Jobs · Accounting · Tennessee

Accountant

Knoxville Utilities Board · Knoxville, TN · 3 days ago
AccountingFull-time
The user wants me to reformat a job posting into clean, well-structured semantic HTML. Let me analyze the content and apply the rules. First, identify sections: - About KUB (company description) - About the Role (role description) - Qualifications (with Physical Requirements, Minimum Requirements, Preferred Requirements) - Selection Process (with phases) The job title is "Business Analyst" but the role description says "Accountant". The classification says Business Analyst but the role is Accountant. I should not repeat job title as heading. Rules: - Use

for section headings (About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule) - Use
  • for lists - Use

    for prose - Do NOT repeat job title as heading - Do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings - Preserve ALL substantive information - Remove boilerplate (cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions) - Include section ONLY when real specific content - Never emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text - Never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them - Output ONLY HTML fragment, no /, no markdown code fences Now, let's map content: The posting has: - Classification: Business Analyst (this is metadata, maybe fold into a short

    or drop) - Work Hours: 40+ hours/week: M-F (schedule info, could be a Schedule section if substantive) - About KUB: company description - About the Role: role description - Qualifications: heading with subsections: Physical Requirements, Minimum Requirements, Preferred Requirements - Selection Process: with phases The posting does NOT have explicit Responsibilities, Skills, Benefits, Pay sections. It has Qualifications (with physical, minimum, preferred). It has Selection Process. Work Hours is mentioned: "40+ hours/week: M-F". That could be a Schedule section. But the rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state work hours, so Schedule section is appropriate. Also, "Classification: Business Analyst" and "Work Hours: 40+ hours/week: M-F" are metadata. Could fold into a short

    at top or under a "Position Details" section? But the rule says do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. Classification might be like a job category. Could include in a brief intro paragraph. Better to have: - About KUB (company) - About the Role (role description) - Schedule (work hours) - Qualifications (with subsections) - Selection Process But Qualifications has three subsections: Physical Requirements, Minimum Requirements, Preferred Requirements. Should I make them separate

    or keep under one Qualifications heading with sub-lists? The rule says use

    for section headings. Could make each a

    but they are subsections of Qualifications. Might be better to have Qualifications as

    and then use

    ? But rule only mentions

    for section headings. It says "use

    for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)". So we should use

    for each major section. For subsections, maybe use

    ? But not specified. Could use or just list under Qualifications with subheadings as

    ? However, the instruction: "Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences." It doesn't forbid

    . But to be safe, maybe keep Qualifications as one section with sub-lists labeled with or

    Physical Requirements:

    then list. But the example headings include "Requirements" and "Qualifications" as separate. Here we have "Qualifications" heading in the posting, with subsections. I think we should treat "Qualifications" as a section heading (

    ) and then within it, have subsections as

    or just bold labels. Since the rule says "use

    for section headings", and "Qualifications" is a section heading. The subsections are not top-level sections. I'll use

    for Physical Requirements, Minimum Requirements, Preferred Requirements. That's semantic. Similarly, Selection Process has phases. Could make Selection Process as

    and then list phases as
      or with

      for each phase? The phases are steps, maybe just a list. Also, the posting includes "Please note that due to job responsibilities, KUB does not provide immigration sponsorship for and/or based on this position." That's a note, could be a

      under Qualifications or separate. Also, "Knoxville Utilities Board is an Equal Opportunity Employer" is boilerplate EEO, should remove. "KUB is part of the Tennessee Drug Free Workplace Program" is also boilerplate. "If special accommodations are needed at any phase of the selection process, please notify Human Resources in advance." That's application instruction/accommodation, remove. "Phase 1 – Apply online at www.kub.org" is application instruction, remove. But the selection process phases are part of the posting's description of the process. The rule says "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should remove the application instructions (Phase 1 apply online) and the accommodation note, EEO statement, drug free workplace. But keep the phases as description of selection process? The phases are part of the selection process description. However, Phase 1 is "Apply online at www.kub.org" which is application instruction. Phase 2-6 are evaluation steps. Might keep phases 2-6 as part of selection process, but phase 1 is application instruction. Could include all phases but remove the URL? The rule says remove application instructions. So maybe keep the selection process as a list of phases but omit the apply online instruction. Or just describe the process in prose. Better to keep the selection process as a list of phases (2-6) but not include phase 1. However, the posting includes phase 1 as part of the process. The rule says remove application instructions. Phase 1 is explicitly "Apply online at www.kub.org". That's an application instruction. So we should drop phase 1. But the other phases are part of the selection process. We'll include phases 2-6. Also, "Physical assessment and/or drug screen*" with asterisk and note about drug free workplace. That's part of phase 6. Keep phase 6 but remove the footnote about drug free workplace program (boilerplate). Keep "Physical assessment and/or drug screen". Now, let's structure: -

      About KUB

      -

      ...company description...

      -

      About the Role

      -

      ...role description...

      -

      Schedule

      -

      40+ hours per week, Monday through Friday.

      (or list) -

      Qualifications

      -

      Physical Requirements

      -

      ...description...

      -

      Minimum Requirements

      -
      • ...
      -

      Preferred Requirements

      -
      • ...
      -

      Note: KUB does not provide immigration sponsorship for this position.

      -

      Selection Process

      -

      The selection process includes the following phases:

      -
      • Experience, training, and education evaluation
      • Interview with department representatives
      • Written, performance, and behavioral exercises
      • Background investigation
      • Physical assessment and/or drug screen
      But the phases are numbered. Could keep as ordered list? Use
        ? The rule says use
        • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. It doesn't specify ordered vs unordered. But phases are sequential, so
            might be better. However, the rule says "use
            • for any list". It says "use
              • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". It doesn't forbid
                  . But to be safe, use
                    as they said. But they said "use
                    • for any list of duties/requirements/benefits". Selection process phases are not duties/requirements/benefits. But it's a list. I'll use
                        . Now, the classification "Business Analyst" and work hours are metadata. Could include in a brief intro paragraph before sections? The rule: "do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

                        or drop it." Classification and work hours are minor metadata. Could fold into a short

                        at top. But the page already shows job title? The user said "the page already shows it". So we can drop classification. Work hours we already have Schedule section. Maybe add a

                        at top: "Classification: Business Analyst | Work Hours: 40+ hours/week, Monday–Friday" but that's duplicating schedule. Better to just have Schedule section. I'll omit classification. Now, ensure no boilerplate: remove EEO, drug free workplace, accommodation notice, apply online instruction. Now, write HTML. Let's craft. First, About KUB: the text: "KUB is one of the largest public utilities in the country providing safe, reliable, and affordable electric, gas, water, wastewater, and fiber services to more than 520,000 customers in Knoxville and parts of seven surrounding counties. We are looking for employees who want to be a part of a mission-driven organization with strong values that support a skilled, diverse, and inclusive workforce." About the Role: "We're looking for a motivated, detail-oriented Accountant who thrives on solving complex financial challenges, uncovering meaningful insights, and making an impact. In this role, you'll play an essential part in maintaining financial accuracy and integrity through key general ledger responsibilities, preparing journal entries and financial statements, and transforming complex financial data into clear, actionable reports. You'll also have the opportunity to expand your expertise by contributing to cash management, investment and bond-related initiatives while collaborating with teams across the organization to support informed financial decisions. Our ideal candidate combines a strong foundation in corporate or governmental accounting with analytical thinking, exceptional attention to detail, and a commitment to outstanding customer service. If you're a collaborative problem-solver who enjoys a fast-paced environment, takes pride in delivering high-quality work, and is eager to make a meaningful financial impact, we'd love to have you on our team!" Qualifications: Physical Requirements: "Sedentary work; exerting up to 10 pounds of force occasionally, and/or a negligible amount of force frequently to lift, carry, push, pull, or otherwise move objects, including the human body. Sedentary work involves sitting most of the time in normal office conditions, but does involve walking or standing outside periodically for inspections, customer calls, etc. Work requires no unusual physical demands. Physical demands for a specific position within this classification may vary and/ or exceed those demands described above." Minimum Requirements: list: - Bachelor’s degree in Accounting or Finance from an accredited four-year college or university - One (1) to three (3) years of experience in related field - Strong communication, interpersonal, written, oral, and team skills - Strong analytical skills - Ability to work independently on projects in a timely manner - Experience and proficiency in Microsoft Excel - Valid driver's license Preferred Requirements: - CPA, MBA, or advanced degree is preferred

Similar jobs

Accountant

ExecutivePlacements.comNew York, NY· Yesterday
Accounting$70k–$80k/yrapply on executiveplacements.com

Accountant

CurrentUnited States· 3 mo ago
RemoteAccountingapply on jobs.ashbyhq.com

Accountant

Anheuser-BuschTempe, AZ· 3 mo ago
Accountingapply on wd1.myworkdaysite.com

Accountant

McCarthy-Bush CorporationDavenport, IA· 3 mo ago
Accountingapply on mcbcorp.bamboohr.com

Accountant

JobgetherUnited States· 3 mo ago
RemoteAccountingapply on jobs.lever.co

Accountant

CFSWindsor Locks, CT· 3 mo ago
Accountingapply on pcrecruiter2.cfstaffing.com