2027 Summer Intern: Renewables Intern
for section headings (e.g., About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use - for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences.
We need to decide which sections to include based on content.
The posting includes:
- Intro paragraph about UL mission etc. Could be "About the role" or maybe "About UL". The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we can map content accordingly.
We have:
- Responsibilities: detailed list of tasks for wind, solar, BESS.
- Qualifications: bullet list of qualifications.
- Skills: maybe part of qualifications? There's mention of proficiency in Excel, programming languages, etc. Could be separate Skills section.
- Pay: "Total Rewards: The hourly rate for this role is $23.00-$25.00. Qualified candidates may be eligible for a sign-on bonus..."
- Benefits: "Your internship will consist of a 10-12 week long project, networking, learning & development opportunities, and will provide you with the opportunity to make a real world impact."
- Schedule: maybe not explicit; but we have internship length 10-12 weeks; could be schedule? Not exactly schedule like full-time/part-time. Might not include schedule if not explicit.
- About the role: maybe the introductory paragraph about UL mission and the role description (the paragraph before Responsibilities). Could be "About the role".
- Requirements: maybe same as Qualifications? Usually Requirements separate. But we have Qualifications section already. Could treat Qualifications as Requirements. But we have both Qualifications and Skills? Might combine.
We need to avoid thin sections. Let's decide to have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Skills, Pay, Benefits. Possibly also Requirements? But Qualifications already covers requirements. We could rename Qualifications to Requirements? But instruction list includes Qualifications as a possible heading. We'll use Qualifications for the bullet list of qualifications. Skills could be separate for technical skills (Excel, programming). However the qualifications already mention those skills. Might be redundant. Better to have Qualifications include all bullet points; and maybe not have separate Skills. But we need to follow instruction: use headings only when posting has real specific content. The posting does have a list of qualifications (including education, skills, etc.). So we can have a Qualifications section.
We also have Pay and Benefits explicit.
We might also have a short paragraph about location (Northbrook, IL or Chicago, IL). Could be part of About the role.
We need to remove boilerplate: "Learn More: Join UL Solutions to be at the center of safety..." etc. Also "About Us", "About The Team" sections are boilerplate? They are descriptive but maybe considered boilerplate? The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The "About Us" and "About The Team" might be considered generic company description; but they are substantive? Might be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. However they are not about the role; they are about the company. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The "About Us" and "About The Team" are substantive about the company but maybe not needed for the role? The instruction says we should reformat a job posting into clean HTML. Usually we keep company overview? Not sure. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. It does not explicitly say to remove company overview. However they said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Including About Us might be a thin section? It's a few paragraphs. Could be considered substantive. But the headings list does not include About Us; we could put it under About the role? Might be okay to include as a paragraph under About the role.
We need to output only HTML fragment.
Let's extract content:
Intro paragraph: "At UL, we know why we come to work. Thousands of us around the world wake up every day with a common purpose: to make the world a safer, more secure and sustainable place. Science is in our DNA; we are endlessly curious and passionate about seeking and speaking the truth. We take delight in knowing that our work makes a meaningful contribution to society, and we are proud that our culture is centered on integrity, collaboration, inclusion and excellence. UL stands at the forefront of technological advancement, and we are continually challenged to find new ways to foster innovation and positive change. Satisfying? Yes. Exciting? Absolutely! As our global footprint continues to spread across the world, we are looking for a Renewables Intern to join our team in Northbrook, IL. or Chicago, IL."
That's the intro.
Then "Responsibilities What you’ll learn & achieve:" then bullet-like paragraphs.
We need to convert responsibilities into
- . The responsibilities are long paragraphs with multiple items. We could break each sentence or clause into list items. But we need to preserve ALL substantive information; we can keep the paragraphs as
inside
- ? Usually
- can contain
. We'll just put each major bullet as
- with the text.
We have sections: Wind, Solar Energy, BESS (maybe under Solar?). Actually after Solar Energy they have BESS 1. etc. It seems BESS is a subcategory.
We'll treat responsibilities as a list of duties: maybe group by technology.
We'll create
with - for each major bullet: e.g., "Wind Carry out initial steps of pre-construction analyses under supervision, including:" then sub-items? Could be nested lists but not required. Simpler: each sentence as
- .
But we need to preserve all detail; we can keep the original paragraphs as
- content.
Let's extract responsibilities text:
"Wind Carry out initial steps of pre-construction analyses under supervision, including:Compilation and validation of meteorological data for wind resource assessments. Assist wind energy project planning, provide spatial planning support identifying potential wind farm locations. Management of project documentation and data. Perform data preparation and analysis of raster datasets in support of wind resource mapping efforts. Run atmospheric and wind flow models to develop wind resource maps. Creation of project map images. Assist the IE team with technical due diligence reviews for renewable energy projects (wind energy). Support in reviewing and summarizing project documents such as: Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) contracts, Operations & Maintenance (O&M) agreements, Power Purchase Agreements (PPA), Asset Management Agreements (AMA), Interconnection Agreements (IA) and interconnection studiesContribute to financial model review by validating technical inputs (energy production, operating costs, reserve accounts, availability assumptions, etc.). Conduct research on equipment suppliers, technology trends, and market benchmarks. Prepare draft sections of Independent Engineering reports and QA/QC logs under supervision. Support site inspections and construction monitoring (where applicable)."
Then "Solar Energy Assist in the technical evaluation of pre-construction solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, including:Long‑term solar resource assessmentSupport with technical due diligence reviews for renewable energy projects, including utility scale solar and DG/C&I systemsSupport in reviewing and summarizing project documents such as: Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) contracts, Operations & Maintenance (O&M) agreements, Power Purchase Agreements (PPA), Asset Management Agreements (AMA), Interconnection Agreements (IA) and Interconnection studies. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysisPerform data analysis (production data, weather data, performance ratios, etc.)Development of energy yield estimates for bankability assessments R&D efforts for Solar Back cast studies BESS 1. Assist the IE team with technical due diligence reviews for stand-alone BESS and hybrid Solar + BESS renewable energy projects. Strond coding skills with an eye to eliminate repetitive tasks during IE reviews. Support in reviewing and summarizing project documents such as: Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) contracts, equipment supply agreements, long term service agreements, augmentation plans, Interconnection Agreements (IA) and interconnection studies Contribute to financial model review by validating technical inputs (round trip efficiencies, operating costs, reserve accounts, availability assumptions, etc.). Conduct research on equipment suppliers, technology trends, and market benchmarks. Prepare draft sections of Independent Engineering reports and QA/QC logs under supervision. Support site inspections and construction monitoring (where applicable)."
Note there are some typos: "Strond coding skills". We'll keep as is.
Now Qualifications: "What makes you a great fit: Currently pursuing a bachelor’s (rising senior) or master’s degree in engineering (Electrical, Mechanical, or Civil), Renewable Energy, Atmospheric Science, Physics, or a related technical field. Strong analytical, problem‑solving, and organizational skills. Demonstrated interest in renewable energy technologies; familiarity with power systems or electrical fundamentals preferred. Proficiency in Microsoft Excel, Word, and PowerPoint; exposure to financial models is a plus. Strong communication skills, including writing and presenting technical information. Experience with programming languages such as Python or R is preferred; familiarity with data manipulation libraries (e.g., Pandas) and data visualization tools is a significant plus. A process‑improvement mindset, with interest in automation, efficiency enhancements, or tool development. Ability to work both independently and collaboratively in a team environment. Ability to work under deadlines in a fast‑paced setting."
Pay: "Total Rewards: The hourly rate for this role is $23.00-$25.00. Qualified candidates may be eligible for a sign-on bonus to assist with housing, travel, and other relocation expenses, subject to terms and conditions."
Benefits: "Your internship will consist of a 10-12 week long project, networking, learning & development opportunities, and will provide you with the opportunity to make a real world impact."
Also there is "Learn More: Join UL Solutions to be at the center of safety. To learn more about us and the work we do, visit UL.com" - that's application instruction? Might be considered boilerplate; we should remove.
Also "About Us" and "About The Team" paragraphs: we could keep as part of About the role? But they are generic. Might be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. Safer to remove them? The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. It does not say to remove company overview. However "About Us" and "About The Team" might be considered boilerplate but not necessarily. However they are not about the role; they are about the company. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we remove them, we are losing detail about the company. But maybe the expectation is to focus on the role details only. The examples of headings include About the role, Responsibilities, etc. Not About Us. So likely we should omit the generic company description
for prose. Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short
or drop it. Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences. We need to decide which sections to include based on content. The posting includes: - Intro paragraph about UL mission etc. Could be "About the role" or maybe "About UL". The instruction says use headings like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we can map content accordingly. We have: - Responsibilities: detailed list of tasks for wind, solar, BESS. - Qualifications: bullet list of qualifications. - Skills: maybe part of qualifications? There's mention of proficiency in Excel, programming languages, etc. Could be separate Skills section. - Pay: "Total Rewards: The hourly rate for this role is $23.00-$25.00. Qualified candidates may be eligible for a sign-on bonus..." - Benefits: "Your internship will consist of a 10-12 week long project, networking, learning & development opportunities, and will provide you with the opportunity to make a real world impact." - Schedule: maybe not explicit; but we have internship length 10-12 weeks; could be schedule? Not exactly schedule like full-time/part-time. Might not include schedule if not explicit. - About the role: maybe the introductory paragraph about UL mission and the role description (the paragraph before Responsibilities). Could be "About the role". - Requirements: maybe same as Qualifications? Usually Requirements separate. But we have Qualifications section already. Could treat Qualifications as Requirements. But we have both Qualifications and Skills? Might combine. We need to avoid thin sections. Let's decide to have sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Qualifications, Skills, Pay, Benefits. Possibly also Requirements? But Qualifications already covers requirements. We could rename Qualifications to Requirements? But instruction list includes Qualifications as a possible heading. We'll use Qualifications for the bullet list of qualifications. Skills could be separate for technical skills (Excel, programming). However the qualifications already mention those skills. Might be redundant. Better to have Qualifications include all bullet points; and maybe not have separate Skills. But we need to follow instruction: use headings only when posting has real specific content. The posting does have a list of qualifications (including education, skills, etc.). So we can have a Qualifications section. We also have Pay and Benefits explicit. We might also have a short paragraph about location (Northbrook, IL or Chicago, IL). Could be part of About the role. We need to remove boilerplate: "Learn More: Join UL Solutions to be at the center of safety..." etc. Also "About Us", "About The Team" sections are boilerplate? They are descriptive but maybe considered boilerplate? The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The "About Us" and "About The Team" might be considered generic company description; but they are substantive? Might be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. However they are not about the role; they are about the company. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The "About Us" and "About The Team" are substantive about the company but maybe not needed for the role? The instruction says we should reformat a job posting into clean HTML. Usually we keep company overview? Not sure. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. It does not explicitly say to remove company overview. However they said "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Including About Us might be a thin section? It's a few paragraphs. Could be considered substantive. But the headings list does not include About Us; we could put it under About the role? Might be okay to include as a paragraph under About the role. We need to output only HTML fragment. Let's extract content: Intro paragraph: "At UL, we know why we come to work. Thousands of us around the world wake up every day with a common purpose: to make the world a safer, more secure and sustainable place. Science is in our DNA; we are endlessly curious and passionate about seeking and speaking the truth. We take delight in knowing that our work makes a meaningful contribution to society, and we are proud that our culture is centered on integrity, collaboration, inclusion and excellence. UL stands at the forefront of technological advancement, and we are continually challenged to find new ways to foster innovation and positive change. Satisfying? Yes. Exciting? Absolutely! As our global footprint continues to spread across the world, we are looking for a Renewables Intern to join our team in Northbrook, IL. or Chicago, IL." That's the intro. Then "Responsibilities What you’ll learn & achieve:" then bullet-like paragraphs. We need to convert responsibilities into
- . The responsibilities are long paragraphs with multiple items. We could break each sentence or clause into list items. But we need to preserve ALL substantive information; we can keep the paragraphs as
inside
- ? Usually
- can contain
. We'll just put each major bullet as
- with the text.
We have sections: Wind, Solar Energy, BESS (maybe under Solar?). Actually after Solar Energy they have BESS 1. etc. It seems BESS is a subcategory.
We'll treat responsibilities as a list of duties: maybe group by technology.
We'll create
- with
- for each major bullet: e.g., "Wind Carry out initial steps of pre-construction analyses under supervision, including:" then sub-items? Could be nested lists but not required. Simpler: each sentence as
- . But we need to preserve all detail; we can keep the original paragraphs as
- content. Let's extract responsibilities text: "Wind Carry out initial steps of pre-construction analyses under supervision, including:Compilation and validation of meteorological data for wind resource assessments. Assist wind energy project planning, provide spatial planning support identifying potential wind farm locations. Management of project documentation and data. Perform data preparation and analysis of raster datasets in support of wind resource mapping efforts. Run atmospheric and wind flow models to develop wind resource maps. Creation of project map images. Assist the IE team with technical due diligence reviews for renewable energy projects (wind energy). Support in reviewing and summarizing project documents such as: Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) contracts, Operations & Maintenance (O&M) agreements, Power Purchase Agreements (PPA), Asset Management Agreements (AMA), Interconnection Agreements (IA) and interconnection studiesContribute to financial model review by validating technical inputs (energy production, operating costs, reserve accounts, availability assumptions, etc.). Conduct research on equipment suppliers, technology trends, and market benchmarks. Prepare draft sections of Independent Engineering reports and QA/QC logs under supervision. Support site inspections and construction monitoring (where applicable)." Then "Solar Energy Assist in the technical evaluation of pre-construction solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, including:Long‑term solar resource assessmentSupport with technical due diligence reviews for renewable energy projects, including utility scale solar and DG/C&I systemsSupport in reviewing and summarizing project documents such as: Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) contracts, Operations & Maintenance (O&M) agreements, Power Purchase Agreements (PPA), Asset Management Agreements (AMA), Interconnection Agreements (IA) and Interconnection studies. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysisPerform data analysis (production data, weather data, performance ratios, etc.)Development of energy yield estimates for bankability assessments R&D efforts for Solar Back cast studies BESS 1. Assist the IE team with technical due diligence reviews for stand-alone BESS and hybrid Solar + BESS renewable energy projects. Strond coding skills with an eye to eliminate repetitive tasks during IE reviews. Support in reviewing and summarizing project documents such as: Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) contracts, equipment supply agreements, long term service agreements, augmentation plans, Interconnection Agreements (IA) and interconnection studies Contribute to financial model review by validating technical inputs (round trip efficiencies, operating costs, reserve accounts, availability assumptions, etc.). Conduct research on equipment suppliers, technology trends, and market benchmarks. Prepare draft sections of Independent Engineering reports and QA/QC logs under supervision. Support site inspections and construction monitoring (where applicable)." Note there are some typos: "Strond coding skills". We'll keep as is. Now Qualifications: "What makes you a great fit: Currently pursuing a bachelor’s (rising senior) or master’s degree in engineering (Electrical, Mechanical, or Civil), Renewable Energy, Atmospheric Science, Physics, or a related technical field. Strong analytical, problem‑solving, and organizational skills. Demonstrated interest in renewable energy technologies; familiarity with power systems or electrical fundamentals preferred. Proficiency in Microsoft Excel, Word, and PowerPoint; exposure to financial models is a plus. Strong communication skills, including writing and presenting technical information. Experience with programming languages such as Python or R is preferred; familiarity with data manipulation libraries (e.g., Pandas) and data visualization tools is a significant plus. A process‑improvement mindset, with interest in automation, efficiency enhancements, or tool development. Ability to work both independently and collaboratively in a team environment. Ability to work under deadlines in a fast‑paced setting." Pay: "Total Rewards: The hourly rate for this role is $23.00-$25.00. Qualified candidates may be eligible for a sign-on bonus to assist with housing, travel, and other relocation expenses, subject to terms and conditions." Benefits: "Your internship will consist of a 10-12 week long project, networking, learning & development opportunities, and will provide you with the opportunity to make a real world impact." Also there is "Learn More: Join UL Solutions to be at the center of safety. To learn more about us and the work we do, visit UL.com" - that's application instruction? Might be considered boilerplate; we should remove. Also "About Us" and "About The Team" paragraphs: we could keep as part of About the role? But they are generic. Might be considered boilerplate but not explicitly listed. Safer to remove them? The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. It does not say to remove company overview. However "About Us" and "About The Team" might be considered boilerplate but not necessarily. However they are not about the role; they are about the company. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we remove them, we are losing detail about the company. But maybe the expectation is to focus on the role details only. The examples of headings include About the role, Responsibilities, etc. Not About Us. So likely we should omit the generic company description