Associate Project Manager 01
for section headings. Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose.
We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include the exact text? Probably we can paraphrase but must preserve all info. Safer to copy the sentences as is, but we can break into list items.
We must not repeat job title as heading. So no heading for "Associate Project Manager". Also we must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings; we can drop them.
We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. So we need to remove the "Additional Information" EEO block, also the "Public Service Loan Forgiveness" maybe not boilerplate? It's info about loan forgiveness; keep. The "Residency Requirement" line is not boilerplate; keep. The "55-a Program" line is not boilerplate; keep. The "IMPORTANT NOTE" about only those currently serving as permanent or probable permanent Associate Project Manager will be considered - that's not boilerplate; keep.
We also need to remove duplicated lines: there may be duplicate sentences? Not seeing.
Now craft HTML.
Structure:
About the role
... prose ...
Responsibilities
- ...
...
Requirements
... maybe combine note and residency?
Maybe we need a list? The note is a sentence; residency is a sentence. Could be Only those currently serving as a permanent or probable permanent, i.e. probationary, Associate Project Manager will be considered.
New York City Residency is not required for this position.
Qualifications
Minimum Qualifications ...
(the long block). Could be a containing the whole qualification text. But we might want to break into
for the options? The instruction: Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The qualifications are not a list but a paragraph with options. Could keep as
. However there are enumerated options (1, 2, 3) and sub-options (a,b,c,d). Might be better as
but not required. The instruction says use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Qualifications could be considered a list? It's a set of alternative qualifications. Might be okay to keep as
. But to be safe, we could format as
- for each bullet point (the three main options). However the text includes "One year of full-time satisfactory experience..." etc. It's long. Might be okay as
.
We also have "In addition to meeting the qualification requirements for Assignment Level I, candidates must have at least one additional year of experience as described in "1" above in a supervisory capacity or have served for at least one year as a project manager for a large and/or complex construction project." Then another similar sentence for two additional years. Actually there are two similar statements: one says at least one additional year; another says at least two additional years. Might be a mistake but we must preserve.
We'll include them as part of Qualifications.
Skills
- Good communication skills, oral and written
- Solid background in engineering principles
- Project management skills
- Proficiency with Microsoft Project and Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint)
- Ability to multi-task
Note there is a duplicated "5" and "55a". We'll just list as above.
Benefits
- Eligible for federal Public Service Loan Forgiveness program (see https://studentaid.gov/pslf/)
- Open to qualified persons with a disability who are eligible for the 55-a Program
But we need to preserve the exact wording: "This position is also open to qualified persons with a disability who are eligible for the 55-a Program. Please indicate at the top of your resume and cover letter that you would like to be considered for the position through the 55-a Program." That's application instruction? Actually it's instruction to indicate in resume/cover letter. That could be considered application instruction, which we should remove per instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So the sentence about indicating at top of resume is an application instruction; we should remove that. Keep only the fact that position is open to qualified persons with disability eligible for 55-a Program. So we keep that.
Public Service Loan Forgiveness line: "As a prospective employee of the City of New York, you may be eligible for federal loan forgiveness programs and state repayment assistance programs. For more information, please visit the U.S. Department of Education’s website at https://studentaid.gov/pslf/." The second sentence is application instruction? It's a direction to visit website for more info. Might be considered application instruction? It's not exactly applying; it's info. Might keep but maybe remove the "For more information, please visit..." as it's direction. However the instruction says remove application instructions. That sentence is not about applying; it's about where to get more info. Might be okay to keep. But to be safe, we could keep the eligibility statement and drop the "For more information..." as it's not essential? But we must preserve ALL substantive information. The URL is substantive info. So we should keep the URL. The sentence "For more information, please visit the U.S. Department of Education’s website at https://studentaid.gov/pslf/." is substantive because it gives the URL. So we keep it.
Thus Benefits section: - As a prospective employee of the City of New York, you may be eligible for federal loan forgiveness programs and state repayment assistance programs. For more information, please visit the U.S. Department of Education’s website at https://studentaid.gov/pslf/.
- This position is also open to qualified persons with a disability who are eligible for the 55-a Program.
Now Pay section: Pay
$78,740.00 – $114,033.00
Now we need to ensure we didn't include any boilerplate like EEO etc. Remove that.
Also remove duplicated lines: there is a duplicate "In addition to meeting the qualification requirements for Assignment Level I, candidates must have at least one additional year of experience as described in "1" above in a supervisory capacity or have served for at least one year as a project manager for a large and/or complex construction project." and then another similar with two additional years. We'll keep both as they are distinct.
Now craft the About the role paragraph: combine the description of DEP, mission, size, water supply system, Bureau of Wastewater Treatment, and the supervision line.
Let's write:
The NYC Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) enriches the environment and protects public health for all New Yorkers by providing 1.1 billion gallons of high quality drinking water, managing wastewater and stormwater, and reducing air, noise, and hazardous materials pollution. DEP is the largest combined municipal water and wastewater utility in the country, with nearly 6,000 employees. DEP's water supply system is comprised of 19 reservoirs and 3 controlled lakes throughout the system’s 2,000 square mile watershed that extends 125 miles north and west of the City. The Bureau of Wastewater Treatment (BWT) is responsible for the operation and maintenance of all facilities related to the treatment of sewage within the five boroughs of the City. This includes 14 wastewater treatment plants, sludge dewatering facilities, collections facilities (pumping stations, combined sewer overflow retention facilities, regulators, tide gates, etc.), wastewater laboratories and harbor vessels. Under general supervision of the Area Engineer or Section Chief, the selected candidate will perform Project Management work of moderate difficulty and responsibility.
That seems good.
Now Responsibilities list: we need to capture each duty as list item.
List:
- Planning, coordinating, and implementing the design, specification preparation and construction supervision of capital projects of moderate size and complexity for the repair,
for prose. We need to preserve all substantive information, not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include the exact text? Probably we can paraphrase but must preserve all info. Safer to copy the sentences as is, but we can break into list items. We must not repeat job title as heading. So no heading for "Associate Project Manager". Also we must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings; we can drop them. We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. So we need to remove the "Additional Information" EEO block, also the "Public Service Loan Forgiveness" maybe not boilerplate? It's info about loan forgiveness; keep. The "Residency Requirement" line is not boilerplate; keep. The "55-a Program" line is not boilerplate; keep. The "IMPORTANT NOTE" about only those currently serving as permanent or probable permanent Associate Project Manager will be considered - that's not boilerplate; keep. We also need to remove duplicated lines: there may be duplicate sentences? Not seeing. Now craft HTML. Structure:
About the role
... prose ...
Responsibilities
- ... ...
Requirements
... maybe combine note and residency?
Maybe we need a list? The note is a sentence; residency is a sentence. Could beOnly those currently serving as a permanent or probable permanent, i.e. probationary, Associate Project Manager will be considered.
New York City Residency is not required for this position.
Qualifications
Minimum Qualifications ...
(the long block). Could be acontaining the whole qualification text. But we might want to break into
- for the options? The instruction: Use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. The qualifications are not a list but a paragraph with options. Could keep as
. However there are enumerated options (1, 2, 3) and sub-options (a,b,c,d). Might be better as
- but not required. The instruction says use
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Qualifications could be considered a list? It's a set of alternative qualifications. Might be okay to keep as
. But to be safe, we could format as
- for each bullet point (the three main options). However the text includes "One year of full-time satisfactory experience..." etc. It's long. Might be okay as
. We also have "In addition to meeting the qualification requirements for Assignment Level I, candidates must have at least one additional year of experience as described in "1" above in a supervisory capacity or have served for at least one year as a project manager for a large and/or complex construction project." Then another similar sentence for two additional years. Actually there are two similar statements: one says at least one additional year; another says at least two additional years. Might be a mistake but we must preserve. We'll include them as part of Qualifications.
Skills
- Good communication skills, oral and written
- Solid background in engineering principles
- Project management skills
- Proficiency with Microsoft Project and Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint)
- Ability to multi-task
Benefits
- Eligible for federal Public Service Loan Forgiveness program (see https://studentaid.gov/pslf/)
- Open to qualified persons with a disability who are eligible for the 55-a Program
- As a prospective employee of the City of New York, you may be eligible for federal loan forgiveness programs and state repayment assistance programs. For more information, please visit the U.S. Department of Education’s website at https://studentaid.gov/pslf/.
- This position is also open to qualified persons with a disability who are eligible for the 55-a Program.
Pay
$78,740.00 – $114,033.00
Now we need to ensure we didn't include any boilerplate like EEO etc. Remove that. Also remove duplicated lines: there is a duplicate "In addition to meeting the qualification requirements for Assignment Level I, candidates must have at least one additional year of experience as described in "1" above in a supervisory capacity or have served for at least one year as a project manager for a large and/or complex construction project." and then another similar with two additional years. We'll keep both as they are distinct. Now craft the About the role paragraph: combine the description of DEP, mission, size, water supply system, Bureau of Wastewater Treatment, and the supervision line. Let's write: The NYC Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) enriches the environment and protects public health for all New Yorkers by providing 1.1 billion gallons of high quality drinking water, managing wastewater and stormwater, and reducing air, noise, and hazardous materials pollution. DEP is the largest combined municipal water and wastewater utility in the country, with nearly 6,000 employees. DEP's water supply system is comprised of 19 reservoirs and 3 controlled lakes throughout the system’s 2,000 square mile watershed that extends 125 miles north and west of the City. The Bureau of Wastewater Treatment (BWT) is responsible for the operation and maintenance of all facilities related to the treatment of sewage within the five boroughs of the City. This includes 14 wastewater treatment plants, sludge dewatering facilities, collections facilities (pumping stations, combined sewer overflow retention facilities, regulators, tide gates, etc.), wastewater laboratories and harbor vessels. Under general supervision of the Area Engineer or Section Chief, the selected candidate will perform Project Management work of moderate difficulty and responsibility. That seems good. Now Responsibilities list: we need to capture each duty as list item. List: - Planning, coordinating, and implementing the design, specification preparation and construction supervision of capital projects of moderate size and complexity for the repair,
- for each bullet point (the three main options). However the text includes "One year of full-time satisfactory experience..." etc. It's long. Might be okay as
- for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Qualifications could be considered a list? It's a set of alternative qualifications. Might be okay to keep as