Clinical Nurse Coordinator Endoscopy
for section headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones.
We need to parse the job posting text.
Let's extract content:
First paragraph: "As a Clinical Nurse Coordinator Endoscopy, your voice to influence patient care is valued and empowered at every turn –whether through open, collaborative relationships with your direct manager or more formal opportunities through hospital councils and national nursing initiatives. You'll help shape decisions that elevate both patient outcomes and the future of nursing."
That's like an introductory paragraph about the role. Could be "About the role" or "Job Summary". The posting includes "Job Summary And Qualifications" heading later.
Then: "The Clinical Nurse Coordinator (CNC) ensures and delivers high quality, patient-centered care and coordination of all functions in the unit/department during the designated shift. In collaboration with other members of the management team, the CNC directs, monitors, and evaluates nursing care in accordance with established policies/procedures, serves as a resource person for staff, and models a commitment to the organization’s vision/mission/values to support an unparalleled patient experience and clinical outcomes that contribute to overall departmental performance."
That's also job summary.
Then: "What you will do in this role:" followed by bullet list (though not bullet but sentences). Let's list duties:
- Assists with admission and discharge processes to ensure efficient throughput and high quality, patient-centered care.
- Participates in the ongoing assessment of the quality of patient care services provided in the unit, in collaboration with other members of the management team.
- Collaborates with subject matter experts and other managers to create an environment of teamwork that supports improved outcomes and service.
- Supports a patient-first philosophy and engages in service recovery when necessary.
- Supports the efforts of the facility to improve engagement by operationalizing current nursing strategies, including employee rounding, hourly rounds, and other initiatives.
- Provides recommendations related to interviewing, selecting, and training new staff.
- Recommends and implements courses of action, including training and development, conflict resolution, personnel policy compliance, completion of performance evaluations, and/or disciplinary actions to ensure a competitively better organization.
- Assists with staff scheduling.
- Manages all practical aspects of staff labor in accordance with patient care needs and established productivity guidelines.
- Supports proper inventory control and assists with managing supplies and equipment.
Then: "What qualifications you will need:" followed by list:
- Advanced Cardiac Life Spt (typo: Advanced Cardiac Life Support? Actually "Advanced Cardiac Life SptBasic Cardiac Life Support(RN)" maybe they meant Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Basic Cardiac Life Support (BLS) for RN)
- Registered Nurse
- Bachelors Degree
- No Travel Required
Then: "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience TriStar Summit Medical Center, offers a total rewards package that supports the health, life, career and retirement of our colleagues. The available plans and programs include:" then list of benefits.
Let's parse benefits list:
- Comprehensive benefits for medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, behavioral health and telemedicine services
- Wellbeing support, including free counseling and referral services
- Time away from work programs for paid time off, paid family leave, long- and short-term disability coverage and leaves of absence
- Savings and retirement resources, including a 401(k) Plan with a 100% match on 3% to 9% of pay (based on years of service), Employee Stock Purchase Plan, flexible spending accounts, preferred banking partnerships, retirement readiness tools, rollover support and financial wellbeing counseling
- Education support through tuition assistance, student loan assistance, certification support, dependent scholarships and a partnership with Galen College of Nursing
- Additional benefits for fertility and family building, adoption assistance, life insurance, supplemental health protection plans, auto and home insurance, legal counseling, identity theft protection and consumer discounts
Then: "Learn More About Employee Benefits Note: Eligibility for benefits may vary by location."
Then there is a quote from Erica Rossitto etc. That's likely boilerplate (EEO? Actually it's a quote about nurses). Might be considered not essential? It's not boilerplate but maybe it's fluff. The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The quote is not exactly boilerplate but might be considered promotional. However we need to preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The quote is substantive? It's a statement from a leader about nursing. Might be considered not essential to the job but still part of posting. However we might keep it as part of "About the role" or maybe we can include as a paragraph under "About the role". The instruction says we should not include duplicated lines, but this quote is not duplicated. It's okay to keep.
Then: "TriStar Summit is a 230+ bed comprehensive facility. We serve Davidson, Wilson and surrounding counties. We include a Level III Trauma Center. We offer a full array of acute care services. These include cardiology, oncology, orthopaedics/spine, rehabilitation and women’s services. We are an Accredited Chest Pain Center with PCI. We are a Primary Stroke Center. TriStar Summit is a leading provider of emergency heart and stroke care."
That's facility description, could be part of "About the role" or separate "About the facility". Not a standard heading but we could put under "About the role" or maybe a separate section "About the facility". However the instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine facility description into "About the role" or maybe a separate "About the facility" but that would be thin. Better to include in "About the role" as prose.
Then: "If this opportunity is your next step in your career path, we encourage you to apply for our Clinical Nurse Coordinator Endoscopy opening. We review all applications. Qualified candidates will be contacted by a member of our team. We are interviewing, apply today! We are an equal opportunity employer. We do not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran status, or disability status."
That's application instructions and EEO statement. According to instruction, remove application instructions and EEO/equal-opportunity boilerplate. So we should drop that paragraph.
Also earlier there is "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience" seems garbled. Likely they meant "Benefits" then "0 Required Years of Experience"? Actually maybe they meant "Benefits" then "0 Required Years of Experience" is a placeholder? The phrase "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience" seems like a mistake. We should treat "Benefits" as a heading and then the benefits list. The "0 Required Years of Experience" maybe is a field that says 0 years required? Actually they might have meant "Required Years of Experience: 0"? But they didn't state a number. The phrase "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience" is weird. We should interpret as: Benefits section, then maybe "Required Years of Experience: 0"? But they didn't explicitly state a number. The phrase could be a formatting error where they intended separate headings: "Benefits", "Required Years of Experience". Since they didn't give a number for required years of experience, we should not create a section for it if it's placeholder or not specified. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Benefits are stated, so we keep Benefits section. For Required Years of Experience, they didn't state a number; they said "0 Required Years of Experience" maybe meaning zero years required? Actually "0 Required Years of Experience" could be read as "0 years of experience required". That is a specific statement: zero years required. However it's ambiguous. The phrase "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience" could be two separate items: Benefits, and 0 Required Years of Experience. If they meant zero years required, that is substantive. But we need to decide.
Look at the text: "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience TriStar Summit Medical Center, offers a total rewards package that supports the health, life, career and retirement of our colleagues." It seems like they concatenated "Benefits" and "0 Required Years of Experience" without spacing. Likely the original posting had separate lines: Benefits, Required Years of Experience: 0 (or maybe not). But they wrote "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience". I'd interpret that as they intended to list Benefits and then Required Years of Experience (maybe 0). Since they didn't give a number after "Required Years of Experience", it's ambiguous. However the phrase "0 Required Years of Experience" could be read as "0 years of experience required". That is a specific statement: zero years required. If we treat that as substantive, we could include a section for Requirements (or Qualifications) that includes years of experience. But we already have a Qualifications section listing education, certifications, no travel required. We could add "Years of experience: 0 (no prior experience required)" as a bullet under Qualifications or Requirements. However the instruction says: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could incorporate years of experience into Qualifications.
But we need to check if there is any other mention of experience elsewhere. Not really. So we could add a line under Qualifications: "No prior experience required (0 years)". However the phrase "0 Required Years of Experience" might be a mistake; maybe they meant "Required Years of Experience: 0"? I'd lean to include it as part of Qualifications: "No prior experience required". But we need to be careful not to invent detail. If the posting says "0 Required Years of Experience", we can treat that as stating that zero years of experience are required. So we can include that.
Thus Qualifications section will include:
- Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Basic Cardiac Life Support (BLS) for RN (we need to correct the typo? We should preserve as written? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The text says "Advanced Cardiac Life SptBasic Cardiac Life Support(RN)". That's garbled. We need to interpret but not invent. We could keep the exact string? But that seems nonsensical. Better to interpret as "Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Basic Cardiac Life Support (BLS) for RN". However that is inventing (expanding abbreviation). The instruction says do NOT invent or summarize away detail. But we also need to preserve substantive information; the garbled text is likely a formatting error. Should we keep it exactly as written? That would be "Advanced Cardiac Life SptBasic Cardiac Life Support(RN)". That is not meaningful but it's what's there. However the instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we "correct" it, we are inventing (assuming it's a typo). If we leave it as is, it's still substantive (the exact text). But it's nonsense; but maybe they'd rather we keep it as is. However typical tasks like this expect us to clean up obvious typos? The instruction does not explicitly forbid correcting obvious typos
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We need to parse the job posting text. Let's extract content: First paragraph: "As a Clinical Nurse Coordinator Endoscopy, your voice to influence patient care is valued and empowered at every turn –whether through open, collaborative relationships with your direct manager or more formal opportunities through hospital councils and national nursing initiatives. You'll help shape decisions that elevate both patient outcomes and the future of nursing." That's like an introductory paragraph about the role. Could be "About the role" or "Job Summary". The posting includes "Job Summary And Qualifications" heading later. Then: "The Clinical Nurse Coordinator (CNC) ensures and delivers high quality, patient-centered care and coordination of all functions in the unit/department during the designated shift. In collaboration with other members of the management team, the CNC directs, monitors, and evaluates nursing care in accordance with established policies/procedures, serves as a resource person for staff, and models a commitment to the organization’s vision/mission/values to support an unparalleled patient experience and clinical outcomes that contribute to overall departmental performance." That's also job summary. Then: "What you will do in this role:" followed by bullet list (though not bullet but sentences). Let's list duties: - Assists with admission and discharge processes to ensure efficient throughput and high quality, patient-centered care. - Participates in the ongoing assessment of the quality of patient care services provided in the unit, in collaboration with other members of the management team. - Collaborates with subject matter experts and other managers to create an environment of teamwork that supports improved outcomes and service. - Supports a patient-first philosophy and engages in service recovery when necessary. - Supports the efforts of the facility to improve engagement by operationalizing current nursing strategies, including employee rounding, hourly rounds, and other initiatives. - Provides recommendations related to interviewing, selecting, and training new staff. - Recommends and implements courses of action, including training and development, conflict resolution, personnel policy compliance, completion of performance evaluations, and/or disciplinary actions to ensure a competitively better organization. - Assists with staff scheduling. - Manages all practical aspects of staff labor in accordance with patient care needs and established productivity guidelines. - Supports proper inventory control and assists with managing supplies and equipment. Then: "What qualifications you will need:" followed by list: - Advanced Cardiac Life Spt (typo: Advanced Cardiac Life Support? Actually "Advanced Cardiac Life SptBasic Cardiac Life Support(RN)" maybe they meant Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Basic Cardiac Life Support (BLS) for RN) - Registered Nurse - Bachelors Degree - No Travel Required Then: "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience TriStar Summit Medical Center, offers a total rewards package that supports the health, life, career and retirement of our colleagues. The available plans and programs include:" then list of benefits. Let's parse benefits list: - Comprehensive benefits for medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, behavioral health and telemedicine services - Wellbeing support, including free counseling and referral services - Time away from work programs for paid time off, paid family leave, long- and short-term disability coverage and leaves of absence - Savings and retirement resources, including a 401(k) Plan with a 100% match on 3% to 9% of pay (based on years of service), Employee Stock Purchase Plan, flexible spending accounts, preferred banking partnerships, retirement readiness tools, rollover support and financial wellbeing counseling - Education support through tuition assistance, student loan assistance, certification support, dependent scholarships and a partnership with Galen College of Nursing - Additional benefits for fertility and family building, adoption assistance, life insurance, supplemental health protection plans, auto and home insurance, legal counseling, identity theft protection and consumer discounts Then: "Learn More About Employee Benefits Note: Eligibility for benefits may vary by location." Then there is a quote from Erica Rossitto etc. That's likely boilerplate (EEO? Actually it's a quote about nurses). Might be considered not essential? It's not boilerplate but maybe it's fluff. The instruction: Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The quote is not exactly boilerplate but might be considered promotional. However we need to preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The quote is substantive? It's a statement from a leader about nursing. Might be considered not essential to the job but still part of posting. However we might keep it as part of "About the role" or maybe we can include as a paragraph under "About the role". The instruction says we should not include duplicated lines, but this quote is not duplicated. It's okay to keep. Then: "TriStar Summit is a 230+ bed comprehensive facility. We serve Davidson, Wilson and surrounding counties. We include a Level III Trauma Center. We offer a full array of acute care services. These include cardiology, oncology, orthopaedics/spine, rehabilitation and women’s services. We are an Accredited Chest Pain Center with PCI. We are a Primary Stroke Center. TriStar Summit is a leading provider of emergency heart and stroke care." That's facility description, could be part of "About the role" or separate "About the facility". Not a standard heading but we could put under "About the role" or maybe a separate section "About the facility". However the instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So we could combine facility description into "About the role" or maybe a separate "About the facility" but that would be thin. Better to include in "About the role" as prose. Then: "If this opportunity is your next step in your career path, we encourage you to apply for our Clinical Nurse Coordinator Endoscopy opening. We review all applications. Qualified candidates will be contacted by a member of our team. We are interviewing, apply today! We are an equal opportunity employer. We do not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, veteran status, or disability status." That's application instructions and EEO statement. According to instruction, remove application instructions and EEO/equal-opportunity boilerplate. So we should drop that paragraph. Also earlier there is "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience" seems garbled. Likely they meant "Benefits" then "0 Required Years of Experience"? Actually maybe they meant "Benefits" then "0 Required Years of Experience" is a placeholder? The phrase "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience" seems like a mistake. We should treat "Benefits" as a heading and then the benefits list. The "0 Required Years of Experience" maybe is a field that says 0 years required? Actually they might have meant "Required Years of Experience: 0"? But they didn't state a number. The phrase "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience" is weird. We should interpret as: Benefits section, then maybe "Required Years of Experience: 0"? But they didn't explicitly state a number. The phrase could be a formatting error where they intended separate headings: "Benefits", "Required Years of Experience". Since they didn't give a number for required years of experience, we should not create a section for it if it's placeholder or not specified. The instruction: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Benefits are stated, so we keep Benefits section. For Required Years of Experience, they didn't state a number; they said "0 Required Years of Experience" maybe meaning zero years required? Actually "0 Required Years of Experience" could be read as "0 years of experience required". That is a specific statement: zero years required. However it's ambiguous. The phrase "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience" could be two separate items: Benefits, and 0 Required Years of Experience. If they meant zero years required, that is substantive. But we need to decide. Look at the text: "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience TriStar Summit Medical Center, offers a total rewards package that supports the health, life, career and retirement of our colleagues." It seems like they concatenated "Benefits" and "0 Required Years of Experience" without spacing. Likely the original posting had separate lines: Benefits, Required Years of Experience: 0 (or maybe not). But they wrote "Benefits 0 Required Years of Experience". I'd interpret that as they intended to list Benefits and then Required Years of Experience (maybe 0). Since they didn't give a number after "Required Years of Experience", it's ambiguous. However the phrase "0 Required Years of Experience" could be read as "0 years of experience required". That is a specific statement: zero years required. If we treat that as substantive, we could include a section for Requirements (or Qualifications) that includes years of experience. But we already have a Qualifications section listing education, certifications, no travel required. We could add "Years of experience: 0 (no prior experience required)" as a bullet under Qualifications or Requirements. However the instruction says: Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could incorporate years of experience into Qualifications. But we need to check if there is any other mention of experience elsewhere. Not really. So we could add a line under Qualifications: "No prior experience required (0 years)". However the phrase "0 Required Years of Experience" might be a mistake; maybe they meant "Required Years of Experience: 0"? I'd lean to include it as part of Qualifications: "No prior experience required". But we need to be careful not to invent detail. If the posting says "0 Required Years of Experience", we can treat that as stating that zero years of experience are required. So we can include that. Thus Qualifications section will include: - Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Basic Cardiac Life Support (BLS) for RN (we need to correct the typo? We should preserve as written? The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The text says "Advanced Cardiac Life SptBasic Cardiac Life Support(RN)". That's garbled. We need to interpret but not invent. We could keep the exact string? But that seems nonsensical. Better to interpret as "Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Basic Cardiac Life Support (BLS) for RN". However that is inventing (expanding abbreviation). The instruction says do NOT invent or summarize away detail. But we also need to preserve substantive information; the garbled text is likely a formatting error. Should we keep it exactly as written? That would be "Advanced Cardiac Life SptBasic Cardiac Life Support(RN)". That is not meaningful but it's what's there. However the instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we "correct" it, we are inventing (assuming it's a typo). If we leave it as is, it's still substantive (the exact text). But it's nonsense; but maybe they'd rather we keep it as is. However typical tasks like this expect us to clean up obvious typos? The instruction does not explicitly forbid correcting obvious typos