Jobs · Virginia

Director of Technical and Quality Assurance

DLA Careers · Fort Belvoir, VA · 1 mo ago
HybridFull-time
We need to produce HTML fragment with sections for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, etc. Also remove duplicated lines, application instructions. We need to parse the posting content. The posting includes: - Summary: "See below for important information regarding this job." Not substantive. - Duties: a paragraph describing duties. - Requirements: includes Conditions of employment (list of items). Also "Recruitment Incentives: Not Authorized" etc. Also "Supervisory Probation: Required", "Completion of Supervisory Certification Program: Required", etc. Also "Selectees are required to have a REAL ID ...". Also "Financial Filing: Yes". Also "This is a Mission Essential (ME) position..." etc. - Qualifications: includes "To qualify for a Director of Technical and Quality Assurance, your resume and supporting documentation must support: Specialized Experience: ..." etc. Also "Education Substitution of education may not be used in lieu of specialized experience for this grade level." Also "Additional information" includes many items: Section 508, Reemployed Annuitants, Veterans info, Drug-Free Workplace Policy, etc. Also "Candidates should be committed to improving the efficiency..." etc. - Benefits: "A career with the U.S. government provides employees with a comprehensive benefits package. As a federal employee, you and your family will have access to a range of benefits that are designed to make your federal career very rewarding. Opens in a new windowLearn more about federal benefits. Review our benefits Eligibility for benefits depends on the type of position you hold and whether your position is full-time, part-time or intermittent. Contact the hiring agency for more information on the specific benefits offered." Thus we have content for Duties, Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits. Possibly also Skills? Not explicit. Pay? Not mentioned. Schedule? Not mentioned except "Tour of Duty: Set Schedule" under Requirements. That is schedule info: "Tour of Duty: Set Schedule". So we could include a Schedule section with that detail. However the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." But we can include Schedule if there is real specific content. "Tour of Duty: Set Schedule" is specific. So we can include a Schedule section with that line. Pay: Not mentioned. So we should not include Pay. Skills: Not explicit separate list; maybe we could infer from duties but not explicit. Better not to include Skills if not explicit. Thus sections: About the role? The posting didn't have an explicit "About the role" paragraph; the summary is minimal. Could we treat the first paragraph after Summary as About the role? The content under "Duties Help" is duties. There's no separate "About the role". So we might not include About the role unless we have substantive content. The instruction: "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it". So we should not create About the role if none. Thus we will have sections: Responsibilities (duties), Requirements, Qualifications, Benefits, Schedule. We need to use

for section headings. Use
  • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

    for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep the details as they appear, but we can format them into lists where appropriate. We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. We need to identify and remove duplicated lines. The posting has some duplicated sentences: e.g., "Serves as the ultimate authority and expert on manufacturing, production, and Quality Assurance programs for the acquisition of Strategic and Critical Materials, services, or supplies in accordance with DLA and DoW quality assurance policies." appears twice? Actually appears once in duties and again later? Let's check: In duties: "Serves as the ultimate authority and expert on manufacturing, production, and Quality Assurance programs for the acquisition of Strategic and Critical Materials, services, or supplies in accordance with DLA and DoW quality assurance policies." That appears once. Later in qualifications? Not sure. There's also "Serves as the ultimate authority and key Science and Technology Advisor for the NDS, identifying and addressing science and technology issues impacting Stockpile commodities and programs." That's separate. We need to remove duplicated lines if any. We'll just keep unique content. We need to preserve all substantive info, but we can consolidate similar items into list items without losing meaning. We must not add placeholders like "commensurate with experience". The posting does not have those. Now let's extract substantive content. **Duties** (under "Duties Help"): - Serves as Director, Technical and Quality Assurance Directorate with DLA Strategic Materials, as the senior technical expert and Process Owner on technical and quality assurance related processes. - Plans, directs, executes, and provides authoritative oversight for the programs focused on the strict quality assurance and technical oversight of all critical minerals and strategic materials in the National Defense Stockpile (NDS). - Responds to industry and congressional concerns, presents, and proposes budgeting requirements at senior DLA, Office of Secretary of War, or Congressional levels. - Serves as the ultimate authority and key Science and Technology Advisor for the NDS, identifying and addressing science and technology issues impacting Stockpile commodities and programs. - Directs the NDS Material Testing Program, overseeing the independent evaluation of physical and chemical parameters for all critical minerals and strategic materials acquired. - Serves as the ultimate authority and expert on manufacturing, production, and Quality Assurance programs for the acquisition of Strategic and Critical Materials, services, or supplies in accordance with DLA and DoW quality assurance policies. We should keep each as a list item. **Requirements** (under "Requirements Help"): List of conditions: - Must be a U.S. citizen - Tour of Duty: Set Schedule - Security Requirements: Critical Sensitive with Top Secret access - Appointment is subject to the completion of a favorable suitability or fitness determination, where reciprocity cannot be applied; unfavorably adjudicated background checks will be grounds for removal. - Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): Exempt - Selective Service Requirement: Males born after 12-31-59 must be registered or exempt from Selective Service. - Recruitment Incentives: Not Authorized - Supervisory Probation: Required - Completion of Supervisory Certification Program: Required - Bargaining Unit Status: No - Selectees are required to have a REAL ID or other acceptable identification documents to access certain federal facilities. See https://www.tsa.gov/real-id for more information. - Financial Filing: Yes - This is a Mission Essential (ME) position. The incumbent may be required to report to work in the event of a natural disaster, inclement weather, or crisis. - You will be a Mission Essential employee. This requires you to work during an emergency to ensure continuation of essential functions. You may be required to work at the designated duty location, a telework site, or an alternate location/facility. - This position and any future selections from this announcement may be used to fill various shifts located within DLA Strategic Materials in Fort Belvoir, VA. We need to ensure we don't duplicate. Some sentences repeat: "This is a Mission Essential (ME) position..." and "You will be a Mission Essential employee..." are similar but not identical; we keep both. **Qualifications** (under "Qualifications"): - To qualify for a Director of Technical and Quality Assurance, your resume and supporting documentation must support: Specialized Experience: One year of specialized experience that equipped you with the particular competencies to successfully perform the duties of the position and is directly in or related to this position. - To qualify at the GS-15 level, applicants must possess one year of specialized experience equivalent to the GS-14 level or equivalent under other pay systems in the Federal service, military, or private sector. - Applicants must meet eligibility requirements including time-in-grade (General Schedule (GS) positions only), time-after-competitive appointment, minimum qualifications, and any other regulatory requirements by the cut-off/closing date of the announcement. - Creditable specialized experience includes: - Directing technically complex quality assurance and science support services in support of the National Defense Stockpile. - Ensuring commodity inventories of an organization are in the physical and chemical forms for immediate use in the event of an emergency. - Serving as the key Science & Technology and Quality Assurance advisor by responding to senior leadership, Office of the Secretary of War, and Congress on the legislation, policies, budgets, and planning on strategic and transformational programs. - Experience refers to paid and unpaid experience, including volunteer work done through National Service programs (e.g., Peace Corps, AmeriCorps) and other organizations (e.g., professional, philanthropic, religious, spiritual, community, student, social). Volunteer work helps build critical competencies, knowledge, and skills and can provide valuable training and experience that translates directly to paid employment. You will receive credit for all qualifying experience, including volunteer experience. - Education Substitution of education may not be used in lieu of specialized experience for this grade level. **Additional information** (under "Additional information") includes many items: Section 508, Reemployed Annuitants, Veterans info, Drug-Free Workplace Policy, etc. Also "Candidates should be committed to improving the efficiency of the Federal government, passionate about the ideals of our American republic, and committed to upholding the rule of law and the United States Constitution." We need to decide whether to include these under Qualifications or a separate section like "Additional Information". The instruction only lists specific headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we should fit additional info into Qualifications if relevant, or maybe we can omit if not fitting those headings. However we must preserve ALL substantive information; we cannot drop info. So we need to incorporate that additional info somewhere. The allowed headings are limited; we could put it under Qualifications as extra bullet points, or under Responsibilities? Not appropriate. Could we create a section "Additional information" but not allowed? The instruction says use headings for those specific sections; but does it forbid other headings? It says "Use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." suggests those are examples, but likely they expect only those headings. It also says "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". It doesn't explicitly forbid other headings, but to be safe we should stick to those headings. However we must preserve all substantive info; we can embed the additional info under Qualifications as extra bullet points (makes sense as qualifications-related). Or we could put under Requirements? Not exactly. The additional info includes things like Section 508, Reemployed Annuitants, Veterans info, Drug-Free Workplace Policy, etc. Those are not qualifications but rather general employment info. Could be considered part of Requirements? Not really. But we could treat them as part of Qualifications (since they are eligibility criteria). However some are not eligibility but policy statements (Drug-Free Workplace). Might be okay to include under Qualifications as additional notes. Alternatively, we could create a section "Benefits" already present; we could also add a section "Additional Information" but risk deviating from spec. The spec says "Use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." indicates those are examples, not an exhaustive list. So we could add other headings if needed. But the instruction also says

Similar jobs