Demand Generation Manager (ABM Focus)
Phamily · New York, NY · 3 wk ago
On-siteMarketingFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings for each section heading present. Must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must include only sections with real content. Must not include boilerplate like EEO, etc. Must remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. The posting includes "Our Compensation & Benefits" with details. So we need a Benefits section (maybe also Pay? It says "Competitive compensation based on experience and impact" - that's compensation info, but not specific numbers. The rule: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. It does state compensation and benefits, albeit generic. Should we include a Benefits section? The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Also "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. 'commensurate with experience', 'not specified', 'N/A', 'varies', 'TBD')". The posting says "Competitive compensation based on experience and impact" which is vague but still some content. It also lists benefits specifics. So we can include a Benefits section with the details. Pay maybe not needed as separate; we could combine compensation into Benefits or have a Compensation subsection? The rule: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have Benefits heading. Pay heading only if posting states pay specifics; it does not give numbers, just "Competitive compensation based on experience and impact". That's vague but still mentions compensation. However the instruction says never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text like "commensurate with experience", "not specified", etc. "Competitive compensation based on experience and impact" is somewhat filler but maybe acceptable? It's not a specific number. Safer to omit Pay section and include compensation details within Benefits or maybe a "Compensation & Benefits" section? But the allowed headings list includes Benefits and Pay separate. We could make a Benefits section that includes both compensation and benefits details. That seems okay.
We need sections: About the role (maybe from Job/Role Description), Responsibilities (Key Responsibilities), Requirements (Requirements), maybe Qualifications? The posting includes Requirements and Preferred requirements. Could combine into Requirements section with subpoints? Or separate Requirements and Preferred? The instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have Requirements and maybe Qualifications? The posting doesn't have a separate Qualifications heading; it's under Requirements. So we can just have Requirements.
We also have "Work style & logistics" and "Our Compensation & Benefits". Could be part of Benefits or maybe a separate "Work Style" section? Not in allowed headings list. Could incorporate into Benefits or maybe a "Culture" section? Not allowed. Probably we should include only the standard headings that have content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Benefits. Possibly also "Skills"? Not explicitly listed but could be derived from Requirements. But we should not create thin sections.
Thus output:
for headings.
Now craft final HTML.
Check for any duplicated lines: none.
Ensure we preserve all substantive info: we included all responsibilities, requirements, preferred, benefits, compensation, work style? We omitted work style & logistics paragraph. Should we include it? It's substantive about culture. Could be included under a section like "Culture" but not in allowed headings. Could we incorporate into Benefits? Not really. Could we add a section "Work Style"? Not in allowed headings list but maybe allowed? The instruction gave examples but not exhaustive? It said "Use
for each section heading present. Must not repeat job title. Must not include Job ID etc. Must include only sections with real content. Must not include boilerplate like EEO, etc. Must remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. The posting includes "Our Compensation & Benefits" with details. So we need a Benefits section (maybe also Pay? It says "Competitive compensation based on experience and impact" - that's compensation info, but not specific numbers. The rule: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. It does state compensation and benefits, albeit generic. Should we include a Benefits section? The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Also "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. 'commensurate with experience', 'not specified', 'N/A', 'varies', 'TBD')". The posting says "Competitive compensation based on experience and impact" which is vague but still some content. It also lists benefits specifics. So we can include a Benefits section with the details. Pay maybe not needed as separate; we could combine compensation into Benefits or have a Compensation subsection? The rule: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have Benefits heading. Pay heading only if posting states pay specifics; it does not give numbers, just "Competitive compensation based on experience and impact". That's vague but still mentions compensation. However the instruction says never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text like "commensurate with experience", "not specified", etc. "Competitive compensation based on experience and impact" is somewhat filler but maybe acceptable? It's not a specific number. Safer to omit Pay section and include compensation details within Benefits or maybe a "Compensation & Benefits" section? But the allowed headings list includes Benefits and Pay separate. We could make a Benefits section that includes both compensation and benefits details. That seems okay.
We need sections: About the role (maybe from Job/Role Description), Responsibilities (Key Responsibilities), Requirements (Requirements), maybe Qualifications? The posting includes Requirements and Preferred requirements. Could combine into Requirements section with subpoints? Or separate Requirements and Preferred? The instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can have Requirements and maybe Qualifications? The posting doesn't have a separate Qualifications heading; it's under Requirements. So we can just have Requirements.
We also have "Work style & logistics" and "Our Compensation & Benefits". Could be part of Benefits or maybe a separate "Work Style" section? Not in allowed headings list. Could incorporate into Benefits or maybe a "Culture" section? Not allowed. Probably we should include only the standard headings that have content: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Benefits. Possibly also "Skills"? Not explicitly listed but could be derived from Requirements. But we should not create thin sections.
Thus output:
About the role
... (Job/Role Description paragraph)
Responsibilities
- ... each responsibility
Requirements
- ... each requirement
Benefits
- ... each benefit
or drop it. Location, Job Type, Reports To are minor metadata. Could fold into a short
maybe under About the role? Or we could drop it. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Could include a short paragraph at start with location etc. But they said "fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it." So we can include a
with location, job type, reports to before the sections. That seems okay. Thus output:
Location: Manhattan, NYC, on-site 5 days per week | Job Type: Full Time | Reports To: Director of Marketing
Then sections. Make sure to use