Travel COTA - $1,716 per week

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: headings

for sections like About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections that have real specific content. We must not repeat job title as heading. Must preserve all substantive info, remove boilerplate, duplicate lines, application instructions, cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. Also must not include Pay/Schedule/Benefits unless posting actually states them. The posting includes pay: Gross Weekly Pay: $1573.20, also mentions early pay program, student loan reimbursement, free well-being tele-visits, etc. Also mentions benefits: 401k, holiday pay, healthcare, dental, travel reimbursement, etc, plus unique benefits. So we can include Benefits and Pay sections. Schedule: It mentions 40 hours per week, shift: 8 hours, day shift. So schedule info exists: 40 hours per week, 8 hour shifts, day shift. So we can include Schedule section. We need About the role: maybe description of role? The posting includes "Care Team Solutions is seeking a travel Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant for a travel job in Yarmouth, Massachusetts." Also details about specialty, discipline, start date, duration, etc. Could be considered About the role. Responsibilities? Not explicitly listed. Requirements: Must have 2+ years recent experience. Also maybe "Registered Nurse must have 2+ years of recent experience in particular specialty" but that's weird because it's COTA not RN. But we can include Requirements: 2+ years recent experience as COTA. Qualifications? Not explicit besides experience. Skills? Not explicit. We could combine. We must not invent or summarize away detail. Must preserve all substantive info. So we need to include details: location Yarmouth, Massachusetts; specialty Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant; discipline Therapy; start date 09/21/2026; duration 13 weeks (but later says Duration: 16 Weeks contradictory). We need to preserve both? The posting includes both: "Duration: 13 weeks" earlier, then later "Details: Must Have 2+ Years of recent experience. Specialty: Discipline: Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant Start Date: 2026-09-21 Duration: 16 Weeks". There's inconsistency. We must preserve all substantive info, not invent or summarize away detail. So we should include both mentions? Could list both as separate bullet points? Might be confusing but we must keep both. Could note both durations appear. However we should not invent. We'll include both as separate bullet points under About the role maybe. Also shift: 8 hours, day shift. Hours per week: 40. Employment type: Travel/Contract. Gross Weekly Pay: $1573.20. Pay package based on 8 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. Benefits: early pay program, student loan reimbursement, free well-being tele-visits with a psychologist, plus standard: 401k, holiday pay, healthcare, dental, travel reimbursement, wellness and fitness programs, referral bonus, medical benefits, dental benefits, vision benefits, school loan reimbursement (duplicate). Also mention "Weekly pay", "Holiday Pay", "Guaranteed Hours", "401k retirement plan", "Wellness and fitness programs", "Referral bonus", "Medical benefits", "Dental benefits", "Vision benefits", "School loan reimbursement". Also "Our early pay program Student loan reimbursement Free well-being tele-visits with a psychologist". We'll combine. We need to avoid duplication but preserve all substantive info. We can combine similar items but must not lose info. Duplication removal: we can list each unique benefit once. Let's extract unique benefits: - Early pay program - Student loan reimbursement (also school loan reimbursement) - Free well-being tele-visits with a psychologist - 401k retirement plan - Holiday pay - Healthcare (medical benefits) - Dental benefits - Vision benefits - Travel reimbursement - Wellness and fitness programs - Referral bonus - Guaranteed Hours - Weekly pay (maybe part of pay) - (maybe also "Weekly pay" is just pay) We also have "Weekly pay" as benefit? Already covered. Now schedule: 40 hours per week, 8 hour shifts, day shift. Pay: Gross Weekly Pay: $1573.20, tax-free stipend amount to be determined, based on 8 hour shifts and 40 hours per week. Now About the role: location Yarmouth, MA; specialty Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant; discipline Therapy; start date 09/21/2026; duration 13 weeks (also 16 weeks). Employment type: Travel/Contract. Shift: 8 hours day shift. Hours per week: 40. Requirements: Must have 2+ years recent experience as COTA. Qualifications? Not given beyond experience. Skills? Not given. We could have sections: About the role, Requirements, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must not create sections with filler. Ensure each has content. Now produce HTML fragment: use

for each heading, then

for prose,

• for lists. We'll need to avoid markdown fences. Let's craft:

  About the role

  Care Team Solutions is seeking a travel Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant for a position in Yarmouth, Massachusetts.

  • Specialty: Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant
  • Discipline: Therapy
  • Start Date: September 21, 2026
  • Duration: 13 weeks (also noted as 16 weeks in details)
  • Employment Type: Travel / Contract
  • Shift: 8‑hour day shift
  • Hours per Week: 40

  Requirements

  • Minimum of 2+ years of recent experience as a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant

  Benefits

  • Early pay program
  • Student loan reimbursement (also referred to as school loan reimbursement)
  • Free well‑being tele‑visits with a psychologist
  • 401(k) retirement plan
  • Holiday pay
  • Medical / healthcare benefits
  • Dental benefits
  • Vision benefits
  • Travel reimbursement
  • Wellness and fitness programs
  • Referral bonus
  • Guaranteed hours

  Pay

  Gross weekly pay: $1,573.20 (based on 8‑hour shifts and 40 hours per week). A tax‑free stipend amount will be determined.

  Schedule

  40 hours per week, 8‑hour shifts, day shift.

  Check for any duplicated content: we listed student loan reimbursement and school loan reimbursement as one line; we kept both references in parentheses. That's okay. We must not include any boilerplate like EEO, application instructions, etc. We removed. Check for any mention of "Registered Nurse must have 2+ years of recent experience in particular specialty" - we ignored because it's not relevant to COTA but it's a statement. Should we preserve? It's substantive but seems mis-typed. The instruction: Preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. That line is present: "Registered Nurse must have 2+ years of recent experience in particular specialty". It's a statement, albeit maybe erroneous. Should we include? It's part of the posting. It's a requirement but mis-specified. We could include under Requirements as an additional bullet: "Registered Nurse must have 2+ years of recent experience in particular specialty". However that seems irrelevant to COTA role but it's in the posting. The instruction says preserve all substantive info, not to filter based on relevance. So we should include it. However we already have a requirement bullet for 2+ years experience as COTA. We could add another bullet: "Registered Nurse must have 2+ years of recent experience in particular specialty". That preserves the statement. But we must be careful not to invent. We'll include it. Also there is line: "Details: Must Have 2+ Years of recent experience. Specialty: Discipline: Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant Start Date: 2026-09-21 Duration: 16 Weeks Shift: 8 Hours Day shift Hours Per Week: 40 Hours Employment Type: Contract". This duplicates many items but we already captured. We also have "Gross Weekly Pay: $1573.20 Six things that won’t happen if you apply to this job: ..." That's promotional fluff but still substantive? It's a list of six things that won't happen. That is substantive info about the company's promises. Should we preserve? The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. That list is part of the posting. It's not boilerplate; it's specific content about what they guarantee. So we should include it maybe under a section like "What you won’t experience" or similar. However we only allowed headings from list: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We cannot create new headings not in that list unless the posting has real specific content for it. The list of six things is not one of those headings. But we could incorporate that content into Benefits or About the role? It's not exactly benefits but more about company promises. The instruction says: "IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". It doesn't forbid adding other headings beyond the given list? Actually earlier: "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." The "e.g." suggests those are examples, not exclusive. But later: "IMPORTANT: include a section ONLY when the posting has real, specific content for it — never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". So we could create a section like "What you won’t experience" if the posting has that content. However the instruction also says "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." So we could incorporate that list into Benefits or About the role. But it's not a benefit; it's about what they won't do. Could be placed under About the role as additional details. Given the instruction to prefer few sections, we can incorporate that list into About the role as a bullet list under "What you won’t experience". But we need to keep headings from the allowed list? The examples are not exclusive but we should stick to them to be safe. However the instruction says "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." It implies those are the expected headings. It doesn't say we cannot use others, but to be safe we should stick to those. So we should fit the six things into one of those sections, maybe Benefits? But they are not benefits; they are promises about process. Could be under About the role as part of role description. We'll add a bullet list under About the role: "What you won’t experience:" with the six items. Let's extract the six items exactly: - You won’t have to guess what the downsides are. We’ll tell you up front. - You won’t show up on day 1 and find out this is not what you signed up for. - We won't leave your phone call ringing when it's inconvenient