Commissioning Technician

We need to output HTML fragment with sections only when posting has real specific content. Use

for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to parse the posting. First, the posting includes a description of company, then details: Experience: 3+ years, Employment Type: Full-time, Hybrid Schedule: 3 days in-office / 2 remote, Salary Range: $90,000 - $120,000 + (dependent on experience). Also mentions annual performance-based bonus. Location: San Jose, CA (open to candidates in surrounding Northern California cities) Then description of role: P2S Commissioning (Cx) team, looking for Commissioning Technician. Then "Responsibilities" bullet list. Then "Required Qualifications" bullet list. Then "Preferred Qualifications" bullet list. Then "Working Knowledge" bullet list (maybe part of qualifications? It says "Working Knowledge Minimum 3 years of experience as a mechanical design engineer ..." Actually that seems like more qualifications. Then "What sets P2S|CMTA apart?" paragraph about benefits. Then "Learn more..." link. Then "P2S|CMTA is an equal opportunity employer." (EEO boilerplate, remove) Then "About Legence" (seems unrelated, maybe part of another job posting? Should we keep? It's not about this role; it's about Legence. Likely boilerplate to remove. Then "Benefits" section with details. Then "Reasonable Accommodations" etc (boilerplate, remove). Then "Third-Party Recruiting Disclaimer" remove. Then "Pay Disclosure & Considerations" maybe part of Pay section? It includes statement about pay determination. Could be considered Pay section content. Then "Employment Eligibility" (visa sponsorship not available) maybe part of Requirements? Could be included as a note. Then "Equal Employment Opportunity Employer" remove. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. Remove boilerplate. We need to decide which sections to include. We have: - About the role: Could include description of role, team, what they do, ideal candidate description. That's substantive. - Responsibilities: list. - Requirements: maybe combine Required Qualifications and maybe some other requirements like experience, degree, certification, driver's license, travel, etc. - Qualifications: maybe Preferred Qualifications. - Skills: maybe Working Knowledge and other skill bullets (communication, organizational, etc). Could be separate Skills section. - Benefits: from Benefits section. - Pay: from Salary Range and bonus info, plus Pay Disclosure. - Schedule: from Hybrid Schedule: 3 days in-office / 2 remote. We also have Location info; could be part of About the role or maybe a separate section? Not in list of allowed headings; we could fold into About the role as a short paragraph. Employment Type: Full-time could be in About the role. Experience: 3+ years could be in Requirements. We must not repeat job title as heading. We must not include Job ID/requisition numbers. We must not include placeholder text like "commensurate with experience", etc. The posting includes "$90,000 - $120,000 + (dependent on experience)" which is specific; we can include. We must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. It does state them. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. We'll produce something like:

About the role

...

Responsibilities

• ...

Requirements

• ...

Qualifications

• ...

Skills

• ...

Benefits

• ...

Pay

...

Schedule

...

We need to ensure we don't include empty sections. Now gather content. About the role: Should include company description, team description, role ideal candidate, location, employment type, maybe experience. Let's craft a concise paragraph preserving all substantive info. Company: P2S|CMTA stands as a provider of professional engineering services to a broad range of markets, including higher education, healthcare, ports/harbors, industrial, entertainment, commercial, laboratories, municipal, and federal sectors. Specialties include electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire protection, and technology integration. Services range from engineering and commissioning to construction management. Over 400 dedicated employees on the West Coast, internationally recognized leader. Provide blend of innovation and technical excellence delivering green solutions. Offices in Long Beach, Seattle, Irvine, San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Jose. Role: P2S Commissioning (Cx) team focused on delivering high-performance building systems. Looking for a Commissioning Technician with strong technical foundation, hands-on approach, interest in advancing building commissioning. Ideal for someone who understands building systems design and functionality and enjoys identifying opportunities to improve system operations and maintainability. Provides ongoing education and training. Location: San Jose, CA (open to candidates in surrounding Northern California cities). Employment Type: Full-time. Experience: 3+ years. We can combine. Now Responsibilities list: from posting: - Perform design reviews of drawings, specifications, and submittals to ensure alignment with Owner Project Requirements (OPR) and Basis of Design (BOD) - Develop commissioning plans, pre-functional checklists, and functional performance test procedures - Identify, document, and track issues throughout all project phases and support resolution - Execute and oversee onsite functional performance testing of building systems while working with MEP trades - Attend commissioning coordination meetings with owners, engineers, general contractors, subcontractors, and facilities personnel - Prepare clear, organized reports summarizing project progress, test results, and system performance - Support owner training and documentation of systems and operations Now Requirements: Required Qualifications: - Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering or related field - CxT (ACG) or ACP (BCA) certification preferred - Valid driver’s license and reliable transportation required - Ability to travel up to 40% - 3+ years of experience in mechanical design for commercial buildings - Working knowledge of building systems, including: - HVAC – Airside and Water Side - Central Utility Plants - Plumbing/Piping - Electrical systems – Power and Lighting - Fire protection - Controls and instrumentation We could treat the working knowledge as part of Requirements or Skills. But we have separate Skills section; maybe put the detailed system knowledge under Skills. However the instruction: Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. So we can split. We have also "Preferred Qualifications" list: - Commissioning and retro-commissioning experience - Experience working within a consulting engineering environment - Strong client-facing experience And "Working Knowledge" list (which seems like a repeat of the earlier working knowledge but with extra bullets): - Minimum 3 years of experience as a mechanical design engineer working with a consulting engineering firm designing mechanical systems for facilities or buildings - Ability to communicate effectively with people through oral presentations and written communications - Ability to work independently in a fast-paced environment with supervision and support from a commissioning agent - Ability to work well under pressure while managing and prioritizing multiple projects - Strong organizational skills, detail-oriented, creative, self-motivated, and enthusiastic - Strong interpersonal skills and experience in maintaining strong client relationships are required - Proficiency with Microsoft Office, including Word, Excel, and Outlook We need to decide where to place each. We could treat "Required Qualifications" as Requirements section, "Preferred Qualifications" as Qualifications section, and the "Working Knowledge" as Skills section. But note that the "Working Knowledge" includes experience requirement (minimum 3 years as mechanical design engineer) which overlaps with Required Qualifications (3+ years experience in mechanical design for commercial buildings). Might be duplicate but we should preserve all substantive info; we can include both but avoid duplication? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep both, even if overlapping. However we should not create filler/placeholder text. Duplication is okay as long as it's from posting. Thus we can include all three lists under appropriate headings. Now Benefits: from Benefits section: - 401(k) Plan with Company Match: Currently match contributions dollar-for-dollar up to 4% of eligible pay; immediate vesting. - Health & Welfare Benefits: Employer provided medical, dental, vision, prescription drug, Employee Assistance Program and accident & illness coverage. - Life and Disability Insurance: Employer provided basic life insurance and AD&D valued at 50K coverage amount with the option for voluntary buy-up for additional coverage. - Time Off: Flexible non-accrual vacation; company holidays per policy. (For California employees, this is separate from California paid sick leave, if applicable.) - Expenses: Business travel and related expenses reimbursed per company policy. - Discount Program: Company-sponsored discount program with savings on multiple lifestyle categories. We should keep as list items. Pay: Salary Range: $90,000 - $120,000 + (dependent on experience). This role is also eligible for an annual performance‑based bonus. Bonus eligibility and payout are determined by role, individual performance, and company performance, and are not guaranteed. Also Pay Disclosure & Considerations: Where pay ranges are indicated, please note that a successful candidate’s exact pay will be determined based relevant job-related factors, including any of the following: candidate’s experience, skills, and qualifications, as well as geographic and market considerations. We are committed to ensuring fair and competitive compensation for all employees and comply with all applicable salary transparency laws. We can combine into a paragraph or list. Schedule: Hybrid Schedule: 3 days in-office / 2 remote. Now we need to ensure we don't include boilerplate like EEO, Legence description, Reasonable Accommodations, Third-Party Recruiting Disclaimer, Employment Eligibility (visa sponsorship not available) maybe we could include as a requirement? It's substantive: "Candidates must have current work authorization in the U.S.; visa sponsorship is not available for this position." That's a requirement; we could include under Requirements. But the instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. The visa sponsorship statement might be considered legal/requirement; it's not exactly boilerplate? It's a specific condition. I'd keep it as a requirement. Similarly "Employment Eligibility" maybe keep. But "Equal Employment Opportunity Employer" is boilerplate; remove. "About Legence" seems unrelated to this job; likely a copy-paste from another posting; we should remove as it's not about this role. Now we need to ensure we don't include any heading that has only filler text. All sections we plan have content. Now produce HTML. We'll need to escape any HTML special characters? Not needed. Let's craft.

  About the role

  P2S|CMTA provides professional engineering services to markets including higher education, healthcare, ports/harbors, industrial, entertainment, commercial, laboratories, municipal, and federal sectors. Specialties include electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire protection, and technology integration, offering services from engineering and commissioning to construction management. With over 400 dedicated employees on the West Coast, the firm is an internationally recognized leader delivering green solutions that enhance built, natural, and social environments. Offices are located in Long Beach, Seattle, Irvine, San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Jose. The P2S Commissioning (Cx) team focuses on high-performance building systems and seeks a Commissioning Technician with a strong technical foundation, hands‑on approach,