Jobs · Analyst · Virginia

Sr. Engineering Scientist

Systems Planning & Analysis · Arlington, VA · 1 mo ago
Analyst$150k/yrFull-time
We need to output HTML fragment with sections: h3 for headings: About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule. Only include sections if posting has real specific content. We need to parse the posting. Content: Overview (company description) - could be "About the role"? Actually overview is about company and mission. Could be "About the role" maybe includes description of role? The posting includes overview of SPA and JOID, then description of need for Sr. Engineering Scientist. We can treat that as "About the role" (or maybe "Overview"). The instruction says use h3 for section headings (e.g. About the role, Responsibilities, Requirements, Qualifications, Skills, Benefits, Pay, Schedule). So we need to decide which sections are present. We have: - Overview (company description) -> could be "About the role". We'll include. - Responsibilities: present with bullet list. - Qualifications: includes Required and Desired. Could be split into Requirements and Qualifications? The instruction lists both Requirements and Qualifications as possible headings. We need to decide what content goes where. Usually "Requirements" could be mandatory qualifications, "Qualifications" could be desired? But we have both Required and Desired. We could map Required to "Requirements" and Desired to "Qualifications". Or we could combine into one "Qualifications". Since both headings allowed, we can use both if we have content. We have "Required:" bullet list (though not bullet but sentences). We have "Desired:" bullet list. We also have "Pay Range Information" with salary range. So we need Pay section. We have benefits description: "SPA provides eligible employees with an opportunity to enroll in a variety of benefit programs, generally including health insurance, flexible spending accounts, health savings accounts, retirement savings plans, life and disability insurance programs, and a number of programs that provide for both paid and unpaid time away from work." That's benefits content. So Benefits section. Schedule: The posting mentions "This is a full-time on-site position in Arlington, VA. Up to 15% travel may be required." That's schedule info (full-time, onsite, travel). So we can include Schedule section. Skills: Not explicitly listed, but we have proficiency with software suites (Microsoft 365, Word, PowerPoint, Excel) and communication skills etc. Could be considered Skills. We could include Skills section with those. We must not invent or summarize away detail. Must preserve all substantive information. So we need to include all details from posting, but we can reorganize into sections. We must not include boilerplate like cookie/navigation/legal/EEO etc. Not present. We must not repeat job title as heading. Not include Job ID. We must not create Pay/Schedule/Benefits sections unless posting actually states them. We have those. We must not emit heading followed by filler/placeholder text like "commensurate with experience", "not specified", etc. The posting includes "Salaries are commensurate with experience and qualifications, as well as market and business considerations." That's filler? It's a statement but not a specific number. However we also have specific salary range: "$150,000.00/Yr. - $200,000.00/Yr." So we can include that. The phrase "commensurate with experience" is filler; we should avoid including it as a separate line if it's just filler. But we need to preserve all substantive information; that phrase is not substantive? It's generic. We could omit it because it's not adding specific detail beyond the range. The instruction: "never emit a heading followed by filler/placeholder text (e.g. 'commensurate with experience', 'not specified', 'N/A', 'varies', 'TBD')". So we should not include that phrase. We can still include the salary range. Now we need to format lists with
  • . For prose use

    . We need to decide what goes into each section. Let's extract content: About the role (overview): The paragraphs about SPA, JOID, mission, need for Sr. Engineering Scientist, location DARPA Arlington VA. We'll combine into a

    maybe multiple paragraphs. Responsibilities: bullet list of duties: - Apply a strong technical background and a proactive attitude in support of DARPA and will be motivated to learn or already understand DARPA processes, procedures, and culture. - Utilize technical skills to understand the complex problems associated with DARPA programs, while simultaneously providing the necessary management support to execute the day-to-day requirements. - Support periodic (monthly or bi-weekly) performer assessments to analyze programmatic, technical, and schedule risks and communicate findings to the Program Manager. - Assess performer task progress and projected performer outcomes with a program team. - Monitor both the technical and programmatic progress of various performers and keep the Program Manager abreast of progress through daily communications, monthly reports, and other reports as needed. - Assist in preparation and execution of various reviews of programs, gathering technical information and data on progress and accomplishments from the various performers. - This is a full-time on-site position in Arlington, VA. Up to 15% travel may be required. Note: The last bullet about full-time onsite and travel could be schedule, but it's also a responsibility. We'll keep it in responsibilities or schedule? Since schedule section exists, we could move that to schedule. But the instruction says to include schedule section only if posting actually states them. It does state full-time on-site and up to 15% travel. So we can put that in Schedule section. However the responsibilities bullet includes that sentence; we could keep it there but then schedule would be duplicate. Better to separate: responsibilities list excludes the schedule sentence; schedule section includes full-time onsite and travel. Thus responsibilities bullets (excluding the schedule sentence). We'll keep the rest. Requirements: Required qualifications list: - Master's degree in science, technology, engineering or math (STEM); may substitute a non-technical degree with demonstrated technical acumen. - 10+ years of technical experience supporting research and development (R&D) programs. - Demonstrated skill in conceiving, planning, and conducting research in complex problem areas requiring novel approaches. - Proven ability to make independent decisions on R&D engineering problems and to plan and coordinate work. - Active DoW TS/SCI clearance. - Self-starter with excellent oral and written communication skills, with mature judgment and attention to detail. - Proficiency with software suites such as Microsoft 365, Word, PowerPoint, and Excel. - Ability to work fully onsite at DARPA's HQ in Arlington, VA. Note: Ability to work fully onsite duplicates schedule; but it's a requirement. We'll keep it in Requirements. Qualifications (Desired): - At least 3 years of experience working in or with DARPA or a similar organization. - Prior experience as senior PM support at DARPA. - Published articles in the field of expertise. Skills: Could be overlapping with required proficiency etc. But we already have proficiency in software suites under Requirements. Could also include communication skills etc. Since we have a Skills section allowed, we could extract skills: strong technical background, proactive attitude, understanding DARPA processes, technical skills, management support, analytical skills, communication, judgment, attention to detail, software proficiency. But to avoid duplication, maybe we skip Skills section because its content is already covered. However instruction says prefer a few substantive sections over many thin ones. We could omit Skills if its content is redundant. But we need to decide if we have substantive content for Skills beyond what's already in Requirements. The posting does not have a separate "Skills" heading; it's embedded. We could still create a Skills section with the software proficiency and communication skills etc. But that would duplicate content from Requirements. The instruction says preserve ALL substantive information; does not forbid duplication, but better to avoid redundancy. However we could keep Skills separate with items like "Strong technical background, proactive attitude, understanding of DARPA processes, technical and programmatic analysis, communication, judgment, attention to detail, proficiency with Microsoft 365 suite." That is still substantive but duplicates some. Might be okay but risk of being considered thin? It's not thin. Given we already have Requirements covering many of those, maybe we skip Skills. Benefits: paragraph about benefit programs. Pay: salary range. Schedule: full-time on-site, up to 15% travel. Now we need to output HTML fragment only, no /, no markdown. We'll produce something like:

    About the role

    ...

    Responsibilities

    • ...
    • ...

    Requirements

    • ...
    • ...

    Qualifications

    • ...
    • ...

    Benefits

    ...

    Pay

    Salary range: USD $150,000.00/Yr. - USD $200,000.00/Yr.

    Schedule

    Full-time on‑site position in Arlington, VA; up to 15% travel may be required.

    We need to ensure we preserve all substantive information from overview. Let's craft About the role paragraph(s): Overview: "Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. (SPA) delivers high-impact, technical solutions to complex national security issues. With over 50 years of business expertise and consistent growth, we are known for continuous innovation for our government customers, in both the US and abroad. Our exceptionally talented team is highly collaborative in spirit and practice, producing Results that Matter . Come work with the best! We offer opportunity, unique challenges, and clear-sighted commitment to the mission. SPA: Objective. Responsive. Trusted. The Joint, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Interagency Division provides expert support services to a range of customers spanning across the Department of Defense, Federal Civilian, and international markets. JOID provides a diverse portfolio of analytical and programmatic capabilities to help our customers make informed decisions on their most challenging issues. SPA provides critical decision support to enabling and executing a strategy of technological superiority and enabling the delivery and sustainment of secure, resilient, and preeminent capabilities to the warfighter quickly and cost effectively. Our team of experienced military, technical, and operations research analysts is skilled in evaluating military problems, identifying the driving factors, devising innovative approaches, collecting applicable data, developing necessary software tools, and performing thorough and timely assessments to inform technology and acquisition governance decisions to ensure U.S. military forces retain military superiority in the future. We have a near-term need for a Sr. Engineering Scientist to provide onsite support out of DARPA in Arlington, VA." We can keep as one or two paragraphs. Use

    for prose; we can break into multiple

    if needed but not required. Now Responsibilities bullets (excluding schedule sentence). Let's list: - Apply a strong technical background and a proactive attitude in support of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and will be motivated to learn or already understand DARPA processes, procedures, and culture. - Utilize technical skills to understand the complex problems associated with DARPA programs, while simultaneously providing the necessary management support to execute the day-to-day requirements. - Support periodic (monthly or bi-weekly) performer assessments to analyze programmatic, technical, and schedule risks and communicate findings to the Program Manager. - Assess performer task progress and projected performer outcomes with a program team. - Monitor both the technical and programmatic progress of various performers and keep the Program Manager abreast of progress through daily communications, monthly reports, and other reports as needed. - Assist in preparation and execution of various reviews of programs, gathering technical information and data on progress and accomplishments from the various performers. Check if any other responsibilities: The sentence "This is a full-time on-site position in Arlington, VA. Up to 15% travel may be required." we moved to Schedule. Now Requirements bullets: - Master's degree in science, technology, engineering or math

Similar jobs

Sr. Research Engineer

AdobeSan Francisco, CA· 2 mo ago
Engineering$216k–$313k/yrapply on careers.adobe.com

Sr. Scientist

Waters CorporationGoleta, CA· 4 mo ago
Analystapply on uscareers-waters.icims.com

Sr. Scientist

CHEManager InternationalCalifornia, United States· 3 mo ago
Analyst$80k–$100k/yrapply on diversityinresearch.careers