A West Virginia Facility Is Seeking a Locums Pathologist

We need to extract substantive info, format as HTML with headings

for sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. Let's parse the posting: Text: "If you are seeking a new opportunity or would simply like to learn more about locum tenens, give Weatherby a call today for details.2 weeks per month, Monday - Friday -- no nights or weekends35 - 40 cases per day1 - 2 frozen sections and ROSE per day3 - 5 peripheral blood smears for review dailyGeneral surgical pathology -- GI, GU, ENT, breast, lymph nodesCT guided biopsies; gyn and non-gyn cytology requiredGrossing coverage when PA is unavailableHospital privileges requiredPaid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expensesAssignment details and time entry in online portalCompetitive compensation24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultantCharter member of NALTO " Since 1995, Weatherby Healthcare has established itself as an expert in locum tenens staffing for physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners. The company employs nearly 600 employees committed to filling locum tenens assignments in large-scale healthcare networks, hospitals, and clinics nationwide. Learn more at http://weatherbyhealthcare.com" We need to remove boilerplate: "If you are seeking a new opportunity or would simply like to learn more about locum tenens, give Weatherby a call today for details." That's like a call to action, maybe considered boilerplate? It's not a section heading, but it's a sentence encouraging contact. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. This line is like an invitation to call for details; maybe considered application instruction? It's not exactly application instructions but could be considered promotional. Safer to remove it. Also remove the final paragraph about company history? That's also boilerplate? It's about the company, not the job. Might be considered boilerplate; but it's substantive about the employer. The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." Company description may be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. However, we should preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The company description is substantive about the employer, but maybe not needed for the job posting? The instruction says we should not include application instructions, but company description is not that. However, we might keep it under "About the role" or similar? But we have no explicit "About the role" content besides the schedule and duties. The company description could go under a section like "About the employer" but we don't have that heading. The allowed headings are limited to those list. We could put company info under "About the role"? Not ideal but maybe acceptable. However, the instruction says "use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we can use those headings. We need to decide which sections have content. Let's extract details: - Schedule: "2 weeks per month, Monday - Friday -- no nights or weekends" - Cases per day: "35 - 40 cases per day" - Frozen sections and ROSE: "1 - 2 frozen sections and ROSE per day" - Peripheral blood smears: "3 - 5 peripheral blood smears for review daily" - General surgical pathology areas: "GI, GU, ENT, breast, lymph nodes" - CT guided biopsies; gyn and non-gyn cytology required - Grossing coverage when PA is unavailable - Hospital privileges required - Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses - Assignment details and time entry in online portal - Competitive compensation - 24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant - Charter member of NALTO Also maybe "Since 1995, Weatherby Healthcare has established itself as an expert in locum tenens staffing for physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners. The company employs nearly 600 employees committed to filling locum tenens assignments in large-scale healthcare networks, hospitals, and clinics nationwide." That's about the company. We need to map to sections: - About the role: could include description of role: general surgical pathology, CT guided biopsies, grossing coverage, etc. Could be a paragraph. - Responsibilities: list of duties: cases per day, frozen sections, peripheral blood smears, CT guided biopsies, grossing coverage, etc. - Requirements: hospital privileges required. - Qualifications: maybe none explicit besides being a pathologist? Not given. - Skills: maybe not explicit. - Benefits: Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses; 24-hour access to consultant; charter member of NALTO? Actually NALTO is a professional association; maybe not a benefit. Could be considered benefit. - Pay: Competitive compensation (but that's vague; we should not include Pay section if content is vague like "competitive compensation" which is not specific. The instruction: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. "Competitive compensation" is vague but still states compensation exists; but it's not a specific number. Is that considered filler? Likely yes, it's placeholder. So we should not create a Pay section. - Schedule: we have specific schedule: 2 weeks per month, Monday-Friday, no nights/weekends. That's specific, so we can include Schedule section. - Benefits: we have Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses; 24-hour access to consultant; maybe charter member of NALTO (not a benefit). Those are specific benefits. So we can include Benefits section. - About the role: we can include a paragraph describing the role: general surgical pathology, GI, GU, ENT, breast, lymph nodes, CT guided biopsies, gyn and non-gyn cytology, grossing coverage when PA unavailable. - Responsibilities: we can list the daily volume: 35-40 cases per day, 1-2 frozen sections and ROSE per day, 3-5 peripheral blood smears for review daily. - Requirements: Hospital privileges required. - Qualifications: maybe none explicit; we could omit. - Skills: none explicit. We must not repeat the job title as heading. No job title given. We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings. We must output only HTML fragment. Let's craft:

About the role

General surgical pathology covering GI, GU, ENT, breast, and lymph nodes, with CT-guided biopsies and both gyn and non‑gyn cytology. Grossing coverage is required when the physician assistant is unavailable.

Responsibilities

• 35‑40 cases per day
• 1‑2 frozen sections and ROSE per day
• 3‑5 peripheral blood smears for review daily

Requirements

• Hospital privileges required

Benefits

• Paid malpractice insurance
• Pre‑paid travel and housing expenses
• 24‑hour access to a Weatherby Healthcare consultant

Schedule

2 weeks per month, Monday‑Friday; no nights or weekends.

We should not include Pay section because compensation is vague. We should not include About the role if it's too thin? It's substantive. Check for any duplicated lines: we have not duplicated. Check for any boilerplate removed: we removed the call to action and company history. Check for any application instructions: none. Now ensure we didn't invent details. All details are from posting. Let's verify each piece: - "General surgical pathology -- GI, GU, ENT, breast, lymph nodes" -> we used that. - "CT guided biopsies; gyn and non-gyn cytology required" -> we said CT-guided biopsies and both gyn and non‑gyn cytology. - "Grossing coverage when PA is unavailable" -> we said Grossing coverage is required when the physician assistant is unavailable. - "35 - 40 cases per day" -> we used 35‑40 cases per day. - "1 - 2 frozen sections and ROSE per day" -> we used 1‑2 frozen sections and ROSE per day. - "3 - 5 peripheral blood smears for review daily" -> we used 3‑5 peripheral blood smears for review daily. - "Hospital privileges required" -> we used Hospital privileges required. - "Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses" -> we split into two items. - "Assignment details and time entry in online portal" -> we omitted; is that substantive? It's about assignment details and time entry in online portal. Could be considered a responsibility or a benefit? It's a tool/process. Might be worth including under Responsibilities or maybe under Benefits? It's not a benefit; it's a procedural detail. Could be included under Responsibilities as "Assignment details and time entry via online portal". The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information. So we should include that. Where? Could be under Responsibilities as another bullet. - "Competitive compensation" -> we omitted as vague. - "24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant" -> we included as benefit. - "Charter member of NALTO" -> we omitted; it's not a benefit per se, but could be considered a benefit? It's a professional affiliation. Might be considered a benefit but it's vague. The instruction says never create Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. It does state "Charter member of NALTO". That is a statement of membership. Could be considered a benefit (affiliation). However, it's not a direct benefit to the employee; it's about the company. Might be considered boilerplate? Not sure. Safer to omit? But we need to preserve ALL substantive information. If we omit, we lose that detail. However, we could include it under Benefits as "Charter member of NALTO". That is a specific statement. It's not filler. So we should include it. Thus Benefits list: Paid malpractice insurance; Pre-paid travel and housing expenses; 24-hour access to a Weatherby Healthcare consultant; Charter member of NALTO. Now about "Assignment details and time entry in online portal": we can add under Responsibilities. Let's adjust. Responsibilities bullets: - 35‑40 cases per day - 1‑2 frozen sections and ROSE per day - 3‑5 peripheral blood smears for review daily - Assignment details and time entry via online portal Now About the role paragraph: we could also mention locum tenens? The posting is about locum tenens role. Could include that it's a locum tenens position. The opening line: "If you are seeking a new opportunity or would simply like to learn more about locum tenens, give Weatherby a call today for details." That's removed. But we could still mention it's a locum tenens assignment. However, we removed that line; but we could still include "This is a locum tenens assignment." Is that substantive? It's implied by context but not explicitly stated elsewhere. The posting does mention locum tenens in the call to action and later in company description. Since we removed those lines, we might lose explicit mention. But we could still include a sentence: "This is a locum tenens position." Is that inventing? It's not directly stated in the remaining text, but the posting is