Travel Radiology Technologist - $2,554 per week

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections with real specific content. We need to parse the posting. Content: - Job title: travel Radiology Technologist in Fargo, North Dakota. - Job Description & Requirements: includes Specialty, Discipline, Start Date, Duration, 36 hours per week, Shift: 12 hours, days, Employment Type: Travel. - Benefits available on 1st of the month after start: Holiday pay, Weekly pay, Retention bonus, 401k retirement plan, Medical benefits, Dental benefits, Vision benefits, Referral bonus. - Then paragraph about Voca offering benefits etc. - Qualifications: bullet list? Actually "Qualifications 2 years of recent experience as a Radiation Technologist preferred Valid license and/or certification in state of practice, if applicable Demonstrated ability to maintain high level of professionalism during stressful times Valid Driver’s License Background and drug screen" - Then "Benefits Health, Dental, and Vision Insurance Life and Disability Insurance 401(k) options Certification and Licensure Reimbursement Generous Referral Bonus Program Weekly Direct Deposit" - Then "Voca Healthcare Job ID #19234628. Pay package is based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." - Then "Posted job title: Allied Health Professional:Radiology Tech,07:00:00-19:00:00" - Then "About Voca Healthcare" paragraph. - Then "Benefits" list again: Holiday Pay, 401k retirement plan, Medical benefits, Dental benefits, Vision benefits, Guaranteed Hours. We need to remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. Not present. We need to preserve all substantive info. We need to produce sections: maybe "About the role", "Responsibilities", "Requirements", "Qualifications", "Skills", "Benefits", "Pay", "Schedule". But we only include sections that have real specific content. Let's map: - About the role: could be description of job: travel Radiology Technologist in Fargo, ND, specialty, discipline, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type. That's substantive. - Responsibilities: Not explicitly listed. The posting doesn't list duties. So we should not create a Responsibilities section if no specific content. - Requirements: maybe the qualifications? Actually "Requirements" could be the qualifications list: 2 years experience, license, professionalism, driver's license, background/drug screen. That's specific. - Qualifications: maybe overlapping with Requirements. But we can combine? The instruction: Use headings for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). We need to decide which to use. We have content for About the role, Requirements (or Qualifications), Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We have schedule: shift 12 hours, days, 36 hours per week. That's schedule. Pay: "Pay package is based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." That's vague but includes mention of pay package based on shifts and hours, tax-free stipend TBD. The instruction says: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Here Pay section would have "tax-free stipend amount to be determined" which is TBD, placeholder. Also "subject to confirmation". That's not specific amount. So we should not create a Pay section because it lacks specific pay info. However we could include the statement as prose under About the role? But the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." If we include Pay with only vague info, it's thin and includes TBD. Better to omit Pay section. Schedule: we have shift 12 hours, days, 36 hours per week. That's specific. So we can include Schedule section. Benefits: we have multiple specific benefits: Holiday pay, Weekly pay, Retention bonus, 401k retirement plan, Medical benefits, Dental benefits, Vision benefits, Referral bonus, Life and Disability Insurance, Certification and Licensure Reimbursement, Generous Referral Bonus Program, Weekly Direct Deposit, Guaranteed Hours (mentioned later). So we have substantive benefits. Qualifications/Requirements: we have specific qualifications: 2 years recent experience as a Radiation Technologist preferred, Valid license and/or certification in state of practice, if applicable, Demonstrated ability to maintain high level of professionalism during stressful times, Valid Driver’s License, Background and drug screen. Also maybe "Certification and Licensure Reimbursement" is a benefit not qualification. We need to decide whether to use Requirements or Qualifications. Both are similar. The posting has a "Qualifications" heading in the text. So we can use

Qualifications

and list those items. We also have "About Voca Healthcare" paragraph describing company. That could be "About the role"? Actually "About the role" is about the job, not company. But we have a paragraph about Voca Healthcare (company). Could be "About the role" or maybe we could treat as "About the role" includes job location etc. The company description could be considered "About the role"? Not exactly. But we have a section "About Voca Healthcare". The instruction list includes "About the role" as an example heading. We could use that for the job description (specialty, discipline, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type). The company description could be omitted? It's substantive but not required headings. Could we include it under About the role? Might be okay to include as prose under About the role. Better: Use About the role for job details (specialty, discipline, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type, location). Then maybe we could add a separate section "About Voca Healthcare" but not in allowed headings list. The instruction says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says use those for section headings. Likely we should stick to those headings. So we can put company description under About the role as extra prose. Thus sections: - About the role: includes location, specialty, discipline, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type, plus company description. - Qualifications: list of qualifications. - Benefits: list of benefits. - Schedule: shift details. We should not include Responsibilities, Skills, Pay. Now format: Use

for each section heading. Then content:

for prose,

• for lists. We need to preserve all substantive information. Let's extract. About the role content: - Voca Healthcare is seeking a travel Radiology Technologist for a travel job in Fargo, North Dakota. - Specialty: Radiology Technologist - Discipline: Allied Health Professional - Start Date: 10/12/2026 - Duration: 13 weeks - 36 hours per week - Shift: 12 hours, days - Employment Type: Travel - Also mention: "Are you looking for your next travel assignment or to kick off your traveler career? Voca offers a full benefits package, a high level of individualized support, and a strong, traveler-first culture. Apply today to connect with one of our talented recruiters!" That's promotional but substantive? It's about applying; maybe we can keep as prose. - About Voca Healthcare paragraph: "As a Voca Traveler, you will gain new clinical skills, visit amazing places and meet awesome healthcare professionals. As a travel health professional, your experience and dedication to patient care is in high demand throughout the United States. Whether you are a veteran traveler looking for your next opportunity, or you are looking to travel for the first time, Voca is here to support you. Voca’s experienced and dedicated travel team works in concert with you every step of the way. Our long-standing partnerships with some of the most respected and recognized healthcare organizations in the country allow us to identify career opportunities to help you increase your knowledge and experience while working with some of the best physicians and healthcare professionals in the world. At Voca, we strongly believe a better career results in a happier you. We are here to help you find a position that is professionally and personally rewarding." We can include that as prose. Now Qualifications list: - 2 years of recent experience as a Radiation Technologist preferred - Valid license and/or certification in state of practice, if applicable - Demonstrated ability to maintain high level of professionalism during stressful times - Valid Driver’s License - Background and drug screen Note: The text also includes "Benefits Health, Dental, and Vision Insurance Life and Disability Insurance 401(k) options Certification and Licensure Reimbursement Generous Referral Bonus Program Weekly Direct Deposit" after Qualifications. That seems like a continuation of benefits list. We'll incorporate into Benefits. Benefits list (from multiple mentions): From first benefits block: - Holiday pay - Weekly pay - Retention bonus - 401k retirement plan - Medical benefits - Dental benefits - Vision benefits - Referral bonus From second benefits block: - Health, Dental, and Vision Insurance - Life and Disability Insurance - 401(k) options - Certification and Licensure Reimbursement - Generous Referral Bonus Program - Weekly Direct Deposit From third benefits block (under "Benefits" heading): - Holiday Pay - 401k retirement plan - Medical benefits - Dental benefits - Vision benefits - Guaranteed Hours Combine and deduplicate but preserve all. Let's list unique items: - Holiday pay / Holiday Pay (same) - Weekly pay - Retention bonus - 401k retirement plan - Medical benefits - Dental benefits - Vision benefits - Referral bonus - Health, Dental, and Vision Insurance (maybe same as medical/dental/vision but we can keep) - Life and Disability Insurance - 401(k) options (same as 401k retirement plan) - Certification and Licensure Reimbursement - Generous Referral Bonus Program (maybe same as Referral bonus) - Weekly Direct Deposit - Guaranteed Hours - Weekly pay (already) - Retention bonus (already) We should avoid duplication but can keep similar but not identical. The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. Duplication is okay if it's in the source; we could keep but maybe better to keep as appears but not repeat same phrase exactly? It's okay to repeat if it's in source multiple times. But we can combine to avoid redundancy while preserving meaning. However "Preserve ALL substantive information" suggests we shouldn't omit any detail; combining similar items could be considered summarizing. Safer to keep each mention as separate list items, even if similar. But that could be repetitive. However the instruction also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Not about duplication. I'll produce a benefits list that includes each distinct benefit mentioned, but not repeat exact same phrase. I'll combine synonyms: "Holiday pay" and "Holiday Pay" same; keep one. "Weekly pay" appears. "Retention bonus". "401k retirement plan" and "401(k) options" similar; keep one. "Medical benefits", "Dental benefits", "Vision benefits". "Health, Dental, and Vision Insurance" is essentially same as those three; but it's a separate mention; we could keep as separate item