Travel CT Technologist - $2,468 per week
American Traveler · Franklin, WI · 1 mo ago
On-siteHealthcareInternship
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must not include Job ID etc. Must preserve all substantive info, remove boilerplate. Let's parse the posting.
Key info:
- Job: Travel CT Technologist in Franklin, Wisconsin.
- Specialty: CT Technologist
- Discipline: Allied Health Professional
- Start Date: 10/18/2026
- Duration: 13 weeks
- 36 hours per week
- Shift: 12 hours, days
- Employment Type: Travel
- Assignment Overview: Shift: Days, 3x12hrs; Hours: 36 hrs/wk; Start Date: Oct 18, 2026; Length: 13 weeks; Openings: 1
- Description: American Traveler is hiring a CT Technologist for a 13-week assignment requiring 2+ years of experience, ARRT advanced CT certification, and GE scanner proficiency.
- Details: Radiology-CT department; 13-week assignment; Fridays 0645-1915, Saturdays and Sundays 0700-1900; No on-call requirements; Weekend work required; Rotating holiday coverage with regular staff; May float onsite within skill set or to sites within 40 miles as needed.
- Requirements: Minimum of 2 years of experience required; BLS (AHA) and ARRT advanced CT certification required; State of WI license required if applicable; Current license and primary source verification required within 30 days prior to start of assignment; GE scanner experience required; EPIC EMR experience required; Prior traveler experience preferred.
- Additional Information: Local candidates accepted, though a radius rule may apply that could affect rate eligibility.
- Pay package: based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined.
- Benefits: American Traveler offers exceptional benefits, including premium medical, dental, vision and life insurance beginning day one of your assignment, generous 401(k) match, substantial housing stipends, and more. Additionally, with 24/7 support and access to our in-house clinicians, you are assured confidence and comfort throughout your assignment.
- About American Traveler: description of company.
We need sections: About the role (maybe description of role), Responsibilities (duties), Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule.
We must not create sections with filler. So we need to decide which sections have content.
- About the role: Could include description of role: CT Technologist duties, assignment overview, shift details, location, etc. We have details: Radiology-CT department, shift specifics, weekend work, rotating holiday coverage, floating, etc. That could be responsibilities.
- Responsibilities: Could list duties: performing CT scans, operating GE scanner, using EPIC EMR, ensuring patient safety, etc. The posting doesn't explicitly list duties beyond "CT Technologist". However we have details: "Radiology-CT department", "Fridays 0645-1915, Saturdays and Sundays 0700-1900", "No on-call requirements", "Weekend work required", "Rotating holiday coverage with regular staff", "May float onsite within skill set or to sites within 40 miles as needed". Those could be responsibilities or schedule.
- Requirements: Minimum 2 years experience, BLS, ARRT advanced CT certification, WI license if applicable, current license verification within 30 days, GE scanner experience, EPIC EMR experience.
- Qualifications: Could be similar to requirements? Might be overlapping. The posting doesn't separate qualifications vs requirements. Might combine.
- Skills: GE scanner proficiency, EPIC EMR, BLS, ARRT, etc.
- Benefits: premium medical, dental, vision, life insurance day one, generous 401(k) match, substantial housing stipends, 24/7 support, in-house clinicians.
- Pay: Pay package based on 12 hour shifts and 36 hours per week, tax-free stipend amount to be determined. This is somewhat vague but it's specific: based on 12 hour shifts and 36 hours per week, tax-free stipend amount TBD. The instruction says: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. Here Pay section includes "tax-free stipend amount to be determined" which is TBD. That's placeholder. Should we avoid Pay section? The posting does state pay package is based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. That includes some specifics (based on 12 hour shifts, 36 hours per week) but the stipend amount is TBD. The rule says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It says "never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them." The posting does state something about pay, albeit with TBD stipend. Is that considered stating them? It states pay package is based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. That is somewhat vague but still states something. However the rule also says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. The Pay section would have content: "based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." That includes TBD which is placeholder. Might be considered filler. Safer to omit Pay section? But we might lose substantive info about shift length and hours. However that info could go under Schedule section. Schedule: we have shift details: 12 hour shifts, days, 3x12hrs, Fridays 0645-1915, Saturdays and Sundays 0700-1900, weekend work required, rotating holiday coverage, no on-call, may float within 40 miles. That's schedule info. So we can put schedule details there. Pay: we could mention that pay package is based on 12 hour shifts and 36 hours per week, tax-free stipend TBD. But that includes TBD. Might be better to omit Pay section and incorporate the base rate info into Schedule? But schedule is about timing, not pay. The instruction says: never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. It does state something about pay, albeit with TBD. I'd lean to include Pay section but ensure we don't have placeholder text like "TBD". We could phrase: "Pay package is based on 12 hour shifts and 36.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with a tax-free stipend (amount to be determined)." That still includes "amount to be determined". That's placeholder. Might violate rule. Safer to omit Pay section.
Benefits: we have concrete benefits: premium medical, dental, vision, life insurance day one, generous 401(k) match, substantial housing stipends, 24/7 support, in-house clinicians. That's specific, no placeholder. So include Benefits.
Schedule: we have concrete schedule details. Include Schedule.
Now About the role: Could be a brief paragraph summarizing role: CT Technologist assignment in Franklin, WI, 13-week travel assignment, 36 hrs/wk, days shift, etc. That's substantive.
Responsibilities: Could list duties: performing CT scans, operating GE scanner, using EPIC EMR, ensuring patient safety, adhering to protocols, etc. The posting doesn't explicitly list duties beyond that. However we can infer from "CT Technologist" and details: Radiology-CT department, GE scanner experience, EPIC EMR experience. Could list: Operate GE CT scanners, perform diagnostic imaging procedures, utilize EPIC EMR for documentation, maintain equipment, follow safety protocols, etc. But we must not invent detail. We should only include what is explicitly stated. The posting does not list specific duties; it only mentions requirements and assignment details. So maybe we should not create a Responsibilities section if we don't have explicit duty list. However we have "Assignment Overview" which includes shift, hours, start date, length, openings. That's more about schedule/logistics. Could treat that as Responsibilities? But it's not duties.
Better to have sections: About the role (description), Requirements, Qualifications (maybe combine), Skills, Benefits, Schedule. Avoid Responsibilities if no explicit duty list.
But the instruction says: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we can combine.
Let's decide sections:
- About the role: paragraph summarizing the assignment: location, specialty, start date, duration, hours, shift, department, etc.
- Requirements: list of mandatory requirements: 2+ years experience, BLS (AHA), ARRT advanced CT certification, WI license if applicable, current license verification within 30 days, GE scanner experience, EPIC EMR experience.
- Qualifications: maybe "Prior traveler experience preferred" could go here. Or we could add a "Preferred Qualifications" section. But we only have headings list: Qualifications. Could include preferred qualifications.
- Skills: maybe list technical skills: GE scanner proficiency, EPIC EMR, BLS, ARRT.
- Benefits: list benefits.
- Schedule: list shift details.
We must not repeat job title as heading. So no heading for "Travel CT Technologist". Good.
We must not include Job ID etc.
We must not include boilerplate like "About American Traveler" maybe considered boilerplate? It's describing the company, but could be considered part of the posting. The instruction says remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. "About American Traveler" is not exactly boilerplate but could be considered company description. Might be okay to keep as part of About the role? But we already have About the role for the job. The company description could be considered extra but not prohibited. However we might want to include it under a section like "About the employer" but not in allowed headings. Since only allowed headings are those listed, we should not add extra headings. So we could incorporate that info into About the role paragraph or maybe omit. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. So we should keep the company description somewhere. Could we put it in a for section headings,
without a heading? Yes, we can have paragraphs outside sections? The instruction says use
for section headings, - for any list,
for prose. It doesn't forbid having prose outside sections. But we likely want to wrap everything in sections. However we could have an initial
describing the employer before sections. That's allowed.
But to keep simple, we could include a section "About the role" that includes both job description and employer info. That's okay.
Now we need to ensure we don't create sections with filler. Let's draft.
HTML:
About the role
American Traveler is seeking a travel CT Technologist for a 13‑week assignment in Franklin, Wisconsin. The role is in the Radiology‑CT department, requiring 36 hours per week on 12‑hour day shifts (Fridays 06:
for prose. It doesn't forbid having prose outside sections. But we likely want to wrap everything in sections. However we could have an initial
describing the employer before sections. That's allowed. But to keep simple, we could include a section "About the role" that includes both job description and employer info. That's okay. Now we need to ensure we don't create sections with filler. Let's draft. HTML:
About the role
American Traveler is seeking a travel CT Technologist for a 13‑week assignment in Franklin, Wisconsin. The role is in the Radiology‑CT department, requiring 36 hours per week on 12‑hour day shifts (Fridays 06: