Staff Electrical Engineer - Power System Studies (Distribution)

We need to output HTML fragment with sections: About the role? Actually we need to include sections only when posting has real specific content. The posting includes: About the role? Not exactly but there is description of company and opportunity. Could treat "About the role" as description of opportunity. But we need headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. We must include only those sections that have real content. We have content: "The Opportunity Black & Veatch is seeking a Power System Studies Engineer with 5-10 years’ experience..." That's about the role. So we can have

About the role

with paragraph(s) describing. Responsibilities: there is a long list under "Key Responsibilities". So we can have

Responsibilities

with

• each bullet. Requirements: maybe "Preferred Qualifications" and "Minimum Qualifications". Those are qualifications. Could split into Requirements (maybe minimum) and Preferred Qualifications (maybe Skills). But we have sections: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to decide mapping. We have "Preferred Qualifications" list: many bullet-like sentences. Also "Minimum Qualifications": bachelor's degree, 1 year related work experience, pre-employment onboarding. We also have "Skills" maybe from "Proven ability to independently develop written communication..." etc. Could treat those as Skills. We have Benefits: there is a paragraph about benefits portfolio: health care, flexible work schedules, paid vacation, etc. Also mention 401k, adoption reimbursement, tuition reimbursement, etc. So we have Benefits content. Pay: there is compensation transparency with ranges for Colorado and Minnesota. Also Salary Plan ENG: Engineering Job Grade 016. So we have Pay info. Schedule: not explicitly mentioned besides flexible work schedules (under benefits). No explicit schedule like full-time/part-time? There's "Full time/Part time : Full-Time" earlier. That's schedule info. So we can include Schedule section with that. We must not repeat job title as heading. Not include Job ID/Req ID as heading. We must remove boilerplate: cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. Remove duplicated lines. We must preserve all substantive information; do not invent or summarize away detail. We must not include sections with filler like "commensurate with experience". Not present. We need to output only HTML fragment. Let's extract content precisely. First, About the role: combine the paragraphs from "The Opportunity" and maybe the company description? The company description is more about company, not role. But we could include as part of About the role? The instruction: "use

  for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule)." So we can include About the role with description of the role and maybe company overview? The posting includes "Company: Black & Veatch Family of Companies Together, we own our company..." That's company overview. Might be considered About the role? Might be better to include as part of About the role? However the instruction says "Do NOT repeat the job title as a heading (the page already shows it) and do NOT put Job ID / requisition numbers as headings — fold minor metadata into a short

  or drop it." So we can include a short paragraph with location, date, etc? But we can drop minor metadata. We need to preserve ALL substantive information. So we need to keep location list, date, company description, etc. Where to put them? Could be in About the role as a paragraph. But we must not create sections with filler. So we need to decide where to place location list and date. Could be a short

  before sections? The instruction says output ONLY the HTML fragment. It didn't forbid having a leading paragraph before sections. It said use

  for section headings,

  • for any list,

    for prose. So we can have a leading

    with date and location list and company overview, then sections. But we need to ensure we don't create a heading for something that doesn't have content. So we can have a leading paragraph with the date, locations, company description. Then sections. Let's extract date: "Date: Sep 15, 2026". Locations list: many. Company description: "Company: Black & Veatch Family of Companies Together, we own our company, our future, and our shared success. As an employee-owned company, our people are Black & Veatch. We put them at the center of everything we do and empower them to grow, explore new possibilities and use their diverse talents and perspectives to solve humanity's biggest challenges in an ever-evolving world. With over 100 years of innovation in sustainable infrastructure and our expertise in engineering, procurement, consulting and construction, together we are building a world of difference." Then later "Company : Black & Veatch Corporation Req Id : 117124 Opportunity Type : Staff Relocation eligible : Yes Full time/Part time : Full-Time Project Only Hire : No Visa Sponsorship Available: No". That's metadata; we can fold minor metadata into a short

    or drop it. We could include a short paragraph with Relocation eligible Yes, Full-Time, etc. But we might drop as minor. We need to preserve ALL substantive information. The relocation eligibility and full-time are substantive? Possibly yes. But we can include them in Schedule section (full-time) and maybe a note about relocation eligibility in About the role? Could be a short paragraph. But we must not invent or summarize away detail. So we need to keep that info. Let's plan: - Opening

    : Date and locations list (maybe as a sentence). Then company overview paragraph. - Then maybe a

    for metadata: Relocation eligible: Yes; Full-Time; etc. But we could incorporate into Schedule section (full-time) and maybe a note about relocation. But the instruction: "fold minor metadata into a short

    or drop it." So we can create a short

    for things like Req Id, Opportunity Type, etc. That's okay. Now sections: About the role: we can include the "The Opportunity" paragraph plus maybe the "Why Black & Veatch?" paragraph (which describes why work matters). That's substantive about role and company. Responsibilities: list from "Key Responsibilities". Need to extract each sentence as bullet. Let's copy the responsibilities text: "Continues developing knowledge and may provide guidance and direction on design guides, standards, systems, applicable engineering codes and B&V policies. Provides technical guidance to others regarding projects and disciplines. Independently applies knowledge and complies with B&V quality program relative to assigned tasks. May be responsible for ensuring compliance with B&V quality program. Provides related guidance and direction to others. Supports continuous improvement and change management efforts. Prepares a variety of complex engineering deliverables for larger or multiple projects. Performs complex research and develops recommendations for equipment and/or materials selection. May oversee collection, assimilation, and management of data for engineering work. Prepares complex engineering calculations following standard methods and principles. Manages assigned budget, schedule, and quality requirements. Independently applies advanced engineering techniques and analysis problems and methods. Actively delegates appropriate tasks to lower level team members to develop depth of project execution staff. Reviews lower level engineering work or assignments. Is responsible for one or more of the following: leading production teams; coordinating multiple discipline activity; and serving as the responsible charge for a project. Actively coordinates with all other internal/external team members on moderately complex projects. Responsible for assisting with identification of key client interests and drivers on low to moderately complex projects. Communicates client interests and drivers to project team members and develops approaches to accommodate these concerns in the performance of the work on low to moderately complex projects. Provides support to business development or pursuit activities and may offer other services to clients. Recognized as a technical specialist and has knowledge and skill set to provide consultation and guidance to project teams in a particular practice area. May design a complete project of moderately complex scope or support multiple projects on the complex technical challenges. Actively fosters knowledge management and provides mentoring. May develop and apply advanced engineering concepts and approaches to unique engineering problems Typically assists with performance management process, mentoring, recognition, and any corrective actions required. May participate in career planning, and learning and development. Actively mentors lower level professionals and identifies successors to train in the specifics of their role. May assist with resource management strategy. May have responsibility of engineering resources for small groups of a single discipline. May be accountable for some administrative responsibilities that include but aren't limited to: Ensuring policies, procedures and processes are effectively implemented and communicated for work group. Ensuring adherence to corporate and division programs. Approving timesheets and expense reports." We need to split into bullet items. Each sentence ends with period. Some sentences have multiple clauses but still one bullet. We'll create

    • for each. Now Requirements: maybe Minimum Qualifications: bachelor's degree, 1 year related work experience, pre-employment onboarding (background check, drug screen, motor vehicle records). We'll put as
      . Qualifications: maybe Preferred Qualifications list. We'll put as
      . Skills: maybe the "Proven ability to independently develop written communication..." etc. Also "Strong leaderships skills, with desire to train and develop early career and/or inexperienced professionals." etc. We'll extract those. Let's extract Preferred Qualifications block: "Preferred Qualifications 5-10 years of experience in performing Distribution System planning studies Previous working experience with Distribution System design concepts, analyses, calculations, et cetera. 5 years of experience performing studies such as Short Circuit (Fault) Analysis, Load Flow, DER Impact Analysis, Protection Coordination Studies, Distribution Interconnection Studies, System Impact Studies, et cetera. 5 years of significant experience utilizing one of the below system modeling software programs and knowledge with others that are listed:CYME, Synergi Electric, et cetera. Working experience performing various power system studies which are performed in support of Distribution System design (Short Circuit, Power Flow, Voltage Analysis, et cetera). Knowledge and working experience with analytics and scripting (Python, et cetera). Proven ability to independently develop written communication and to facilitate coordination with team members and clients. Proven ability to work cooperatively in a team environment. Proven ability to lead small projects including management of project schedules, budgets, and staffing. Significant experience supporting proposal development including scope of work, level of work, engineering estimates, schedule. Strong leaderships skills, with desire to train and develop early career and/or inexperienced professionals. Significant experience functioning in a QA/QC capacity. PE License (preferred, not required)" We can treat these as Qualifications (maybe Requirements?). But we already have Requirements as minimum. We'll put Preferred Qualifications under Qualifications section. Skills: maybe the "Proven ability to independently develop written communication..." etc could be considered skills, but they are already in Preferred Qualifications. However we have separate Skills section; we could move some items like "Proven ability to independently develop written communication..." etc to Skills. But to avoid duplication, we need to decide mapping. We have sections: Requirements, Qualifications, Skills. We need to avoid duplicate content. We could assign: - Requirements: Minimum Qualifications (education, experience, onboarding) - Qualifications: Preferred Qualifications (experience, software, etc) - Skills: Specific abilities like "Proven ability to independently develop written communication...", "Proven ability to work cooperatively in a team environment.", "Proven ability to lead small projects...", "Strong leaderships skills...", "Significant experience functioning in a QA/QC capacity." etc. But those are also in Preferred Qualifications. However we could split: Preferred Qualifications includes experience and knowledge; Skills includes abilities. But the Preferred Qualifications list includes those ability statements as well. To avoid duplication, we could keep all Preferred Qualifications under Qualifications and not have a separate Skills section, or we could move the ability statements to Skills and keep experience/knowledge under Qualifications. The instruction: "Prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones