Jobs · Healthcare · New Mexico

Travel Occupational Therapist - $2,024 per week

Anders Group, LLC · Albuquerque, NM · 4 wk ago
On-siteHealthcareInternship
We need to output HTML fragment with sections for headings where there is real content. The job posting includes: About Anders Group (with description), Benefits (list). Also maybe "Job Description & Requirements" but that section is mostly metadata (specialty, discipline, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type, job ID, pay package note). According to rules: do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings; fold minor metadata into short

or drop it. Also we should not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. Benefits are stated (list). Pay package is mentioned but vague: "Pay package is based on 8 hour shifts and 40 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." That's vague, not specific amount. According to rule: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). So we should not create a Pay section because it's not specific. Schedule: they gave shift details (8 hours, days, 40 hours per week). That's specific schedule info. Should we create a Schedule section? The rule: "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." They do state schedule: 8 hour shifts, days, 40 hours per week. So we can include a Schedule section with that info. However we need to see if that is considered substantive. It is specific: 8 hour shifts, days, 40 hours per week. So we can include Schedule. Also we have "Job Description & Requirements" heading but content is mostly metadata; we should not repeat job title as heading. We could maybe include a short paragraph summarizing the role? The posting doesn't give duties/responsibilities beyond specialty. So we might not have a Responsibilities section because no specific duties listed. The rule: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it. So we should not create Responsibilities if it's just generic. Thus sections: About Anders Group (we have description), Benefits (list), Schedule (maybe). Also maybe "About the role"? Not present. Could we include a short paragraph about the role using the metadata? The metadata includes specialty, discipline, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type. That could be considered role specifics. But the rule says do NOT put Job ID/requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

or drop it. So we could include a paragraph with those details under a heading? But we need a heading for that paragraph; possible headings: "About the role" is allowed as a section heading per list. However we need to check if the posting has real, specific content for it. It does have specialty, discipline, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type. That's specific. So we could create an "About the role" section with that info as a paragraph or list. However the rule says: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can use About the role heading. We must not repeat the job title as a heading. So we can have

About the role

then a

containing the details: Specialty: Occupational Therapist; Discipline: Therapy; Start Date: 10/05/2026; Duration: 13 weeks; 40 hours per week; Shift: 8 hours, days; Employment Type: Travel. Also maybe include location: Albuquerque, New Mexico. That's also part of the job posting. We also have Anders Group description; we could put that under

About Anders Group

(though not in the list but allowed? The list includes examples but not exhaustive; we can use any heading? The instruction: use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). It suggests those are examples; we can still use other headings like About Anders Group. Probably okay. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning, duplicated lines, application instructions. The posting includes some boilerplate like "Anders Group Job ID #1403779." We'll drop that as minor metadata. We need to preserve all substantive information. So include location, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type, specialty, discipline, benefits list, Anders Group description. Let's craft:

About the role

Specialty: Occupational Therapist; Discipline: Therapy; Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico; Start Date: October 5, 2026; Duration: 13 weeks; Schedule: 40 hours per week, 8‑hour day shifts; Employment Type: Travel.

We could also separate schedule into its own section, but we already included schedule in About the role. However we might also create a Schedule section for clarity. But we should avoid duplication. The rule: prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. So maybe combine role info into About the role and not have separate Schedule. But we also have Benefits section. Thus sections: About the role, About Anders Group, Benefits. Benefits list: from posting: Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options), Dental & Vision Insurance, Life Insurance, 401(k) Retirement Plan, Competitive, Premium Pay Packages, Licensure & CEU Reimbursement, Daily Per Diems & Travel Reimbursements, Rental Car Allowances, Continuing Education Resources, Referral Bonuses, And more. Also later they list: Medical benefits, Dental benefits, Vision benefits, Life insurance, 401k retirement plan, License and certification reimbursement, Continuing Education, Referral bonus. There's duplication; we should combine unique items. We need to preserve ALL substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to include all benefits mentioned, but we can deduplicate identical items. The list includes both "Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options)" and later "Medical benefits". Those are similar but not identical; we should keep both? The instruction: preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. If we deduplicate, we might lose nuance. However "Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options)" is more specific than "Medical benefits". The latter is generic. To preserve all, we could include both but that might be redundant. However the rule also says remove duplicated lines. The duplicated lines are exact duplicates. These are not exact duplicates; they are similar but not identical. Might be considered duplication of meaning but not exact. Safer to keep both as they appear. We also have "Competitive, Premium Pay Packages" which is vague but it's a benefit mentioned. It's not specific amount, but it's a benefit description. According to rule: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). This is about headings, not list items. So we can include it as a list item even if vague. Thus benefits list items: - Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options) - Dental & Vision Insurance - Life Insurance - 401(k) Retirement Plan - Competitive, Premium Pay Packages - Licensure & CEU Reimbursement - Daily Per Diems & Travel Reimbursements - Rental Car Allowances - Continuing Education Resources - Referral Bonuses - And more - Medical benefits - Dental benefits - Vision benefits - Life insurance - 401k retirement plan - License and certification reimbursement - Continuing Education - Referral bonus But many duplicates: Dental & Vision Insurance vs Dental benefits, Vision benefits; Life Insurance vs Life insurance; 401(k) Retirement Plan vs 401k retirement plan; Licensure & CEU Reimbursement vs License and certification reimbursement; Continuing Education Resources vs Continuing Education; Referral Bonuses vs Referral bonus. These are essentially same but phrased differently. The instruction: remove duplicated lines. These lines are not exact duplicates but convey same meaning. Might be considered duplicated content. Safer to deduplicate to avoid redundancy while preserving substantive info. However we risk losing nuance like "Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options)" vs "Medical benefits". Those are not duplicates; we keep both. Thus we can produce a benefits list with unique items, combining similar ones but preserving specifics. Let's decide to include: - Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options) - Dental & Vision Insurance - Life Insurance - 401(k) Retirement Plan - Competitive, Premium Pay Packages - Licensure & CEU Reimbursement - Daily Per Diems & Travel Reimbursements - Rental Car Allowances - Continuing Education Resources - Referral Bonuses - And more - Medical benefits - Dental benefits - Vision benefits - Life insurance - 401k retirement plan - License and certification reimbursement - Continuing Education - Referral bonus But that still has many duplicates. Better to combine: For each benefit type, we can keep the most specific description. For health insurance: "Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options)" and also "Medical benefits". The former is more specific; we could keep both but maybe we can keep the specific and note that medical benefits are included. However to preserve all, we could keep both but it's redundant. I'd choose to keep the specific and drop the generic as duplicate meaning. Similarly for dental/vision: we have "Dental & Vision Insurance" and separate "Dental benefits", "Vision benefits". Keep the combined. Life insurance: we have "Life Insurance" and "Life insurance". Keep one. 401k: "401(k) Retirement Plan" and "401k retirement plan". Keep one. Licensure & CEU Reimbursement vs "License and certification reimbursement": keep one (maybe the former). Continuing Education Resources vs "Continuing Education": keep former. Referral Bonuses vs "Referral bonus": keep former. Thus final benefits list: - Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options) - Dental & Vision Insurance - Life Insurance - 401(k) Retirement Plan - Competitive, Premium Pay Packages - Licensure & CEU Reimbursement - Daily Per Diems & Travel Reimbursements - Rental Car Allowances - Continuing Education Resources - Referral Bonuses - And more That seems to capture all unique benefits. The "And more" is vague but it's in the posting; we keep it. Now About Anders Group description: we have two paragraphs: "About Anders Group Why Anders?At Anders Group, we do things differently. As a Joint Commission–accredited healthcare staffing agency, we’re committed to one thing above all else—you.Our travelers aren’t just placements, they’re partners. That’s why we focus on delivering exceptional customer service, personalized support, and access to some of the best-paying travel opportunities nationwide. What You Can ExpectFrom your very first assignment, you’ll have access to a comprehensive benefits package designed to support you both professionally and personally:Day One Health Insurance (with buy-up options)Dental & Vision InsuranceLife Insurance401(k) Retirement PlanCompetitive, Premium Pay PackagesLicensure & CEU ReimbursementDaily Per Diems & Travel ReimbursementsRental Car AllowancesContinuing Education ResourcesReferral BonusesAnd more The Anders DifferenceYou’re committed to providing exceptional patient care and we’re committed to supporting you every step of the way.Founded in 2010 by experienced healthcare recruiters, Anders Group was built on a simple idea: people come before numbers. While many staffing firms focus

Similar jobs