Travel Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant - $1,717 per week

We need to output HTML fragment with sections only if real specific content. Use

for section headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We need to parse the posting. Content: - Job title: travel Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) in Denver City, Texas. - Specialty: Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant - Discipline: Therapy - Start Date: 10/19/2026 - Duration: 13 weeks - 40 hours per week - Shift: 8 hours, days - Employment Type: Travel - Travel, COTA - Rehab - Location: Denver City, TX - Shift: 5x8 Days, 08:00:00-16:00:00, 8.00-5 - Duration 13 Weeks - When you join Synergy Medical Staffing, you’ll have a dedicated recruiter helping you at all times. Your recruiter is a cross between a career coach and a concierge. They will help you fine-tune your resume, find your next job, and locate an apartment (even one that takes pets!). Make one call and get help with everything from placement to housing to payroll, even travel directions! - As a travel, contract and permanent placement medical staffing company with over 20 years of experience in the industry, we understand your needs. - Synergy’s Benefits are best in class and include the following: - 401K that matches up to 5% of your pay and you are 100% vested from Day 1. - Medical, Dental, Vision, Life insurance, Long and short-term disability and others - Loyalty Program - Weekly pay - Holiday Pay (varies by Assignment) - Guaranteed Hours (varies by Assignment) - Referral bonus - Continuing Education - License and certification reimbursement - Synergy Medical Staffing Job ID #38228683. Pay package is based on 8 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. Posted job title: COTA:Rehab,08:00:00-16:00:00 - About Synergy Medical Staffing (duplicate of earlier recruiter paragraph). Then more about company: over 12 years experience (contradicts earlier 20 years). Then list of jobs. - Then again Synergy’s Benefits are best in class and include the following (duplicate list with some variations: 401K, Day 1 Full Medical, Dental, Vision, Life insurance, Long and short term disability and others, Student Loan Repayment and CEU reimbursement, Loyalty bonus after 600 hours, Benefits Discount program, Weekly pay, Holiday Pay, Guaranteed Hours, Referral bonus, Medical benefits, Dental benefits, Continuing Education, License and certification reimbursement, Life insurance, 401k retirement plan, Cancelation protection, Vision benefits) We need to preserve all substantive information, but remove boilerplate, duplicated lines, navigation, legal, EEO, etc. Also remove cookie/navigation/legal/EEO/equal-opportunity/scam-warning boilerplate, duplicated lines, and application instructions. We need to decide sections. We have details about role: Specialty, Discipline, Start Date, Duration, Hours, Shift, Employment Type, Location. We could put these under "About the role" (or maybe "Responsibilities"?). The instruction: Use

for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we can choose appropriate headings. We have no explicit responsibilities list; we have description of role? Not much. Could put under "About the role" the details: Specialty, Discipline, Start Date, Duration, Hours, Shift, Employment Type, Location. We have no explicit requirements list (like certification needed). Could infer that they need Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant license. Might be considered requirement. But we should not invent details; we can include requirement: Must hold current COTA certification/license. The posting says "Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant" as specialty; we can infer requirement. However we must not invent or summarize away detail. Is stating "Must hold current COTA certification/license" an invention? It's implied but not explicitly stated. Safer to not add that; we can leave Requirements section omitted if no explicit content. We have benefits: list many items. We'll create Benefits section with

• items. We have Pay: mention "Pay package is based on 8 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation) with tax-free stipend amount to be determined." That's vague; we should not create Pay section unless posting actually states them. It does state pay package based on 8 hour shifts and 40 hours per week, with tax-free stipend amount to be determined. That's some info but not specific amount. The rule: never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD"). Here we have "tax-free stipend amount to be determined" which is TBD. So we should not create Pay section because it's placeholder. Also "Pay package is based on 8 hour shifts and 40.0 hours per week (subject to confirmation)" is somewhat specific but still not a concrete amount. Might be considered filler? The rule says avoid placeholder like "varies", "TBD". "subject to confirmation" is similar. Safer to omit Pay section. Schedule: we have shift details: 5x8 Days, 08:00:00-16:00:00, 8.00-5. Also earlier: Shift: 8 hours, days; 40 hours per week. So we can create Schedule section with those details. We also have Duration: 13 weeks, Start Date: 10/19/2026. Could be part of About the role. We need to remove duplicated lines: The recruiter paragraph appears twice; we should include only once. Also the "About Synergy Medical Staffing" paragraph duplicates recruiter info; we can keep one version. We need to remove Job ID line? The instruction: do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it. So we can include Job ID in a short paragraph maybe under About the role or separate small paragraph. But we should not make a heading for it. We can include it in a

  as minor metadata. We need to output only HTML fragment, no /, no markdown. Thus produce something like:

  About the role

  Specialty: Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant; Discipline: Therapy; Start Date: 10/19/2026; Duration: 13 weeks; Hours: 40 per week; Shift: 5x8 days (08:00–16:00); Employment Type: Travel; Location: Denver City, TX.

  Job ID: #38228683.

  Benefits

  • 401K that matches up to 5% of pay, 100% vested from Day 1
  • Medical, Dental, Vision, Life insurance, Long and short‑term disability
  • Loyalty Program
  • Weekly pay
  • Holiday Pay (varies by assignment)
  • Guaranteed Hours (varies by assignment)
  • Referral bonus
  • Continuing Education
  • License and certification reimbursement
  • Student Loan Repayment and CEU reimbursement
  • Loyalty bonus after 600 hours
  • Benefits Discount program
  • Cancelation protection

  Schedule

  Shift: 5×8 days, 08:00–16:00 (8‑hour day shift), 40 hours per week.

  We need to ensure we didn't include placeholder text like "varies by assignment" - that's placeholder? The rule says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. "commensurate with experience", "not specified", "N/A", "varies", "TBD") and never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. For Benefits, we have items like "Holiday Pay (varies by Assignment)" and "Guaranteed Hours (varies by Assignment)". Those contain "varies". That's placeholder. Should we avoid including those lines? The rule says never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text. It doesn't say we cannot include list items that contain "varies". It says never create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless the posting actually states them. We are creating Benefits section because posting does state benefits. Within that section, we can include the lines as they appear, even if they contain "varies". The rule about filler/placeholder text applies to headings followed by filler/placeholder text, not list items. So it's okay. But we should avoid creating Pay section because it's placeholder. We omitted Pay. Schedule section: we have actual schedule details, not placeholder. Good. Now check duplication: we included Benefits items from both lists, but we need to avoid duplicating identical items. Let's consolidate unique items. From first benefits list: - 401K that matches up to 5% of your pay and you are 100% vested from Day 1. - Medical, Dental, Vision, Life insurance, Long and short-term disability and others - Loyality Program (typo) - Weekly pay - Holiday Pay (varies by Assignment) - Guaranteed Hours (varies by Assignment) - Referral bonus - Continuing Education - License and certification reimbursement From second benefits list: - 401K (maybe same) - Day 1 Full Medical, Dental, Vision, Life insurance, Long and short term disability and others - Student Loan Repayment and CEU reimbursement - Loyalty bonus after 600 hours - Benefits Discount program - Weekly pay (duplicate) - Holiday Pay (duplicate) - Guaranteed Hours (duplicate) - Referral bonus (duplicate) - Medical benefits (duplicate) - Dental benefits (duplicate) - Continuing Education (duplicate) - License and certification reimbursement (duplicate) - Life insurance (duplicate) - 401k retirement plan (duplicate) - Cancelation protection - Vision benefits (duplicate) We need to deduplicate. Let's produce a concise list: - 401K matching up to 5% of pay, 100% vested from Day 1 - Medical, Dental, Vision, Life insurance, Long‑term and short‑term disability - Loyalty Program (including loyalty bonus after 600 hours) - Weekly pay - Holiday Pay (varies by assignment) - Guaranteed Hours (varies by assignment) - Referral bonus - Continuing Education - License and certification reimbursement - Student Loan Repayment and CEU reimbursement - Benefits Discount program - Cancelation protection We could combine loyalty program and loyalty bonus after 600 hours as one item. Now About the role: we need to include details: Specialty, Discipline, Start Date, Duration, Hours, Shift, Employment Type, Location. Also maybe mention "Travel, COTA - Rehab". We'll incorporate. We also need to include the recruiter description? That's more about company, not role. Could be part of About the role? Might be better as a separate section like