Associate Relationship Banker -West Loop - Chicago IL
for section headings. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose.
We need to decide which content goes into lists vs prose.
- About the role: could be prose (
) containing the intro paragraph plus maybe company description.
- Responsibilities: list (
- each duty).
- Required Qualifications: list (
- each).
- Preferred Qualifications: list (
- each). Also include the Dodd Frank etc details maybe as prose or list items? The Dodd Frank section is a paragraph with multiple sentences; we could treat as list items? It's not a simple list but could be broken into bullet points for clarity. However instruction: Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The Dodd Frank section is not a list but a set of requirements; we could still format as list items for clarity, but it's not originally a list. Safer to keep as prose (
) under a heading like "Requirements" maybe. But we already have Required Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications headings. The Dodd Frank section is about qualification requirements for Loan Originators; could be placed under "Required Qualifications" as additional items. However it's quite detailed; we could break into list items for each requirement: e.g., "Employment offer contingent on JPMC's review of criminal conviction history, credit report, information available through NMLS, and any other information relevant to determination of financial responsibility, good character, and general fitness." etc. That would be a list item. That seems acceptable as it's still a requirement.
But we must not invent or summarize away detail; we can break into multiple list items each containing a sentence; that's preserving detail.
Similarly, the Benefits and Pay sections: we have prose describing benefits and pay; we could turn benefits into a list (
- ) each benefit item. Pay could be prose.
Schedule: we don't have specific schedule; we will not include.
Now we need to ensure we don't include boilerplate like "We are an equal opportunity employer..." etc. Remove.
Also remove "Visit our FAQs for more information about requesting an accommodation." That's boilerplate.
Also remove "Additional details about total compensation and benefits will be provided during the hiring process." That's maybe okay to keep? It's not boilerplate but it's a statement that details will be provided later; it's not specific benefit. Might be considered filler but it's still part of the benefits description. However instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The sentence "Additional details about total compensation and benefits will be provided during the hiring process." is not a specific benefit; it's a placeholder. Might be considered filler. Safer to omit that sentence.
Similarly, "We offer a competitive total rewards package including base salary determined based on the role, experience, skill set and location." That's specific enough for Pay.
Now we need to decide headings: We'll have:
About the role
... intro + company description ...
Responsibilities
- ...
...
Required Qualifications
- ...
...
Preferred Qualifications
- ...
...
Benefits
- ...
...
Pay
...
We must not include Schedule.
Now we need to extract the exact text for each item, preserving original wording as much as possible.
Let's copy the intro paragraph exactly:
"At Chase, we are passionate about creating memorable experiences for our clients and employees, making them feel welcomed, valued, and understood. We build lasting relationships by doing the right thing, exceeding expectations, and embracing diversity and inclusion. As an Associate Relationship Banker in a Chase Branch, you will represent our brand and culture with the utmost hospitality, using the latest banking solutions and cutting-edge financial technology combined with friendly and attentive service. You will welcome and assist clients that walk into our branches using your financial knowledge to offer thoughtful solutions to help address their financial needs and make their lives easier, contributing to the success of the branch."
We may also include company description from "About Us": "JPMorganChase, one of the oldest financial institutions, offers innovative financial solutions to millions of consumers, small businesses and many of the world's most prominent corporate, institutional and government clients under the J.P. Morgan and Chase brands. Our history spans over 200 years and today we are a leader in investment banking, consumer and small business banking, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management."
We could combine that after the intro. Ensure we don't include the later EEO statements.
Now Responsibilities list items: need to
for prose. We need to decide which content goes into lists vs prose. - About the role: could be prose (
) containing the intro paragraph plus maybe company description. - Responsibilities: list (
- each duty).
- Required Qualifications: list (
- each).
- Preferred Qualifications: list (
- each). Also include the Dodd Frank etc details maybe as prose or list items? The Dodd Frank section is a paragraph with multiple sentences; we could treat as list items? It's not a simple list but could be broken into bullet points for clarity. However instruction: Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The Dodd Frank section is not a list but a set of requirements; we could still format as list items for clarity, but it's not originally a list. Safer to keep as prose (
) under a heading like "Requirements" maybe. But we already have Required Qualifications and Preferred Qualifications headings. The Dodd Frank section is about qualification requirements for Loan Originators; could be placed under "Required Qualifications" as additional items. However it's quite detailed; we could break into list items for each requirement: e.g., "Employment offer contingent on JPMC's review of criminal conviction history, credit report, information available through NMLS, and any other information relevant to determination of financial responsibility, good character, and general fitness." etc. That would be a list item. That seems acceptable as it's still a requirement. But we must not invent or summarize away detail; we can break into multiple list items each containing a sentence; that's preserving detail. Similarly, the Benefits and Pay sections: we have prose describing benefits and pay; we could turn benefits into a list (
- ) each benefit item. Pay could be prose.
Schedule: we don't have specific schedule; we will not include.
Now we need to ensure we don't include boilerplate like "We are an equal opportunity employer..." etc. Remove.
Also remove "Visit our FAQs for more information about requesting an accommodation." That's boilerplate.
Also remove "Additional details about total compensation and benefits will be provided during the hiring process." That's maybe okay to keep? It's not boilerplate but it's a statement that details will be provided later; it's not specific benefit. Might be considered filler but it's still part of the benefits description. However instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The sentence "Additional details about total compensation and benefits will be provided during the hiring process." is not a specific benefit; it's a placeholder. Might be considered filler. Safer to omit that sentence.
Similarly, "We offer a competitive total rewards package including base salary determined based on the role, experience, skill set and location." That's specific enough for Pay.
Now we need to decide headings: We'll have:
About the role
... intro + company description ...
Responsibilities
- ... ...
Required Qualifications
- ... ...
Preferred Qualifications
- ... ...
Benefits
- ... ...
Pay
...
We must not include Schedule. Now we need to extract the exact text for each item, preserving original wording as much as possible. Let's copy the intro paragraph exactly: "At Chase, we are passionate about creating memorable experiences for our clients and employees, making them feel welcomed, valued, and understood. We build lasting relationships by doing the right thing, exceeding expectations, and embracing diversity and inclusion. As an Associate Relationship Banker in a Chase Branch, you will represent our brand and culture with the utmost hospitality, using the latest banking solutions and cutting-edge financial technology combined with friendly and attentive service. You will welcome and assist clients that walk into our branches using your financial knowledge to offer thoughtful solutions to help address their financial needs and make their lives easier, contributing to the success of the branch." We may also include company description from "About Us": "JPMorganChase, one of the oldest financial institutions, offers innovative financial solutions to millions of consumers, small businesses and many of the world's most prominent corporate, institutional and government clients under the J.P. Morgan and Chase brands. Our history spans over 200 years and today we are a leader in investment banking, consumer and small business banking, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management." We could combine that after the intro. Ensure we don't include the later EEO statements. Now Responsibilities list items: need to
- ) each benefit item. Pay could be prose.
Schedule: we don't have specific schedule; we will not include.
Now we need to ensure we don't include boilerplate like "We are an equal opportunity employer..." etc. Remove.
Also remove "Visit our FAQs for more information about requesting an accommodation." That's boilerplate.
Also remove "Additional details about total compensation and benefits will be provided during the hiring process." That's maybe okay to keep? It's not boilerplate but it's a statement that details will be provided later; it's not specific benefit. Might be considered filler but it's still part of the benefits description. However instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The sentence "Additional details about total compensation and benefits will be provided during the hiring process." is not a specific benefit; it's a placeholder. Might be considered filler. Safer to omit that sentence.
Similarly, "We offer a competitive total rewards package including base salary determined based on the role, experience, skill set and location." That's specific enough for Pay.
Now we need to decide headings: We'll have:
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The Dodd Frank section is not a list but a set of requirements; we could still format as list items for clarity, but it's not originally a list. Safer to keep as prose (
- each). Also include the Dodd Frank etc details maybe as prose or list items? The Dodd Frank section is a paragraph with multiple sentences; we could treat as list items? It's not a simple list but could be broken into bullet points for clarity. However instruction: Use
- each).
- Preferred Qualifications: list (