Director, Digital Transformation & Technology

The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. Let me analyze the content and structure it according to the rules. First, I need to identify the sections: 1. "How We Work At Chick-fil-A" - this seems like an intro/about the company section 2. "Overview" - describes the business context and the Business Architecture team 3. "The Director Of Enterprise Business Architecture Is Charged With Developing The Vision, Strategy, And Execution Plan For The Following Key Outcomes" - this is essentially the role overview/key responsibilities 4. "Responsibilities" - listed as bullet points 5. "Required Qualifications (Knowledge, Skills, & Abilities)" - bullet points 6. "Preferred Qualifications (Knowledge, Skills, & Abilities)" - bullet points 7. Various metadata fields at the end: Required Years Of Experience, Preferred Years Of Experience, Travel Requirements, Required Level Of Education, Preferred Level Of Education, Required Major/Concentration, Preferred Major/Concentration, Relocation Assistance Provided According to rules: - Use

for section headings (About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule) - Use

• for lists - Use

  for prose - Do NOT repeat job title as heading - Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings - Fold minor metadata into short

  or drop it - Preserve ALL substantive information - Remove boilerplate (cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/scam-warning) - Include section ONLY when posting has real, specific content - Never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text - Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them - Output ONLY HTML fragment, no /, no markdown code fences Let me structure this: 1. The "How We Work At Chick-fil-A" and "Overview" sections are prose about the company and context. I'll combine them into an "About the role" or "Overview" section with

  tags. 2. The "Director Of Enterprise Business Architecture Is Charged With..." section is essentially the role summary/key outcomes. I'll include this as part of the overview or as a separate "About the role" section. 3. "Responsibilities" - clear list, use

  • 4. "Required Qualifications" - list, use
    • 5. "Preferred Qualifications" - list, use
      • 6. The metadata at the end: Required Years Of Experience 10, Preferred Years Of Experience 15, Travel Requirements 10%, Required Level Of Education Bachelor's degree or equivalent experience, Preferred Level Of Education Master's Degree, Required Major/Concentration MIS, Computer Science, or similar, Preferred Major/Concentration MBA, Relocation Assistance Provided No. These are specific details. I should include them, perhaps in a "Qualifications" section or a "Requirements" section. Since they are specific, I'll create a "Qualifications" section with a list or prose. The rules say: "use

        for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". So I can use "Qualifications" as a heading. I need to decide on section headings. The posting has: - Overview/context (How We Work + Overview + Director charged with...) - Responsibilities - Required Qualifications - Preferred Qualifications - Additional requirements (years, education, travel, relocation) I'll create: -

        About the role

        for the overview/context -

        Responsibilities

        for the responsibilities list -

        Qualifications

        for required and preferred qualifications, plus the metadata But the metadata includes years of experience, education, travel, relocation. These are part of qualifications. I'll include them in the Qualifications section. I must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless stated. The posting doesn't mention pay, schedule, or benefits explicitly (except travel and relocation). Travel is mentioned, relocation is mentioned. Schedule? Not really. Benefits? Not mentioned. So no Benefits, Pay, Schedule sections. Now, let's write the HTML. First, the "How We Work At Chick-fil-A" and "Overview" and the "Director charged with..." are all prose. I'll combine them into a few paragraphs under "About the role". The "Director Of Enterprise Business Architecture Is Charged With Developing The Vision, Strategy, And Execution Plan For The Following Key Outcomes" has four bullet-like paragraphs: Lead the Business Architecture Practice, Translate Strategy into Execution, Champion Enterprise Outcomes, Provide Digital Delivery Process leadership. These are key outcomes. I'll include them as part of the role description, maybe as a list or separate paragraphs. Since they are distinct, I could make them a list under "Key outcomes" but the rules say use
        • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. These are key outcomes, not duties per se. But they are part of the role description. I'll include them as a list under "About the role" or as part of the prose. Better to keep as prose paragraphs, but they are structured. I'll use

          for each. Now, the "Responsibilities" section has bullet points. I'll use

          • . "Required Qualifications" bullet points ->
            • "Preferred Qualifications" bullet points ->
              • Then the metadata: I'll create a list or prose. Since they are specific, I'll include them in the Qualifications section, perhaps as a separate list or combined. I'll structure Qualifications section with two sub-lists: Required and Preferred, then additional details. But the rules say use

                for section headings. I can have one

                Qualifications

                and then within, use

                ? But the rules only mention

                for section headings. It doesn't forbid

                , but to keep simple, I'll just use

                for main sections. I can have "Required Qualifications" and "Preferred Qualifications" as separate

                ? The example includes "Requirements, Qualifications, Skills" as possible headings. I think it's okay to have "Required Qualifications" and "Preferred Qualifications" as separate

                headings. However, the posting has them as separate sections. I'll follow the posting's structure. But the rules: "use

                for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". So "Requirements" and "Qualifications" are both examples. I'll use "Required Qualifications" and "Preferred Qualifications" as

                headings. Then the metadata (years, education, travel, relocation) could be under a "Requirements" heading or included in "Required Qualifications". Since they are specific requirements, I'll add them as a list under "Required Qualifications" or a separate "Additional Requirements" section. But to avoid too many thin sections, I'll include them in the "Required Qualifications" section as a separate list or prose. Let's see: The posting lists "Required Years Of Experience 10", "Preferred Years Of Experience 15", "Travel Requirements 10%", "Required Level Of Education Bachelor's degree or equivalent experience", "Preferred Level Of Education Master's Degree", "Required Major/Concentration MIS, Computer Science, or similar", "Preferred Major/Concentration MBA", "Relocation Assistance Provided No". These are distinct from the bullet-point qualifications. I'll create a "Requirements" section for these, or include in "Qualifications". I think a "Requirements" section is appropriate. But the rules say "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe combine. I'll do: - About the role - Responsibilities - Required Qualifications - Preferred Qualifications - Additional Requirements (for years, education, travel, relocation) But "Additional Requirements" might be thin. I'll include them in "Required Qualifications" as a separate list. Alternatively, I can create a "Qualifications" section with subsections. But only

                allowed? The rules don't forbid

                , but they say "use

                for section headings". It doesn't say you can't use other headings, but to be safe, I'll use only

                for main sections. I'll create:

                About the role

                Responsibilities

                Required Qualifications

                Preferred Qualifications

                Requirements

                for the metadata. But "Requirements" might be confused with "Required Qualifications". The metadata includes both required and preferred. I'll call it "Experience & Education" or "Additional Details". But the rules say use headings like "Requirements, Qualifications, Skills". I'll use "Requirements" for the metadata. Let's proceed. Now, write HTML. First, About the role: combine "How We Work At Chick-fil-A", "Overview", and the four key outcomes. I'll write paragraphs. Note: The text has some all-caps headings. I'll normalize. Let's draft.

                About the role

                At Chick-fil-A, staff members play a vital role in achieving strategic goals by developing their skills, fostering inclusive teamwork, and embracing innovation. All staff are expected to contribute to a compelling future by inspiring and motivating those around them. Growth and development are essential; staff are encouraged to seek new perspectives and adopt new methods to drive continuous improvement and adaptation to evolving business needs. The Flexible Futures Model offers a healthy mix of working in person (currently a minimum of 8-10 days per month) and virtually, strengthening key elements of the Chick-fil-A culture by fostering collaboration and community.

                As Chick-fil-A has grown, the shared context that once allowed challenges to be addressed relationally has diminished. Today, the business needs a common language to express core capabilities to make decisions about where to invest for growth and operational success. The Business Architecture team is charged with making this vision a reality.

                The Director of Enterprise Business Architecture is charged with developing the vision, strategy, and execution plan for the following key outcomes:

                • Lead the Business Architecture Practice: Steward the Business Capability Catalog and its associated data, including business capabilities, people support, systems, critical data objects, planned projects, and more. This catalog serves as a shared way of talking about what the business does and how well it is supported by people, process, data, and technology. Beyond maintaining it, the Director must actively advocate for its use across the business at the right times. This includes applying and maturing practices such as capability modeling, systems mapping, maturity scoring, and data-driven decision making through portfolio planning, and shaping the team into an effective consulting function that leverages the model to help the business and DTT deliver solutions that move the needle on targeted strategy outcomes.
                • Translate Strategy into Execution: Help the business translate strategy goals into execution paths, advocating for effective measurement of business impact. This involves influencing the planning process at the functional team level and jumping into challenging cross-team situations as a player/coach. Requires building strategic relationships with leaders across talent, organizational strategy, business departments, and DTT.
                • Champion Enterprise Outcomes: Manage the tension between departmental or DTT product team outcomes and enterprise outcomes, ensuring decisions are made with “eyes wide open.” Enterprise outcomes include Momentum Accelerators, Enterprise Item Lifecycle Management (Supply Chain + Marketing + DTT), and International expansion. Business Architecture was critical in defining the international operating model and navigating the intersection of people, process, data, and technology on the highly cross-functional EILM.