A South Dakota Facility Is Searching for a Locum Tenens Cardiologist

We need to produce HTML fragment only. Need to extract sections: About the role? There's description: "If this opportunity sounds right for you, give us a call today to speak with an expert Weatherby consultant for details." That's like call to action, maybe not needed? It's not a section heading. We need sections only when posting has real specific content. Let's parse content: - "One week per month minimum coverage" - "Inpatient coverage with rounding and consults" - "10-20 patients per day rounding, 1-5 consults per day" - "Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures" - "Nuclear and TEE experience preferred" - "ACLS and BLS certification required" - "Outpatient and inpatient work setting" - "Optional clinic work available" - "Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses" - "Assignment details and time entry in online portal" - "Competitive compensation" - "24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant" - "Charter member of NALTO" - Then description about Weatherby Healthcare: "Since 1995, Weatherby Healthcare has established itself as an expert in locum tenens staffing for physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners. The company employs nearly 600 employees committed to filling locum tenens assignments in large-scale healthcare networks, hospitals, and clinics nationwide. Learn more at http://weatherbyhealthcare.com" We need to decide sections: Possibly "Responsibilities", "Requirements", "Qualifications", "Skills", "Benefits", "Pay", "Schedule". We must only include sections if there is real specific content. We have schedule: "One week per month minimum coverage" indicates schedule. Also maybe "Outpatient and inpatient work setting" is setting not schedule. "Optional clinic work available" maybe schedule? But we can put schedule section with that line. Responsibilities: duties: "Inpatient coverage with rounding and consults", "10-20 patients per day rounding, 1-5 consults per day", "Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures", maybe also "Outpatient and inpatient work setting" is setting not duty. Could include. Requirements: "ACLS and BLS certification required". Also maybe "Nuclear and TEE experience preferred" is qualification/skill. Qualifications: maybe "Nuclear and TEE experience preferred" is qualification. Skills: maybe "Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures" is skill. Benefits: "Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses", "24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant", maybe "Competitive compensation" is pay not benefit. Also "Assignment details and time entry in online portal" maybe benefit? Could be. Pay: "Competitive compensation" is vague but it's stated. According to rule: do NOT include Pay section unless posting actually states them and not filler like "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD". "Competitive compensation" is somewhat vague but it's a statement. It's not a specific number but it's still stating compensation is competitive. The rule says avoid filler like "commensurate with experience", "not specified", etc. "Competitive compensation" might be considered filler? It's vague but it's a statement. I'd lean to include Pay section only if there is actual number or range. Since it's just "Competitive compensation", maybe treat as filler and omit Pay section. The rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." It does state "Competitive compensation". That is stating something about pay, albeit vague. I'd include Pay section with that line. Schedule: we have "One week per month minimum coverage". That's schedule. Also maybe "Outpatient and inpatient work setting" is not schedule. We'll include Schedule section with that line. Benefits: we have "Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses", "24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant". Also maybe "Assignment details and time entry in online portal" is a benefit? Could be. We'll include those. Now About the role: maybe we can have a short paragraph summarizing the role: The initial line "If this opportunity sounds right for you, give us a call today to speak with an expert Weatherby consultant for details." That's call to action, not role description. There's no explicit "About the role" paragraph. Could skip About the role. We need to output HTML fragment with headings

for each section we include. Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits. Use

  for prose. We need to decide which content goes in which section. Let's define: - Responsibilities: Inpatient coverage with rounding and consults; 10-20 patients per day rounding, 1-5 consults per day; Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures. Possibly also Outpatient and inpatient work setting? That's setting not duty. Could be under Responsibilities or maybe under Qualifications? I'd put under Responsibilities as work setting. - Requirements: ACLS and BLS certification required. - Qualifications/Skills: Nuclear and TEE experience preferred (maybe under Qualifications). Skills: Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures (but we already used that in Responsibilities). Might duplicate. Better to keep responsibilities separate from skills. Let's think: Responsibilities are duties; Skills are abilities needed. Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures are skills/procedures. So maybe move that to Skills. Responsibilities: Inpatient coverage with rounding and consults; 10-20 patients per day rounding, 1-5 consults per day; Outpatient and inpatient work setting; Optional clinic work available. That seems plausible. - Skills: Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures; Nuclear and TEE experience preferred. - Requirements: ACLS and BLS certification required. - Benefits: Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses; 24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant; Assignment details and time entry in online portal. - Pay: Competitive compensation. - Schedule: One week per month minimum coverage. Now we need to ensure we don't repeat content. Let's list each bullet exactly as in posting: - "One week per month minimum coverage" - "Inpatient coverage with rounding and consults" - "10-20 patients per day rounding, 1-5 consults per day" - "Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures" - "Nuclear and TEE experience preferred" - "ACLS and BLS certification required" - "Outpatient and inpatient work setting" - "Optional clinic work available" - "Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses" - "Assignment details and time entry in online portal" - "Competitive compensation" - "24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant" - "Charter member of NALTO" (maybe not needed; could be under Benefits? It's a fact about Weatherby, not a benefit to candidate. Could be omitted as boilerplate? It's not a benefit but could be under About the company. However we are not including About the company section unless we have content. Could include a short paragraph about Weatherby under maybe "About the company" but not required. The instruction: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it. We have content about Weatherby: "Since 1995, Weatherby Healthcare has established itself as an expert in locum tenens staffing for physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners. The company employs nearly 600 employees committed to filling locum tenens assignments in large-scale healthcare networks, hospitals, and clinics nationwide. Learn more at http://weatherbyhealthcare.com". That's about the company. Could we make an "About the company" section? Not in the list of allowed headings; only those listed: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we cannot add About the company. So we must either incorporate that info into another section or drop it. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." So we must keep that info somewhere. Perhaps we can put it under a

  without a heading? The instruction says output ONLY the HTML fragment, we can include

  paragraphs not under headings? It says use

  for section headings,

  • for any list,

    for prose. It doesn't forbid having prose outside sections. But they said "include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So we can have headings for sections we choose, and we can also have

    paragraphs that are not under a heading? The typical approach: we wrap each section in

    then content. But we could also have a leading

    for general description. However the instruction about sections suggests we should use headings for logical sections. The Weatherby description could be placed under a heading like "About the role"? Not appropriate. Could be under "About the role" as a description of the role/company? Might be okay to treat as "About the role" even though it's about company. But the role is a locum tenens cardiology position; the description about Weatherby is about the staffing agency. Might be okay to put under "About the role" as context. However the instruction: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it)". It didn't forbid using About the role for company info. I'd rather include a short

    paragraph before any headings describing the opportunity: maybe the initial sentence "If this opportunity sounds right for you, give us a call today to speak with an expert Weatherby consultant for details." That's call to action, could be omitted as it's not substantive? It's a call to action, maybe considered boilerplate? It's not a navigation/footer but it's a CTA. Might be considered not essential. But we need to preserve ALL substantive information. Is that substantive? It's a prompt to call. Might be considered not essential detail about the job. I'd lean to omit it. Thus we need to incorporate the Weatherby company description somewhere. Perhaps we can add a

    after the headings as a general description. The instruction didn't forbid extra

    outside headings. It said use

    for prose. So we can have a

    containing that description. Thus final HTML: maybe start with a

    containing the Weatherby description. Then sections: Responsibilities, Requirements, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Use

    before each. Let's list content: Responsibilities: - Inpatient coverage with rounding and consults - 10-20 patients per day rounding, 1-5 consults per day - Outpatient and inpatient work setting - Optional clinic work available Requirements: - ACLS and BLS certification required Skills: - Echo, stress, EKG, general inpatient cardiology procedures - Nuclear and TEE experience preferred Benefits: - Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses - 24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant - Assignment details and time entry in online portal Pay: - Competitive compensation Schedule: - One week per month minimum coverage Now check for any missing: "Charter member of NALTO" - we omitted. Could be placed under Benefits? It's a fact about Weatherby, not a direct benefit to candidate but could be considered a benefit (being part of NALTO). Might be okay to include under Benefits as a bullet. Let's add it. Thus Benefits bullets: Paid malpractice insurance; pre-paid travel and housing expenses; 24-hour access to your Weatherby Healthcare consultant; Assignment details and time entry in online portal;