Travel Occupational Therapist - $2,145 per week

We need to output HTML fragment only, with headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. Must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info. Remove boilerplate, navigation, legal, EEO, duplicated lines, application instructions. Also remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. Also remove duplicated lines. Must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. The posting includes pay range, shift details, duration, start date, etc. Also includes benefits: health, dental, vision insurance, 401(k) plan, completion and signing bonuses may also be available, referral bonus up to $500, weekly on-time pay with direct deposit, transparent communication, recruiter support. Also includes "Weekly Gross Pay: $2,038 - $2,145". Also "Pay package is based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." Also "Shift: 12 hours" earlier, also "Shift: 40 hrs" contradictory? There's some duplication. We need to preserve all substantive info, but not invent. We need to decide what sections to include. We have: - About the role: description: "Join the care team in Rehabilitation where you’ll provide patient-centered care in a collaborative environment. Typical responsibilities include direct patient care, timely documentation, and coordination with the care team. Specific duties will be confirmed during your interview with a recruiter." - Responsibilities: maybe list duties: direct patient care, timely documentation, coordination with the care team. Could be a

. - Requirements/Qualifications: Minimum Requirements: Active license in Rehabilitation, 1 year full-time Occupational Therapist, Rehabilitation experience within the last 2 years. - Benefits: Weekly on-time pay with direct deposit, Transparent communication, clear assignment details, and recruiter support from start to finish - or extension, Referral bonus up to $500, Health, dental, and vision insurance, 401(k) plan, Completion and signing bonuses may also be available. - Pay: Weekly Gross Pay: $2,038 - $2,145. Also mention pay package based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. - Schedule: Shift: 12 hours (or 40 hrs?). The posting says "Shift: 12 hours" earlier, also "Shift: 40 hrs" later in Quick Look. Also "36 hours per week". Also "Duration: 13 weeks". Also "Start Date: 10/12/2026". Also "Assignment Length: 13 weeks". Also "End Date: 01/11/2027". Also "Employment Type: Travel". Also "Specialty: Occupational Therapist". Also "Discipline: Therapy". Also "Location: Sheridan, WY". Also "Assignment Details Location: Sheridan, WY". Also "GLC – Named Best Nurse Agency 2024–2025." That's maybe boilerplate? It's about the agency, could be considered About GLC? Might be considered boilerplate? It's not EEO, but it's promotional. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. The agency description may be considered not essential? But it's substantive info about GLC. However the instruction says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Might include an "About GLC" section? Not in the list of allowed headings. The allowed headings are: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. So we should stick to those. So we can put agency description maybe under About the role? But that's about the role, not agency. Could incorporate into About the role? Probably not. Better to omit agency description as it's not directly about the role. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. However agency description may be considered substantive but not about the role. The allowed headings list doesn't include "About the company". But we could still include it as a

without heading? The instruction says use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It doesn't forbid other headings, but says "Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It implies we should use those headings for sections. It doesn't say we cannot have other headings, but to follow the pattern. Safer to stick to those headings and put any other info as

under appropriate sections or maybe as a general

before sections? The instruction: "Output ONLY the HTML fragment — no /, no markdown code fences." So we can output a series of

and following content. We need to decide which sections to include based on presence of real specific content. - About the role: we have a paragraph about the assignment: "Join the care team in Rehabilitation where you’ll provide patient-centered care in a collaborative environment. Typical responsibilities include direct patient care, timely documentation, and coordination with the care team. Specific duties will be confirmed during your interview with a recruiter." That's specific enough. - Responsibilities: we can list duties: direct patient care, timely documentation, coordination with the care team. Could also include "provide patient-centered care". Might be overlapping with About the role. But we can still have a Responsibilities section with a list. - Requirements: we have Minimum Requirements: Active license in Rehabilitation, 1 year full-time Occupational Therapist, Rehabilitation experience within the last 2 years. - Qualifications: maybe same as Requirements? Could combine. But we could have Requirements and Qualifications separate if there is distinct content. The posting only has Minimum Requirements. Could treat that as Requirements. Qualifications maybe not present. So we skip Qualifications. - Skills: not explicitly listed. Could infer but not present. So skip. - Benefits: we have list: Weekly on-time pay with direct deposit, Transparent communication, clear assignment details, and recruiter support from start to finish - or extension, Referral bonus up to $500, Health, dental, and vision insurance, 401(k) plan, Completion and signing bonuses may also be available. Also maybe "tax-free stipend amount to be determined" but that's more pay. - Pay: Weekly Gross Pay: $2,038 - $2,145. Also note pay package based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. - Schedule: Shift: 12 hours (or 40 hrs?), 36 hours per week, Duration: 13 weeks, Start Date: 10/12/2026, End Date: 01/11/2027. Also "Assignment Length: 13 weeks". Also "Start Date: 10/12/2026". Also "Duration: 13 weeks". Also "Shift: 12 hours" earlier, also "Shift: 40 hrs" later. There's some inconsistency. We need to preserve all substantive info, not invent. So we should include both mentions? Might be duplicated. We can combine: "Shift: 12 hours (or 40 hours as noted in some details)"? But that would be summarizing/inventing. Better to list both as separate statements? Could duplicate lines but we should remove duplicated lines. The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." So we should remove duplicated lines. So we need to deduplicate. Which lines are duplicates? "Start Date: 10/12/2026" appears multiple times. "Duration: 13 weeks" appears multiple times. "Shift: 12 hours" appears once; "Shift: 40 hrs" appears once (different). So we keep one instance of each unique piece. For shift, we have two different values; we cannot deduplicate because they differ. We need to decide which is correct. The posting says: "Shift: 12 hours" earlier in the job description block. Then later in Quick Look: "Shift: 40 hrs". Also "36 hours per week". This is confusing. We should keep both as they are distinct statements. But they may be contradictory; we should not resolve. So we include both. We also have "Employment Type: Travel". Could be under Schedule? Or maybe under About the role? Not a heading. Could be a

under Schedule or maybe under About the role. Since we have limited headings, we could put it under Schedule as part of schedule details. We also have "Location: Sheridan, WY". Could be under About the role? Or maybe a separate

before sections. Since we don't have a heading for location, we could include it as a

before the first heading or under About the role. The instruction: "Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). Use

• for any list of duties/requirements/benefits, and

  for prose." So we can have

  for prose anywhere. So we can include location as a

  before sections. We also have "GLC – Named Best Nurse Agency 2024–2025." That's promotional; maybe we can include as a

  under About the role? But it's not about the role. Could be considered boilerplate? It's not EEO/legal, but it's promotional. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate. This is not those. So we could keep it. However it's not directly about the role. Might be considered "About GLC". Since we don't have a heading for that, we could include as a

  before sections. We also have "We connect nurses, nursing professionals, and allied health professionals like you to contracts that align with your skills, schedule, and career goals." That's also promotional. We need to decide what to keep. The instruction: "Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail." So we should keep all substantive info, which includes promotional content about GLC? It's substantive about the agency. So we should keep it. But we need to fit into allowed headings. We could create a section "About GLC" but not in the list. However the instruction says "Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." suggests those are examples, not an exhaustive list. So we could use other headings if appropriate. But to be safe, we could incorporate that promotional content into a

  under "About the role" or maybe as a general

  before sections. The instruction says "Use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It doesn't forbid other headings, but suggests using those for those sections. So we can add other headings if needed, but better to stick to those. Thus we can put the promotional content as a

  before the first heading, or as part of "About the role". Since "About the role"