Travel Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) – Rehab - $1,550 per week

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. We need to extract substantive info. Let's parse the posting. Title: travel Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) in Mitchell, South Dakota. Job Description & Requirements: Specialty: Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant Discipline: Therapy Start Date: 09/21/2026 Duration: 13 weeks 40 hours per week Shift: 8 hours, days Employment Type: Travel Travel, COTA - Rehab Location: Mitchell, South Dakota Shift: 5x8 Days, 08:00:00-16:00:00, 8.00-5 Duration 13 Weeks Then description: When you join Synergy Medical Staffing, you’ll have a dedicated recruiter helping you at all times... (some repeated later). Then benefits list. Then "Synergy Medical Staffing Job ID #38183875. Pay package is based on 8 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. Posted job title: COTA:Rehab,08:00:00-16:00:00" Then "About Synergy Medical Staffing" repeated description. Then benefits again. We need to remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. Not present. Remove duplicated lines, application instructions. We need to preserve all substantive info: start date, duration, hours per week, shift, location, employment type, recruiter support, benefits details (401K match up to 5%, medical/dental/vision/life insurance, long/short term disability, loyalty program, weekly pay, holiday pay (varies), guaranteed hours (varies), referral bonus, continuing education, license and certification reimbursement, student loan repayment and CEU reimbursement, loyalty bonus after 600 hours, discount program, cancellation protection, etc). Also note "Pay package is based on 8 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." That's pay info but not specific amount; we should not create Pay section unless posting actually states them. It says pay package based on 8 hour shifts and 40 hours per week with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. That's vague; not a specific number. The rule: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. For Pay, we have no specific amount; it's "tax-free stipend amount to be determined." That's placeholder/TBD. So we should NOT include a Pay section. Schedule: we have shift details: 5x8 Days, 08:00:00-16:00:00, 8.00-5. Also earlier: Shift: 8 hours, days; 40 hours per week. That's specific schedule. So we can include Schedule section with those details. Benefits: we have specific benefits list; we should include Benefits section. About the role: we can include a short paragraph summarizing role: travel COTA, rehab, etc. The posting includes description about recruiter support etc. That's more about company. But we can put role details: Specialty: Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant, Discipline: Therapy, location, start date, duration, hours, shift, employment type. That's substantive. Responsibilities: not explicitly listed; maybe not present. Requirements: maybe not explicit beyond being a COTA. Qualifications: maybe not explicit. Skills: not explicit. We should only include sections if posting has real specific content. Since no explicit responsibilities, requirements, qualifications, skills listed, we should omit those headings. Thus we will have sections: About the role, Benefits, Schedule. Possibly also "Qualifications" if we infer that being a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant is a qualification. But the rule: only include when posting has real specific content for it. The posting does mention "Specialty: Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant" and "Discipline: Therapy". That could be considered qualifications. However it's more like job title. I'd rather include a "Qualifications" section with that info? But the posting does not list extra qualifications like certification, license, etc. It does mention license and certification reimbursement as benefit, but not as requirement. The requirement is presumably being a COTA. That's implied. Might be too thin. Safer to omit. Thus output:

About the role

Travel Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) position in Mitchell, South Dakota. Start date: September 21, 2026. Duration: 13 weeks, 40 hours per week. Shift: 5×8‑hour days, 08:00–16:00. Employment type: Travel.

Then Benefits:

Benefits

• 401(k) match up to 5% of pay, 100% vested from day 1
• Medical, dental, vision, life insurance
• Long‑ and short‑term disability
• Loyalty program
• Weekly pay
• Holiday pay (varies by assignment)
• Guaranteed hours (varies by assignment)
• Referral bonus
• Continuing education
• License and certification reimbursement
• Student loan repayment and CEU reimbursement
• Loyalty bonus after 600 hours
• Discount program
• Cancellation protection

Schedule:

Schedule

5×8‑hour days, 08:00–16:00 (8‑hour shifts), 40 hours per week.

We should not include Pay section. Make sure no duplicate info. Also ensure we don't include job ID. Also remove duplicated recruiter description; we included only brief about role. The recruiter description is more about company; we could include in About the role? Might be considered boilerplate? It's not boilerplate but it's about company support. Could be considered part of role description. However the instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones." Including recruiter details may be okay but it's not strictly role. Might be considered "About the company". But we don't have a section for that. Could incorporate into About the role as extra detail. However the rule: "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

or drop it." The recruiter description is not minor metadata; it's a benefit of working with the agency. Could be considered part of Benefits? But it's not a benefit like insurance etc. It's more about support. Could be omitted as it's somewhat fluff. The posting repeats it twice. Might be considered boilerplate? Not exactly legal/EEO. It's promotional. The instruction: "Remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions." This is not those categories. It's just promotional fluff. Might be okay to keep? But we need to preserve ALL substantive information; do NOT invent or summarize away detail. The recruiter description is substantive? It describes what the recruiter does. Could be considered part of the role's support. I'd include a short paragraph under About the role that mentions the recruiter support. However that might be considered "About the company". But we don't have a section for that; we could still put it in About the role as it's relevant to the role. Thus About the role paragraph could be: "Travel Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) position in Mitchell, South Dakota. Start date: September 21, 2026. Duration: 13 weeks, 40 hours per week. Shift: 5×8‑hour days, 08:00–16:00. Employment type: Travel. Synergy Medical Staffing provides a dedicated recruiter who acts as a career coach and concierge, assisting with resume, housing, payroll, travel directions, and more." That preserves the recruiter detail. Now Benefits: we need to ensure we captured all benefits from both lists, avoiding duplicates. First list: 401K that matches up to 5% of your pay and you are 100% vested from Day 1. Medical, Dental, Vision, Life insurance, Long and short-term disability and others Loyality Program Weekly pay Holiday Pay (varies by Assignment) Guaranteed Hours (varies by Assignment) Referral bonus Continuing Education License and certification reimbursement Second list (under About Synergy Medical Staffing): Synergy’s Benefits are best in class and include the following 401K Day 1 Full Medical, Dental, Vision, Life insurance, Long and short term disability and others Student Loan Repayment and CEU reimbursement Loyalty bonus after 600 hours BenefitsDiscount program Weekly pay Holiday Pay Guaranteed Hours Referral bonus Medical benefits Dental benefits Continuing Education License and certification reimbursement Life insurance 401k retirement plan Cancelation protection Vision benefits Combine unique items: - 401(k) match up to 5% (or 401K, day 1 full, retirement plan) -> we can say "401(k) match up to 5% of pay, 100% vested from day 1" - Medical, dental, vision, life insurance (day 1 full) - Long‑ and short‑term disability - Loyalty program (loyalty bonus after 600 hours) - Weekly pay - Holiday pay (varies by assignment) - Guaranteed hours (varies by assignment) - Referral bonus - Continuing education - License and certification reimbursement - Student loan repayment and CEU reimbursement (maybe same as continuing education but we keep) - Discount program - Cancellation protection We should not repeat "Medical benefits", "Dental benefits", "Vision benefits" separate; just include them in the insurance line. Thus Benefits list as above. Now Schedule: we have shift details. Now output HTML fragment. Check for any placeholders: "Holiday Pay (varies by Assignment)" includes "varies". The rule says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. For Benefits section, we have items that include "varies". That's considered placeholder text inside the list. Is that disallowed? The rule says "never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g., "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD")". It seems to refer to the heading's immediate content? Or any filler text? It says "never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text". That suggests if a section only contains placeholder text, don't create it. But if the section contains substantive info plus some placeholder qualifiers, it's okay? The example: "commensurate with experience" is placeholder for pay. They say never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. If we create Benefits section