Director of AI

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually the posting includes "About Ludia Consulting", "About Ludia Labs", "The Role", "What Success Looks Like", "Customer Facing", "Essential Functions", "Skills & Competencies Required", "Preferred Experience", etc. We need to use

for section headings (e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). But we should only include sections when posting has real specific content. We should not repeat job title as heading. We need to include sections like About the role? The posting includes "About Ludia Consulting" and "About Ludia Labs". Those could be considered "About the role"? Actually "About the role" is a generic heading; but we can use headings that reflect content: maybe "About Ludia Consulting", "About Ludia Labs", "The Role", "What Success Looks Like", "Customer Facing", "Essential Functions", "Skills & Competencies Required", "Preferred Experience". However the instruction says: use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It suggests we should map content to those standard headings where appropriate. But we can also use other headings? It says "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." That implies we should use those headings if they exist. But we can also use other headings? The examples are just examples; but they say "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." Likely they want us to use those standard headings when applicable. However the posting doesn't have explicit sections named exactly those; we need to decide which content fits which heading. We have: - About Ludia Consulting (company overview) -> could be "About the role"? Not exactly. Maybe "About the role" is for role description; but we have "The Role". Could map to "About the role". But they said do NOT repeat the job title as a heading. So we can have a heading "About the role" and put the description of the role there. - Responsibilities: we have many responsibilities listed under "Essential Functions" and "Customer Facing". Could combine. - Requirements/Qualifications: we have "Skills & Competencies Required" and "Preferred Experience". Could map to Requirements and Qualifications. - Skills: maybe separate. - Benefits, Pay, Schedule: not present, so we should NOT include those sections. Thus we should include sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills (maybe). But we need to avoid filler. Let's extract substantive content. We need to preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all details from the posting, but we can structure them under headings. We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The posting doesn't seem to have those; it's just the description. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences. Thus produce something like:

About the role

... description ...

Responsibilities

• ... each responsibility ...

Requirements

• ... required qualifications ...

Qualifications

• ... maybe preferred? Actually qualifications could be required; but we have both required and preferred. Could put required under Requirements, preferred under Qualifications? Or we could have Skills section for skills. But we need to follow instruction: use headings as examples; we can have multiple sections. Let's parse the posting for responsibilities: From "The Role": Reports To: Chief Operations Officer; Responsible For: the Ludia Labs AI engineering team, and the firm's AI policy, platform register, and AI budget; As Director of AI, you lead how Ludia uses AI, inside our own walls and in what we deliver to customers. You own the internal AI strategy that brings intelligent agents to every part of the business, the policy and governance that keep those agents safe, the budget that pays for them, and the Ludia Labs accelerators that put the same capability in our customers' hands. We care about AI that reaches production and gets used. You are also responsible for all Customer AI Implementation projects. This is a hands-on technical leadership role. You know Dynamics 365 cold, because nearly every agent and accelerator we build sits on top of it, and you are comfortable in the code, the architecture, and the standards that keep what we ship reliable. You set the bar for how Ludia builds AI, and you give the team the tools to move faster. You are also a human-first thinker. You believe AI should get more out of people rather than replace them: pair human reasoning and judgment with agents that handle the rest, and people do their best work. You will be Ludia's advocate for that future inside the firm, and you will help our customers picture it and get there too. You work with the leaders of Operations, Delivery, Sales, Marketing, and Talent to turn ideas into automation the business can measure. You meet with the CEO monthly and with the AI Steering Committee quarterly, and you run the AI function in between. Security, governance, and responsible AI stay central to everything you ship. Then "What Success Looks Like": bullet points (first 90 days, first year). Those are success metrics, could be under Responsibilities or maybe separate section "Success Metrics". But we don't have a heading for that; we could put under Responsibilities. Then "Customer Facing": bullet points. Then "Essential Functions": sub-sections: AI strategy, policy, governance, and cost; Technical leadership and AI development standards; Agentic innovation and automation; Ludia Labs accelerators; Educate, mentor, and lead adoption; Working across the business. Thus many responsibilities. We could combine all responsibilities into a single
  under

  Responsibilities

  . But we need to preserve all detail; we can break into subheadings? Not allowed? We could still use

  for subheadings but they'd be extra sections; but we can still use

  for each subsection if we want. However instruction: "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests we should use those. Safer to stick to those headings only. Thus we will have: - About the role: includes company overview (About Ludia Consulting, About Ludia Labs) and role summary. - Responsibilities: includes all duty bullet points from The Role, What Success Looks Like, Customer Facing, Essential Functions. - Requirements: includes required skills/competencies (the "Skills & Competencies Required" list). - Qualifications: maybe includes preferred experience? Or we could put preferred under Qualifications. - Skills: maybe we could separate technical skills? But we already have required skills list; maybe we can put them under Requirements and Qualifications. But we need to avoid thin sections. Let's decide: About the role: company overview + role summary. Responsibilities: all duties. Requirements: required qualifications (10+ years, degree, track record, deep knowledge, coding, Microsoft AI stack, etc.) Qualifications: preferred experience (Physical Operations verticals, certifications, etc.) Skills: maybe we could list specific skills like "C#/.NET, Python, TypeScript", "Copilot Studio", etc. But those are already in requirements. Could combine. Better to have: - About the role - Responsibilities - Requirements - Qualifications No Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must ensure we don't create empty sections. Now we need to extract content precisely. Let's extract About Ludia Consulting and Ludia Labs: "Who is Ludia Consulting? Ludia Consulting is one of the fastest-growing and innovative consulting firms in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain, Customer Engagement, and Power Platform. We are looking for a team member committed to helping others and their communities while also growing professionally as part of our Ludia family. We are not just a traditional organization; we are driven to help our partners and clients while delivering value every day. Our team members are encouraged to grow by sharing their knowledge and experience through community-driven channels, including local non-profit organizations. About Ludia Labs Ludia Labs is our AI innovation studio. It is where we build the AI accelerators, intelligent agents, and Microsoft Copilot solutions that we put to work for our customers and inside our own business. We have a direct line to Microsoft Engineering and FastTrack, and we ground everything we build in our Dynamics 365 and Physical Operations experience." We can combine into a paragraph. Now role summary: The Role section (starting at "The Role Reports To: Chief Operations Officer ..." up to before "What Success Looks Like"). We'll include that as part of About the role? Or we could separate but we already have About the role heading; we can include both company overview and role summary. Thus About the role

  containing both. Now Responsibilities: need to list all duties. Let's gather bullet points from: From The Role (after the summary): Actually the role description includes many responsibilities: leading AI use, owning internal AI strategy, policy, governance, budget, Ludia Labs accelerators, responsible for Customer AI Implementation projects, hands-on technical leadership, know Dynamics 365, set bar, human-first thinker, advocate, work with leaders of Operations, Delivery, Sales, Marketing, Talent, meet with CEO monthly, AI Steering Committee quarterly, run AI function, security/governance/responsible AI central. From What Success Looks Like: first 90 days and first year bullet points. From Customer Facing: bullet points. From Essential Functions: sub-sections each with bullet-like sentences. We need to convert each distinct responsibility into

  items. We must preserve all detail; not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep the exact phrasing? Ideally we keep the substance but can rephrase slightly as long as we keep detail. Safer to keep sentences as they are. Let's extract each responsibility as a separate item. I'll go through the text and pull out responsibility statements. **From The Role paragraph:** - Reports to Chief Operations Officer. - Responsible for the Ludia Labs AI engineering team, and the firm's AI policy, platform register, and AI budget. - Lead how Ludia uses AI, inside our own walls and in what we deliver to customers. - Own the internal AI strategy that brings intelligent agents to every part of the business, the policy and governance that keep those agents safe, the budget that pays for them, and the Ludia Labs accelerators that put the same capability in our customers' hands. - Care about AI that reaches production and gets used. - Responsible for all Customer AI Implementation projects. - This is a hands-on technical leadership role. - Know Dynamics 365 cold, because nearly every agent and accelerator we build sits on top of it, and you are comfortable in the code, the architecture, and the standards that keep what we ship reliable. - Set the bar for how Ludia builds AI, and you give the team the tools to move faster. - Be a human-first thinker: believe AI should get more out of people rather than replace them: pair human reasoning and judgment with agents that handle the rest, and people do their best work. - Be Ludia's advocate for that future inside the firm, and help our customers picture it and get there too. - Work with the leaders of Operations, Delivery, Sales, Marketing, and Talent to turn ideas into automation the business can measure. - Meet with the CEO monthly and with the AI Steering Committee quarterly, and you run the AI function in