Jobs · Legal · Michigan

Commercial & Regulatory Counsel

Association of Corporate Counsel · Southfield, MI · 1 mo ago
LegalFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually the posting includes "About Sylvan Global Holdings" (company description) then "Position Overview", "Key Responsibilities", "Required Qualifications", "Preferred Qualifications", "What We Offer". We need to use

for section headings (e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). We must not repeat job title as heading. We must not include Job ID etc. We must include sections only when posting has real specific content. We must not include filler like "commensurate with experience" etc. So we need to decide which sections to include. We have content: About Sylvan Global Holdings (company description) - could be "About the role"? Actually "About Sylvan Global Holdings" is about company, not role. The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We can map sections accordingly. We have Position Overview (overview of role) - could be "About the role". We'll put that as

About the role

with paragraph(s). Key Responsibilities ->

Responsibilities

with
  • items. Required Qualifications ->

    Requirements

    (or Qualifications). The instruction says Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We can combine Required Qualifications under Requirements or Qualifications. Probably Requirements for required qualifications, and Preferred Qualifications could be under Qualifications or Skills? But we have both required and preferred. Could do Requirements for required, and Qualifications for preferred? Or we could have Requirements (required) and Qualifications (preferred). The instruction says we should prefer few substantive sections over many thin ones. Could combine required and preferred into one Qualifications section? But we need to preserve all info. Could have

    Requirements

    for required qualifications, and

    Preferred Qualifications

    for preferred. However headings list includes Qualifications but not Preferred Qualifications. But we can still use Qualifications heading for both required and preferred? Might be okay to have two sub-sections? But instruction: "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests those as examples. Safer to stick to those headings. We could map Required Qualifications to

    Requirements

    , Preferred Qualifications to

    Qualifications

    . That seems reasonable. We also have "What We Offer" which includes benefits, culture, etc. Could map to

    Benefits

    (covers benefits). Also includes "Competitive base salary and performance-based bonus, commensurate with experience." That's pay info but includes "commensurate with experience" which is filler? It's not a specific number, but it's still mention of salary and bonus. The instruction says: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The posting does state "Competitive base salary and performance-based bonus, commensurate with experience." That's still somewhat vague but it's stating that there is a competitive base salary and performance-based bonus. It's not a specific number but it's stating existence. Is that considered filler? The phrase "commensurate with experience" is considered filler per instruction. However the sentence also includes "Competitive base salary and performance-based bonus". That is substantive? It says there is a competitive base salary and performance-based bonus. That's not a specific number but it's a statement that they exist. The instruction says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state them (though vague). But also says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", ...). If we include a Pay section, we would have to include the text about salary. The text includes "commensurate with experience" which is filler. But we could still include the sentence; the instruction is about not creating a section if the content is only filler. Since we have some substantive statement ("Competitive base salary and performance-based bonus") plus filler, it's okay? Might be safer to omit Pay section and instead include that info under Benefits? The Benefits section could include "Competitive base salary and performance-based bonus". That seems okay. Thus we will have sections: About the role (Position Overview), Responsibilities (Key Responsibilities), Requirements (Required Qualifications), Qualifications (Preferred Qualifications), Benefits (What We Offer). Possibly also Skills? Not needed. We must not repeat job title as heading. No Job ID. We must preserve all substantive information. Need to include details from company description? The "About Sylvan Global Holdings" is substantive about company. Should we include that? The instruction says include a section only when posting has real specific content for it. The company description is not about the role but could be considered part of "About the role"? Might be okay to include as part of About the role paragraph. We'll include it as a paragraph under About the role. Now we need to format lists. Responsibilities: The posting has bullet-like sentences but not actual list. We need to convert to
    • . We'll break each sentence or clause. Key Responsibilities includes two main areas: Commercial & Construction Contracts and Construction Regulatory & Compliance and Legal Department & Enterprise Support. Within each there are multiple duties separated by periods. We'll create list items for each duty. Let's extract: Commercial & Construction Contracts: - Draft, review, and negotiate a high volume of critical construction and commercial agreements, including prime contracts, subcontracts, master service agreements, purchase orders, design-build, equipment leases, professional services agreements, and vendor and supplier contracts. - Advise on key contract risk areas, including indemnification, insurance, warranties, limitations of liability, liquidated damages, consequential damages, payment and retainage terms, change orders, scheduling and delay provisions, force majeure, termination rights, dispute resolution, and other key terms. - Proactively lead contract lifecycle management, including intake, triage, risk escalation, and approval workflows; contribute to the development and continuous improvement of templates and negotiation playbooks; provide leadership to evaluate and implement fit-for-purpose AI and other technology tools. - Counsel business teams on bid and proposal terms, flow-down obligations from owners and general contractors, and contract close-out practices. - Assist with claims avoidance and pre-litigation dispute management, including payment disputes, mechanics' liens and bond claim strategy, and coordination with outside counsel. Construction Regulatory & Compliance: - Coordinate and advise on federal, state/provincial, and local regulatory requirements affecting industrial construction operations in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, including contractor and trade licensing, permitting, and registration requirements. - Provide legal counsel on prevailing wage and public works requirements (including Davis-Bacon and state equivalents) and, in coordination with the company’s safety, human resources, and operational teams, on OSHA/workplace safety and project-site and company facility environmental regulatory matters. - Support compliance with lien, bond, and security-of-payment regimes across multiple jurisdictions, including notice deadlines and preservation of rights. - Monitor legal and regulatory developments affecting the industrial construction industry across North America and translate them into practical guidance, training, and policy updates for business teams. - Support cross-border commercial matters, including coordination with local counsel in Canada and Mexico on jurisdiction-specific contracting and regulatory questions. Legal Department & Enterprise Support: - Partner with the General Counsel on various corporate and legal operations initiatives as the legal shared service function continues to grow. - Support the General Counsel on acquisitions and other strategic transactions, including diligence, transaction documentation, closing coordination, and post-closing legal integration, as needs and experience permit. - Manage and coordinate outside counsel to support the core responsibilities of the role as needed, with attention to expense management, responsiveness and work product quality. - Travel periodically to project sites, subsidiary offices, and partner locations to support business teams and build relationships across our decentralized organization. We'll put each as
    • . Required Qualifications: list each bullet. - Juris Doctor from an accredited law school and active membership in good standing in at least one U.S. state bar; Michigan bar admission (or eligibility for admission, including via reciprocity or in-house counsel registration) required within a reasonable period after hire, as required. - At least 5 years of relevant legal experience at a law firm, in-house legal department, or a combination of both. - Substantial experience drafting and negotiating a range of complex commercial agreements and advising corporate clients. - Experience building or improving contract templates, playbooks, and legal intake and workflow processes, including the use of contract lifecycle management and AI-assisted tools. - Working knowledge of construction law or regulatory frameworks, or demonstrated ability to develop that knowledge quickly and effectively manage specialized outside counsel. - Strong client service approach to supporting internal team members. - Strong drafting, negotiation, and analytical skills, with the judgment to identify material risks and propose practical, business-oriented solutions. - Ability to manage a high-volume, fast-paced workload with significant autonomy and to prioritize effectively across competing demands. - Excellent interpersonal and communication skills, including the ability to explain legal concepts clearly to non-lawyers at all levels of the organization. - Willingness and ability to travel domestically and internationally (U.S., Canada, and Mexico) as business needs require. Preferred Qualifications: list. - Experience supporting industrial, energy, infrastructure, or multi-trade (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) construction businesses. - Familiarity with cross-border contracting and managing regulatory issues in Canada and/or Mexico. - Experience with government contracting, public works procurement, or federally funded projects. - In-house experience in a decentralized, multi-entity, or acquisition-oriented organization integrating multiple operating businesses. What We Offer: paragraph(s). Include: - The opportunity to help build and shape a newly formed, growing in-house legal function with direct access to senior leadership. - Broad, sophisticated work spanning commercial transactions, construction law, and multi-jurisdictional regulatory practice. - Competitive base salary and performance-based bonus, commensurate with experience. - Potential for incentive units depending on the experience level and background of the candidate. - Comprehensive benefits, including medical, dental, and vision coverage, retirement plan with company contribution, and paid time off. - A collaborative, high performing, entrepreneurial culture with meaningful exposure to operations across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. We need to avoid filler like "commensurate with experience". It's in the sentence about salary. Might be considered filler. But we could rephrase? We cannot invent or summarize away detail. We must preserve ALL substantive information. If we remove "commensurate with experience", we lose some detail (that it's commensurate). However the instruction says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", ...). It doesn't say we cannot include that phrase inside a section; it says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. That is, if we create a Benefits section, we must not have the section's content be only filler. But we have other substantive content besides that phrase. So it's okay to include the phrase as part of the content. So we keep it. Now we need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown fences. We'll produce:

      About the role

      ... (company description + position overview)

      Then

      Responsibilities

        ...
      Then

      Requirements

        ...
      Then

      Qualifications

        ...
      Then

      Benefits

        ...
      (or

      for each? The instruction: Use

      • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

        for prose. Benefits is

Similar jobs