnership with the Integrated Evidence Teams (IET), lead the exploration, analysis and interpretation of patient-relevant outcomes data from clinical trials to generate insights, and strengthen value propositions for HTA, payer and other stakeholders"
"Shape strategic scientific communication plans, and lead presentation and publication of research in peer-reviewed journals"
"Assess business development opportunities against payer and HTA requirements to identify risks, evidence gaps, and access considerations"
We need to ensure we keep all details exactly. Also note there is a period after each.
Education & Experience:
"12+ years of Pharma Industry experience with 7+ years of experience in HEOR roles in pharmaceutical companies or consulting, and at least 5 years of direct experience with patient-relevant outcomes research"
"Advanced degree in health economics, outcomes research, epidemiology, public health, health services research, pharmacy, or a related scientific discipline"
"Deep understanding of market access, value and global HTA frameworks"
"Demonstrated experience developing and executing patient-relevant outcomes strategies to meet payer and HTA requirements"
"Prior experience in the evaluation, development, and validation of PRO measures to support regulatory, payer, and HTA decision making"
"Experience supporting HTA submissions, value dossiers, and patient-relevant briefing books"
"Proven ability to influence and drive alignment across senior cross-functional stakeholders, including Value & Access, Commercial, Medical Affairs, Clinical Development & Regulatory Affairs"
"Ability to lead multiple complex initiatives and effectively prioritize in a dynamic, fast-paced environment"
"Recognized leader within the patient-reported outcomes field, with a strong professional network and external visibility"
"Experience engaging with external stakeholders, including HTA agencies, payers, health economists, clinical experts, and patient advocacy organizations"
"Rare disease experience preferred"
"Prior people leadership experience, including talent development preferred"
Note: The line "Note: This description is not intended to be all-inclusive, or a limitation of the duties of the position. It is intended to describe the general nature of the job that may include other duties as assumed or assigned." is boilerplate; we should remove.
Also "Equal Opportunity Employer/Veterans/Disabled ..." and "Ireland Safety Responsibility ..." are boilerplate/legal; remove.
Thus final HTML:
About BioMarin
BioMarin is a leading rare disease biotechnology company focused on genetically defined conditions. Guided by our purpose to develop medicines that make a profound impact on people’s lives, our global teams have delivered a portfolio of therapies since our founding in 1997. Our revolutionary treatments for conditions like achondroplasia (the most common form of dwarfism), PKU (phenylketon
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We need to decide which sections to include based on content. We have: - Who We Are (company description) - About Commercial (description of commercial team) - Summary (role summary) - Description (detailed responsibilities) - Education & Experience (qualifications) - Possibly "Ireland Safety Responsibility" (some EHS note) - but that seems like boilerplate? It's specific to Ireland safety responsibility; maybe we keep as a section? It's not typical heading like About the role etc. But we can treat as a separate section maybe "Safety Responsibility". However guidelines: Use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. But they say "use
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That suggests we can use those headings if appropriate, but we can also use other headings? The examples are just examples; we likely should map content to those standard headings where possible. For "Who We Are" maybe not needed; could be part of About the role? But they said do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it). The "Who We Are" is company overview; could be placed under a heading like "About the company" but not in list. However they said prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could combine Who We Are and About Commercial into an "About the company" section. But they didn't list that as example; but we can still use for any heading; they just gave examples. Likely acceptable to use headings like "About BioMarin", "About Commercial", "Summary", "Responsibilities", "Qualifications". However they said use for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should stick to those headings if possible. Let's map:
- About the role: could include Summary and maybe Who We Are? Actually About the role is about the role itself, not company. So we could put Summary under About the role.
- Responsibilities: from Description bullet points.
- Requirements / Qualifications: from Education & Experience.
- Skills: maybe not explicitly listed; we could omit if not present.
- Benefits, Pay, Schedule: not present, so omit.
Thus we will have sections: About the role (Summary), Responsibilities (Description), Qualifications (Education & Experience). Possibly also "About the company" but not required; we could incorporate Who We Are and About Commercial into About the role? But that would be mixing company info with role summary; maybe better to have a separate section like "About BioMarin". However guidelines say prefer few substantive sections; adding another section may be okay if substantive. But they didn't forbid other headings; they just gave examples. I'd include a section "About BioMarin" for Who We Are and About Commercial combined.
But we must not include filler. All content is substantive.
We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences.
We'll produce:
About BioMarin
for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we should stick to those headings if possible. Let's map:
- About the role: could include Summary and maybe Who We Are? Actually About the role is about the role itself, not company. So we could put Summary under About the role.
- Responsibilities: from Description bullet points.
- Requirements / Qualifications: from Education & Experience.
- Skills: maybe not explicitly listed; we could omit if not present.
- Benefits, Pay, Schedule: not present, so omit.
Thus we will have sections: About the role (Summary), Responsibilities (Description), Qualifications (Education & Experience). Possibly also "About the company" but not required; we could incorporate Who We Are and About Commercial into About the role? But that would be mixing company info with role summary; maybe better to have a separate section like "About BioMarin". However guidelines say prefer few substantive sections; adding another section may be okay if substantive. But they didn't forbid other headings; they just gave examples. I'd include a section "About BioMarin" for Who We Are and About Commercial combined.
But we must not include filler. All content is substantive.
We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences.
We'll produce:
About BioMarin
... combined Who We Are and About Commercial ...
About the role
... Summary ...
Responsibilities
- ... each responsibility from Description ...
Qualifications
- ... each bullet from Education & Experience ...
or two
s. Probably two
under same heading. Summary: "The Health Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR) Senior Director leads asset-specific payer evidence strategies, including patient-relevant outcomes strategy, to generate differentiated evidence, strengthen the payer value proposition, and optimize access for BioMarin assets across all therapeutic areas of interest. s. The role is responsible for shaping patient-relevant outcomes requirements within the clinical programs, ensuring alignment with Regulatory, HTA and access needs. In partnership with internal cross-functional and external stakeholders, the Senior Director leads the design and execution of patient-relevant outcomes research initiatives. The Sr. Director cultivates strong partnerships with cross-functional partners across Value & Access, Commercial, Medical Affairs, Clinical Development, Regulatory Affairs and Patient Advocacy, while engaging with external stakeholders including HTA agencies, payers and patient organizations. This role requires deep expertise in patient-relevant outcomes research and a strong understanding of market access, value and HTA frameworks. The position reports to the ED, Head of the Global HEOR team, which sits within the Pricing Access Value & Evidence (PAVE) organization and has a direct report." Note there is a stray "s." after "interest." Probably a typo; we keep as is. Description (Responsibilities) list: We need to extract each bullet point (sentences starting with verbs). The description is a paragraph with many sentences; we need to turn each duty into a
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we should split the description into separate items. Let's parse:
"Lead the development, execution and communication of payer evidence strategies aligned with brand and Value & Access priorities for early-stage pipeline assets"
"Collaborate closely with Value & Access, Commercial, Medical Affairs, Clinical Development & Regulatory Affairs & Patient Advocacy organizations"
"Drive organizational understanding of payer and HTA requirements related to patient-relevant outcomes and health utility measurement"
"Drive the strategic assessment for patient-relevant outcomes requirements for HTA and access to support differentiation and value demonstration"
"Ensure payer evidence requirements are incorporated into clinical development plans to enable optimal patient access"
"Lead the development of cross-functionally aligned, asset-specific patient-relevant outcomes strategies informed by disease conceptual models"
"Lead patient-relevant endpoint planning and provide oversight of implementation within clinical trials"
"Lead early Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) strategy development, including assessment of access implications and trade-offs across markets"
"Assess payer evidence gaps and inform future integrated evidence planning for early-stage pipeline assets"
"Manage and partner with external partners in the execution of asset-level patient-relevant outcomes strategies, including PRO development and validation, health state valuation studies (time trade-off or standard gamble), and patient preference research, as appropriate"
"Lead scientific interactions with HTA agencies, particularly scientific advice (e.g., EU HTA JSC, NICE, CADTH), including preparation of briefing materials and evidence packages related to PRO endpoints, MCIDs, etc"
"Support scientific interactions with regulatory agencies and patient advocacy organizations"
"In partnership with the Integrated Evidence Teams (IET), lead the exploration, analysis and interpretation of patient-relevant outcomes data from clinical trials to generate insights, and strengthen value propositions for HTA, payer and other stakeholders"
"Shape strategic scientific communication plans, and lead presentation and publication of research in peer-reviewed journals"
"Assess business development opportunities against payer and HTA requirements to identify risks, evidence gaps, and access considerations"
We need to ensure we keep all details exactly. Also note there is a period after each.
Education & Experience:
"12+ years of Pharma Industry experience with 7+ years of experience in HEOR roles in pharmaceutical companies or consulting, and at least 5 years of direct experience with patient-relevant outcomes research"
"Advanced degree in health economics, outcomes research, epidemiology, public health, health services research, pharmacy, or a related scientific discipline"
"Deep understanding of market access, value and global HTA frameworks"
"Demonstrated experience developing and executing patient-relevant outcomes strategies to meet payer and HTA requirements"
"Prior experience in the evaluation, development, and validation of PRO measures to support regulatory, payer, and HTA decision making"
"Experience supporting HTA submissions, value dossiers, and patient-relevant briefing books"
"Proven ability to influence and drive alignment across senior cross-functional stakeholders, including Value & Access, Commercial, Medical Affairs, Clinical Development & Regulatory Affairs"
"Ability to lead multiple complex initiatives and effectively prioritize in a dynamic, fast-paced environment"
"Recognized leader within the patient-reported outcomes field, with a strong professional network and external visibility"
"Experience engaging with external stakeholders, including HTA agencies, payers, health economists, clinical experts, and patient advocacy organizations"
"Rare disease experience preferred"
"Prior people leadership experience, including talent development preferred"
Note: The line "Note: This description is not intended to be all-inclusive, or a limitation of the duties of the position. It is intended to describe the general nature of the job that may include other duties as assumed or assigned." is boilerplate; we should remove.
Also "Equal Opportunity Employer/Veterans/Disabled ..." and "Ireland Safety Responsibility ..." are boilerplate/legal; remove.
Thus final HTML:
About BioMarin
BioMarin is a leading rare disease biotechnology company focused on genetically defined conditions. Guided by our purpose to develop medicines that make a profound impact on people’s lives, our global teams have delivered a portfolio of therapies since our founding in 1997. Our revolutionary treatments for conditions like achondroplasia (the most common form of dwarfism), PKU (phenylketon