Jobs · Healthcare · Oregon

Travel X-Ray Tech - $1,786 per week

Focus Staff · Milwaukie, OR · 1 mo ago
On-siteHealthcareFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections only if real content. Use

for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to extract content. Job description: Focus Staff is seeking a travel Radiology Technician for a travel job in Milwaukie, Oregon. Details: Specialty: Radiology Technician, Discipline: Allied Health Professional, Start Date: 10/19/2026, Duration: 13 weeks, 40 hours per week, Shift: 8 hours, nights, Employment Type: Travel. Then repeated: Focus Staff is seeking a X-Ray Tech for a travel contract in Milwaukie, OR. Ideal candidate: at least 1 year of experience in a X-Ray Tech setting. Contract Length: 13 Weeks, Start Date: 10/19/2026, Shift: Nights. Benefits for Travel X-Ray Techs: list: Health insurance, Vision insurance, Dental insurance, Life insurance, Licensure reimbursement, Travel reimbursement, Relocation assistance, 401(k), 401(k) matching, Competitive pay, Referral bonus, Holiday bonus. Requirements: 1 Year of Experience, 2 Preferred, Valid OR License, BLS, Eligible to work in the United States. About Focus Staff: description. We also have "We Offer:" list: Immediate Openings, Weekly Pay through Direct Deposits, Flexible Schedules, Day and Night Shifts Available, Competitive Compensation, Guaranteed Hours (based on employer), Travel Assistance, Dedicated/Responsive Recruiters, Day One Medical, Dental, Vision and Life Insurance, Generous Housing Stipend, 24/7 Support, Company Provided Housing Options, Referral Bonus ($600), Loyalty Bonus ($1,200), Discounts/Coupons to Hotels, Access to Jobs in all 50 States, Painless Credentialing Process, U.S.A.-based Company, Equal Opportunity Employer, Joint Commission Certified, Licensure Reimbursement, Pet-Friendly, Access to Discounts, Rewards, and more. But we need to remove boilerplate like EEO etc. Also remove duplicated lines, navigation, legal, EEO, scam-warning, application instructions. Also remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. We need to preserve all substantive information. So we need to include sections: About the role (maybe description), Responsibilities (maybe not explicit), Requirements, Qualifications (maybe license etc), Skills (maybe not explicit), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We have explicit Benefits list. Pay: "Competitive pay" mentioned but no specific amount. The instruction says: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state "Competitive pay" but that's vague. Is that considered stating pay? It says "Competitive pay" as a benefit. It might be considered stating pay exists but not amount. The rule: "never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. 'commensurate with experience', 'not specified', 'N/A', 'varies', 'TBD')". "Competitive pay" is similar to placeholder? It's vague but not exactly those phrases. However it's still not a specific number. Might be considered filler. Safer to not include Pay section unless there is explicit pay amount or range. There's also "Weekly Pay through Direct Deposits" under We Offer. That's still not amount. So maybe omit Pay section. Schedule: we have shift details: 8 hours, nights, 40 hours per week. That's specific. So we can include Schedule section. Responsibilities: Not explicitly listed; maybe implied duties of Radiology Technician but not given. So we should not create Responsibilities section if no specific content. Qualifications: Could include license, BLS, OR license, eligibility. That's qualifications. Skills: Not given. About the role: we can put a paragraph summarizing the job: Focus Staff seeking travel Radiology Technician in Milwaukie, OR, 13-week contract, nights, 40 hrs/week, start date 10/19/2026. We need to preserve all substantive information: include start date, duration, hours, shift, location, specialty, experience requirement, license, benefits list, etc. We also have "About Focus Staff" description; that's about the company, not the role. Should we include? Possibly as "About Focus Staff" but not a standard heading. The instruction only allows those headings; we could put that info under "About the role" maybe? But it's about the agency. Might be considered boilerplate? It's descriptive but not required. The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." The About Focus Staff paragraph is not boilerplate; it's descriptive about the agency. Might be considered substantive? However the instruction says to use headings only for those categories. Could we include a

about the agency under "About the role"? Might be okay but could be considered not role. Safer to include it as a

without heading? The instruction says output ONLY the HTML fragment, but we can include

elements without heading? It didn't forbid. It says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities...). Use
  • for any list... and

    for prose. So we can have prose paragraphs not under headings. So we can include a paragraph about Focus Staff as prose. We must not repeat the job title as a heading. So no

    Travel X-Ray Tech. We must not put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings; we can drop them. Now construct HTML. We'll have:

    About the role

    Focus Staff is seeking a travel Radiology Technician (X‑Ray Tech) for a 13‑week travel contract in Milwaukie, Oregon. The assignment starts on 10/19/2026, requires 40 hours per week on 8‑hour night shifts.

    Maybe also include specialty and discipline.

    Requirements

    • Minimum 1 year of experience in an X‑Ray Tech setting (2 years preferred)
    • Valid Oregon (OR) license
    • BLS certification
    • Eligible to work in the United States

    Qualifications

    Maybe same as requirements? But we could combine. However Qualifications could include license, BLS, eligibility. But we already have those in Requirements. To avoid duplication, maybe we put license etc under Qualifications and experience under Requirements. Let's split: Requirements: experience. Qualifications: license, BLS, eligibility. But the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So maybe combine into one Requirements section that includes experience, license, BLS, eligibility. That's fine. We'll have one Requirements section. Benefits: list.

    Benefits

    • Health insurance
    • Vision insurance
    • Dental insurance
    • Life insurance
    • Licensure reimbursement
    • Travel reimbursement
    • Relocation assistance
    • 401(k)
    • 401(k) matching
    • Competitive pay
    • Referral bonus
    • Holiday bonus
    • Generous housing stipend
    • Company provided housing options
    • Day one medical, dental, vision and life insurance
    • 24/7 support
    • Dedicated/responsive recruiters
    • Weekly pay via direct deposit
    • Immediate openings
    • Flexible schedules
    • Day and night shifts available
    • Guaranteed hours (based on employer)
    • Travel assistance
    • Access to jobs in all 50 states
    • Painless credentialing process
    • Pet‑friendly
    • Access to discounts, rewards, and more
    But note some items duplicate: "Day one medical, dental, vision and life insurance" duplicates health etc. Might be okay but we could deduplicate. The instruction: remove duplicated lines. So we should avoid duplicate entries. Let's consolidate. List unique benefits: - Health insurance - Vision insurance - Dental insurance - Life insurance - Licensure reimbursement - Travel reimbursement - Relocation assistance - 401(k) - 401(k) matching - Competitive pay - Referral bonus - Holiday bonus - Generous housing stipend - Company provided housing options - Day one medical, dental, vision and life insurance (this overlaps with first four; maybe we keep the specific "Day one" as it emphasizes timing; but it's duplicate content. Might consider it duplicate; we could drop it to avoid duplication. However it's a nuance: day one coverage vs standard. Might be considered substantive. I'd keep it but note it's similar. The instruction says remove duplicated lines; if the line is exactly same text, it's duplicate. This line is not exactly same as separate lines; it's a combined statement. Might be okay. - 24/7 support - Dedicated/responsive recruiters - Weekly pay via direct deposit - Immediate openings - Flexible schedules - Day and night shifts available - Guaranteed hours (based on employer) - Travel assistance - Access to jobs in all 50 states - Painless credentialing process - Pet‑friendly - Access to discounts, rewards, and more We also have "Licensure reimbursement" already. Now Schedule section:

    Schedule

    • 40 hours per week
    • 8‑hour night shifts
    Or we could put as prose. Use
    • . Now we need to ensure we don't include Pay section. Now we need to include a paragraph about Focus Staff maybe as prose without heading. Let's craft final HTML:

      About the role

      Focus Staff is seeking a travel Radiology Technician (X‑Ray Tech) for a 13‑week travel contract in Milwaukie, Oregon. The assignment starts on 10/19/2026, requires 40 hours per week on 8‑hour night shifts.

      Requirements

      • Minimum 1 year of experience in an X‑Ray Tech setting (2 years preferred)
      • Valid Oregon (OR) license
      • BLS certification
      • Eligible to work in the United States

      Benefits

      • Health insurance
      • Vision insurance
      • Dental insurance
      • Life insurance
      • Licensure reimbursement
      • Travel reimbursement
      • Relocation assistance
      • 401(k)
      • 401(k) matching
      • Competitive pay
      • Referral bonus
      • Holiday bonus
      • Generous housing stipend
      • Company provided housing options
      • Day one medical, dental, vision and life insurance
      • 24/7 support
      • Dedicated/responsive recruiters
      • Weekly pay via direct deposit
      • Immediate openings
      • Flexible schedules
      • Day and

Similar jobs